Impact of body mass index on the severity of bexarotene-associated hypertriglyceridemia: A post hoc analysis of an open-labeled clinical study of combined bexarotene and phototherapy in Japanese patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Bexarotene is an effective oral drug for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, but careful management is required due to its various side effects. In particular, hypertriglyceridemia often requires a reduction or even suspension of bexarotene therapy. The risk factors of bexarotene-associated severe hypertriglyceridemia are not clear. Here, we conducted a post hoc analysis of the data from our previous clinical trial, which confirmed the efficacy and safety of combined bexarotene and phototherapy, to evaluate the effect of body mass index on bexarotene-associated hypertriglyceridemia. Twenty-five subjects were divided into two subgroups: normal and underweight (body mass index [BMI] <25 kg/m2 group) and overweight and obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2 group) patients. The overall incidence of hypertriglyceridemia was 81.3% (13/16) in the BMI <25 kg/m2 group and 88.9% (8/9) in the BMI ≥25 kg/m2 group. The incidence of grade ≥3 hypertriglyceridemia (≥500 mg/dL) was 7.7% (1/13) in the BMI <25 kg/m2 group and 7/8 (87.5%) in the BMI ≥25 kg/m2 group (P < 0.001). Consequently, dose reduction in the BMI ≥25 kg/m2 group was larger than that in the BMI <25 kg/m2 group. The bexarotene-induced change in the serum triglyceride concentration was significantly increased in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients with a higher body mass index (ρ = 0.508, P = 0.009). The area under the curve was 0.886 (95% confidence interval 0.748-1.000, P = 0.002). With a body mass index cut-off of 24.85 kg/m2 , the sensitivity and specificity for identifying grade ≥3 hypertriglyceridemia were 0.875 and 0.882, respectively. The present findings suggest that BMI ≥25 kg/m2 is a risk factor for bexarotene-associated severe hypertriglyceridemia, therefore overweight and obese patients treated with bexarotene should receive lipid-lowering drugs prophylactically. Further studies for optimizing the initial bexarotene dose in such patients are required.

Efficacy and safety of apremilast and phototherapy versus phototherapy only in psoriasis vulgaris.

Phototherapy and apremilast (oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor) are well-known in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris. However, current evidence on the efficacy and safety of their combination is not sufficient. This multicenter, randomized controlled study compared the efficacy and safety between phototherapy as monotherapy and phototherapy and apremilast as combination therapy in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Patients with moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris were assigned to combination (n = 29) and monotherapy (n = 13) groups. All patients underwent an 8-week phototherapy regimen comprising irradiation with narrowband UV-B. The patients in the combination group were also administered 10 mg to 60 mg of oral apremilast. We evaluated the improvement percentage based on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline to week 8. Additionally, we evaluated the percentage of patients who achieved ≥75% improvement; changes in body surface area (BSA) and scores of EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-level, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and visual analog scale for pruritis from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks; and adverse events. Compared with the monotherapy group, the combination group had significantly lower PASI scores at 4 and 8 weeks and more patients who achieved a PASI score improvement of ≥75% at 8 weeks. Both groups exhibited a significant decrease in BSA; at 8 weeks, no significant difference was observed between the two groups, although the combination group tended toward a greater reduction in BSA. The intergroup differences in the changes at the three time points were not significant. Adverse events were more frequent in the combination group than in the monotherapy group. Our findings suggest that an 8-week combined apremilast and phototherapy regimen may not be adequate in patients for improvements in their subjective assessment of psoriasis, and longer treatment periods may be necessary.

The development of a filter to enhance the efficacy and safety of excimer light (308 nm) therapy.

BACKGROUND: Excimer light (308 nm) therapy is a new ultraviolet (UV) B phototherapy for which the efficacy and resulting DNA damage are not well established. PURPOSE: To develop an effective and safe phototherapy using the excimer lamp, we studied the effects of different light cut-off filters, A and B. METHODS: Efficacy was evaluated by measuring apoptosis using fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. DNA damage was evaluated by measuring cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). Light sources, including normal wave and short wave (SW) excimer light, broad-band (BB) UVB, and narrow-band (NB) UVB, were examined using the filters. A human skin equivalent model was also examined. RESULTS: The ratio of positive apoptosis to CPD formation normalized to the mean induced by NB-UVB was 5.7 using the excimer lamp without a filter, 6.3 using the excimer lamp with the A filter, 6.4 using the SW excimer lamp without a filter, and 4.2 using the BB-UVB. The A filter reduced CPD formation induced by the normal wave and SW excimer lamp. In the human skin equivalent model, the use of filters significantly decreased the amount of CPD-positive cells. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that using the A filter with the excimer lamp increases the efficacy and safety of excimer light therapy.