Dynamics of lidocaine in topical anesthesia for office-based laryngeal procedures: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To study topical lidocaine for office-based laryngeal procedures recording onset, duration, and subjective experience of topical anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Nine healthy volunteers were anesthetized with 4 % lidocaine endoscopically. Laryngeal sensitivity prior to and during anesthesia was recorded until normal sensation returned measured by air-puff sensory testing. Subjective experience of the process was recorded. METHODS: Questionnaires regarding subjective experience were completed prior to, during, and after anesthesia. Laryngeal sensitivity via air-pulse trigger of the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) prior to and after 3 mL shower of 4 % lidocaine was recorded at 30 second intervals until the larynx was insensate with no LAR at 10 mmHg. Time to anesthesia was recorded and post-endoscopy questionnaire was given. Upon subjective change in sensation, sensitivity via air-pulse trigger of the LAR was recorded until baseline sensation returned. A post-anesthesia questionnaire recorded the subjective experience. RESULTS: Average time to full anesthesia was 110 s (±31.2). Subjective return of sensation was noted at 10 min (±2.5), however time to return to normal LAR was 22 min (±5.8). Based on three standard deviations, 99.7 % of the population will be anesthetized at 3.4 min, report subjective change at 18.2 min and regain full sensation at 40 min. CONCLUSIONS: Office-based laryngeal procedures should be performed at least 2 min following topical 4 % lidocaine with a window for manipulation of at least 16 min. Oral intake should be delayed for over 45 min to ensure complete return of sensation. The laryngeal shower of lidocaine is subjectively tolerated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2C Outcomes Research.

Trigger Reduction Prior to Systemic Drugs for Neurogenic Chronic Cough.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Neurogenic chronic cough typically presents as a postviral chronic cough, often with paroxysms of coughing preceded by a tickle sensation with multiple triggers and often recalcitrant to multiple treatments for reflux disease, sinus disease, and asthma. Current treatment uses neuromodulating agents with moderate success. Post nasal drainage and laryngopharyngeal reflux can be triggers in the setting of laryngopharyngeal hypersensitivity. Treatment will focus on trigger reduction using nasal toilet and a dietary regimen for laryngopharyngeal reflux. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of retrospective cohort studies METHODS: One-year retrospective review of new patients with cough (R05.0) excluding asthma, proton pump inhibitor response, and sinus or pulmonary disease. Cough severity index (CSI) and reflux symptom index (RSI) were evaluated initially and 6 weeks after trigger-reduction treatment using nasal saline irrigation, nasal steroids, nasal antihistamines, and a plant-based diet with alkaline water. RESULTS: Of 119 patients, 29 met the criteria. Using the six-point reduction (improvement) in RSI as an accepted response, 20 of 29 patients (68.9%, P = .0014) experienced a clinical response. Using reduction in RSI and CSI as a continuous variable to assess response, patients experienced a 10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.75-13.2) and 10.9 (95% CI: 7.4-14.3) mean point reduction, respectively. The mean percent reduction in RSI following 6 weeks of treatment was 54.7% (95% CI: 41.5-68.0; P = .0001). These patients experienced a 59.8% (95% CI: 43.4-76.2; P = .0001) reduction in CSI. CONCLUSIONS: A trigger-reduction approach using nasal toilet and a plant-based diet in patients with neurogenic chronic cough prior to the initiation of systemic neuromodulating medications should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:198-202, 2019.

A Comparison of Alkaline Water and Mediterranean Diet vs Proton Pump Inhibition for Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Importance: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common disorder with protean manifestations in the head and neck. In this retrospective study, we report the efficacy of a wholly dietary approach using alkaline water, a plant-based, Mediterranean-style diet, and standard reflux precautions compared with that of the traditional treatment approach of proton pump inhibition (PPI) and standard reflux precautions. Objective: To determine whether treatment with a diet-based approach with standard reflux precautions alone can improve symptoms of LPR compared with treatment with PPI and standard reflux precautions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective medical chart review of 2 treatment cohorts. From 2010 to 2012, 85 patients with LPR that were treated with PPI and standard reflux precautions (PS) were identified. From 2013 to 2015, 99 patients treated with alkaline water (pH >8.0), 90% plant-based, Mediterranean-style diet, and standard reflux precautions (AMS) were identified. The outcome was based on change in Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). Main Outcomes and Measures: Recorded change in the RSI after 6 weeks of treatment. Results: Of the 184 patients identified in the PS and AMS cohorts, the median age of participants in each cohort was 60 years (95% CI, 18-82) and 57 years (95% CI, 18-93), respectively (47 [56.3%] and 61 [61.7%] were women, respectively). The percentage of patients achieving a clinically meaningful (≥6 points) reduction in RSI was 54.1% in PS-treated patients and 62.6% in AMS-treated patients (difference between the groups, 8.05; 95% CI, -5.74 to 22.76). The mean reduction in RSI was 27.2% for the PS group and 39.8% in the AMS group (difference, 12.10; 95% CI, 1.53 to 22.68). Conclusions and Relevance: Our data suggest that the effect of PPI on the RSI based on proportion reaching a 6-point reduction in RSI is not significantly better than that of alkaline water, a plant-based, Mediterranean-style diet, and standard reflux precautions, although the difference in the 2 treatments could be clinically meaningful in favor of the dietary approach. The percent reduction in RSI was significantly greater with the dietary approach. Because the relationship between percent change and response to treatment has not been studied, the clinical significance of this difference requires further study. Nevertheless, this study suggests that a plant-based diet and alkaline water should be considered in the treatment of LPR. This approach may effectively improve symptoms and could avoid the costs and adverse effects of pharmacological intervention as well as afford the additional health benefits associated with a healthy, plant-based diet.

Laryngopharyngeal dysfunction from the implant vagal nerve stimulator.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of the study was to examine the side-effect profile of the vagal nerve stimulator. Vagal nerve stimulators have been used to treat intractable seizures in all age groups. They provide relief to the patient with a seizure disorder by decreasing the overall number and severity of seizure activities. Although significant complications are rare, many patients have some complaint, usually of their voice. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective evaluation of four patients with intractable epilepsy. METHODS: Evaluation of charts and medical records and endoscopic examination of the larynx. RESULTS: In this small series, all four patients had implantation-related paresis. Three of the four appear to have side effects from device activation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom a vagal nerve stimulator is placed can have adverse side effects. These can be related to the surgical manipulation of the vagus nerve, resulting in a temporary paresis of the vocal folds. A second set of side effects is related to the actual electrical stimulation of the device, and these side effects can directly affect the laryngeal musculature.