Racial-Ethnic Comparison of Guideline-Adherent Gynecologic Cancer Care in an Equal-Access System.

OBJECTIVE: To compare receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline-adherent treatment for gynecologic cancers, inclusive of uterine, cervical, and ovarian cancer, between non-Hispanic White women and racial-ethnic minority women in the equal-access Military Health System. METHODS: We accessed MilCanEpi, which links data from the Department of Defense Central Cancer Registry and Military Health System Data Repository administrative claims data, to identify a cohort of women aged 18-79 years who were diagnosed with uterine, cervical, or ovarian cancer between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2014. Information on tumor stage, grade, and histology was used to determine which treatment(s) (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) was indicated for each patient according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines during the period of the data (1998-2014). We compared non-Hispanic Black, Asian, and Hispanic women with non-Hispanic White women in their likelihood to receive guideline-adherent treatment using multivariable logistic regression models given as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: The study included 3,354 women diagnosed with a gynecologic cancer of whom 68.7% were non-Hispanic White, 15.6% Asian, 9.0% non-Hispanic Black, and 6.7% Hispanic. Overall, 77.8% of patients received guideline-adherent treatment (79.1% non-Hispanic White, 75.9% Asian, 69.3% non-Hispanic Black, and 80.5% Hispanic). Guideline-adherent treatment was similar in Asian compared with non-Hispanic White patients (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 0.84-1.48) or Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic White women (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 0.86-1.96). Non-Hispanic Black patients were marginally less likely to receive guideline-adherent treatment compared with non-Hispanic White women (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.00, P=.011) and significantly less likely to receive guideline-adherent treatment than either Asian (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.97) or Hispanic patients (aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.92). CONCLUSION: Racial-ethnic differences in guideline-adherent care among patients in the equal-access Military Health System suggest factors other than access to care contributed to the observed disparities.

Adjuvant radioactive iodine use among differentiated thyroid cancer patients in the military health system.

OBJECTIVE: Adjuvant radioactive iodine (RAI) for the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer has been associated with better prognosis, but no consensus has been reached on the best practices for RAI. Limited data on RAI use and factors associated with the receipt of postoperative RAI in the general population are available and, to our knowledge, no data on RAI use among the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) beneficiaries. METHODS: Among 3,002 beneficiaries with differentiated thyroid cancer, who underwent total/near-total thyroidectomy between 1998 and 2007, logistic regression identified factors associated with RAI and examined effect modification by age and tumor size. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of patients received RAI. Receipt of RAI was more likely among beneficiaries who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2007, active duty members, had indirect care, and more advanced disease, and less likely among those affiliated with the Air Force or had unknown medical coverage. In addition, receipt of RAI significantly varied by tumor size among patients with regional lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: Among DoD beneficiaries, adjuvant RAI use was associated with clinical and nonclinical factors. Although evidence of effect modification between the recipient of RAI by tumor size was apparent, future research with a larger sample size is warranted to confirm results of this study.