Minilaparoscopic ovarian drilling under local anesthesia in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess pain control in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who are undergoing ovarian drilling during minilaparoscopy under local anesthesia and conscious sedation and to evaluate the efficacy of this protocol compared with the traditional approach in terms of operative and discharge times, subsequent ovulation, and pregnancy. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: University hospitals and private day-surgery unit. PATIENT(S): Sixty-two infertile women with PCOS. INTERVENTION(S): Group A underwent minilaparoscopic ovarian drilling under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Group B (control group) was treated with traditional ovarian drilling by laparoscopy under general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative pain score in group A. Hormonal profile before and after surgery, operative and discharge times, postoperative analgesic requirements, and reproductive follow-up in both groups. RESULT(S): Group A showed a good intraoperative pain score. The hormonal profile after surgery did not differ between groups A and B. Operative times were also similar for both groups. The number of patients discharged within 2 hours after surgery was significantly higher in group A. The need for postoperative analgesics was significantly higher in group B. No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups in terms of pregnancy and ovulation rates. CONCLUSION(S): Intraoperative and postoperative local anesthesia plus conscious sedation allows outpatient bilateral ovarian drilling by minilaparoscopy to be performed without general anesthesia. The high pregnancy rates, the simplicity of the method, and the faster discharge time offer a new option for patients with PCOS who are resistant to clomiphene citrate. Moreover, ovarian cauterization can be performed simultaneously with a diagnostic minilaparoscopy and integrated into the infertility workup of these patients.

Is local anesthesia an affordable alternative to general anesthesia for minilaparoscopy?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if minilaparoscopy under local anesthesia is at least as reliable and affordable as that performed under general anesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-four consecutive women evaluated for infertility. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic minilaparoscopy performed after women were randomized to receive general or local anesthesia with conscious sedation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Levels of postoperative pain measured by visual analog scale; volume of CO(2) used; length of procedure, complete pelvic evaluation, and hospitalization; complications; and pathologic diagnosis were evaluated. The groups were comparable in age, years of infertility, and symptoms. For women receiving local anesthesia, 5.5% required general anesthesia to complete the procedure. Women in both groups required postoperative analgesics. The groups had no statistically significant differences in pain level 1 hour after the procedure, number of complications, and pelvic pathology. Patients who had local anesthesia required a smaller volume of CO(2) (p <0.01) and their hospitalization was significantly shorter (p <0.01). However, in 15% of these women pelvic visualization was incomplete, compared with 7.2% in the general anesthesia group. CONCLUSION: Minilaparoscopy performed under local anesthesia was as reliable and affordable as when performed under general anesthesia.

Pain mapping during minilaparoscopy in infertile patients without pathology.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To draw a map of pelvic pain and quantify the level of provoked pain during minilaparoscopy under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. DESIGN: Observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty infertile women. INTERVENTIONS: Minilaparoscopy was performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation, and cognitive performance was evaluated with the Rey auditory verbal learning task. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The diagnostic procedure was performed with one 2-mm micrograsper and one 2-mm microprobe to evaluate the pelvis. In particular we grasped utero-ovarian ligaments; we touched, grasped, and distended fallopian tubes with blue dye; we moved the uterus with a manipulator inserted at the cervix; and we touched and grasped bowel and omentum. Level of pain was recorded on a visual analog scale. Patients had no pathologic findings, including minimal endometriosis and pelvic adhesions. The highest level of pain was recorded when we distended the tubes. No pain was elicited when we touched and grasped ovary, omentum, and bowel. In 10% of women when we stretched the tubo-ovarian ligament we provoked a minimal vagal reaction. CONCLUSION: Minilaparoscopy under conscious sedation for pelvic pain mapping in women without pain or pathology revealed consistently negative findings, validating the value of this measurement. (J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6(1):51-54, 1999)

A prospective randomized study to evaluate leuprolide acetate treatment before laparoscopic myomectomy: efficacy and ultrasonographic predictors.

OBJECTIVE: Aims of our study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the preoperative administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog before laparoscopic myomectomy and (2) to assess whether any ultrasonographic parameter of the fibroids (number, size, Doppler velocimetry, or echogenicity) was of prognostic value. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized study was performed on 67 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids that were mainly intramural; these patients were undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy. Patients were randomized either to preoperative administration of two injections of a depot formulation of leuprolide acetate 28 days apart (group A, n = 35) or to direct surgery (group B, n = 32). In each group we studied the number, volume, and echogenicity of the larger fibroids; the resistance index of uterine arteries and of fibroid vessels; hematologic parameters; operative time; and blood loss. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly in basal ultrasonographic parameters and hematologic data. Postoperatively, the red blood cell count and the serum hemoglobin and iron levels were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in group B. Both blood loss (p < 0.01) and operative time (p < 0.05) were significantly lower in group A. However, the operative time was significantly longer when the main fibroid was markedly hypoechoic, probably because the increased softness of the tumor after leuprolide acetate pretreatment makes its enucleation much more cumbersome. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the therapeutic efficacy of preoperative administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog before laparoscopic myomectomy in reducing the blood loss and in decreasing the operative time. This preoperative course of leuprolide acetate in hypoechoic fibroids, because of the further reduction of the density of the myomas, causes a significant (p < 0.05) increase in operative time.

The use of topical anesthesia in diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To show that intrauterine anesthesia is a reliable method for reducing pain associated with endocavitary procedures. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy. PATIENTS: Forty-five patients undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy (n = 27) or hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy (n = 18). INTERVENTIONS: Five milliliters of 2% mepivacaine or saline solution were injected transcervically into the uterine cavity before performing the procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of pain reduction on a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Pain expectation and pain reported were reduced during and after the procedures. CONCLUSION: Topical anesthesia effectively reduces pain during hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy.

The use of topical anesthesia in diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the pain and discomfort of routine hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy to diagnose infertility and endometrial pathology can be minimized by topical application of mepivacaine. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at a teaching hospital in Rome, Italy. PATIENTS: Eighteen women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy were performed after transcervical injection of 5 ml 2% mepivacaine or 5 ml saline solution into the uterine cavity. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Difficulty introducing the hysteroscope was rated by the operator on a scale of 1 to 3. An observer scored visible signs of each woman's distress using a three-point scale. The patients reported their pain 15, 30, 60, 120 minutes after the procedure on a visual analog scale. Mepivacaine was more effective than placebo according to all measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Topical mepivacaine reduced the pain experienced during and after hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy.