Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 33(9): 2525-2531, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35881177

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare postoperative pain between patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament colpopexy (SSLF) and hysteropexy (SSLH). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing native tissue SSLF and SSLH between January 2013 and March 2020. The electronic medical record was queried for demographic and perioperative data until the postoperative visit. The primary outcome was a composite incidence of any of the following: telephone calls, urgent office visits, additional analgesic prescriptions and need for intervention for pain in the buttocks, posterior thigh or perirectal area. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of persistent pain at the postoperative visit and perioperative risk factors associated with reported pain. RESULTS: A total of 406 patients met inclusion criteria (308 SSLF, 98 SSLH). The composite pain outcome was seen in 99 patients (24.4%; 95% CI 20.5%-28.8%), and there was no statistical difference between cohorts. Persistent pain was seen in 15.6% and 13.3% of SSLF and SSLH patients at 6 weeks (p = 0.58). Twelve patients (3.0%) underwent interventions for pain, including physical therapy (2), trigger point injections (5) and suture release (5). Compared to SSLF patients, SSLH patients were more likely to need interventions (7 [7.1%] vs. 5 [1.6%], p = 0.005) and office visits (14 [14.3%] vs. 13 [4.2%], p = 0.0005) for pain. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the overall incidence of postoperative pain between patients who underwent SSLF or SSLH. However, patients who underwent hysteropexy were more likely to need intervention and office evaluation for postoperative pain.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Nádegas , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Ligamentos/cirurgia , Ligamentos Articulares , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/etiologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 25(2): e45-e46, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730349

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Neurologic injury after sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is rare, but the incidence is unknown. Infection is a potential mechanism for neurologic damage. This report illustrates the presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic considerations, and treatment of epidural infection causing neurologic deficits after SNS. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a woman with severe fecal incontinence due to Crohn's disease who underwent SNS implantation and subsequently developed a wound infection requiring complete device explantation. A few days later, she presented with leg pain and weakness. Urgent evaluation and treatment of epidural infection were performed. She had persistent neurologic deficits 6 months later. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic sequelae from an infection after SNS are a rare event and should be considered in patients with fevers, leg pain, and neurologic deficits.


Assuntos
Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Abscesso Epidural/diagnóstico , Abscesso Epidural/etiologia , Plexo Lombossacral , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/complicações , Adulto , Remoção de Dispositivo , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Abscesso Epidural/tratamento farmacológico , Incontinência Fecal/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Debilidade Muscular/microbiologia , Polirradiculopatia/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA