A phase I trial of deep brain stimulation of memory circuits in Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by functional impairment in the neural elements and circuits underlying cognitive and memory functions. We hypothesized that fornix/hypothalamus deep brain stimulation (DBS) could modulate neurophysiological activity in these pathological circuits and possibly produce clinical benefits. METHODS: We conducted a phase I trial in 6 patients with mild AD receiving ongoing medication treatment. Patients received continuous stimulation for 12 months. Three main lines of investigation were pursued including: (1) mapping the brain areas whose physiological function was modulated by stimulation using standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography, (2) assessing whether DBS could correct the regional alterations in cerebral glucose metabolism in AD using positron emission tomography (PET), and 3) measuring the effects of DBS on cognitive function over time using clinical scales and instruments. RESULTS: DBS drove neural activity in the memory circuit, including the entorhinal, and hippocampal areas and activated the brain's default mode network. PET scans showed an early and striking reversal of the impaired glucose utilization in the temporal and parietal lobes that was maintained after 12 months of continuous stimulation. Evaluation of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale and the Mini Mental State Examination suggested possible improvements and/or slowing in the rate of cognitive decline at 6 and 12 months in some patients. There were no serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: There is an urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches for AD. Modulating pathological brain activity in this illness with DBS merits further investigation.

Memory enhancement induced by hypothalamic/fornix deep brain stimulation.

Bilateral hypothalamic deep brain stimulation was performed to treat a patient with morbid obesity. We observed, quite unexpectedly, that stimulation evoked detailed autobiographical memories. Associative memory tasks conducted in a double-blinded "on" versus "off" manner demonstrated that stimulation increased recollection but not familiarity-based recognition, indicating a functional engagement of the hippocampus. Electroencephalographic source localization showed that hypothalamic deep brain stimulation drove activity in mesial temporal lobe structures. This shows that hypothalamic stimulation in this patient modulates limbic activity and improves certain memory functions.

Mesial temporal inhibition in a patient with deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus for epilepsy.

We investigated the electrophysiological effects of high-frequency anterior thalamic deep brain stimulation using intracerebral mesial and lateral temporal depth electrodes in a patient with intractable focal epilepsy. Monopolar and bipolar stimulation delivered to the thalamic anterior nucleus using the programmable ITREL II stimulation device led to a significant decrease of cross power spectral density and a nonsignificant decrease of coherence in ipsilateral hippocampal structures. No such effect was found in lateral temporal or contralateral sites. The hippocampal inhibition was clearly related to the voltage (> or =7 V) and frequency (> or =70 Hz) of the thalamic stimulus and occurred with a delay of approximately 60 s after stimulus onset.

Rhythmic cortical EEG synchronization with low frequency stimulation of the anterior and medial thalamus for epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the neurophysiological characteristics and prognostic impact of EEG synchronization with low frequency thalamic stimulation in patients with intractable epilepsy. METHODS: Electrical stimuli were delivered through deep brain stimulating (DBS) electrodes at 2, 5 or 10Hz to the anterior nucleus (AN) and the dorsomedial nucleus (DM) of six patients using the implanted programmable stimulation device. EEGs were recorded from 27 scalp electrodes. "Modeled" responses for 5 and 10Hz stimulation were computed based on the cerebral responses (CRs) evoked by "single pulse" (2Hz) stimulation and compared with the recorded EEG results. RESULTS: Rhythmic cortical 5Hz EEG synchronization occurred in 4/6 patients, with stimulation at 6/11 AN and 5/11 DM sites. Three of four patients with synchronization, but neither of the two patients without, had a significant reduction in seizure frequency. The magnitude of 5 and 10Hz EEG synchronization was positively related to the amplitudes of "single pulse" CRs. Simple temporal superposition of "single pulse" CRs resulted in "modeled" responses with strikingly similar morphology and scalp voltage distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Rhythmic EEG synchronization with low frequency stimulation primarily reflects spatiotemporal summation (interference) of "single pulse" CRs. SIGNIFICANCE: Rhythmic EEG synchronization might not serve as a physiologic verification of optimal localization of DBS electrodes. Its usefulness for the prediction of clinical efficacy is questionable.

Cortical activation with deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus for epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: We studied the relation between thalamic stimulation parameters and the morphology, topographic distribution and cortical sources of the cerebral responses in patients with intractable epilepsy undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus. METHODS: Bipolar and monopolar stimuli were delivered at a rate of 2 Hz to the anterior (AN, four patients), the dorsomedian (DM, four patients), and the centromedian nucleus (CM, one patient) using the programmable stimulation device (Medtronic ITREL II). Source modeling was carried out by using statistical non-parametric mapping of low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) values. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated reproducible time-locked cortical responses (CRs) consisting of a sequence of components with latencies between 20 and 320 ms. The morphology of these CRs, however, was very heterogeneous, depending primarily on the site of stimulation. Following AN stimulation, cortical activation was most prominent in ipsilateral cingulate gyrus, insular cortex and lateral neocortical temporal structures. Stimulation of the DM mainly showed activation of the ipsilateral orbitofrontal and mesial and lateral frontal areas, but also involvement of mesial temporal structures. Stimulation of the CM showed a rather diffuse (though still mainly ipsilateral) increase of cortical activity. The magnitude of cortical activation was positively related to the strength of the stimulus and inversely related to the impedance of the electrode. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of cortical activation corresponded with the hodology of the involved structures and may underscore the importance of optimal localization of DBS electrodes in patients with epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: The method of analyzing sources of CRs could potentially be a useful tool for titration of DBS parameters in patients with electrode contacts in clinically silent areas. Furthermore, the inverse relation of the cortical activation and the impedance of the electrode contacts might suggest that these impedance measurements should be taken into consideration when adjusting DBS parameters in patients with epilepsy.