Genome-wide identification of Apetala2 gene family in Hypericum perforatum L and expression profiles in response to different abiotic and hormonal treatments.

The Apetala2 (AP2) gene family of transcription factors (TFs) play important functions in plant development, hormonal response, and abiotic stress. To reveal the biological functions and the expression profiles of AP2 genes in Hypericum perforatum, genome-wide identification of HpAP2 family members was conducted. Methods: We identified 21 AP2 TFs in H. perforatum using bioinformatic methods; their physical and chemical properties, gene structures, conserved motifs, evolutionary relationships, cis-acting elements, and expression patterns were investigated. Results: We found that based on the structural characteristics and evolutionary relationships, the HpAP2 gene family can be divided into three subclasses: euANT, baselANT, and euAP2. A canonical HpAP2 TF shared a conserved protein structure, while a unique motif 6 was found in HpAP2_1, HpAP2_4, and HpAP2_5 from the euANT subgroup, indicating potential biological and regulatory functions of these genes. Furthermore, a total of 59 cis-acting elements were identified, most of which were associated with growth, development, and resistance to stress in plants. Transcriptomics data showed that 57.14% of the genes in the AP2 family were differentially expressed in four organs. For example, HpAP2_18 was specifically expressed in roots and stems, whereas HpAP2_17 and HpAP2_11 were specifically expressed in leaves and flowers, respectively. HpAP2_5, HpAP2_11, and HpAP2_18 showed tissue-specific expression patterns and responded positively to hormones and abiotic stresses. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that the HpAP2 family genes are involved in diverse developmental processes and generate responses to abiotic stress conditions in H. perforatum. This article, for the first time, reports the identification and expression profiles of the AP2 family genes in H. perforatum, laying the foundation for future functional studies with these genes.

Laser therapy versus topical desensitising agents in the management of dentine hypersensitivity: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of lasers and topical desensitising agent treatments for dentine hypersensitivity. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE and ISI Web of Knowledge were electronically searched without restrictions. Study search, selection, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were conducted independently by two reviewer authors. All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration). RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 13 eligible studies that compared topical desensitising agents and Nd:YAG or diode laser. Four, six and three studies were considered to have low, moderate and high risks of bias, respectively. The follow-up period varied from immediate to 9 months. All comparisons except the 3-month Nd:YAG laser parallel group and 6-month diode laser group showed that the clinical efficacy of lasers for dentine hypersensitivity was not significantly different with topical desensitising agents. CONCLUSION: We found low-quality evidence that was insufficient to draw any conclusions regarding the superiority of lasers or conventional topical desensitising agents in the treatment of DH. Further well-designed RCTs on this topic are needed to draw definitive conclusions.