Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(51): e36655, 2023 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38134093

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effects and safety of pediatric tuina for recurrent respiratory tract infections (RRTIs). METHODS: Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and CBM databases were searched from inception to September 20 2023. Two authors independently selected studies, collected data, and evaluated methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Revman 5.4 was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials involving 1420 pediatric patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that pediatric tuina significantly reduced the incidence of RRTIs [MD -1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-1.77, -0.46)], decreased infection duration (MD -1.16 days, 95% CI [- 1.66, - 0.66]), improved IgA (MD 0.25 g/L, 95% CI [0.09, 0.41]), IgG (MD 1.64 g/L; 95% CI [0.82, 2.45]), CD3+ (MD 3.33%, 95% CI [0.74, 5.92]), CD4+ (MD 4.78%, 95% CI [2.08, 7.48]), CD4+/CD8+ ratio (MD 0.27%, 95% CI [0.08, 0.47]), and total effective rate (RR 1.19, 95% CI [1.13, 1.25]). However, IgM levels (MD 0.26 g/L, 95% CI [-0.26, 0.81]) and CD8+ (MD -1.36%, 95% CI [- 3.12, 0.41]) were not significantly different between the groups. Moreover, no Tuina-linked adverse reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: Pediatric tuina has shown positive effects in RRTIs treatment. However, these results should be interpreted with caution owing to study quality. Further large-scale and high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
Infecções Respiratórias , Criança , Humanos , Relação CD4-CD8 , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(47): e23237, 2020 Nov 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33217841

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of warm needle acupuncture (WNA) treatment for Scapulohumeral periarthritis. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials will be searched from the databases of Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Database, CBM and VIP Database from their inception to September 2021. The primary outcomes are effective rate, visual analog scale score. The secondary outcomes are Constant-Murley score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, adverse events. Two reviewers will independently select studies, collect data, and assess the methodology quality by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The Stata 14.0 will be used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: This study is ongoing and will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This study will provide an assessment of the current state of WNA for the scapulohumeral periarthritis, aiming to show the efficacy and safety of WNA treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There is no requirement of ethical approval and informed consent, and it will be in print or published by electronic copies. REGISTRATION: INPLASY2020100049.


Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Periartrite/terapia , Articulação do Ombro , Humanos , Úmero , Metanálise como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa , Escápula , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA