Nomogram for visual acuity outcome after iodine-125 plaque radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab for uveal melanoma in 1131 patients.

AIMS: To develop a nomogram for prediction of visual acuity outcome following plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma. METHODS: Retrospective review of uveal melanoma treated with plaque radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab injections at 4-month intervals for 2 years duration. Two nomograms for poor visual acuity outcome (Snellen <20/200) were developed based on (1) Clinical risk factors. (2) Or clinical and treatment risk factors. RESULTS: There were 1131 included cases. The most important clinical risk factors (points for nomogram) for poor visual acuity outcome included subretinal fluid involving four quadrants (100), tumour thickness >4 mm (69), presenting visual acuity ≤20/30 (65), non-Caucasian race (58), tumour shape mushroom, bilobed, or multilobulated (57), and insulin-dependent diabetes (54). Risk of poor visual acuity at 2 years and 4 years increased from 11% and 24% with 40 points to 97% and >99% with 304 points. A second analysis was performed using both clinical and treatment risk factors. The most important factors included presenting visual acuity ≤20/30 (100), tumour largest basal diameter >11 mm (80), radiation dose rate to tumour base ≥164 cGy/hour (78), tumour thickness >4 mm (76), insulin-dependent diabetes (75) and abnormal foveolar status by optical coherence tomography at presentation (72). Risk of poor visual acuity at 2 years and 4 years increased from 6% and 14% with 56 points to 88% and 99% with 496 points. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram using clinical or treatment risk factors can predict visual acuity outcome following plaque radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab for uveal melanoma and is available online at https://fighteyecancer.com/nomograms/.

Metastases and death rates after primary enucleation of unilateral retinoblastoma in the USA 2007-2017.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Enucleation for retinoblastoma is performed less often in the past decade due to increasingly widespread alternative therapies, but enucleation remains an important option. There is a paucity of reports on the current incidence of metastases and metastatic deaths in unilateral retinoblastoma from US centres. METHODS: Retrospective chart review at five tertiary retinoblastoma centres in the USA for unilateral retinoblastoma patients treated with primary enucleation, 2007-2017, with >1 year of follow-up or treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 228 patients (228 eyes), there were nine metastases (3.9%) and four deaths (1.7%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate at 5 years for metastasis-free survival was 96% (95% CI, 94% to 99 %), and for overall survival was 98% (95% CI 96% to 100%). All metastases were evident within 12 months. Histopathology revealed higher risk pathology (postlaminar optic nerve and/or massive choroidal invasion) in 62 of 228 eyes (27%). Of these higher risk eyes, 39 received adjuvant chemotherapy. There were four subsequent metastases in this higher risk pathology with adjuvant chemotherapy group, with three deaths. Of the nine overall with metastases, seven (78%) showed higher risk pathology. All metastatic patients were classified as Reese-Ellsworth V and International Classification of Retinoblastoma Groups D or E. Initial metastases presented as orbital invasion in seven of nine cases. CONCLUSIONS: Primary enucleation for unilateral retinoblastoma results in a low rate of metastatic death, but is still associated with a 3.9% chance of metastases within a year of enucleation. Most but not all patients who developed metastases had higher risk histopathological findings.