Delayed Repeat Contrast Enema for Treatment of Pediatric Intussusception.

INTRODUCTION: Ileocolic intussusception is a common cause of pediatric bowel obstruction. Contrast enema is successful in treating the majority of patients, and if initially unsuccessful, approximately one-third may be reduced with repeat enemas. We sought to study protocol implementation for delayed repeat enema in pediatric patients not reduced completely by an initial contrast enema. Our aims were to assess repeat enema success rates and outcome differences in preprotocol and postprotocol patients with respect to (1) intussusception recurrence, (2) surgical intervention and complication rates, and (3) length of stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of treatment and clinical outcomes prior to and following protocol implementation for repeat enema for intussusception at two tertiary pediatric referral hospitals. The preprotocol period was defined from 2/2013 to 2/2016, and the postprotocol period was from 8/2016 to 11/2019. RESULTS: There were 112 patients in the preprotocol group, with 74 (66%) having successful reduction following the first enema. Of the 38 patients without successful reduction, 16 (42%) patients underwent repeat enema, and five were successful (31%). The postprotocol group included 122 patients, with 84 (69%) having successful first reduction. Of the 38 patients that failed, 25 patients (66%) underwent repeat enema, of which 13 (52%) were successful. Compared to preprotocol patients, postprotocol patients had significantly more enemas repeated and a trend toward fewer surgical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol implementation of repeat delayed enemas was significantly associated with an increased rate of repeat enemas at our institutions and reduced need for operative intervention during the index stay.

LAHRI: Laparoscopic-Assisted Hydrostatic Reduction of Intussusception.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Intussusception is the most common cause of bowel obstruction in children from 3 months to 3 years of age. In the absence of peritonitis, initial treatment is either hydrostatic or pneumatic reduction. If these measures fail, operative intervention is required. In nonreducible cases, we propose the use of intraoperative hydrostatic enema to achieve or confirm reduction. In this study we describe a cohort of patients who have undergone laparoscopic-assisted hydrostatic reduction of intussusception (LAHRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing LAHRI from the years 2011 to 2013. We performed LAHRI in seven children 4 months to 2 years of age. All patients had ileocolic intussusception that failed initial reduction by radiographic enema. With the patient under general anesthesia, saline enema reduction was facilitated by direct laparoscopic visualization. RESULTS: In 2 of the 7 cases, intussusception reduction was visually confirmed in real time, and only a laparoscopic camera port was required. In 1 patient, the bowel was extensively dilated, requiring mini-laparotomy for visualization. The enema, however, reduced the intussusception without any need for manual reduction. In the remaining 4 cases, minimal laparoscopic manipulation was required after the enema failed to completely reduce the intussusceptum, but enema was used to confirm reduction. No child required bowel resection. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of failed reduction by contrast enema, we have demonstrated LAHRI to be a successful treatment modality. The technique has the advantage of little to no bowel manipulation and has evolved into one performed via a single umbilical port.