Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Transl Med ; 17(1): 205, 2019 06 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31217010

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In our recent clinical trial, increased peripheral concentrations of pro-inflammatory molecular mediators were determined in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) patients. After 3 months adjunctive unilateral, selective L4 dorsal root ganglion stimulation (L4-DRGSTIM), significantly decreased serum IL-10 and increased saliva oxytocin levels were assessed along with an improved pain and functional state. The current study extended molecular profiling towards gene expression analysis of genes known to be involved in the gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor and neuroinflammatory (cytokines/chemokines) signaling pathways. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 12 CRPS patients for whole-transcriptome profiling in order to assay 18,845 inflammation-associated genes from frozen blood at baseline and after 3 months L4-DRGSTIM using PANTHER™ pathway enrichment analysis tool. RESULTS: Pathway enrichment analyses tools (GOrilla™ and PANTHER™) showed predominant involvement of inflammation mediated by chemokines/cytokines and gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor pathways. Further, screening of differentially regulated genes showed changes in innate immune response related genes. Transcriptomic analysis showed that 21 genes (predominantly immunoinflammatory) were significantly changed after L4-DRGSTIM. Seven genes including TLR1, FFAR2, IL1RAP, ILRN, C5, PKB and IL18 were down regulated and fourteen genes including CXCL2, CCL11, IL36G, CRP, SCGB1A1, IL-17F, TNFRSF4, PLA2G2A, CREB3L3, ADAMTS12, IL1F10, NOX1, CHIA and BDKRB1 were upregulated. CONCLUSIONS: In our sub-group analysis of L4-DRGSTIM treated CRPS patients, we found either upregulated or downregulated genes involved in immunoinflammatory circuits relevant for the pathophysiology of CRPS indicating a possible relation. However, large biobank-based approaches are recommended to establish genetic phenotyping as a quantitative outcome measure in CRPS patients. Trial registration The study protocol was registered at the 15.11.2016 on German Register for Clinical Trials (DRKS ID 00011267). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011267.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/terapia , Inflamação/sangue , Inflamação/genética , Neuralgia/terapia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Dor Crônica/sangue , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/sangue , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/genética , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/metabolismo , Citocinas/sangue , Citocinas/genética , Feminino , Gânglios Espinais/fisiologia , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Inflamação/etiologia , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Mediadores da Inflamação/metabolismo , Joelho/patologia , Masculino , Redes e Vias Metabólicas/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia/sangue , Dor Pós-Operatória/sangue , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/terapia , Saliva/química , Saliva/metabolismo
2.
Neuromodulation ; 22(1): 44-52, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30358008

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and associated comorbidities have been linked to a pro-inflammatory state driven by different mediators. Targeted dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGSTIM ) suppressed pain levels and improved functional capacity in intractable CRPS. However, clinical trials assessing the impact of DRG stimulation on the neuroimmune axis are lacking. METHODS: This study enrolled 24 subjects (12 refractory CRPS patients plus suitably matched healthy controls) and performed immunoassays of inflammatory mediators in saliva and serum along with score-based assessments of pain, mood, and sleep quality at baseline and after three months of selective L4-DRGSTIM . RESULTS: After three-month L4-DRGSTIM CRPS associated pain significantly decreased. In addition, disturbed sleep and mood improved post-DRGSTIM , although statistically not significant. Significantly increased serum values of pro-inflammatory markers were detected pre- and post L4-DRGSTIM for high-mobility group box 1, tumor-necrosis factor α, interleukin (IL) 6, and leptin. IL-1ß was significantly elevated pre-L4 DRGSTIM , but not posttreatment. Elevated anti-inflammatory IL-10 significantly decreased after three months in serum, while saliva oxytocin concentrations increased in CRPS subjects after L4-DRGSTIM (p = 0.65). No severe implantation and stimulation associated adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Selective L4-DRGSTIM improved neuropathic pain and functional impairment in CRPS as previously reported. CRPS patients displayed a pro-inflammatory molecular pattern in serum. Serum anti-inflammatory IL-10 significantly declined, while saliva oxytocin nonsignificantly increased after L4-DRGSTIM . An evidence-based relational interpretation of our study is limited due to the uncontrolled study design. However, molecular profiling of biofluids (saliva, serum) represents a novel and experimental field in applied neuromodulation, which warrant further investigations to unveil mechanisms of neuroimmune modulation.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/análise , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/terapia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Gânglios Espinais , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia/terapia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Saliva/química
3.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 15(1): 61-70, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29249191

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Paresthesia-free spinal cord stimulation (SCS) techniques, such as burst and high-frequency (HF) SCS, have been developed and demonstrated to be successful for treating chronic pain, albeit via different mechanisms of action. The goal of this review is to discuss the mechanisms of action for pain suppression at both the cellular and systems levels for burst and HF SCS. In addition, we also discuss the neuromodulation devices that mimic these paradigms. AREAS COVERED: The authors performed a literature review to unravel the mechanisms of action for burst and HF SCS coupled with booklets and user manuals from neuromodulation companies to understand the programmable parameters and operating ranges. Burst SCS modulates the medial pathway to suppress pain. On cellular level, burst SCS is independent on activation of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors to inhibit neuronal firing. HF SCS blocks large-diameter fibers from producing action potentials with little influence on smaller fibers, increasing pain suppression as frequency increases. EXPERT COMMENTARY: The neuromodulation industry is in a phase of intense innovation characterized by adaptive stimulation to improve patients' experience and experiment with alternative frequencies and novel stimulation targets.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/métodos , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Medula Espinal/fisiopatologia , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/instrumentação
4.
Pain ; 158(4): 669-681, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28030470

RESUMO

Animal and human studies indicate that electrical stimulation of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons may modulate neuropathic pain signals. ACCURATE, a pivotal, prospective, multicenter, randomized comparative effectiveness trial, was conducted in 152 subjects diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome or causalgia in the lower extremities. Subjects received neurostimulation of the DRG or dorsal column (spinal cord stimulation, SCS). The primary end point was a composite of safety and efficacy at 3 months, and subjects were assessed through 12 months for long-term outcomes and adverse events. The predefined primary composite end point of treatment success was met for subjects with a permanent implant who reported 50% or greater decrease in visual analog scale score from preimplant baseline and who did not report any stimulation-related neurological deficits. No subjects reported stimulation-related neurological deficits. The percentage of subjects receiving ≥50% pain relief and treatment success was greater in the DRG arm (81.2%) than in the SCS arm (55.7%, P < 0.001) at 3 months. Device-related and serious adverse events were not different between the 2 groups. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation also demonstrated greater improvements in quality of life and psychological disposition. Finally, subjects using DRG stimulation reported less postural variation in paresthesia (P < 0.001) and reduced extraneous stimulation in nonpainful areas (P = 0.014), indicating DRG stimulation provided more targeted therapy to painful parts of the lower extremities. As the largest prospective, randomized comparative effectiveness trial to date, the results show that DRG stimulation provided a higher rate of treatment success with less postural variation in paresthesia intensity compared to SCS.


Assuntos
Causalgia/terapia , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/terapia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/normas , Gânglios Espinais/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Adulto Jovem
5.
Prog Neurol Surg ; 29: 168-91, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26394030

RESUMO

Implementation of wireless technology enables tremendous reduction in the size of implantable neurostimulator devices. Without the need for tethering to an implantable pulse generator, a multitude of clinical applications can be envisioned, utilizing safe, rapidly implanted, economical, and culturally sensitive methods. External pulse generators providing power to implanted microsize wireless leads and/or contact pairs can be incorporated into belts, fabric, jewelry, and other suitable and convenient accoutrements. Microsized wireless neurostimulator lead placements can provide neuromodulation therapies without mechanically compromising normal physiological function in numerous anatomical locations not so accessible now. Avoiding implantation of the pulse generator dramatically reduces the expense of these therapies and can potentially lead to wider global access of care for neuromodulation in general.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Nervos Periféricos/cirurgia , Tecnologia sem Fio , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Humanos , Manejo da Dor/instrumentação , Nervos Periféricos/fisiologia , Tecnologia sem Fio/instrumentação
6.
Anesthesiology ; 123(4): 851-60, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26218762

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current treatments for chronic pain have limited effectiveness and commonly known side effects. Given the prevalence and burden of intractable pain, additional therapeutic approaches are desired. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) delivered at 10 kHz (as in HF10 therapy) may provide pain relief without the paresthesias typical of traditional low-frequency SCS. The objective of this randomized, parallel-arm, noninferiority study was to compare long-term safety and efficacy of SCS therapies in patients with back and leg pain. METHODS: A total of 198 subjects with both back and leg pain were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a treatment group across 10 comprehensive pain treatment centers. Of these, 171 passed a temporary trial and were implanted with an SCS system. Responders (the primary outcome) were defined as having 50% or greater back pain reduction with no stimulation-related neurological deficit. RESULTS: At 3 months, 84.5% of implanted HF10 therapy subjects were responders for back pain and 83.1% for leg pain, and 43.8% of traditional SCS subjects were responders for back pain and 55.5% for leg pain (P < 0.001 for both back and leg pain comparisons). The relative ratio for responders was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5) for back pain and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9) for leg pain. The superiority of HF10 therapy over traditional SCS for leg and back pain was sustained through 12 months (P < 0.001). HF10 therapy subjects did not experience paresthesias. CONCLUSION: HF10 therapy promises to substantially impact the management of back and leg pain with broad applicability to patients, physicians, and payers.


Assuntos
Dor nas Costas/terapia , Dor Crônica/terapia , Perna (Membro) , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/métodos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Dor nas Costas/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Perna (Membro)/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Med Biol Eng Comput ; 49(7): 765-74, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21528381

RESUMO

To understand the theoretical effects of pulse width (PW) programming in spinal cord stimulation (SCS), we implemented a mathematical model of electrical fields and neural activation in SCS to gain insight into the effects of PW programming. The computational model was composed of a finite element model for structure and electrical properties, coupled with a nonlinear double-cable axon model to predict nerve excitation for different myelinated fiber sizes. Mathematical modeling suggested that mediolateral lead position may affect chronaxie and rheobase values, as well as predict greater activation of medial dorsal column fibers with increased PW. These modeling results were validated by a companion clinical study. Thus, variable PW programming in SCS appears to have theoretical value, demonstrated by the ability to increase and even 'steer' spatial selectivity of dorsal column fiber recruitment. It is concluded that the computational SCS model is a valuable tool to understand basic mechanisms of nerve fiber excitation modulated by stimulation parameters such as PW and electric fields.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Modelos Neurológicos , Medula Espinal/fisiologia , Feminino , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fibras Nervosas/fisiologia , Parestesia/fisiopatologia
8.
Pain Physician ; 13(4): 321-35, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20648201

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With advances in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) technology, particularly rechargeable implantable, patients are now being offered a wider range of parameters to treat their pain. In particular, pulse width (PW) programming ranges of rechargeable implantable pulse generators now match that of radiofrequency systems (with programmability up to 1000 microseconds. The intent of the present study was to investigate the effects of varying PW in SCS. OBJECTIVE: To understand the effects of PW programming in spinal cord stimulation (SCS). DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, randomized, single-blind evaluation of the technical and clinical outcomes of PW programming. SETTING: Acute, outpatient follow-up. METHODS: Subjects using fully-implanted SCS for > 3 months to treat chronic intractable low back and/or leg pain. Programming of a wide range (50-1000 microseconds) of programmed PW settings using each patient's otherwise unchanged 'walk-in' program. OUTCOME MEASURES: Paresthesia thresholds (perception, maximum comfortable, discomfort), paresthesia coverage and patient choice of tested programs. RESULTS: We found strength-duration parameters of chronaxie and rheobase to be 295 (242 - 326) microseconds and 2.5 (1.3 - 3.3) mA, respectively. The median PW of all patients' 'walk-out' programs was 400 microseconds, approximately 48% higher than median chronaxie (p = 0.01), suggesting that chronaxie may not relate to patient-preferred stimulation settings. We found that 7/19 patients selected new PW programs, which significantly increased their paresthesia-pain overlap by 56% on average (p = 0.047). We estimated that 10/19 patients appeared to have greater paresthesia coverage, and 8/19 patients appeared to display a 'caudal shift' of paresthesia coverage with increased PW. LIMITATIONS: Small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Variable PW programming in SCS appears to have clinical value, demonstrated by some patients improving their paresthesia-pain overlap, as well as the ability to increase and even 'steer' paresthesia coverage.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Dor Lombar/terapia , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Ciática/terapia , Software , Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Eletrodos Implantados/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Medição da Dor/métodos , Parestesia/etiologia , Parestesia/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Método Simples-Cego , Software/normas , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA