Validation of the Nanjing Criteria for Diagnosing Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids-induced Hepatic Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) is caused by toxic injury to sinusoidal endothelial cells in the liver. The intake of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) in some Chinese herbal remedies/plants remains the major etiology for HSOS in China. Recently, new diagnostic criteria for PA-induced HSOS (i.e. PA-HSOS) have been developed; however, the efficacy has not been clinically validated. This study aimed to assess the performance of the Nanjing criteria for PA-HSOS. METHODS: Data obtained from consecutive patients in multiple hospitals, which included 86 PA-HSOS patients and 327 patients with other liver diseases, were retrospectively analyzed. Then, the diagnostic performance of the Nanjing criteria and simplified Nanjing criteria were evaluated and validated. The study is registered in www.chictr.org.cn (ID: ChiCTR1900020784). RESULTS: The Nanjing criteria have a sensitivity and specificity of 95.35% and 100%, respectively, while the simplified Nanjing criteria have a sensitivity and specificity of 96.51% and 96.33%, respectively, for the diagnosis of PA-HSOS. Notably, a proportion of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (11/49) was misdiagnosed as PA-HSOS on the basis of the simplified Nanjing criteria, and this was mainly due to the overlapping features in the enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Furthermore, most of these patients (10/11) had occlusion or thrombosis of the hepatic vein, and communicating vessels in the liver were found in 8/11 patients, which were absent in PA-HSOS patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Nanjing criteria and simplified Nanjing criteria exhibit excellent performance in diagnosing PA-HSOS. Thus, both could be valuable diagnostic tools in clinical practice.

CSH guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important clinical problem, which has received more attention in recent decades. It can be induced by small chemical molecules, biological agents, traditional Chinese medicines (TCM), natural medicines (NM), health products (HP), and dietary supplements (DS). Idiosyncratic DILI is far more common than intrinsic DILI clinically and can be classified into hepatocellular injury, cholestatic injury, hepatocellular-cholestatic mixed injury, and vascular injury based on the types of injured target cells. The CSH guidelines summarized the epidemiology, pathogenesis, pathology, and clinical manifestation and gives 16 evidence-based recommendations on diagnosis, differential diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of DILI.

[RUCAM scale-based diagnosis, clinical features and prognosis of 140 cases of drug-induced liver injury].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the etiology, clinical features and prognosis of liver injuries caused by different drugs. METHODS: The types of suspected drugs related to liver injury, clinical manifestations, liver biochemical parameters, clinical outcomes and other associated data were retrospectively assessed for 140 patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) was used to assess the causality between drugs and liver injury. RESULTS: The most prevalent agents inducing DILI were Chinese traditional drugs (62.1%), followed by antipyretic analgesic drugs (10%) and antibiotics (5%). The ratio of male to female patients in the study cohort was 1:1.69, with 71 of the total patients (50.7%) being between the ages of 40 and 60 years-old. The RUCAM scale was not less than 3 points for any of the patients.In general, the clinical manifestations and biochemical results were not specific. The percentages of hepatocellular injury type, cholestatic injury type and mixed injury type were 51.4%, 30.7% and 17.9% respectively. The median age of patients with cholestatic liver injury was 55.6 years, which was older than that of patients with hepatocellular injury (47.1 years) or mixed injury (49.9 years). CONCLUSION: Although antipyretic analgesics and antibiotics are considered as common drugs that can induce DILI, Chinese traditional drugs have emerged as another important group of liver injurious agents. Cholestatic DILI was found to occur more often in elderly patients than in younger patients.