Evaluation of shoseiryuto for seasonal allergic rhinitis, using an environmental challenge chamber.

Background: Complementary and alternative medicine, including Japanese traditional medicine (JTM), has been used for various allergic diseases, but the evidence is limited. Shoseiryuto (Xiao-Qing-Long-Tang), one of the representative JTM drugs, is frequently used to treat allergic rhinitis (AR). However, its efficacy for seasonal AR has not been fully established. Using an Environmental challenge chamber (ECC), we evaluated the therapeutic effects of shoseiryuto on AR induced by Japanese cedar pollen (JCP). Methods: A placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study with shoseiryuto was conducted using the ECC. The shoseiryuto or placebo was orally administered from 2 weeks before the exposure test. The pollen exposure test was conducted for 3 h, and the pollen concentration was set at 8000 pollen/m3. The primary endpoint of the study was the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) during pollen exposure. A physician certified by the Japanese Society of Oriental Medicine as a specialist checked each participant's "pattern", a comprehensive expression of signs obtained from individual patients' subjective symptoms and other personal findings. Blood samples collected just before the first pollen exposure were stimulated with cedar antigens and used for immunological studies. Results: The results of the 46 participants were analyzed, and no significant side effects were detected. There was no significant difference in TNSS during pollen exposure for 3 h in the ECC between the shoseiryuto and placebo groups. However, some symptoms were improved in the shoseiryuto group after leaving the ECC. There was no significant correlation between the "fluid retention pattern" and TNSS. In immunological studies, shoseiryuto did not inhibit Th2-type cytokine production and mRNA expression. Conclusions: Oral administration of shoseiryuto from 2 weeks before pollen exposure did not prevent or inhibit immediate symptoms of AR induced by JCP in the ECC. Further study is needed to reevaluate the shoseiryuto specific "pattern" in JTM.

Disease-Modifying Effect of Japanese Cedar Pollen Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablets.

BACKGROUND: Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis is a common allergic rhinitis in Japan. JC pollen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets are licensed for the treatment of JC pollinosis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the disease-modifying effects of JC pollen SLIT tablets over 5 years (2014-2019), comprising a 3-year treatment period and 2-year follow-up. METHODS: A total of 1042 patients with JC pollinosis (aged 5-64 years) were included in the study. An optimal dose-finding study was performed in the first 15 months, after which 240 patients in the placebo (P) group and 236 patients in the optimal active dose (A) group (5000 Japanese allergy units) were re-randomized to receive P or A for an additional 18 months (designated AA, AP, PA, and PP groups). Clinical efficacy was evaluated by the total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS) during the peak symptom period of each JC pollen season over 3 years of treatment and 2 years of observation after treatment cessation. RESULTS: The AA, AP, and PA groups exhibited significantly reduced TNSMS; however, the largest relative reduction was seen in the AA group both during the treatment period (third season, 46.3% vs PP, P < .001) and during the 2-year follow-up period (fourth and fifth seasons, 45.3% and 34.0% vs PP, respectively; P < .001). The most common adverse drug reactions were mild reactions at the administration site. CONCLUSIONS: JC pollen SLIT tablets show sustained clinical efficacy during 3 years of treatment and sustained disease-modifying effects for at least 2 years after treatment cessation.

Safety profile and immunological response of dual sublingual immunotherapy with house dust mite tablet and Japanese cedar pollen tablet.

BACKGROUND: There have been no studies of dual administration of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets for perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis. This trial (JapicCTI-184014) was conducted to investigate the safety profile and immunological response during dual therapy with SQ house dust mite (HDM) and Japanese cedar pollen (JCP) SLIT tablets. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial of 109 Japanese patients with coexisting HDM and JCP allergic rhinitis who had positive tests for HDM- and JCP specific IgE (≥0.7 kU/L). Patients were allocated to receive HDM (N = 54) or JCP (N = 55) SLIT tablets alone for 4 weeks followed by 8 weeks of dual therapy with both SLIT tablets administered within 5 min of each other. Adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and serum IgE and IgG4 specific for HDM (Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) and JCP were recorded. RESULTS: The percentage of subjects with AEs and ADRs was similar between the two groups and between the two periods of monotherapy and dual therapy. Most AEs and ADRs were mild in severity, and no serious events were observed. The most common ADRs were local events in the oral cavity. Levels of IgE and IgG4 specific for HDM (D. farinae, D. pteronyssinus) and JCP were increased after treatment with HDM and JCP SLIT tablets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dual therapy with both SLIT tablets administered within 5 min after 4 weeks of monotherapy with HDM or JCP tablet was well tolerated and induced the expected immunological responses.

Efficacy of Desloratadine and Levocetirizine in Patients with Cedar Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND: No comparative study of antihistamines that differ in structural system has been conducted in allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover comparative study to verify the efficacy of antihistamines that differ in structural system. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with moderate or more severe Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis were randomized to receive either placebo, desloratadine 5 mg (a tricyclic), or levocetirizine 5 mg (a piperazine). One dose of the study drug was orally administered at 9 pm on the day before a pollen exposure test, which was performed for 3 h (9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) to assess symptoms in an environmental challenge chamber (ECC). Nasal and ocular symptoms were compared at an airborne pollen level of 8,000 grains/m3. The primary endpoint was mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from 120 to 180 min in the ECC. Subjects with a difference of ≥1 in TNSS between 2 drugs were extracted to the relevant drug-responsive group. RESULTS: The difference in TNSS from placebo was -2.42 (p < 0.0001) with levocetirizine and -1.66 (p < 0.01) with desloratadine, showing that both drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms, but with no statistically significant difference between the 2 drugs. There were 12 subjects in the desloratadine-responsive group and 24 subjects in the levocetirizine-responsive group, with no contributor to response was detected. CONCLUSION: Levocetirizine tended to control nasal symptoms more effectively than desloratadine. However, the response to each antihistamine varied among individuals and the predictors to the response are unknown. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN ID: UMIN000029653.

Treatment duration-dependent efficacy of Japanese cedar pollen sublingual immunotherapy: Evaluation of a phase II/III trial over three pollen dispersal seasons.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to investigate the optimal dose and long-term efficacy and safety of Japanese cedar (JC) pollen tablets for SLIT (JapicCTI-142579). Here, we report details of the effects of the JC pollen SLIT tablet on rhinitis and conjunctivitis symptoms over three pollen dispersal seasons. METHODS: A total of 1042 JC pollinosis patients (aged 5-64 years) were randomized to receive tablets containing placebo (P), 2000, 5000, or 10,000 Japanese allergy units (JAU) of JC pollen for 15 months to identify an optimal dose. Patients receiving P (n = 240) and the optimal dose (5000 JAU; A, n = 236) were then randomized to receive P or A for an additional 18 months (AA, AP, PA, and PP groups, allocation ratio 2:1:1:2). Nasal and ocular symptoms, rescue medication use, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed on quantitative scales. RESULTS: In the second and third seasons, the AA, AP, and PA groups exhibited significantly better improvements in nasal, ocular, and medication scores compared with the PP group in the order AA > AP > PA > PP during the second season and AA > PA > AP > PP during the third season. Rescue medication use and QOL scores were also significantly better in the AA, AP, and PA groups compared with the PP group. CONCLUSIONS: The JC pollen SLIT tablet relieved nasal and ocular symptoms and medication use and improved QOL in a treatment duration-dependent manner. Continuous dosing regimens appear to enhance the efficacy of the drug.

Long-Term Efficacy and Dose-Finding Trial of Japanese Cedar Pollen Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet.

BACKGROUND: Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis is a common allergic rhinitis in Japan. The JC pollen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet was developed using the highest concentration of JC pollen extract. OBJECTIVE: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II/III trial to investigate the optimal dose of the JC pollen SLIT tablet and examine long-term efficacy and safety for 3 years with the selected dose, and 2-year follow-up. METHODS: A total of 1042 patients with JC pollinosis (aged 5-64 years) were equally randomized into 4 groups and received daily treatment with 2,000, 5,000, or 10,000 Japanese allergy unit (JAU) or placebo. The primary end point was the total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS) during the peak symptom period in the first season. Key secondary end points were TNSMS for the JC pollen dispersion season and total nasal and ocular symptom and medication score for the peak symptom period and JC pollen dispersion season. RESULTS: For the primary end point, absolute reductions and relative mean reductions in TNSMS compared with placebo were 1.50 and 21.4%, 2.24 and 32.1%, and 2.18 and 31.2% for 2,000, 5,000, and 10,000 JAU, respectively (P < .001 in all groups). For all key secondary end points, efficacy was confirmed for all doses (P < .001 in all groups). The treatment was well tolerated. Long-term efficacy of 5,000 JAU was shown over the 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal dose of the JC pollen SLIT tablet was 5,000 JAU, with good efficacy and safety over a 3-year treatment period. This sustained effect was dependent on treatment duration.

[INVESTIGATION OF TREATMENT GOAL IN ALLERGEN IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR JAPANESE CEDAR POLLINOSIS].

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: As few reports are available on treatment goal for Japanese cedar pollinosis treated with allergen immunotherapy, therapeutic effect has to be assessed based on subjective symptoms in clinical practice. This research was conducted to investigate the informative treatment goal in clinical practice by using the results of TO-194SL phase III clinical trial. METHODS: In this investigation, correlation between total nasal symptom medication score (TNSMS), which was predefined as the primary endpoint, and secondary endpoints evaluated by severe symptom day, quality of life (QOL) score, and overall evaluation by subject, was firstly investigated. Based on the results, stratified analyses of the secondary endpoints to confirm relationships on the stratified results, TNSMS, and cedar season were performed. RESULTS: Correlation between TNSMS and evaluations which were severe symptom day, QOL score, and overall evaluation by subject was reasonably observed. TNSMS generally showed 3 or below (classified as mild) throughout the entire pollen season when these evaluations reached each threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation suggest that a few evaluation items would help patients to realize the therapeutic effects of allergen immunotherapy if they could be the treatment goal in clinical practice.

The Relationship of Pollen Dispersal with Allergy Symptoms and Immunotherapy: Allergen Immunotherapy Improves Symptoms in the Late Period of Japanese Cedar Pollen Dispersal.

BACKGROUND: The severity of symptoms of pollen-induced allergic rhinitis is affected by the amount of scattered pollen. However, the relationships between the pollen dispersal pattern, symptom severity, and treatment efficacy are not clear. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, we performed 4 randomized, placebo-controlled studies of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) on patients with Japanese cedar-induced allergic rhinitis who lived in or around Chiba, Japan. The participants were asked to avoid using rescue medicines during the cedar pollen season as much as possible and to record their nasal symptoms in allergy diaries. The amount of pollen dispersed daily was quantified using the Durham method, and the season was divided into early and late periods based on the pollen count. RESULTS: A total of 721 patients were enrolled in the 4 studies during the 6-year study period. In the placebo group (n = 349), a correlation was observed between the amount of pollen dispersed and the severity of symptoms in the early but not late period of pollen dispersal. Treatment with SLIT (n = 372) significantly improved symptom severity in the late but not early period. CONCLUSION: For patients with Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis, the fluctuation of daily pollen dispersal had a minimal effect on the severity of symptoms during the late period. SLIT was remarkably effective in alleviating symptoms during this period but not in the early period.

[A VALIDATION STUDY OF THE IMPROVED PRODUCT FOR MEASURING JAPANESE CYPRESS POLLEN-SPECIFIC IgE (THERMO SCIENTIFIC™ ImmunoCAP™ ImmunoCAP JAPANESE CYPRESS POLLEN-SPECIFIC IgE)].

BACKGROUND: Japanese cypress pollen is a major causative allergen of seasonal allergic rhinitis in Japan. Although ImmunoCAP-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) reagent Japanese cypress pollen has been widely used as a diagnostic aid, its sensitivity requires enhancement. This study evaluated an improved version of this reagent. METHODS: Serum samples from 61 subjects who underwent Japanese cypress pollen exposure testing in an environmental challenge chamber in Chiba University were assessed using the conventional ImmunoCAPspecific IgE Japanese cypress pollen product and the improved product. In addition, specific IgE for Cha o 1 and Cha o 2, the primary allergen components of Japanese cypress pollen, was evaluated and their reactivity to specific IgE was compared between the conventional and improved products. RESULTS: The antibody titer of the improved product was approximately 1.8-fold that of the conventional product. In addition, higher correlations with Cha o 1 and Cha o 2 were observed for the improved product than for the conventional product. The clinical sensitivity (≥class 2) in 56 exposure test-positive subjects was better for the improved product (80.4%) than for the conventional product (71.4%). CONCLUSIONS: An improvement of the ImmunoCAP-specific IgE reagent Japanese cypress pollen resulted in enhanced Japanese cypress pollen-specific IgE sensitivity. The primary reason for this appeared to be an improved Cha o 1- and Cha o 2-specific IgE detectability.

An analysis of factors related to the effect of sublingual immunotherapy on Japanese cedar pollen induced allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) can improve the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and modify its natural history; however, its efficacy varies among patients. This study aimed to determine which factors modify the effect of SLIT through post hoc analysis of a previous phase 3 trial of standardized Japanese cedar (JC) pollen extract (CEDARTOLEN®). METHODS: The study included 482 patients who had previously completed a phase 3 trial during two seasons. The SLIT and placebo groups each contained 241 subjects. Because pollen dispersal differed in the two seasons, we identified good and poor responders from the SLIT group in the 2nd season. We compared patient baseline characteristics, changes in serum immunoglobulin, and severity of symptoms in the 1st season between good and poor responders, as well as between SLIT and placebo groups. RESULTS: When we compared the baseline characteristics of good and poor responders, a significant difference was observed in body mass index (BMI) such that the patients with BMI ≥25 presented with lower treatment efficacy. No significant difference was observed in correlation with any other factors or treatment-induced alterations of serum immunoglobulin levels. We found that 75.3% of the patients with moderate symptoms and 50.9% of the patients with severe or very severe symptoms in the 1st season met our criteria for good responders in the 2nd season. CONCLUSIONS: BMI might modify the effect of SLIT; however, other factors were not related clearly. The severity of symptoms in the 1st season of treatment does not predict that in the 2nd season.

Complementary and alternative medicine for allergic rhinitis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is extensively used in patients with allergic diseases worldwide. The purpose of this study was to investigate the actual situation of CAM practice in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. METHODS: We distributed questionnaires to otolaryngologists at 114 facilities in Japan. The subjects who participated in this study included children <16 years of age and adults ≥16 years of age diagnosed with allergic rhinitis by otolaryngologists. The survey was performed in the period from September 2007 to August 2009. Furthermore, we performed the same investigation out of the hospital setting, such as during general health examinations. All questionnaires were returned to Chiba University and analyzed. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who had ever experimented with CAM in the hospital survey were 7.1% (225/3170) and 19.2% (1416/7363) of children and adults, respectively. Approximately 36.2% of the adult patients thought that the treatments were effective. The main reasons for CAM use were safety, convenience and low price. However, the group who spent more than $1000 on CAM felt more dissatisfaction and anxiety related to treatment at the hospital. The situation of CAM practice was not consistent and was instead influenced by the backgrounds of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients who receive CAM report feeling that the effects of treatment provided by hospitals are insufficient and have concerns about the side effects of such treatments. Information regarding standard treatments, as described in the guidelines, should become widely known and diffused, and strong communication with patients should be considered.

Persistent nasal symptoms and mediator release after continuous pollen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber.

BACKGROUND: Immediate- and late-phase reactions are associated with nasal symptoms of patients with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the symptoms and mediators released after continuous allergen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber (ECC). METHODS: Fifteen patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis were enrolled in this study and continuously exposed to cedar pollen at a concentration of 8,000 grains/m(3) for 3 hours in an ECC. Nasal function tests were performed, and nasal secretions were collected before pollen exposure (0 hour), immediately after exiting the ECC (3 hours), and 6 hours after exiting the ECC (9 hours). Symptom scores were recorded every 30 minutes in the ECC and every 3 hours after exiting the ECC. The frequency of sneezing and nose blowing also was monitored. RESULTS: The severity of symptoms in the ECC peaked approximately 2 hours after the beginning of pollen exposure and continued more than 6 hours after leaving the ECC. Concentrations of histamine, tryptase, interleukins 5, 3, 33, and 31, and substance P increased over time, whereas that of nasal fractional exhaled nitric oxide decreased. CONCLUSION: Various mediators are released during continuous allergen exposure, which subsequently induce persistent nasal symptoms. Effective treatment is required to control the intense inflammation observed after allergen exposure.

Characteristics of laryngeal symptoms induced in patients with allergic rhinitis in an environmental challenge chamber.

BACKGROUND: People with allergic rhinitis often have laryngeal symptoms (LSs) in addition to nasal symptoms during the pollen-scattering season. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the characteristics of the LSs induced by pollen exposure using an environmental challenge chamber. METHODS: Cypress pollen exposure using an environmental challenge chamber for 25 participants with cypress pollen-induced allergic rhinitis was performed for 3 hours for 2 consecutive days in 3 study courses: namely, pollen exposure under normal nasal breathing and pollen or sham pollen exposure with nasal blockage, which eliminated any allergic reactions in the nasal mucosa. The nasal and LSs scores and the levels of serum inflammatory mediators, including eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), were monitored. Laryngeal examinations and physiologic lung tests were also conducted. RESULTS: Various LSs were reported, and these LSs were significantly elevated during pollen exposure and even under sham exposure with artificial nasal blockage. The pollen exposure with artificial nasal blockage exaggerated the LSs in 32% of the participants and also increased the serum ECP levels. The serum ECP levels did not change after sham exposure. The findings of both laryngeal examinations and lung tests failed to reveal any significant changes. CONCLUSION: Nasal obstruction could induce significant LSs even without pollen exposure. LSs were enhanced by pollen exposure and allergic reactions in the larynx could thus be involved in this enhancement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: UMIN000015667.

Efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy for two seasons in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis.

BACKGROUND: Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis is the most common seasonal allergic rhinitis in Japan. Standardized JC pollen extract is available for subcutaneous immunotherapy, but this treatment is limited by potentially serious side effects. The aim of this double-blind, randomized comparative study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of standardized JC pollen extract in a new oral formulation (CEDARTOLEN®, Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for JC pollinosis. METHODS: A total of 531 subjects with JC pollinosis were randomized into 2 groups at a ratio of 1:1 to receive daily sublingual administration of standardized JC pollen extract with a maintenance dose of 2,000 Japanese allergy units (JAU) or placebo for 2 consecutive pollen seasons. The efficacy was evaluated using the total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS) as the primary end point. Secondary end points included the total ocular symptom and medication score (TOSMS) and scores for individual symptoms and medication. RESULTS: The TNSMS was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in the SLIT group than in the placebo group in the peak symptom period by 18 and 30% in the first and second seasons, respectively. All secondary end points were also significantly lower in the SLIT group in both seasons. No systemic anaphylaxis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: SLIT with daily administration of standardized JC pollen extract was effective for improving nasal and ocular symptoms of JC pollinosis and reducing the use of relief medication. The JC pollen extract was well tolerated with only local adverse events.

Characteristics of the Chiba environmental challenge chamber.

BACKGROUND: An environmental challenge chamber (ECC), which we refer to as the α-chamber, was built at Chiba University in 2008. The aim of this study was to validate the functionality of the ECC. METHODS: The stability of the pollen distribution and concentration in the ECC and symptoms of patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis induced by cedar pollen exposure were examined. Carryover effects of symptoms induced by different exposure protocols and correlations between symptoms induced in the ECC and those in the natural cedar pollen season were also determined. All the studies using the α-chamber were conducted out of the cedar pollen season. RESULTS: The severity of symptoms in the chamber reached a peak about 2 hours after the start of pollen exposure and plateaued thereafter. After subjects left the chamber, the symptoms persisted for several days. There was no significant difference between the severity of symptoms at exposure levels of 8000 and 12000 grains/m3. The symptoms were significantly increased by exposure for 3 consecutive days; however, there were no carryover effects in a study performed with a two-week interval. The total nasal symptom score (TNSS) in the natural pollen season showed a weak correlation with the mean TNSS on the day of exposure and the following 3 days. Symptoms in the ECC also had weak correlations with those in the early natural pollen season. CONCLUSIONS: The ECC under well-controlled conditions is suitable for clinical studies and might accelerate development of treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis. A complete evaluation requires inclusion of the persistent reaction after subjects leave the ECC.

Comparison of nasal steroid with antihistamine in prophylactic treatment against pollinosis using an environmental challenge chamber.

Environmental challenge chambers (ECC) have been used to expose people to pollen allergens within a stable atmosphere and to examine the efficacy of treatment. Although pollinosis is one of the typical IgE-mediated type I allergic diseases, allergic inflammation is thought to contribute to the fundamental pathogenesis and prophylactic treatment may reduce exacerbations of pollinosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of prophylactic treatment with nasal steroid (mometasone furoate nasal spray) or an antihistamine (fexofenadine) in the control of cedar pollinosis using the ECC. In a randomized, double-blind two-way crossover study, 48 patients received nasal steroid or antihistamine for 7 consecutive days (days 1-7). On day 8, patients were exposed to cedar pollen (8000 grains/m(3)) in the ECC for 3 hours. Nasal symptoms induced by pollen exposure were assessed. Total nasal symptom scores (TNSSs) during the exposure in the ECC were not significantly different between the antihistamine and the nasal steroid groups. Nasal symptoms induced by pollen exposure using the ECC persisted for up to 3 days. TNSSs after pollen exposure on days 8-11 were significantly lower in the nasal steroid group compared with the antihistamine group. Prophylactic treatment with nasal steroid is more effective than antihistamine against pollinosis, particularly in the late phase. Clinical trial registration JAPIC CTI 101182 (www.clinicaltrials.jp/user/ctiMain_e.jsp).