Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by metastasectomy converts to survival benefit in stage IV rectum cancer.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on stage IV rectum cancer. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2011, 297 consecutive patients diagnosed with stage IV rectum cancer (synchronous metastasis) were enrolled. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used for prognostic factors determination, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. Propensity scores with the one-to-one nearest-neighbor matching model were used to select matched patients for validation studies. RESULTS: In total, 63 patients received CCRT and 234 did not. The patients in the CCRT group were younger, had more low-lying lesions, and had more T4 lesions, lung metastases, metastasectomies, and oxaliplatin-based upfront chemotherapy. Before propensity-score matching, a younger age (HR = 0.662, P = 0.016), lower carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (≤20 ng/ml) (HR = 0.531, P = 0.001), no metastasectomy (HR = 3.214, P < 0.001), and no CCRT (HR = 1.844, P = 0.019) were independent prognostic factors after controlling for other confounding factors. After matching, only CEA and metastasectomy, but not CCRT, were independent prognostic factors. The survival benefit of CCRT was restricted to patients who undergo subsequent metastasectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront CCRT only provided a survival benefit in patients with stage IV rectum cancer who undergo subsequent metastasectomy.

N-acetylcysteine has neuroprotective effects against oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer patients: preliminary data.

Although adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil and leucovorin in adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer may improve disease-free survival, grade 3-4 sensory neuropathy also increases. To determine whether oral N-acetylcysteine is neuroprotective against oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, we did a pilot study. Fourteen stage III colon cancer patients with 4 or more regional lymph nodes metastasis (N2 disease) receiving adjuvant biweekly oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) plus weekly fluorouracil boluses and low-dose leucovorin were randomized to oral N-acetylcysteine (1,200 mg) (arm A) or placebo (arm B). Clinical neurological and electrophysiological evaluations were performed at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 treatment cycles. Treatment-related toxicity was evaluated based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) Criteria. After four cycles of chemotherapy, seven of nine patients in arm B and two of five in arm A experienced grade 1 sensory neuropathy. After eight cycles, five experienced sensory neuropathy (grade 2-4 toxicity) in arm B; none in arm A (p<0.05). After 12 cycles, grade 2-4 sensory neuropathy was observed in eight patients in arm B, one in arm A (p<0.05). There were no significant electrophysiological changes in arm A after 4, 8, or 12 cycles of chemotherapy. We concluded that oral N-acetylcysteine reduces the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in colon cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Irinotecan (CPT11) plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) as salvage therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) after failed oxaliplatin plus 5-FU and LV: a pilot study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (CPT11) has established activity against advanced colorectal cancer without cross-resistance with 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin-based therapy. We conducted this pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combination treatment with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for patients in whom combination treatment with oxaliplatin with 5-FU + leucovorin has failed. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in this study after oxaliplatin treatment had failed. The treatment protocol consisted of CPT11 (180 mg/m(2) for 90 min) on day 1 and a 2 h infusion of 200 mg/m(2) leucovorin followed by 400 mg/m(2) 5-FU as an intravenous bolus injection plus a 22 h continuous infusion of 600 mg/m(2) 5-FU. This regimen was repeated for two consecutive days every 2 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were eligible for this study and in total 144 cycles of therapy (median eight cycles) were given to these patients. Four patients (22.2%; 95% CI: 8-36.4%) achieved an objective response of partial remission (PR) and an additional seven obtained stable disease (SD) status or minor response. The median duration of response was 8 months and 14 patients were alive at the end of the study. Hematological toxicity (neutropenia) was the most common serious side effect (29.2%), followed by gastrointestinal effects (diarrhea, 28.5%). Grade II-III diarrhea was experienced for at least one cycle by each patient. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment for patients after oxaliplatin failure are encouraging and this treatment protocol is also well tolerated by previously heavily treated patients.