Impact of a centralized osteoporosis coordinator on post-fracture osteoporosis management: a cluster randomized trial.

UNLABELLED: We conducted a cluster randomized trial evaluating the effect of a centralized coordinator who identifies and follows up with fracture patients and their primary care physicians about osteoporosis. Compared with controls, intervention patients were five times more likely to receive BMD testing and two times more likely to receive appropriate management. INTRODUCTION: To determine if a centralized coordinator who follows up with fracture patients and their primary care physicians by telephone and mail (intervention) will increase the proportion of patients who receive appropriate post-fracture osteoporosis management, compared to simple fall prevention advice (attention control). METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in small community hospitals in the province of Ontario, Canada. Hospitals that treated between 60 and 340 fracture patients per year were eligible. Patients 40 years and older presenting with a low trauma fracture were identified from Emergency Department records and enrolled in the trial. The primary outcome was 'appropriate' management, defined as a normal bone mineral density (BMD) test or taking osteoporosis medications. RESULTS: Thirty-six hospitals were randomized to either intervention or control and 130 intervention and 137 control subjects completed the study. The mean age of participants was 65 ± 12 years and 69% were female. The intervention increased the proportion of patients who received appropriate management within 6 months of fracture; 45% in the intervention group compared with 26% in the control group (absolute difference of 19%; adjusted OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.1). The proportion who had a BMD test scheduled or performed was much higher with 57% of intervention patients compared with 21% of controls (absolute difference of 36%; adjusted OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 3.0-7.0). CONCLUSIONS: A centralized osteoporosis coordinator is effective in improving the quality of osteoporosis care in smaller communities that do not have on-site coordinators or direct access to osteoporosis specialists.

Underrecognition and undertreatment of asthma in Cape Town primary school children.

BACKGROUND: In view of the high local prevalence of asthma, the extent of recognition and appropriate management of childhood asthma was studied in a large suburban area of Cape Town. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study based on random community sample of schools. METHOD: 1,955 parents of sub B pupils from 16 schools completed a questionnaire, followed by: (i) an interview of the parents of 348 symptomatic children; and (ii) bronchial responsiveness testing on 254 children. The final case group consisted of 242 children with reported asthma or multiple asthma symptoms on both questionnaires. Children in whom asthma was acknowledged were compared with those in whom it was not. RESULTS: Overall, any past or current ('ever') asthma was acknowledged by respondents in only 53% of the children, and current asthma in only 37.1%. While most children had received treatment in the previous 12 months, 66.1% of the recognised group were on current treatment (23.2% on daily treatment), compared with 37% of the unrecognised group (3% daily). Salbutamol and theophylline syrups were the most common types of medication, while inhalers and anti-inflammatory medications were underused. Only a minority of parents reported the child ever having used a peak flow meter, or volunteered knowledge of preventive measures. Current treatment, and to a lesser degree recognition of asthma by parents, were more common among children on medical aid and of higher socio-economic status. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ways need to be found: (i) to increase the use of current asthma treatment guidelines by practitioners; (ii) to provide access to comprehensive care by children not on medical aid; and (iii) to improve education of parents in home management measures such as severity assessment and avoidance of smoking, allergen and dietary triggers.

Attitudes of private general practitioners towards health care in South Africa.

The need for health care reform in South Africa is acknowledged by the government as well as by the non-governmental health sector. There is, however, no unanimity regarding the nature of the envisaged reform. A country-wide postal survey of 700 private sector general practitioners (GPs) from a commercial database of 5,000 was conducted to explore attitudes towards health care. A response rate of 67.4% was obtained. Respondents were mostly male (92%) and urban-based (64%). The median age was 42 years. Most respondents: (i) believed health care to be a right for all citizens; (ii) favoured private or a combination of private and public funding mechanisms with fee-for-service arrangements; (iii) opposed cost-containment measures imposed by funders, e.g. medical aids; and (iv) believed doctors should be responsible for primary care in under-served areas. After sex, age, location (urban versus rural) and GP postgraduate qualification had been controlled for by means of logistic regression techniques, the university at which a respondent's basic degree was obtained emerged as the only independent predictor of attitudes to the following: (i) comprehensive care as a right; (ii) integration of the public and private sectors; (iii) preferred funding source for a future health system; and (iv) preference for fee-for-service remuneration. Both university and gender independently predicted attitudes on GPs' income. Graduates of white, Afrikaans-medium universities were strongly in favour of a privately funded and fee-for-service orientated system. Those who qualified at black universities, on the other hand, favoured public funding with less emphasison fee-for-service.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)