Combination Therapy to Kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Its Nonreplicating Persister Phenotype.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) exists in various metabolic states, including a nonreplicating persister (NRP) phenotype which may affect response to therapy. We have adopted a model-informed strategy to accelerate discovery of effective Mtb treatment regimens and previously found pretomanid (PMD), moxifloxacin (MXF), and bedaquiline (BDQ) to readily kill logarithmic- and acid-phase Mtb. Here, we studied multiple concentrations of each drug in flask-based, time-kill studies against NRP Mtb in single-, two- and three-drug combinations, including the active M2 metabolite of BDQ. We used nonparametric population algorithms in the Pmetrics package for R to model the data and to simulate the 95% confidence interval of bacterial population decline due to the two-drug combination regimen of PMD + MXF and compared this to observed declines with three-drug regimens. PMD + MXF at concentrations equivalent to average or peak human concentrations effectively eradicated Mtb. Unlike other states for Mtb, we observed no sustained emergence of less susceptible isolates for any regimen. The addition of BDQ as a third drug significantly (P < 0.05) shortened time to total bacterial suppression by 3 days compared to the two-drug regimen, similar to our findings for Mtb in logarithmic or acid growth phases.

Dose Fractionation of Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Tuberculosis: Impact of Dosing Interval and Elimination Half-Life on Microbial Kill and Resistance Suppression.

The repurposed agent moxifloxacin has become an important addition to the physician's armamentarium for the therapy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis When a drug is administered, we need to have metrics for success. As for most antimicrobial chemotherapy, we contend that for Mycobacterium tuberculosis therapy, these metrics should be a decline in the susceptible bacterial burden and the suppression of amplification of less-susceptible populations. To achieve optimal outcomes relative to these metrics, a dose and schedule of administration need to be chosen. For large populations of patients, there are true between-patient differences in important pharmacokinetic parameters. These distributions of parameter values may have an impact on these metrics, depending on what measure of drug exposure drives the metrics. To optimize dose and schedule choice of moxifloxacin, we performed a dose fractionation experiment in the hollow fiber infection model. We examined 12-, 24-, and 48-h dosing intervals with doses of 200, 400, and 800 mg for each interval, respectively. Within each interval, we had an arm where half-lives of 12, 8, and 4 h were simulated. We attempted to keep the average concentration (Cavg) or area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) constant across arms. We found that susceptible bacterial load decline was linked to Cavg, as we had indicated previously. Resistance suppression, a nonmonotonic function, had minimum concentration (Cmin) as the linked index. The 48-h interval with the 4-h half-life had the largest less-susceptible population. Balancing bacterial kill, resistance suppression, toxicity (linked to peak concentration [Cpeak]), and adherence, we conclude that the dose of 400 mg daily is optimal for moxifloxacin.

Prospective Trial on the Use of Trough Concentration versus Area under the Curve To Determine Therapeutic Vancomycin Dosing.

We hypothesized that dosing vancomycin to achieve trough concentrations of >15 mg/liter overdoses many adults compared to area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-guided dosing. We conducted a 3-year, prospective study of vancomycin dosing, plasma concentrations, and outcomes. In year 1, nonstudy clinicians targeted trough concentrations of 10 to 20 mg/liter (infection dependent) and controlled dosing. In years 2 and 3, the study team controlled vancomycin dosing with BestDose Bayesian software to achieve a daily, steady-state AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400, with a maximum AUC value of 800 mg · h/liter, regardless of trough concentration. For Bayesian estimation of AUCs, we used trough samples in years 1 and 2 and optimally timed samples in year 3. We enrolled 252 adults who were ≥18 years old with ≥1 available vancomycin concentration. Only 19% of all trough concentrations were therapeutic versus 70% of AUCs (P < 0.0001). After enrollment, median trough concentrations by year were 14.4, 9.7, and 10.9 mg/liter (P = 0.005), with 36%, 7%, and 6% over 15 mg/liter (P < 0.0001). Bayesian AUC-guided dosing in years 2 and 3 was associated with fewer additional blood samples per subject (3.6, 2.0, and 2.4; P = 0.003), shorter therapy durations (8.2, 5.4, and 4.7 days; P = 0.03), and reduced nephrotoxicity (8%, 0%, and 2%; P = 0.01). The median inpatient stay was 20 days among nephrotoxic patients versus 6 days (P = 0.002). There was no difference in efficacy by year, with 42% of patients having microbiologically proven infections. Compared to trough concentration targets, AUC-guided, Bayesian estimation-assisted vancomycin dosing was associated with decreased nephrotoxicity, reduced per-patient blood sampling, and shorter length of therapy, without compromising efficacy. These benefits have the potential for substantial cost savings. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01932034.).