RESUMO
This cohort study examines health care utilization patterns for patients with COVID-19 who were enrolled vs not enrolled in a home monitoring program.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Assistência Médica , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers (HCW) is crucial. OBJECTIVE: Utilizing a health system COVID-19 research registry, we assessed HCW risk for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with overlap propensity score weighting. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large academic healthcare system (N = 72,909) from March 8-June 9, 2020, stratified by HCW and patient-facing status. MAIN MEASURES: SARS-CoV-2 test result, hospitalization, and ICU admission for COVID-19 infection. KEY RESULTS: Of 72,909 individuals tested, 9.0% (551) of 6145 HCW tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared to 6.5% (4353) of 66,764 non-HCW. The HCW were younger than the non-HCW (median age 39.7 vs. 57.5, p < 0.001) with more females (proportion of males 21.5 vs. 44.9%, p < 0.001), higher reporting of COVID-19 exposure (72 vs. 17%, p < 0.001), and fewer comorbidities. However, the overlap propensity score weighted proportions were 8.9 vs. 7.7 for HCW vs. non-HCW having a positive test with weighted odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.38. Among those testing positive, weighted proportions for hospitalization were 7.4 vs. 15.9 for HCW vs. non-HCW with OR of 0.42 (CI 0.26-0.66) and for ICU admission: 2.2 vs. 4.5 for HCW vs. non-HCW with OR of 0.48 (CI 0.20-1.04). Those HCW identified as patient facing compared to not had increased odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (OR 1.60, CI 1.08-2.39, proportions 8.6 vs. 5.5), but no statistically significant increase in hospitalization (OR 0.88, CI 0.20-3.66, proportions 10.2 vs. 11.4) and ICU admission (OR 0.34, CI 0.01-3.97, proportions 1.8 vs. 5.2). CONCLUSIONS: In a large healthcare system, HCW had similar odds for testing SARS-CoV-2 positive, but lower odds of hospitalization compared to non-HCW. Patient-facing HCW had higher odds of a positive test. These results are key to understanding HCW risk mitigation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Florida/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Ohio/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Background: Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers (HCW) is crucial. Objective: Utilizing a health system COVID-19 research registry, we assessed HCW risk for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Design: Retrospective cohort study with overlap propensity score weighting. Participants: Individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large academic healthcare system (N=72,909) from March 8-June 9 2020 stratified by HCW and patient-facing status. Main Measures: SARS-CoV-2 test result, hospitalization, and ICU admission for COVID-19 infection. Key Results: Of 72,909 individuals tested, 9.0% (551) of 6,145 HCW tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared to 6.5% (4353) of 66,764 non-HCW. The HCW were younger than non-HCW (median age 39.7 vs. 57.5, p<0.001) with more females (proportion of males 21.5 vs. 44.9%, p<0.001), higher reporting of COVID-19 exposure (72 vs. 17 %, p<0.001) and fewer comorbidities. However, the overlap propensity score weighted proportions were 8.9 vs. 7.7 for HCW vs. non-HCW having a positive test with weighted odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.38. Among those testing positive, weighted proportions for hospitalization were 7.4 vs.15.9 for HCW vs. non-HCW with OR of 0.42 (CI 0.26-0.66) and for ICU admission: 2.2 vs.4.5 for HCW vs. non-HCW with OR of 0.48 (CI 0.20 -1.04). Those HCW identified as patient-facing compared to not had increased odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (OR 1.60, CI 1.08-2.39, proportions 8.6 vs. 5.5), but no statistically significant increase in hospitalization (OR 0.88, CI 0.20-3.66, proportions 10.2 vs. 11.4) and ICU admission (OR 0.34, CI 0.01-3.97, proportions 1.8 vs. 5.2). Conclusions: In a large healthcare system, HCW had similar odds for testing SARS-CoV-2 positive, but lower odds of hospitalization compared to non-HCW. Patient-facing HCW had higher odds of a positive test. These results are key to understanding HCW risk mitigation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypokalemia is common in heart failure (HF) and is associated with increased mortality. Potassium supplements are commonly used to treat hypokalemia and maintain normokalemia. However, their long-term effects on outcomes in chronic HF are unknown. We used a public-use copy of the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial dataset to determine the associations of potassium supplement use with outcomes using a propensity-matched design. METHODS: Of the 7788 DIG participants with chronic HF, 2199 were using oral potassium supplements at baseline. We estimated propensity scores for potassium supplement use for each patient and used them to match 2131 pairs of patients receiving and not receiving potassium supplements. Matched Cox regression models were used to estimate associations of potassium supplement use with mortality and hospitalization during 40 months of median follow-up. RESULTS: All-cause mortality occurred in 818 (rate, 1327/10,000 person-years) and 802 (rate, 1313/10,000 person-years) patients respectively receiving and not receiving potassium supplements (hazard ratio {HR} when potassium supplement use was compared with nonuse, 1.05; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.94-1.18; P=0.390). All-cause hospitalizations occurred in 1516 (rate, 4777/10,000 person-years) and 1445 (rate, 4120/10,000 person-years) patients respectively receiving and not receiving potassium supplements (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26; P=0.004). HRs (95% CI) for hospitalizations due to cardiovascular causes and worsening HF were respectively 1.19 (95% CI, 1.08-1.32; P=0.001) and 1.27 (1.12-1.43; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of potassium supplements in chronic HF was not associated with mortality. However, their use was associated with increased hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes and progressive HF.
Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Hipopotassemia/terapia , Potássio/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hipopotassemia/mortalidade , Masculino , Análise por Pareamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de PropensãoRESUMO
The role of sympathetic innervation in regulation of thyroid function is incompletely understood. We, therefore, carried out studies in rats utilizing techniques of norepinephrine turnover to assess thyroid sympathetic activity in vivo. Thyroidal sympathetic activity was increased 95% by exposure to cold (4 degrees C), 42% by chronic ingestion of an iodine-deficient diet, and 32% in rats fed a goitrogenic diet (low-iodine diet supplemented with propylthiouracil). In addition, fasting for 2 days reduced sympathetic nervous system activity in thyroid by 38%. Thyroid growth and 125I uptake were also compared in intact and decentralized hemithyroids obtained from animals subjected to unilateral superior cervical ganglion decentralization. Unilateral superior cervical ganglion decentralization led to a reduction in thyroid weight, in 125I uptake by thyroid tissue, and in TSH-induced stimulation of 125I uptake in decentralized hemithyroids. These results suggest that sympathetic activity in thyroid contributes to gland enlargement and may modulate tissue responsiveness to TSH.
Assuntos
Bócio/etiologia , Bócio/fisiopatologia , Iodo/deficiência , Norepinefrina/metabolismo , Sistema Nervoso Simpático/fisiopatologia , Glândula Tireoide/inervação , Glândula Tireoide/fisiopatologia , Animais , Temperatura Baixa/efeitos adversos , Homeostase , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Tamanho do Órgão , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-DawleyRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (CHF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have a high risk of death and hospitalization for CHF deterioration despite therapies with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers, and even an aldosterone antagonist. To determine whether the angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan decreases cardiovascular mortality, morbidity, and all-cause mortality in patients with CHF and depressed LVEF, a prespecified analysis of the combined Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) low LVEF trials was performed. CHARM is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, international trial program. METHODS AND RESULTS: New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II through IV CHF patients with an LVEF of < or =40% were randomized to candesartan or placebo in 2 complementary parallel trials (CHARM-Alternative, for patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors, and CHARM-Added, for patients who were receiving ACE inhibitors). Mortality and morbidity were determined in 4576 low LVEF patients (2289 candesartan and 2287 placebo), titrated as tolerated to a target dose of 32 mg once daily, and observed for 2 to 4 years (median, 40 months). The primary outcome (time to first event by intention to treat) was cardiovascular death or CHF hospitalization for each trial, with all-cause mortality a secondary end point in the pooled analysis of the low LVEF trials. Of the patients in the candesartan group, 817 (35.7%) experienced cardiovascular death or a CHF hospitalization as compared with 944 (41.3%) in the placebo group (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90; P<0.001) with reduced risk for both cardiovascular deaths (521 [22.8%] versus 599 [26.2%]; HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.75 to 0.95]; P=0.005) and CHF hospitalizations (516 [22.5%] versus 642 [28.1%]; HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.68 to 0.85]; P<0.001). It is important to note that all-cause mortality also was significantly reduced by candesartan (642 [28.0%] versus 708 [31.0%]; HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.79 to 0.98]; P=0.018). No significant heterogeneity for the beneficial effects of candesartan was found across prespecified and subsequently identified subgroups including treatment with ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, an aldosterone antagonist, or their combinations. The study drug was discontinued because of adverse effects by 23.1% of patients in the candesartan group and 18.8% in the placebo group; the reasons included increased creatinine (7.1% versus 3.5%), hypotension (4.2% versus 2.1%), and hyperkalemia (2.8% versus 0.5%), respectively (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Candesartan significantly reduces all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with CHF and LVEF < or =40% when added to standard therapies including ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and an aldosterone antagonist. Routine monitoring of blood pressure, serum creatinine, and serum potassium is warranted.
Assuntos
Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/antagonistas & inibidores , Benzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Baixo Débito Cardíaco/tratamento farmacológico , Baixo Débito Cardíaco/mortalidade , Tetrazóis/uso terapêutico , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/mortalidade , Idoso , Compostos de Bifenilo , Baixo Débito Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Volume Sistólico , Sístole , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnósticoRESUMO
We have previously reported that dopamine increased active Na+ transport in rat lungs by upregulating the alveolar epithelial Na,K-ATPase. Here we tested whether alveolar epithelial cells produce dopamine and whether increasing endogenous dopamine production by feeding rats a 4% tyrosine diet (TSD) would increase lung liquid clearance. Alveolar Type II cells express the enzyme aromatic-L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) and, when incubated with the dopamine precursor, 3-hydroxy-L-tyrosine (L-dopa), produce dopamine. Rats fed TSD, a precursor of L-dopa and dopamine, had increased urinary dopamine levels, which were inhibited by benserazide, an inhibitor of AADC. Rats fed TSD for 15, 24, and 48 hours had a 26, 46, and 45% increase in lung liquid clearance, respectively, as compared with controls. Also, dopaminergic D1 receptor antagonist--but not dopaminergic D2 receptor antagonist--inhibited the TSD-mediated increase in lung liquid clearance. Alveolar Type II cells isolated from the lungs of rats after they had been fed TSD for 24 hours demonstrated increased protein abundance of Na,K-ATPase alpha1 and beta1 subunits. Basolateral membranes isolated from peripheral lung tissue of tyrosine-fed rats had increased Na,K-ATPase activity and Na,K-ATPase alpha1 subunit. These data provide the first evidence that alveolar epithelial cells produce dopamine and that increasing endogenous dopamine increases lung liquid clearance.