Long-term Follow-up of a Toddler with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report with a Literature Review of Patients Under 5 Years of Age

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is extremely rare in children. Herein, we present a case diagnosed with PTC at 15 months of age. We conducted a literature review of the published cases with PTC under five years of age. A 1.25-year-old male patient had initially presented with a complaint of progressively enlarging cervical mass that appeared four months earlier. On physical examination, a mass located in the anterior cervical region with the largest measurements of around 3x3 cm was detected. Cervical and thyroid ultrasonography showed a 50x27 mm solid mass in the right lateral neck. Excisional biopsy revealed a follicular variant of PTC with capsular invasion. Subsequently, he underwent a complementary total thyroidectomy. He was diagnosed with intermediate-risk (T3N0M0) PTC. He developed permanent hypoparathyroidism. In the first year of the operation, he was treated with radioiodine ablation (RAI) since basal and stimulated thyroglobulin (Tg) levels tended to increase. Whole-body scintigraphy was normal in the first year of RAI ablation. On levothyroxine sodium (LT4) treatment, levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and Tg were adequately suppressed. He is now 8.5-years-old and disease-free on LT4 replacement therapy for seven years and three months. Pediatric PTC has different biological behavior and an excellent prognosis compared to adults. The optimal treatment strategy for pediatric TC is total thyroidectomy, followed by RAI ablation. Post-operative management should include regular follow-up, TSH suppression by adequate LT4 therapy, serial Tg evaluation, and radioiodine scanning when indicated.

Patterns of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the tendency to use complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) by patients with cancer in Turkey, and to compare sociodemographic and medical characteristics, perceptions, and quality of life of users and nonusers of CAM. METHODS: A total of 1060 cancer patients were asked to complete a questionnaire about the use of CAM along with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Life Quality Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Medical information was obtained from hospital chart records. RESULTS: The response rate was 40.1% (425/1060). Use of at least one kind of CAM was identified in 57.4% of the patients. Herbal medications (95%), spiritual/religious affiliations (23.3%), multivitamins/antioxidants (18.4%), and transcendental meditation/yoga (8.6%) were the leading CAM methods. In multivariate analysis, CAM use was found to be associated with age (>60 years) only. Average expenditure on CAMs was 30 U.S. dollars (USD) per patient per month. The most common causes of CAM use were belief in their efficacy (41.3%) and intimate interaction with CAM users (37.2%). Only 41% of the users had informed their doctors that they used CAM. QLQ scores were similar between CAM users and nonusers. Of all participants, 15.5% had psychiatric support. Proportions of regular antidepressant and analgesic use were 16.4%, and 46.3%, respectively. CAM users had worse appetite scores. There was no difference in terms of other scales between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that CAM use is widespread among Turkish cancer patients and CAM use does not improve QLQ scores. Physicians should be aware of high CAM utilization rate in patients with cancer and should better understand the factors directing the patients to such treatments.