[Peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to CUP syndrome : Diagnosis and indications for multimodal treatment]. / Peritonealkarzinose beim CUP­Syndrom : Diagnostik und Indikationsstellung für die multimodale Therapie.

CLINICAL PROBLEM: Peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to cancer of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome is a rare entity for which there are no uniform treatment recommendations or guidelines. The median survival time is 3 months. DIAGNOSIS: Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 18F­FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT are valid imaging modalities for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The sensitivity of all techniques is highest for large, macronodular peritoneal carcinomatosis manifestations. A limitation of all imaging techniques is limited and small-nodular peritoneal carcinomatosis. Also, peritoneal metastasis in the small bowel mesentery or diaphragmatic domes can only be visualized with low sensitivity. Therefore, exploratory laparoscopy should be considered as the next diagnostic step. In half of these cases an unnecessary laparotomy can be avoided, because the laparoscopy revealed diffuse, small-nodule involvement of the small bowel wall and thus an irresectable situation. TREATMENT: In selected patients, performing complete cytoreduction followed by hyperthermic intra-abdominal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a good therapeutic option. Therefore, the identification of the extent of peritoneal tumor manifestation as accurately as possible is important for the definition of the increasingly complex oncological therapy strategies.

[Cost analysis of contrast-enhanced cranial MRI at a German university hospital]. / Kostenanalyse einer kontrastgestützten MRT des Schädels an einem Universitätsklinikum.

PURPOSE: Detailed evaluation and cost analysis of a cranial contrast-enhanced MRI (c-ceMRI) in outpatients, inpatients, patients in an intensive care unit and children under anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on a detailed process-oriented model, we calculated the cost of a cranial MRI for the four situations mentioned above. A comprehensive evaluation of the overhead and personnel costs was performed. RESULTS: We performed 5108 MRI examinations on 2 scanners in the year 2008. 2150 examinations (42 %) were identified as c-ceMRI. For inpatients we calculated a total cost of € 242.46 per examination with a personnel cost of € 81.71 for the radiological department. In outpatients we calculated total costs of € 181.97 with radiological personnel costs of € 68.67. Patients coming from an intensive care unit were treated by an intensive care team, which resulted in total costs of € 416.58 with € 283 in costs for radiological personnel (32.8 %). MRI examinations of children under anesthesia resulted in costs of € 616.79 for the hospital, of which € 285.78 were radiological personnel costs (34.5 %). CONCLUSION: In this study we evaluated for the first time different radiological scenarios of a c-ceMRI at a university hospital. Considering the present reimbursement situation, all outpatients covered by statutory health insurance resulted in a deficit for the hospital. Particularly high costs for patients in intensive care units as well as for children under anesthesia have to be taken into account and are currently not adequately covered by care providers.