Diverticular Inflammation and Complication Assessment classification, CODA score and fecal calprotectin in clinical assessment of patients with diverticular disease: A decision curve analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Diverticular Inflammation and Complication Assessment (DICA) classification and the Combined Overview on Diverticular Assessment (CODA) were found to be effective in predicting the outcomes of Diverticular Disease (DD). We ascertain whether fecal calprotectin (FC) can further aid in improving risk stratification. METHODS: A three-year international, multicentre, prospective cohort study was conducted involving 43 Gastroenterology and Endoscopy centres. Survival methods for censored observations were used to estimate the risk of acute diverticulitis (AD) in newly diagnosed DD patients according to basal FC, DICA, and CODA. The net benefit of management strategies based on DICA, CODA and FC in addition to CODA was assessed with decision curve analysis, which incorporates the harms and benefits of using a prognostic model for clinical decisions. RESULTS: At the first diagnosis of diverticulosis/DD, 871 participants underwent FC measurement. FC was associated with the risk of AD at 3 years (HR per each base 10 logarithm increase: 3.29; 95% confidence interval, 2.13-5.10) and showed moderate discrimination (c-statistic: 0.685; 0.614-0.756). DICA and CODA were more accurate predictors of AD than FC. However, FC showed high discrimination capacity to predict AD at 3 months, which was not maintained at longer follow-up times. The decision curve analysis comparing the combination of FC and CODA with CODA alone did not clearly indicate a larger net benefit of one strategy over the other. CONCLUSIONS: FC measurement could be used as a complementary tool to assess the immediate risk of AD. In all other cases, treatment strategies based on the CODA score alone should be recommended.

Hepatitis B (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving biologic therapy for chronic inflammatory diseases in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Biologic treatment - particularly with the anti-TNF molecules - is frequently used in clinical practice to treat the severe form for both chronic rheumatic diseases and inflammatory bowel diseases. The immunosuppression induced by biologic therapies increases the risk of infections, including tuberculosis, as well as hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation may occur in inactive carriers or occult HBV infection (OBI) subjects during biologic therapy. This study aimed to update data on HBV prevalence and reactivation in patients receiving biologic therapy for either chronic rheumatic diseases or IBD, and to describe their management in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed in 6 Italian centers (3 Rheumatology Units and 3 Gastroenterology Units). Clinical, biochemical and virological data, as well as follow up information, were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: 984 patients were considered, including 817 with rheumatic disease and 167 with IBD. A total of 43 showed HBV infection (38 OBI and 5 carriers) accounting for a prevalence of 4%. Among OBI patients, 1 (2.6%) case of HBV reactivation occurred in a male patient with Crohn disease. Among the 5 HBV carriers, two patients (1 with spondyloarthritis and 1 with rheumatoid arthritis) did not received HBV antiviral therapy, and both experienced flare of hepatitis at 47 and 49 months following biologic therapy starting. DISCUSSION: Data of our study highlight that guidelines on management of HBV patients treated with biologic therapies should be still implemented in clinical practice when considering that, although infrequent, HBV reactivation could be potentially life-threatening.

The "Hub and Spoke" model has no effect on mortality in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: the lack of standardized pathways for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding may have led to differences in their management and inequity to medical care access. The "Hub & Spoke" model was adopted to fill this gap in many disciplines, but, to our knowledge, no data exist on its efficacy on mortality in GI bleeding. We aimed to evaluate if the "Hub & Spoke" organizational model has an impact on mortality risk from UGIB. METHODS: from January 2014 to December 2015, 3324 consecutive patients admitted for UGIB in 50 Italian hospitals were enrolled (1977 patients in hospitals within the "Hub & Spoke" network for digestive hemorrhagic emergency and 1347 in hospitals outside the "Hub & Spoke" network). Clinical, endoscopic and organizational data were recorded. RESULTS: we observed no differences in mortality between patients admitted to hospitals included or not included in the "Hub & Spoke" network (5.2% vs 6.1%, p = 0.3). On multivariate analysis, admission in gastroenterology wards (OR 0.61, p = 0.001) or an academic hospital (OR 0.65, p < 0.056) were independent protective factors while being in "Hub & Spoke" organization system did not affect mortality (OR 1.09, p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: the "Hub & Spoke" model per sé does not impact on mortality while being treated in academic hospital or gastroenterology wards improved survival.

Gastroprotection in patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy: a position paper of National Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO).

Aspirin and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are widely used across the spectrum of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Gastrointestinal complications, including ulcer and bleeding, are relatively common during antiplatelet treatment and, therefore, concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed. However, potential increased risk of cardiovascular events has been suggested for PPIs, and, in recent years, it has been discussed whether these drugs may reduce the cardiovascular protection by aspirin and, even more so, clopidogrel. Indeed, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies suggested an interaction through hepatic CYP2C19 between PPIs and clopidogrel, which could translate into clinical inefficacy, leading to higher rates of cardiovascular events. The FDA and the EMA sent a warning in 2010 discouraging the concomitant use of clopidogrel with omeprazole or esomeprazole. In addition, whether the use of PPIs may affect the clinical efficacy of the new P2Y12 receptor antagonists, ticagrelor and prasugrel, remains less known. According to current guidelines, PPIs in combination with antiplatelet treatment are recommended in patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, including advanced age, concurrent use of anticoagulants, steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Like vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), DOACs can determine gastrointestinal bleeding. Results from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies suggest that high-dose dabigatran (150 mg bid), rivaroxaban and high-dose edoxaban (60 mg daily) are associated with a higher risk of GI bleeding as compared with apixaban and warfarin. In patients taking oral anticoagulant with GI risk factor, PPI could be recommended, even if usefulness of PPIs in these patients deserves further data. Helicobacter pylori should always be searched, and treated, in patients with history of peptic ulcer disease (with or without complication). Given the large number of patients treated with antithrombotic drugs and PPIs, even a minor reduction of platelet inhibition or anticoagulant effect potentially carries a considerable clinical impact. The present joint statement by ANMCO and AIGO summarizes the current knowledge regarding the widespread use of platelet inhibitors, anticoagulants, and PPIs in combination. Moreover, it outlines evidence supporting or opposing drug interactions between these drugs and discusses consequent clinical implications.

Paradigm shift: the Copernican revolution in diverticular disease.

Diverticular disease (DD) is an umbrella definition that includes different clinical conditions ranging from diverticulosis to severe and potentially life-threatening complications. In the last decade, new concepts regarding pathogenetic alterations have been developed, while the diagnostic, clinical and therapeutic approaches to the management of DD patients have changed. The protective role of dietary factors (i.e., fiber) has been questioned, whilst some drugs widely used in clinical practice have been found to have a deleterious effect. The use of antibiotics in all patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis was reconsidered, as well as the need for a surgical approach in these patients. Conflicting recommendations in different guidelines were proposed for the treatment of symptomatic uncomplicated DD. An endoscopic classification of DD was introduced, and a "curative" endoscopic approach has been pioneered. Based on these observations, which together amount to a kind of "Copernican revolution" in the management of DD patients, we performed a comprehensive and critical reappraisal of the proposed modifications, aiming to discriminate between certainties and doubts on this issue.

Integrated gastroenterology and rheumatology ambulatory: an innovative approach for enteropathic spondyloarthritis early diagnosis.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may develop rheumatic diseases, particularly enterophatic spondyloarthritis (ESpA). Similarly, an IBD may develop in patients with SpA. Management of these patients in a dedicated ambulatory could be advantageous. We pioneered an integrated "GastroReumatology" ambulatory where a gastroenterologist and a rheumatologist with a long-lasting expertise in IBD and spondyloarthritis, respectively, simultaneously visit those patients referred for a suspected ESpA. A total of 101 different patients with suspected or known IBD and/or a rheumatic disease were visited. A new diagnosis of ESpA was eventually achieved in 13 (12.9%) patients, and further 12 patients with an already known ESpA were referred for an appropriate management. No cases of IBD in those patients with an established rheumatic disease were observed. Early diagnosis of ESpA is possible in a "GastroReumatology" ambulatory.

Role of MIC levels of resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in Helicobacter pylori eradication.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole significantly affects the cure rate of standard therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection. We tested whether different MIC levels of resistance to these antibiotics play a role in therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of data from a therapeutic trial in which patients with antibiotic susceptibility testing (Etest) received first-line sequential therapy. The level of antibiotic resistance was classified according to MIC values into low (MIC from >0.5 to ≤8 for clarithromycin, and from >8 to ≤32 for metronidazole) and high (MIC from >8 to 256 mg/L for clarithromycin, and from >32 to 256 mg/L for metronidazole). RESULTS: Data from 1006 patients were included. There were 520 (51.7%) patients with susceptible strains, 136 (13.5%) with clarithromycin-resistant strains, 144 (14.3%) with metronidazole-resistant strains and 206 (20.5%) with clarithromycin-resistant and metronidazole-resistant strains. In the presence of double resistance, the cure rate was still high (38/41, 92.7%) when MIC levels were low and it was reduced (94/112, 83.9%) only when MIC levels of both antibiotics were high. The cure rates did not significantly differ between patients with single antibiotic-resistant strains, irrespective of MIC values, and those with susceptible strains. CONCLUSIONS: We found that MIC levels of resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole play a role in H. pylori therapy outcome and that bacterial resistance becomes relevant in vivo when clarithromycin-resistant and metronidazole-resistant strains have high MIC values for at least one of these antibiotics.

Antibiotic resistance pattern of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated in Italy during 2010-2016.

PURPOSE: Bacterial resistance toward the most used antibiotics is increasing in Helicobacter pylori strains worldwide. Emergence of multidrug resistance significantly affects the efficacy of standard therapy regimens. Therefore, monitoring for primary antimicrobial resistance is essential for H. pylori management in clinical practice. METHODOLOGY: H. pylori isolates obtained from patients consecutively observed in a single center were tested for primary resistance by using E-test method. Bacterial strains showing MIC values >0.5, >8 and >1 mg/L toward clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin, respectively, were considered resistant. The trend of antibiotic prevalence, either single or combined, during 2010-2016 was assessed. RESULTS: Antibiotic susceptibility data were available in 1424 (82.3%) out of 1730 tested patients. The overall resistance for all the three antibiotics showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2013 (clarithromycin: from 19% to 35.6%; metronidazole: from 33.6% to 45.3%; levofloxacin: from 19% to 29.7%; p < .001), when a plateau until 2016 was observed (clarithromycin: 35.9%; metronidazole: 40.2%; levofloxacin: 29.3%). A similar trend occurred for clarithromycin-metronidazole combined resistance rate (2010: 11.4%; 2013: 28.2%; 2016: 21.9%). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that prevalence of primary resistance in H. pylori isolates toward the most frequently used antibiotics probably reached a plateau in the last years.

Pylera and sequential therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a culture-based study in real clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Italian guideline suggests 10-day sequential or bismuth-based quadruple therapies for first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment. Comparison between these regimens is lacking. We assessed the efficacy of these therapies in clinical practice and evaluated the role of primary bacterial resistance toward clarithromycin and metronidazole. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled. Bacterial culture with antibiotics susceptibility testing was attempted in all cases. Patients received either a sequential therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg for 10 days plus amoxicillin 1000 mg for the first 5 days followed by clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg (all twice daily) for the remaining 5 days, or bismuth-based therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily and Pylera 3 tablets four times daily for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by using C-urea breath test. RESULTS: A total of 495 patients were enrolled. Following sequential (250 patients) and quadruple (245 patients) therapies, the eradication rate were 92 and 91%, respectively, at intention-to-treat analysis and 96 and 97%, respectively, at per protocol analysis. Overall, the pattern of bacterial resistance did not significantly affect the cure rate, but the presence of clarithromycin and metronidazole dual resistance tended to reduce the success rate of both sequential (84.8 vs. 90.1%; P=0.4) and quadruple (85 vs. 94.1%; P=0.06) therapies. Adverse events occurred more frequently with the quadruple than with sequential therapy (56.9 vs. 25.8%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In our country, sequential and bismuth-based quadruple therapy achieved similarly high eradication rates as first-line treatments for H. pylori infection in clinical practice.

Rifabutin Triple Therapy is Effective in Patients With Multidrug-resistant Strains of Helicobacter pylori.

INTRODUCTION: Eradicating Helicobacter pylori continues to be a challenge, and no treatment regimen is uniformly successful in all treated patients. Triple therapy with rifabutin and amoxicillin is a successful rescue therapy after consecutive treatment failures. We designed this study to test the efficacy of 12-day rifabutin-based triple therapy in patients infected with multidrug-resistant strains. METHODS: Consecutive patients with dyspeptic symptoms after at least 1 antibiotic therapy course for H. pylori infection harboring triple-resistant (clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin) strains were enrolled. They received triple therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid, and rifabutin 150 mg od for 12 days. Patients who failed rifabutin therapy were treated empirically on the basis of the judgment of the treating physician. RESULTS: A total of 254 out of 756 tested patients were found to be infected with a triple-resistant H. pylori strains after at least 1 antibiotic therapy course. Overall, the infection was eradicated in 213 patients, corresponding to a cure rate of 82.9% (95% CI, 78.3-87.5) by intention-to-treat analysis and 88.7% (95% CI, 84.7-92.7) at per-protocol analysis. In multivariate analysis, no factor was identified as an independent predictor of bacterial eradication. CONCLUSIONS: There is no current standard for the growing population of patients with multidrug-resistant strains of H. pylori. The 12-day low-dose rifabutin/high-dose proton pump inhibitor regimen is a safe and reliable option for patients infected with triple-resistant strains.

New onset or worsening of psoriasis following biologic therapy: A case series.

Biologic therapies may cause so-called "paradoxical side-effects," that is, the onset or exacerbation of new symptoms/diseases for which biological treatment should be effective. Among these, psoriatic skin lesions have been described. We report a case series of ten patients with either new onset (seven cases) or worsening (three cases) of psoriasis occurring during a biologic therapy. Six patients were receiving a biologic monotherapy, while four patients were in combination treatment with methotrexate (MTX). Psoriasis remission was observed in two patients who discontinued biologic therapy. In the six patients in whom biologic therapy was not discontinued, a complete disappearance or a partial improvement of skin lesions was achieved following topic steroid therapy in two patients and three patients, respectively. In the remaining patient, psoriasis developed during Adalimumab monotherapy, which completely disappeared when the Infliximab and MTX combination was started. The potential pathogenetic mechanisms were shortly reviewed.

Two-week Triple Therapy with either Standard or High-dose Esomeprazole for First-line H. pylori Eradication.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The updated Italian guidelines advise a standard 14-day triple therapy for first-line H. pylori eradication. This prospective study evaluated the cure rate following a 14-day triple therapy with either a standard or double-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI). METHODS: A total of 145 consecutive patients with H. pylori infection were randomized to receive a 14-day, first-line triple therapy with clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1 g and esomeprazole at either 20 mg (standard therapy) or 40 mg (double-dose therapy), each given twice daily. RESULTS: At intention-to-treat analysis, H. pylori infection was cured in 73.9% (95% CI: 63.9-84) and 81.9% (95% CI: 73-90.8) following standard and double-dose therapy, respectively, and in 78.2% (95% CI: 68.5-87.9) and 85.5% (95% CI: 77.2-93.8) at per-protocol analysis. No statistically significant difference occurred. Overall, 16.4% and 19.4% patients in the standard and double-dose therapy regimen complained of side effects. CONCLUSION: The success rate of both standard and double-dose 14-day triple therapies for first-line H. pylori treatment was unsatisfactory. A prolonged 14-day levofloxacin-based triple therapy for second-line H. pylori eradication seems to be promising.

Vitamin D deficiency in patients with either rheumatic diseases or inflammatory bowel diseases on biologic therapy.

Vitamin D deficiency has been reported in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatic and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We evaluated the role of biologic therapy on vitamin D, calcium and parathormone (PTH) levels. This cross-sectional study enrolled consecutive patients with either rheumatic diseases or IBD who underwent an ambulatory visit. Patients receiving vitamin D/calcium supplementation were excluded. Vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency was diagnosed when values were <20 ng/mL and 21-29 ng/ml, respectively. Patients were sub-grouped according to biologic therapy. A multivariate analysis was performed. Two-hundred patients, including 136 with a rheumatic disease (M/F 37/99; mean age 60.7 ± 12.9 years) and 64 with IBD (M/F 41/23; Mean age 49.6 ± 13.1 years) were enrolled. Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency was detected in as many as 63.5 % patients, being 61.8 and 67.2 % in patients with either rheumatic diseases or IBD, respectively. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency was higher in those receiving biologics than other therapies (78.3 vs 43.2 %; p < 0.0001), in either rheumatic diseases (78.7 vs 41 %; p < 0.0001) or IBD (75 vs 50 %; p = 0.03) group. At multivariate analysis, only biologic therapy was independently associated with vitamin D deficit (OR 4.61; p = 0.001). Patients with vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency had hypocalcemia more frequently than controls (22.8 vs 10.9 %; p = 0.03), while PTH values did not differ significantly. This study finds that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency was very high in patients with either rheumatic diseases or IBD receiving a biologic therapy.

Culture-based selection therapy for patients who did not respond to previous treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori using empiric therapy has become difficult as a result of increasing resistance to antibiotics. We evaluated the efficacy of specific treatments, selected based on response of bacterial samples to culture with clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole, for patients infected with resistant strains of H pylori. METHODS: We performed a prospective study at a single center of 236 consecutive patients with persistent H pylori infection, despite 1 or more treatment attempts, and documented resistance to at least 1 antimicrobial agent (based on bacterial culture tests). Biopsy samples were collected by endoscopy and cultured in selective media. Patients received either 10 days of levofloxacin (250 mg twice daily for 131 patients with susceptible infections) or 12 days of rifabutin (150 mg once daily for 105 patients resistant to levofloxacin) in combination with amoxicillin (1 g twice daily) and esomeprazole (40 mg twice daily). Efficacy of eradication was determined by the (13)C-urea breath test, 6 to 8 weeks after therapy. Compliance and side effects were determined via personal interviews at the end of therapy. Rifabutin toxicity was monitored by analysis of blood samples. RESULTS: H pylori infection was cured in 118 of the patients who received levofloxacin triple therapy (90%; 95% confidence interval, 85%-95%) and 93 of the patients who received rifabutin triple therapy (88.6%; 95% confidence interval, 82%-95%). In each group, the cure rate did not differ significantly between patients infected with H pylori strains resistant to single or multiple antibiotics. Mild side effects occurred in 15.5% and 14.9% of patients resistant to single or multiple antibiotics, respectively, and self-limiting neutropenia was observed in 1 (0.7%) case. CONCLUSIONS: Selection of triple therapy with either levofloxacin or rifabutin, based on results from bacterial culture tests, cures H pylori infection in about 90% who did not previously respond to antibiotics.

Second-line and rescue therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A levofloxacin-based triple therapy and a rifabutin-based regimen are advised as second-line and rescue therapies in the current Italian guidelines for H. pylori eradication. However, no data are available for the efficacy of these treatments in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 86 consecutive patients who failed a standard, first-line, triple therapy for H. pylori infection were treated with a 10-day triple therapy including omeprazole 20 mg, amoxycillin 1 g, and levofloxacin 250 mg or 500 mg, each given twice daily. Eradication failure patients received a 10-day rescue therapy with omeprazole 20 mg, amoxycillin 1 g, and rifabutin 150 mg, each given twice daily. A further therapeutic attempt was performed with a 14-day, high-dose dual therapy (esomeprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g, each thrice daily). RESULTS: Following the second-line therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 76.4% (95% CI = 67.8-85.0) and 79.5% (95% CI = 70.8-88.2) at intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. After the rescue therapy, bacterial eradication was achieved in 84.6% (95% CI = 65-100). Two patients with persistent infection were successfully cured with the high-dose dual therapy. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of levofloxacin-based second-line therapy seems to be decreasing, whilst rescue therapy with rifabutin would appear a valid third-line therapy, and a high-dose dual therapy may be used as a further rescue therapy.

Phenotypic and genotypic Helicobacter pylori clarithromycin resistance and therapeutic outcome: benefits and limits.

INTRODUCTION: Primary clarithromycin resistance is increasing worldwide, and it has been regarded as the main factor reducing the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori therapy. However, the clinical consequence of either phenotypic or genotypic resistance still remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate: (i) the concordance between phenotypic (culture) and genotypic (real-time PCR) tests in assessing primary clarithromycin resistance; and (ii) the role of both in therapeutic outcome. METHODS: A post hoc subgroup study was selected from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling 146 patients with dyspepsia or peptic ulcers never previously treated. Real-time PCR and Etest on bacterial culture for assessing clarithromycin resistance were performed. [(13)C]urea breath test (UBT), histology and rapid urease tests at entry and UBT after 4-8 weeks were used to assess infection and eradication. All patients received a 10 day therapy. RESULTS: Prevalence of clarithromycin phenotypic resistance was significantly lower as compared with genotypic resistance (18.4% versus 37.6%, P < 0.001). A concordance between the two methods was present in 71.2% of cases. A significant difference in the eradication rate was seen between clarithromycin-susceptible and -resistant strains, when assessed with either Etest (92.4% versus 55.5%, P < 0.001) or a PCR-based method (94.5% versus 70.9%; P < 0.001). Of note, the eradication rate showed the lowest value (30.7%) when phenotypic bacterial resistance was genetically linked to the A2143G point mutation. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that: (i) there is a relevant discordance between the two methods; and (ii) phenotypic clarithromycin resistance markedly reduces H. pylori eradication when it is linked to a specific point mutation.

Treatment of low-grade gastric MALT-lymphoma unresponsive to Helicobacter pylori therapy: a pooled-data analysis.

The most favourable therapeutic strategy for gastric MALT-lymphoma not responding to Helicobacter pylori eradication still remains unclear, neither official guidelines nor randomised studies being available. We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches in these patients. Data regarding 315 patients were valuable, and lymphoma remission following the first therapeutic attempt was achieved in 90.1% cases. The most used therapy was radiotherapy (112 patients), followed by surgery (80 patients) and chemotherapy (68 patients), whilst a combination therapy was less frequent. Radiotherapy achieved a higher remission rate as compared to chemotherapy (97.3 vs. 85.3%; P = 0.007), being similar to surgery (97.3 vs. 92.5%; P = 0.2). No difference emerged when comparing lymphoma remission rate achieved by a single therapy with that of combined treatments (89.6 vs. 96.4%; P = 0.6). This is the first pooled-data analysis assessing the efficacy of different oncologic therapeutic approaches to treat gastric MALT-lymphoma unresponsive to H. pylori eradication. Radiotherapy seems to be the most suitable treatment in these patients.

Value-of-information analysis to guide future research in colorectal cancer screening.

PURPOSE: To identify the most useful areas for research in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by using a value-of-information analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies, including colonoscopy, computed tomographic (CT) colonography, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema examination, were compared by using a Markov model. Monetary net benefit (NB), a measure of cost-effectiveness, was calculated by multiplying effect (life-years gained) by willingness to pay (100,000 dollars per life-year gained) and subtracting cost. A value-of-information analysis was used to estimate the expected benefit of future research that would eliminate the decision uncertainty. RESULTS: In the reference-case analysis, colonoscopy was the optimal test with the highest NB (1945 dollars per subject invited for screening compared with 1862 dollars, 1717 dollars, and 1653 dollars for CT colonography, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema examination, respectively). Results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that colonoscopy was the optimal choice in only 45% of the simulated scenarios, whereas CT colonography, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema examination were the optimal strategies in 23%, 16%, and 15% of the scenarios, respectively. Only two parameters were responsible for most of this uncertainty about the optimal test for CRC screening: the increase in adherence with less invasive tests and CRC natural history. The expected societal monetary benefit of further research in these areas was estimated to be more than 15 billion dollars. CONCLUSION: Results of value-of-information analysis show that future research on the optimal test for CRC screening has a large societal impact. Priority should be given to research on the increase in adherence with screening by using less invasive tests and to better understanding of the natural history of CRC.

Computed tomography enteroclysis in comparison with ileoscopy in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Enteroclysis and computed tomography (CT) have been recently combined in to assess small bowel alterations. We compared the accuracy of CT enteroclysis to that of endoscopy in detecting bowel wall alterations of the terminal or neoterminal ileum in Crohn's disease (CD) patients and assessed whether postcontrast wall density is related to clinical activity of CD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 39 patients referred for either established or suspected CD were enrolled. Diagnosis used ileocolonoscopy with histology; clinical activity was measured by CDAI. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the abdomen was performed after distension of the small bowel with an enema of methylcellulose. Retrograde ileocolonoscopy diagnosed 30 patients with CD of the ileum, while 9 patients served as controls. RESULTS: CT enteroclysis detected CD in 26 patients (86.7%) and in none of the control group. Three of four patients with false-negative findings on CT enteroclysis had postsurgical CD recurrence. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT enteroclysis for ileal CD detection were 86.7% and 100%, respectively (PPV=100%; NPV=69.2%), and 94.1% and 100% (PPV=100%; NPV=90%), excluding those patients with postsurgical recurrence. The postcontrast wall density was significantly higher in CD patients than in the controls and was significantly correlated with the severity of CD. CONCLUSION: CT enteroclysis proved highly accurate in detecting terminal ileal CD involvement, particularly in patients without previous surgery, and to allow assessment of the degree of intramural and clinical activity.