Simultaneous determination of twenty-nine active compounds in fuzhengjiedu granules by HPLC-QQQ-MS/MS.

As an empirical medicine of traditional Chinese medicine, Fuzhengjiedu Granules have shown an effect against COVID-19 in clinical and inflammatory animal models. It is formulated with eight herbs, including Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata, Zingiberis Rhizoma, Glycyrrhizae Radix Et Rhizoma, Lonicerae Japonicae Flos, Gleditsiae Spina, Fici Radix, Pogostemonis Herba, and Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium. This study established a high-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (HPLC-QQQ-MS/MS) method by simultaneously determining 29 active compounds in the granules with significant content differences. Separation by gradient elution using acetonitrile and water (0.1% formic acid) as mobile phases was performed on a Waters Acquilty UPLC T3 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 µm). A triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operating in positive and negative ionization modes, was used for multiple reaction monitoring to detect the 29 compounds. All calibration curves showed good linear regression (r2 > 0.998). RSDs of precision, reproducibility, and stability of active compounds were all lower than 5.0%. The recovery rates were 95.4-104.9%, with RSDs< 5.0%. This method was successfully used to analyze the samples, and the results showed that 26 representative active components from 8 herbs were detected in the granules. While aconitine, mesaconitine, and hypaconitine were not detected, indicating that the existing samples were safe. The granules had the maximum and minimum content of hesperidin (27.3 ± 0.375 mg/g) and benzoylaconine (38.2 ± 0.759 ng/g). To conclude, a fast, accurate, sensitive, and reliable HPLC-QQQ-MS/MS method was established, which can simultaneously detect 29 active compounds that have a considerable difference in the content of Fuzhengjiedu Granules. This study can be used to control the quality and safety of Fuzhengjiedu Granules and provide a basis and guarantee for further experimental research and clinical application.

Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of cough variant asthma: a study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cough variant asthma (CVA) is one of the leading causes of chronic coughing. The main treatment is currently anti-inflammatory medication. However, the coughing may return or be aggravated and lung function may deteriorate once the anti-inflammatory treatment is stopped. The effect of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) on chronic coughing is remarkable, but high-quality evidence supporting its effectiveness is still lacking. This trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy, especially the long-term efficacy, of CHM plus anti-inflammatory medications for the treatment of CVA. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial will be conducted. It will consist of a 3-month intervention followed by a 6-month follow-up period. The target sample size is 60 patients with CVA who are between 18 and 70 years old. The eligible subjects will be allocated randomly into the experimental or control group in a ratio of 1:1. Patients in the experimental group will take CHM granules (4.9 g twice daily), while patients in the control group will be given a matched placebo. An administration of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination for 12 weeks will be the basic therapy for the two groups. The primary outcome is the cough visual analog scales (CVAS). The secondary outcomes include quality of life, rate of symptom relapse, lung function, and blood tests. A safety assessment will also be performed during the trial. DISCUSSION: The evidence gathered by the trial will be a valuable addition to informing treatment options for patients with CVA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn , ID: ChiCTR-IOR-16009148. Registered on 3 September 2016.

[Recognition of Similarities and Differences--a New Thinking Paradigm of Critically Care Integrative Medicine].

"Wise men could recognize similarities, but the fool only recognizes differences" in Su-wen, which expounded clinical thinking methods of Chinese medicine (CM). "To recognize similarities and differences simultaneously" is of important clinical significance in understanding the laws of diseases. CM pays much attention to recognize similarities, while modern medicine emphasizes the differences observed. In order to develop integrative medicine (IM), similarities recognition and differences identification must be combined together to innovate new thinking methods of IM.