RESUMO
Millions of people worldwide are exposed to unacceptable levels of arsenic, a proven human carcinogen, in drinking water. In animal models, arsenic and selenium are mutually protective through formation and biliary excretion of seleno-bis (S-glutathionyl) arsinium ion [(GS)2AsSe]-. Selenium-deficient humans living in arsenic-endemic regions are at increased risk of arsenic-induced diseases, and may benefit from selenium supplementation. The influence of selenium on human arsenic hepatobiliary transport has not been studied using optimal human models. HepaRG cells, a surrogate for primary human hepatocytes, were used to investigate selenium (selenite, selenide, selenomethionine, and methylselenocysteine) effects on arsenic hepatobiliary transport. Arsenite + selenite and arsenite + selenide at different molar ratios revealed mutual toxicity antagonism, with the latter being higher. Significant levels of arsenic biliary excretion were detected with a biliary excretion index (BEI) of 14 ± 8%, which was stimulated to 32 ± 7% by selenide. Consistent with the formation and biliary efflux of [(GS)2AsSe]-, arsenite increased the BEI of selenide from 0% to 24 ± 5%. Arsenic biliary excretion was lost in the presence of selenite, selenomethionine, and methylselenocysteine. Sinusoidal export of arsenic was stimulated â¼1.6-fold by methylselenocysteine, but unchanged by other selenium forms. Arsenic canalicular and sinusoidal transport (±selenide) was temperature- and GSH-dependent and inhibited by MK571. Knockdown experiments revealed that multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2) accounted for all detectable biliary efflux of arsenic (±selenide). Overall, the chemical form of selenium and human MRP2 strongly influenced arsenic hepatobiliary transport, information critical for human selenium supplementation in arsenic-endemic regions.
Assuntos
Arsênio/metabolismo , Hepatócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepatócitos/metabolismo , Proteína 2 Associada à Farmacorresistência Múltipla/metabolismo , Compostos de Selênio/farmacologia , Linhagem Celular , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Técnicas de Silenciamento de Genes , Humanos , Antagonistas de Leucotrienos/farmacologia , Metiltransferases/genética , Metiltransferases/metabolismo , Proteína 2 Associada à Farmacorresistência Múltipla/genética , Proteínas Associadas à Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos/genética , Proteínas Associadas à Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos/metabolismo , Propionatos/farmacologia , Quinolinas/farmacologia , Temperatura , Poluentes Químicos da Água/metabolismoRESUMO
Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are exposed to unacceptable levels of carcinogenic inorganic arsenic. Animal models have shown that selenium and arsenic are mutually protective through the formation and elimination of the seleno-bis(S-glutathionyl) arsinium ion [(GS)2AsSe]-. Consistent with this, human selenium deficiency in arsenic-endemic regions is associated with arsenic-induced disease, leading to the initiation of human selenium supplementation trials. In contrast to the protective effect observed in vivo, in vitro studies have suggested that selenite increases arsenite cellular retention and toxicity. This difference might be explained by the rapid conversion of selenite to selenide in vivo. In the current study, selenite did not protect the human hepatoma (HepG2) cell line against the toxicity of arsenite at equimolar concentrations, however selenide increased the IC50 by 2.3-fold. Cytotoxicity assays of arsenite + selenite and arsenite + selenide at different molar ratios revealed higher overall mutual antagonism of arsenite + selenide toxicity than arsenite + selenite. Despite this protective effect, in comparison to 75Se-selenite, HepG2 cells in suspension were at least 3-fold more efficient at accumulating selenium from reduced 75Se-selenide, and its accumulation was further increased by arsenite. X-ray fluorescence imaging of HepG2 cells also showed that arsenic accumulation, in the presence of selenide, was higher than in the presence of selenite. These results are consistent with a greater intracellular availability of selenide relative to selenite for protection against arsenite, and the formation and retention of a less toxic product, possibly [(GS)2AsSe]-.