Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Respir J ; 47(5): 1510-7, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27030677

RESUMO

Low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) screening increased detection of airway nodules. Most nodules appear to be secretions, but pathological lesions may show similar findings. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends repeating LDCT after 1 month and proceeding to bronchoscopy if the nodules persist. However, no reports exist about incidentally detected airway nodules. We investigated the significance of airway nodules detected by LDCT screening.We screened patients with incidental airway nodules detected by LDCT in the Seoul National University Hospital group. The characteristics of computed tomography, bronchoscopy, pathology and clinical findings were analysed.Among 53 036 individuals who underwent LDCT screening, 313 (0.6%) had airway nodules. Of these, 186 (59.4%) were followed-up with chest computed tomography and/or bronchoscopy. Seven (3.8%) cases had significant lesions, including leiomyoma (n=2), endobronchial tuberculosis (n=2), chronic inflammation (n=1), hamartoma (n=1) and benign granuloma (n=1). The remaining 179 lesions were transient, suggesting that they were secretions.The use of LDCT for lung cancer screening demonstrated the low incidence of airway lesions. Most lesions were transient secretions. True pathological lesions were rare, and no malignant lesion was found. The current recommendation of the NCCN guideline is a reasonable approach that can avoid unnecessary bronchoscopy.


Assuntos
Broncoscopia/métodos , Achados Incidentais , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Seguimentos , Granuloma/diagnóstico por imagem , Hamartoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Incidência , Inflamação/diagnóstico por imagem , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , República da Coreia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sistema Respiratório/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistema Respiratório/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Tuberculose/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Korean J Intern Med ; 26(2): 153-9, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21716591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the effect of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin on treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 171 patients with MDR-TB receiving either levofloxacin or moxifloxacin was performed. Treatment responses were categorized into treatment success (cured and treatment completed) or adverse treatment outcome (death, failure, and relapsed). RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 42.0 years. Approximately 56% of the patients were male. Seventeen patients had extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, and 20 had a surgical resection. A total of 123 patients (71.9%) received levofloxacin for a median 594 days, and 48 patients (28.1%) received moxifloxacin for a median 673 days. Other baseline demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. The moxifloxacin group had a significantly higher number of resistant drugs (p < 0.001) and a higher incidence of resistance to ofloxacin (p = 0.005) in the drug sensitivity test. The treatment success rate was 78.9% in the levofloxacin group and 83.3% in the moxifloxacin group (p = 0.42). Adverse reactions occurred at similar rates in the groups (p = 0.44). Patients in the moxifloxacin group were not more likely to have treatment success than those in the levofloxacin group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 2.43; p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin showed equivalent efficacy for treating MDR-TB.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Aza/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Tuberculose Extensivamente Resistente a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Levofloxacino , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Ofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antituberculosos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Aza/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Quimioterapia Combinada , Tuberculose Extensivamente Resistente a Medicamentos/microbiologia , Tuberculose Extensivamente Resistente a Medicamentos/mortalidade , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Moxifloxacina , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/patogenicidade , Razão de Chances , Ofloxacino/efeitos adversos , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Indução de Remissão , República da Coreia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/microbiologia , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/mortalidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA