Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-934603

RESUMO

Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of spine subtle adjusting manipulation for postpartum low back pain (PLBP). Methods: A total of 76 patients with PLBP were randomized into a control group and a treatment group, with 38 cases in each group. The control group was treated with core muscle strengthening exercises, and the treatment group was treated with spine subtle adjusting manipulation. After 3 weeks of treatment, the clinical efficacy was observed, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the changes of lumbar Cobb angle and pelvic rotation were compared between the two groups. Results: The total effective rate of the treatment group was 92.1%, and that of the control group was 78.9%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, the VAS score and ODI in both groups decreased, and the intra-group differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no intra-group statistical differences in the lumbar Cobb angle or pelvic rotation in the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, there were no statistical differences in the lumbar Cobb angle or pelvic rotation between the two groups (P>0.05); the VAS score and ODI in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Spine subtle adjusting manipulation can effectively relieve the pain for patients with PLBP, and improve their daily activity function.

2.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-701907

RESUMO

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of mesalazine oral plus enema or only oral admin-istration in the treatment of ulcerative colitis .Methods 114 patients with ulcerative colitis were selected , and they were randomly divided into the observation group and treatment group according to random number table , with 57 cases in each group .The observation group was given mesalazine oral treatment ,and the treatment group was given mesalazine oral plus enema .The changes of CRP ,Fid,MPV after treatment were compared between the two groups .The situation of mucosa under colonoscopy , effective rate and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results After treatment,the CRP,Fid levels in the treatment group were lower than those in the observation group [(3.17 ±1.48)mg/L vs.(6.14 ±2.53)mg/L,(2.14 ±0.17)g/L vs.(2.91 ±0.27)g/L],the MPV in the treatment group was higher than that in the observation group [(10.93 ±0.59) fL vs.(10.21 ± 1.21)fL],the differences were statistically significant (t=7.650,18.220,4.038,all P<0.05).The total remission rate of the treatment group was higher than that of the observation group (100.00%vs.78.95%) (χ2 =13.412,P<0.001).The total effective rate of treatment group was higher than that of the observation group (89.47% vs .75.44%) (χ2 =3.881,P=0.049).The incidence rate of adverse reactions in the treatment group was lower than that in the observation group (3.51%vs.26.32%) (χ2 =11.683,P=0.001).Conclusion Mesalazine oral plus enema in the treatment of ulcerative colitis has good effect ,minor adverse reactions,high safety,which is worthy of clinical application .

3.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-576235

RESUMO

AIM: To establish a simple and rapid method for the quality control of Chinese traditional medicine. METHODS: Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae,Fructus Psoraleae,Rhizoma Atractylodis macrocephalae and Radix Codonopsis in Wenweishu Tablets were identified by TLC at two thin-layer chromatographic plates.The contents for hesperidin,psoralen and isopsoralen in this preparation were determined simultaneously by HPLC. RESULTS: The methodological study showd that a good linear correlation existed in the range of 0.039 6-0.495 ?g(r=(0.999 99)) of hesperidin,0.018 5-0.231 ?g(r=0.999 98) of psoralen and 0.019 7-0.246 2 ?g(r=0.999 91) of isopsoralen applied respectively.The average recovery of hesperidin was 98.42%(n=9),RSD was 2.69%;The average recovery of psoralen was 98.29%(n=9),RSD was 1.08%.The average recovery of isopsoralen was(98.93%)(n=9),RSD was 2.41%. CONCLUSION: The method is simple、rapid and practicle.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA