RESUMO
Uremic pruritus (UP) is a chronic disease that can seriously affect the quality of life of dialysis patients. Acupuncture is a non-medication therapy that has been used to treat pruritus disorders. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of UP. A total of nine Chinese and English databases were searched from their inception to December 31, 2021, and 214 studies were retrieved. Finally, seven randomized controlled trials (n=504) were included in the meta-analysis performed using RevMan V.5.3. Results included effective rate, recurrence rates, and adverse events. Compared with conventional treatment, acupuncture was more effective in treating UP (risk ratio [RR]=1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.09 to 1.50, P=0.003). The results were consistent after sensitivity analysis (RR=1.38, 95% CI=1.21 to 1.57, P<0.00001). In subgroup analysis, the efficacy rates of acupuncture and medications (oral and topical) were comparable (RR=1.20, 95% CI=0.98 to 1.47, P=0.07). Acupuncture combined with hemodialysis was more effective than hemodialysis alone in relieving pruritus (RR=1.42, 95% CI=1.18 to 1.72, P=0.0002). Adverse events were reported in only three studies, including one case of hyperphosphatemia in the medications group (RR=0.29, 95% CI=0.01 to 7.06, P=0.45). None of the studies reported recurrence rates. In conclusion, acupuncture is a safe treatment modality for patients with UP receiving hemodialysis that can effectively improve UP symptoms, and acupuncture in combination with hemodialysis has more efficacy than hemodialysis alone in improving the UP symptoms.
Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Diálise Renal , Terapia por Acupuntura/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Prurido/etiologia , Prurido/terapiaRESUMO
Background: With societal and economic development, the annual incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing. Current treatments for CKD are limited, and once patients progress to the uraemic stage, it places a significant economic burden on families and society. Based on the "gut-kidney axis" theory and real-world research, this study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and potential mechanism of high-position colon dialysis combined with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) retention enema in treating stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (non-dialysis). Additionally, it seeks to identify new therapeutic targets and approaches for CKD treatment. Methods: The TCM decoction was analyzed using Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole-Orbitrap-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS). Participants meeting the inclusion criteria were divided into a control group (n = 153) and a treatment group (n = 159) based on their preferences and physicians' recommendations. Both groups adhered to a high-quality low-protein, low-salt, low-phosphorus, and low-fat diet supplemented with essential amino acids, and were monitored for blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipids. The treatment group received high-position colon dialysis combined with TCM retention enemas (administered at least 12 times every other day). Results: Thirteen compounds were identified from the herbs by UPLC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS. The CKD3-5 treatment group exhibited improvements in blood biochemistry and other laboratory indices, with significant enhancements in renal function-related indices for CKD4 and CKD5 stages (p < 0.05). Following treatment, indoxyl sulfate (IS), endotoxin, and D-lactic acid levels decreased to a certain extent in both groups, with a statistically significant difference observed within the treatment group (p < 0.05). The treatment group displayed a significant reduction in aerobic bacterial colonies, an increase in anaerobic bacterial colonies, a decrease in Escherichia coli colonies, and an increase in Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus colonies (p < 0.05). No significant changes in colony numbers were observed in the control group. Conclusion: High-position colon dialysis combined with TCM retention enema may serve as an adjuvant treatment for CKD4-5 (non-dialysis), and its mechanism may be related to the reduction of uraemic toxins, improvement of intestinal mucosal barrier function, and regulation of intestinal microecology. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2200062852.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a common chronic recurrent kidney disease. Many trials have shown that Chinese medicine prescription (CMP) can effectively treat NS. The program aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CMP for NS. METHODS: This systematic evaluation will entail an electronic and manual search of all CMP for NS from inception to February, 2020, regardless of the publication status or language. Databases include PubMed, Embase, Springer, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registration Platform, the Chinese Medicine Database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the China Science Journal Database, and the Wanfang Database. Other sources of information, including bibliographies and meeting minutes for identified publications, will also be searched. A manual search for grey literature, including unpublished conference articles will be performed. Additionally, any clinical randomized controlled trials related to CMP for NS, regardless of the publication status and language limitations, will be included in the study. Study selection, data extraction, and research quality assessments will be conducted independently by 2 researchers. The main result was the total clinical efficacy rate or other validated scales after at least 2 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included 24-hour urine protein quantification, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin 6, recurrence rates and adverse events during follow-up. Implement the Cochrane RevMan V5.3 bias assessment tool to assess bias risk, data integration risk, meta-analysis risk, and subgroup analysis risk (if conditions are met). Mean difference, standard mean deviation and binary data will be used to represent continuous results. RESULTS: This study will provide a comprehensive review and evaluation of CMP for the treatment of NS. CONCLUSION: This study will provide new evidence for evaluating the effectiveness and side effects of CMP on NS. Since the data is not personalized, formal ethical approval is not required. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202040181.