Efficacy and safety of strong acid electrolyzed water for peritoneal lavage to prevent surgical site infection in patients with perforated appendicitis.

PURPOSE: Our previous experimental study of perforated peritonitis in rats proved that peritoneal lavage with strong acid electrolyzed water (SAEW) has no adverse effects, reduces the bacteria count in the ascitic fluid more effectively than saline, and increases the survival rate significantly. Thus, we conducted a randomized controlled study, applying SAEW in the treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. METHODS: Forty-four patients, aged 3-14 years, were randomly divided into two groups: Group S (n = 20), in which the peritoneal cavity was lavaged with 100 ml/kg saline and the wound was washed out with 200 ml saline; and Group E (n = 24), in which the peritoneal cavity was lavaged with 100 ml/kg SAEW and the wound was washed out with 200 ml SAEW. RESULTS: No adverse effect of SAEW was observed in Group E. There was no difference in the bacterial evanescence ratio of ascitic fluid after lavage between Groups S and E (11.1 and 15.8%, respectively). A residual abscess developed in one patient from each group (5.0 and 4.2%, respectively). The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) was significantly lower in Group E than in Group S (0 and 20%, respectively; P < 0.05). There was no difference in the duration of pyrexia, positive C-reactive protein, leukocytosis, or hospital stay between the groups. CONCLUSION: Peritoneal lavage and wound washing with SAEW have no adverse effects and are effective for preventing SSI.

Follow-up studies of anorectal malformations after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There are few follow-up studies comparing posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) with conventional procedures for patients with anorectal malformations (ARM). The authors have examined retrospectively postoperative anorectal function of patients with ARM treated with PSARP compared with those treated with conventional methods. METHODS: Anorectal function in 23 patients with high and intermediate type anorectal malformations (PSARP group), who underwent PSARP more than 4 years previously, were assessed by Kelly's clinical scoring system and objective studies. These results were compared with those in 14 cases (5 high and 9 intermediate type cases; control group), who underwent other conventional surgical procedures. RESULTS: Using Kelly's clinical scoring system, scores of the PSARP group compared with the control group were good in 48% versus 21%, fair in 48% versus 58%, and poor in 4% versus 21%, respectively. Barium enema studies suggested better anorectal sphincteric function in patients with high anorectal malformation in the PSARP group. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies showed more correct placement of the rectum through the striated muscle complex in the PSARP group at the I-line level. Manometric studies showed no difference in maximum resting pressure, anal canal length, and the incidence of anorectal reflex between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The favorable results of MRI and barium enema studies can be explained by direct visualization of the striated muscle complex with the aid of electrical stimulation as well as no harmful effects of amputation of the sphincter muscle in PSARP. However, manometric studies suggest anorectal function in patients with high and intermediate anorectal malformations is limited even after PSARP. Long-term postoperative follow-up with adequate bowel management is required for all patients with high or intermediate anorectal malformation.