Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementation in Pediatric Urology: Pilot-phase outcomes of a prospective, multi-center study.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a fundamental shift in perioperative care that has consistently demonstrated an improved outcome for a wide variety of surgeries in adults but has only limited evidence in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the success with and barriers to implementation of ERAS in a prospective, multi-center study on patients undergoing complex lower urinary tract reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Centers were directed to implement an ERAS protocol using a multidisciplinary team and quality improvement methodologies. Providers completed pre- and post-pilot surveys. An audit committee met after enrolling the first 5 patients at each center. Pilot-phase outcomes included enrollment of ≥2 patients in the first 6 months of enrollment, completion of 90 days of follow-up, identification of barriers to implementation, and protocol adherence. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled across 8 centers. The median age at surgery was 10.3 years (IQR 6.4-12.5). Sixty five percent had a diagnosis of myelomeningocele, and 33 % had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. A bladder augmentation was performed in 70 %, Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy in 52 %, Monti ileovesicostomy in 15 %, and antegrade continence enema channel in 38 %. The most commonly perceived barriers to implementation on the pre-pilot survey were "difficulty initiating and maintaining compliance with care pathway" in 51 % followed by a "lack of time, money, or clinical resources" in 36 %. The pre-pilot study experience, implementation, and pilot-phase outcomes are provided in the Table. All primary and secondary outcomes were achieved. DISCUSSION: The findings of the present study were similar to several small comparative studies with regard to the importance of a multidisciplinary team, strong leadership, and continuous audit for successful implementation of ERAS. Similar barriers were also encountered to other studies, which primarily related to a lack of administrative support, leadership, and buy-in from other services. The limitations of the present study included a relatively small heterogeneous cohort and absence of a comparative group, which will be addressed in the larger exploratory phase of the trial. The findings may also not be generaziable due to the need for sustainable processes that were unique to each center as well as an absence of adequate volume or resources at smaller centers. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS was successfully implemented for complex lower urinary tract reconstruction across 8 centers through a multidisciplinary team, structured approach based on the local context, and focus on a continuous audit.

Multidisciplinary spina bifida clinic: the Chicago experience.

Open spina bifida (open SB) is the most complex congenital abnormality of the central nervous system compatible with long-term survival. Multidisciplinary care is required to address the effect of this disease on the neurological, musculoskeletal, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal systems, as well as the complex psychosocial impact on the developing child. Individuals with SB benefit from the involvement of neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, urologists, physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists, pediatricians, psychologists, physical/occupational/speech therapists, social workers, nurse coordinators, and other personnel. Multidisciplinary clinics are the gold standard for coordinated, optimal medical and surgical care. Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, formerly known as Children's Memorial Hospital, was one of the first hospitals in the USA to manage patients with this complex disease in a multidisciplinary manner. We describe the longitudinal experience of the multidisciplinary Spina Bifida Center at our institution and highlight the advances that have arisen from this care model over time. This clinic serves as an exemplar of organized, effective, and patient-centered approach to the comprehensive care of people living with open SB.

Office management of pediatric primary nocturnal enuresis: a comparison of physician advised and parent chosen alternative treatment outcomes.

PURPOSE: We compared the remission of pediatric primary nocturnal enuresis in groups of children who used a physician advised practice plan vs a parent chosen alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2004 and January 2006 there were 119 patients with primary nocturnal enuresis enrolled in this prospective, nonrandomized study. For this study primary nocturnal enuresis was defined as wetting at night during sleep during any 6-month interval without any known causative problem. A total of 76 children received the physician advised treatment plan and used an alarm, oxybutynin, desmopressin, an elimination diet and a bowel program, as indicated. A total of 43 children received a parent chosen alternative treatment plan, which consisted of any single or combination of treatments involving an alarm, oxybutynin, desmopressin and an elimination diet or bowel program. Parents from each group completed an intake survey that measured functional bladder capacity using a 3-day home diary and they identified demographic variables. Followup occurred at 2 weeks and then monthly for 12 weeks to study end. RESULTS: We found that the probability of remission by the end of the study for the physician advised treatment group was significantly higher than that of the parent choice group (88% vs 29%, Kaplan-Meier curve p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The group of children who followed physician advised treatment for primary nocturnal enuresis showed significantly earlier remission of primary nocturnal enuresis than children who followed the parent choice treatment (25th percentile 2 vs 10 weeks).

The Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: quality of life and family perspective.

PURPOSE: Since introducing the Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) procedure into our practice, it has been our bias that social confidence and independence are significantly improved and satisfaction is overwhelmingly high. We objectively determine outcomes after the MACE to refine patient selection, and maximize the quality of perioperative counseling and teaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to all patients who had undergone the MACE procedure within the last 4 years. Patient/parent satisfaction, impact on quality of life and clinical outcome were assessed with Likert scales. Demographic information, MACE specifics, preoperative expectations, and unanticipated benefits and problems were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 65 questionnaires were returned from our first 92 patients (71%). Myelodysplasia was the primary diagnosis in 88% of patients. Complete or near complete fecal continence was achieved in 77% of patients and all others had improved incontinence. The highest level of satisfaction was reported by 89% of patients. Social confidence and hygiene were significantly improved. Daily time commitment, pain/cramping, intermittent constipation and time for fine-tuning the regimen were cited as unanticipated issues. CONCLUSIONS: The MACE procedure has received high praise from patients and families after years of battling constipation and fecal incontinence. Significant improvement rather than perfection is the realistic expectation. Objective feedback from patients and families will continue to improve patient selection and education.

Use of a Monti channel for administration of antegrade continence enemas.

PURPOSE: Success with Malone antegrade continence enemas (MACE) requires reliable access to the colon and a customized enema regimen. Use of the appendix in situ provides a natural and well-vascularized conduit. When the appendix is absent or inadequate, alternative techniques are required. We report our experience using Monti channels to administer antegrade continence enemas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the 106 MACE procedures performed in 53 months a Monti-MACE was created in 13. Indications for use of ileum, technique, ease of catheterization and incidence of complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Mean followup was 21.7 months. Two patients had transient difficulty advancing the catheter into the cecum. Stoma revisions were required for critical stenosis in 2 patients (15.4%). Stoma leakage occurred in 1 patient after multiple stoma revisions. CONCLUSIONS: The Monti-MACE provides continent access to the colon for antegrade enemas. The rate of stomal revision is only slightly higher than that reported for appendicocecostomy. While use of the appendix in situ remains our preference, reconfigured ileum is a reliable substitute in patients without a suitable appendix.