Prioritization of implementation barriers related to integrated care models in Central and Eastern European countries.

The importance of integrated care will increase in future health systems due to aging populations and patients with chronic multimorbidity, however, such complex healthcare interventions are often developed and implemented in higher income countries. For Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries it is important to investigate which integrated care models are transferable to their setting and facilitate the implementation of relevant models by identifying barriers to their implementation. This study investigates the relative importance of integrated care models and the most critical barriers for their implementation in CEE countries. Experts from Croatia, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Serbia were invited to complete an online survey within the SELFIE H2020 project. 81 respondents completed the survey. Although experts indicated that some integrated care models were already being implemented in CEE countries, the survey revealed a great need for further improvement in the integration of care, especially the managed care of oncology patients, coordinated palliative care of terminally ill patients, and nursing care of elderly with multimorbidity. Lack of long-term financial sustainability as well as of dedicated financing schemes were seen the most critical implementation barriers, followed by the lack of integration between health and social care providers and insufficient availability of human resources. These insights can guide future policy making on integrated care in CEE countries.

Implementation of evidence-based health policy in the field of integrated care: A Ritka Betegségek Nemzeti Eroforrás Központjának tervezési folyamata / Bizonyítékokon alapuló egészségpolitikai döntéshozatal az integrált ellátásban: A Ritka Betegségek Nemzeti Eroforrás Központjának tervezési folyamata

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A ritka betegséggel élok ellátásában fontos elorelépések történtek az elmúlt években. Egy következo lépés lehetne hazánkban a Ritka Betegségek Nemzeti Eroforrás (Uni-Versum) Központjának (a továbbiakban: Központ) létrehozása, amely az egészségügyi, szociális és köznevelési szolgáltatásokat összehangolva és kiegészítve személyközpontú ellátást nyújtana a betegek és támogatóik részére. Célkituzés: Célunk az volt, hogy egy nemzetközi tudományos módszertan alapján javaslatokat tegyünk arra, hogy milyen eszközökkel lehet feloldani a Központ megvalósításának lehetséges korlátozó tényezoit. Módszer: A Központ megvalósíthatóságának értékelésére interdiszciplináris szakmai egyeztetést szerveztünk különbözo érintett érdekcsoportok részvételével, a SELFIE H2020 kutatási projekt által kidolgozott módszertan alapján. Az elozetesen rangsorolt legfontosabb korlátozó tényezokre lehetséges megoldási javaslatokat tettünk. Eredmények: A lehetséges korlátozó tényezoket a résztvevok relevánsnak tartották a Központ létrehozásával kapcsolatban, és ezekre összesen 17 olyan konkrét javaslat született, amelyben a résztvevok között egyetértés alakult ki. A javaslatok kiterjedtek az ellátás tartalmára, az alkalmazott technológiák támogató szerepére, a humáneroforrás-korlátok megoldására, a hatékony vezetés és szervezés kialakítására, az összetett finanszírozási struktúra kialakítására és a kutatási lehetoségek megteremtésére is. Megbeszélés: A Központ megvalósítása esetén a ritka betegséggel élok ellátása az egészségügyi, szociális és köznevelési tevékenységeket integráló megközelítés felé mozdulna el. A kutatás során megfogalmazott javaslatok hozzájárulhatnak a Központ létrehozásához, amennyiben megvan az ehhez szükséges szakpolitikai támogatás is. Ezen túlmutatóan, a leírt munkamódszer más integrált ellátási modellek bevezethetoségének elemzéséhez is mintaként szolgálhat. Következtetés: Összefoglalva megállapíthatjuk, hogy a Központ létrehozásához számos, elozetesen is látható korlátozó tényezot kell feloldani. Az érdekcsoportok közös javaslatai alapján kialakítható egy olyan muködési forma, amely az ellátórendszerek kiegészítésével és összehangolásával jelentos társadalmi értéktöbbletet eredményezhet. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(45): 1818-1825. INTRODUCTION: In Hungary, significant achievements have been made in the care of patients with rare diseases in recent years. A next step could be the establishment of the National Resource Centre for Rare Diseases (hereinafter: Centre) to facilitate patient-centered complex care by the integration and supplementation of existing health, social and educational services. OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to develop recommendations based on international scientific methodology to overcome potential implementation barriers of the aforementioned Centre. METHOD: To evaluate the feasibility of the implementation, we organized an interdisciplinary workshop with representatives of different stakeholder groups, adopting the methodology developed in the SELFIE H2020 research project. During the workshop, we discussed the previously ranked, most significant implementation barriers and made recommendations for potential solutions. RESULTS: The potential implementation barriers were considered relevant by the participants and, reflecting on these barriers, altogether 17 recommendations were developed by consensus. These recommendations were related to the content of service delivery, use of supportive technologies, overcoming workforce issues, establishing effective leadership, implementing a complex financing structure and creating research opportunities. DISCUSSION: Implementation of the Centre would shift the care of rare diseases towards personalized and integrated health, social and educational services. Our recommendations will contribute to the establishment of the Centre, subject to positive policy decision. Furthermore, our methodological approach could support the feasibility assessment of future integrated care solutions and programs. CONCLUSION: Several predictable barriers must be overcome to establish the Centre. Recommendations developed by representatives of relevant stakeholders could support successful implementation and societal value generation. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(45): 1818-1825.

The patient at the centre: evidence from 17 European integrated care programmes for persons with complex needs.

BACKGROUND: As the prevalence of multi-morbidity increases in ageing societies, health and social care systems face the challenge of providing adequate care to persons with complex needs. Approaches that integrate care across sectors and disciplines have been increasingly developed and implemented in European countries in order to tackle this challenge. The aim of the article is to identify success factors and crucial elements in the process of integrated care delivery for persons with complex needs as seen from the practical perspective of the involved stakeholders (patients, professionals, informal caregivers, managers, initiators, payers). METHODS: Seventeen integrated care programmes for persons with complex needs in 8 European countries were investigated using a qualitative approach, namely thick description, based on semi-structured interviews and document analysis. In total, 233 face-to-face interviews were conducted with stakeholders of the programmes between March and September 2016. Meta-analysis of the individual thick description reports was performed with a focus on the process of care delivery. RESULTS: Four categories that emerged from the overarching analysis are discussed in the article: (1) a holistic view of the patient, considering both mental health and the social situation in addition to physical health, (2) continuity of care in the form of single contact points, alignment of services and good relationships between patients and professionals, (3) relationships between professionals built on trust and facilitated by continuous communication, and (4) patient involvement in goal-setting and decision-making, allowing patients to adapt to reorganised service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to identify several key aspects for a well-functioning integrated care process for complex patients and how these are put into actual practice. The article sets itself apart from the existing literature by specifically focussing on the growing share of the population with complex care needs and by providing an analysis of actual processes and interpersonal relationships that shape integrated care in practice, incorporating evidence from a variety of programmes in several countries.

Development of transferability guidance for integrated care models with special focus on Central and Eastern European countries.

AIM: To develop pragmatic recommendations for Central and Eastern European (CEE) policymakers about transferability assessment of integrated care models established in higher income European Union (EU) countries. METHODS: Draft recommendations were developed based on Horizon 2020-funded SELFIE project deliverables related to 17 promising integrated care models for multimorbid patients throughout Europe, as well as on an online survey among CEE stakeholders on the relevance of implementation barriers. Draft recommendations were discussed at the SELFIE transferability workshop and finalized together with 22 experts from 12 CEE countries. RESULTS: Thirteen transferability recommendations are provided in three areas. Feasibility of local implementation covers the identification and prioritization of implementation barriers and proposals for potential solutions. Performance measurement of potentially transferable models focuses on the selection of models with proven benefits and assurance of performance monitoring. Transferability of financing methods for integrated care explores the relevance of financing methodologies and planning of adequate initial and long-term financing. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of international integrated care models cannot be recommended without evidence on its local feasibility or scientifically sound and locally relevant performance assessment in the country of origin. However, if the original financing method is not transferable to the target region, development of a locally relevant alternative financing method can be considered.

Planning, implementation and operation of a personalized patient management system for subjects with first suspect of cancer (OnkoNetwork): system description based on a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: OnkoNetwork is a recently established integrated care model with a personalized pathway system to manage patients with first suspect of a solid tumour in secondary care, that evolved as a regional initiative in Hungary. The primary aim of OnkoNetwork is the improvement of clinical outcomes via timely access to quality assured and defragmented healthcare services. The Horizon 2020 funded SELFIE project has selected OnkoNetwork for in-depth qualitative and quantitative evaluation. The aim of this study was to provide a qualitative evaluation of OnkoNetwork along the six components of the SELFIE conceptual framework: 1) service delivery, 2) leadership and governance, 3) workforce, 4) financing, 5) technologies and medical products, and 6) information and research. METHODS: Analysis of published and grey programme documentation, followed by 20 semi-structured interviews with representatives of programme initiators, general and financial managers, involved physicians and non-physician professionals, patients and their informal caregivers. Transcripts of all interviews were analysed by Mayring's content analysis method by two independent researchers. RESULTS: This study yielded the first comprehensive description of the programme. OnkoNetwork is a blue dahila in Central and Eastern Europe, providing timely and quality-assured healthcare services for the target patients by personalized patient path monitoring and management in a financially sustainable manner without macro-level financing of its operation. Innovative professional roles were implemented for non-physicians and physicians, and a supporting information technology application was developed. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides a systematic description of OnkoNetwork on the six components of the SELFIE conceptual framework for integrated care in multimorbidity to understand how and why OnkoNetwork was implemented and cares (better) for its patients. Because integrated care models are designed and adjusted to their specific local needs and context, those few successful and sustainable models that were established in Central and Eastern European countries represent important benchmarks for other initiatives in this region. Experience with OnkoNetwork during its planning, implementation and operation including the description of key success factors and barriers as perceived by various stakeholder groups, may support the development of further integrated care models especially in countries with similar economic status and healthcare settings.

Defining good health and care from the perspective of persons with multimorbidity: results from a qualitative study of focus groups in eight European countries.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of multimorbidity is increasing in many Western countries. Persons with multimorbidity often experience a lack of alignment in the care that multiple health and social care organisations provide. As a response, integrated care programmes are appearing. It is a challenge to evaluate these and to choose appropriate outcome measures. Focus groups were held with persons with multimorbidity in eight European countries to better understand what good health and a good care process mean to them and to identify what they find most important in each. METHODS: In 2016, eight focus groups were organised with persons with multimorbidity in: Austria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the UK (total n=58). Each focus group followed the same two-part procedure: (1) defining (A) good health and well-being and (B) a good care process, and (2) group discussion on prioritising the most important concepts derived from part one and from a list extracted from the literature. Inductive and deductive analyses were done. RESULTS: Overall, the participants in all focus groups concentrated more on the care process than on health. Persons with multimorbidity defined good health as being able to conduct and plan normal daily activities, having meaningful social relationships and accepting the current situation. Absence of shame, fear and/or stigma, being able to enjoy life and overall psychological well-being were also important facets of good health. Being approached holistically by care professionals was said to be vital to a good care process. Continuity of care and trusting professionals were also described as important. Across countries, little variation in health definitions were found, but variation in defining a good care process was seen. CONCLUSION: A variety of health outcomes that entail well-being, social and psychological facets and especially experience with care outcomes should be included when evaluating integrated care programmes for persons with multimorbidity.

[The patients' cost of the montelukast therapy due to the generic substitution]. / A montelukasztterápia betegterheinek változása a generikus árverseny hatására.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The aim of our study was to analyse the public price of the montelukast sodium therapy in Hungary. METHOD: Data derived from the nationwide pharmaceutical database of the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund Administration. We observed the turnover and price of the medicaments containing the active substance montelukast sodium from 2007 to 2015. Accordingly, our indicators were: consumer price, DCT (daily cost of therapy), co-payment, quasi co-payment, DOT (days of treatment). RESULTS: Due to the increasing DOT, the total amount of the public price paid by the patients increased until 2011, reaching the amount of 1 million USD; then, due to the generic competition and the blind bid methods, it decreased to 490 000 USD. The total amount of the public price of the brand-name Singulair moved to the generics during 3 years (2011-2014). The DCT of the originator Singulair 10 mg tablets decreased from 1.1 USD to 0.34 USD; the DCT of the generic product Montelukast TEVA decreased from 0.67 USD to 0.16 USD in the period under review. CONCLUSION: Due to the generic competition, the patients' access to drugs containing montelukast sodium increased significantly: the DOT increased, the co-payment decreased. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(17): 682-687.

[The effect of generic price competition on drug consumption and health insurance pharmaceutical expenditures in Hungary]. / A generikus árverseny hatása a gyógyszerforgalomra es a társadalombiztosítási támogatás kiáramláisra Magyarországon.

AIM: The aim of our study was to analyze the Hungarian montelukast sodium drug market. We examined the effect of the appearance of generic drugs on the price and turnover of the brand-name drug, Singulair. DATA AND METHODS: Data derived from the nationwide pharmaceutical database of Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund Administration (2007-2014). We analized the turnover and price of the medicaments containing the active substance montelukast sodium. Accordingly our indicators were: consumer price, social insurance subsidy, patients' co-payment and days of treatment (DOT). RESULTS: First the generics started from a significantly lower price of 18 USD which was lower than the price of brand-name Singulair (32 USD). Then the prices of the generics started to diminish. While in 2007 the DOT was below 2 million, it increased over 10 million days by 2014. The increase of DOT was followed by the increase of health insurance subsidy until 2011. Then the amount of health insurance subsidy decreased from 10,5 million USD to 7 million USD in 2012. In 2013 and 2014 there was a further reduction, the amount of the health insurance subsidy decreased to 4,1 million USD in 2013, and in 2014 it was reduced to 2.2 million USD. CONCLUSIONS: Following the introduction of generic drugs, the price of the medicaments containing montelukast sodium was significantly reduced, while the days on treatment (DOT) increased. The patients' access to drugs containing montelukast sodium increased significantly. The annual health insurance subsidy was significantly reduced as well.