Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 16(1): 85, 2021 02 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33581733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a clinical malignant syndrome mainly originating from the appendix, with an incidence of 2-4 per million people. As a rare disease, an early and accurate diagnosis of PMP is difficult. It was not until the 1980s that the systematic study of this disease was started. MAIN BODY: As a result of clinical and basic research progress over the last 4 decades, a comprehensive strategy based on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been established and proved to be an effective treatment for PMP. Currently, CRS + HIPEC was recommended as the standard treatment for PMP worldwide. There are several consensuses on PMP management, playing an important role in the standardization of CRS + HIPEC. However, controversies exist among consensuses published worldwide. A systematic evaluation of PMP consensuses helps not only to standardize PMP treatment but also to identify existing controversies and point to possible solutions in the future. The controversy underlying the consensus and vice versa promotes the continuous refinement and updating of consensuses and continue to improve PMP management through a gradual and continuous process. In this traditional narrative review, we systemically evaluated the consensuses published by major national and international academic organizations, aiming to get a timely update on the treatment strategies of CRS + HIPEC on PMP. CONCLUSION: Currently, consensuses have been reached on the following aspects: pathological classification, terminology, preoperative evaluation, eligibility for surgical treatment, maximal tumor debulking, CRS technical details, and severe adverse event classification system. However, controversies still exist regarding the HIPEC regimen, systemic chemotherapy, and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Hipertermia Induzida , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Pseudomixoma Peritoneal , Consenso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Humanos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Pseudomixoma Peritoneal/diagnóstico , Pseudomixoma Peritoneal/cirurgia
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 46(4 Pt A): 600-606, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31973925

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a standard treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) recommended by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). The study is to analyze the incidence of perioperative serious adverse events (SAEs) of CRS + HIPEC to treat PMP patients, and identify the risk factors, for guiding the prevention of SAEs. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on the PMP database established at our center. The clinicopathological features, treatment details and SAEs information on the PMP patients are systematically established in this database. The incidence, organ system distribution and severity of perioperative SAEs are analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses are performed to identify the independent risk factors. RESULTS: Among the 272 CRS + HIPEC procedures for 254 PMP patients, there are 93 (34.2%) SAEs. Six systems are involved in the SAEs, including infections (9.6%), digestive system (8.1%), respiratory system (6.3%), cardiovascular system (5.5%), hematological system (2.9%), and urinary system (1.5%), in terms of frequency. In terms of severity, the majority is grade III SAEs (27.9%), followed by grade IV SAEs (4.8%) and grade V SAEs (1.5%). Univariate analysis reveals 4 risk factors for perioperative SAEs: HIPEC regimens (P = 0.020), PCI (P = 0.025), intraoperative red blood cell transfusion volume (P = 0.004), and intraoperative blood loss volume (P = 0.002). Multivariate and logistic regression model analysis identifies only one independent risk factor for perioperative SAEs: intraoperative blood loss volume (P = 0.001, OR = 0.344, 95%CI: 0.182-0.649). CONCLUSIONS: PMP patients treated by CRS + HIPEC at experienced centers could have acceptable safety. Improving the surgical techniques and developing the integrated hemostasis techniques are essential to reduce intraoperative blood loss and decrease SAEs rate.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Apêndice/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Pseudomixoma Peritoneal/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Docetaxel/administração & dosagem , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/epidemiologia , Fístula Intestinal/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mitomicina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA