Evaluation potential effects of Picroside II on cytochrome P450 enzymes in vitro and in vivo.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY RELEVANCE: Picrorhiza scrophulariiflora Pennell, a well-known Chinese herb, has been traditionally utilized as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent. One of its main bioactive components is Picroside II, a glycoside derivative. However, there is limited information on the effects of Picroside II on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes nor on potential herb-drug interactions are rarely studied. AIM OF THE STUDY: The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of Picroside II on the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes in vitro and in vivo and its potential herb-drug interactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specific probe substrates were employed to assess the effect of Picroside II on the activity of P450 enzymes. The inhibitory effects of Picroside II on CYP enzymes were assayed both in human (i.e., 1A, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A) and rat (i.e., 1A, 2C6/11, 2D1, 2E1, and 3A) liver microsomes in vitro. The inductive effects were investigated in rats following oral gavage of 2.5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg Picroside II. A specific Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed to determine the formation of specific metabolites. RESULTS: Enzyme inhibition results showed that Picroside II (0.5-200 µM) had no evident inhibitory effects on rat and human liver microsomes in vitro. Interestingly, the administration of multiple doses of 10 mg/kg Picroside II inhibited the activity of CYP2C6/11 by reducing the rate of formation of 4-hydroxydiclofenac and 4-hydroxymephenytoin, while Picroside II at 2.5 mg/kg increased the activity of CYP3A by promoting the formation of 1-hydroxymidazolam and 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone in rats. In addition, there were negligible effects on CYP1A, CYP2D1, and CYP2E1 in rats. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that Picroside II modulated the activities of CYP enzymes and was involved in CYP2C and CYP3A medicated herb-drug interactions. Therefore, careful monitoring is necessary when Picroside II is used in combination with related conventional drugs.

Picroside II protects against cholestatic liver injury possibly through activation of farnesoid X receptor.

BACKGROUD: Cholestasis, accompanied by the accumulation of bile acids in body, may ultimately cause liver failure and cirrhosis. There have been limited therapies for cholesteric disorders. Therefore, development of appropriate therapeutic drugs for cholestasis is required. Picroside II is a bioactive component isolated from Picrorhiza scrophulariiflora Pennell, its mechanistic contributions to the anti-cholestasis effect have not been fully elucidated, especially the role of picroside II on bile acid homeostasis via nuclear receptors remains unclear. PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the hepatoprotective effect of picroside II against alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate (ANIT)-induced cholestatic liver injury and elucidate the mechanisms in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: The ANIT-induced cholestatic mouse model was used with or without picroside II treatment. Serum and bile biochemical indicators, as well as liver histopathological changes were examined. siRNA, Dual-luciferase reporter, quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot assay were used to demonstrate the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) pathway in the anti-cholestasis effects of picroside II in vivo and in vitro. RESULTS: Picroside II exerted hepatoprotective effect against ANIT-induced cholestasis by impaired hepatic function and tissue damage. Picroside II increased bile acid efflux transporter bile salt export pump (Bsep), uptake transporter sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (Ntcp), and bile acid metabolizing enzymes sulfate transferase 2a1 (Sult2a1) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1a1 (Ugt1a1), whereas decreased the bile acid synthesis enzymes cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (Cyp7a1) and oxysterol 12α-hydroxylase (Cyp8b1). In addition, expression of FXR and the target gene Bsep was increased, whereas aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), pregnane X receptor (PXR), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) and their corresponding target genes were not significantly influenced by picroside II under cholestatic conditions. Furthermore, regulation of transporters and enzymes involved in bile acid homeostasis by picroside II were abrogated by FXR silencing in mouse primary cultured hepatocytes. Dual-luciferase reporter assay performed in HepG2 cells demonstrated FXR activation by picroside II. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that picroside II exerts protective effect on ANIT-induced cholestasis possibly through FXR activation that regulates the transporters and enzymes involved in bile acid homeostasis. Picroside II might be an effective approach for the prevention and treatment of cholestatic liver diseases.