Development and evaluation of a sublingual tablet based on recombinant Bet v 1 in birch pollen-allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) applied to type I respiratory allergies is commonly performed with natural allergen extracts. Herein, we developed a sublingual tablet made of pharmaceutical-grade recombinant Bet v 1.0101 (rBet v 1) and investigated its clinical safety and efficacy in birch pollen (BP)-allergic patients. METHODS: Following expression in Escherichia coli and purification, rBet v 1 was characterized using chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, circular dichroism, mass spectrometry and crystallography. Safety and efficacy of rBet v 1 formulated as a sublingual tablet were assessed in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in 483 patients with BP-induced rhinoconjunctivitis. RESULTS: In-depth characterization confirmed the intact product structure and high purity of GMP-grade rBet v 1. The crystal structure resolved at 1.2 Å documented the natural conformation of the molecule. Native or oxidized forms of rBet v 1 did not induce the production of any proinflammatory cytokine by blood dendritic cells or mononuclear cells. Bet v 1 tablets were well tolerated by patients, consistent with the known safety profile of SLIT. The average adjusted symptom scores were significantly decreased relative to placebo in patients receiving once daily for 5 months rBet v 1 tablets, with a mean difference of 17.0-17.7% relative to the group treated with placebo (P < 0.025), without any influence of the dose in the range (12.5-50 µg) tested. CONCLUSION: Recombinant Bet v 1 has been produced as a well-characterized pharmaceutical-grade biological drug. Sublingual administration of rBet v 1 tablets is safe and efficacious in patients with BP allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

The minimally important difference in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score in grass-pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: The minimally important difference (MID) has been defined as the smallest improvement considered worthwhile by a patient. The MID has not been estimated for the Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS). METHODS: In a prospective multicentre study, patients consulting for grass-pollen-induced allergic rhinitis (AR) recorded a 15-point global rating of change scale (GRCS) score and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) score on a weekly basis and the individual symptom scores comprising the RTSS on a daily basis over two consecutive weeks. The MID in the RTSS was determined with anchor-based methods (using the GRCS and the RQLQ) and a distribution-based method [based on the RTSS' standard deviation (SD)]. RESULTS: The study population comprised 806 patients (253 children, 250 adolescents and 303 adults). During the first week of the study, the mean ± SD RTSSs for these age groups were 6.5 ± 3.3, 6.8 ± 3.4 and 7.0 ± 3.4, respectively. For an improvement of 2 points in the GRCS or 0.5 points in the RQLQ score, the regression analysis yielded MIDs in the RTSS of 1.24 ± 0.17 and 1.12 ± 0.14 in children, 1.33 ± 0.14 and 1.20 ± 0.13 in adolescents and 1.13 ± 0.14 and 0.89 ± 0.12 in adults, respectively. When applying distribution-based methods, the MID ranged from 1.09 to 1.13 (based on 0.33 SDs of the first-week RTSS) and from 1.22 to 1.40 (based on 0.5 SDs of the difference in RTSSs between the first and second weeks). CONCLUSION: The MID in the RTSS was consistently estimated as 1.1-1.3 (and could conceivably be rounded to 1) in patients with grass-pollen-induced AR.

Allergen-specific CD4+ T cell responses in peripheral blood do not predict the early onset of clinical efficacy during grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Surrogate biomarkers of efficacy are needed in support of allergen-specific immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to relate changes in peripheral CD4(+) T cell responses to clinical efficacy during sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS: Allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell responses were assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 89 grass pollen-allergic individuals enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled SLIT study conducted in an allergen exposure chamber (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00619827). Surface phenotype, proliferative responses, cytokine production and gene expression were analysed in coded samples at baseline, and after 2 and 4 months of SLIT, in PBMCs after in vitro allergen stimulation or among MHC class II/peptide (pMHCII)-tetramer-positive CD4(+) T cells. RESULTS: SLIT induced a 29.3% improvement of the average rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score in the active group, when compared to the placebo group. In parallel, only minor changes in proportions of CD4(+) T cells expressing Th1 (CCR5(+), CXCR3(+)), Th2 (CRTh2(+), CCR4(+)) and Treg (CD25(+), CD127(-), Foxp3(+)) markers were detected. A down-regulation of IL-4 and IL-10 gene expression and IL-10 secretion (P < 0.001) were observed, as well as a decrease in the frequency of potential "pro-allergic" CD27(-) Th2 cells from patients receiving active tablets (P < 0.001), but without any correlation with clinical benefit. pMHCII-tetramer analyses failed to document any major impact in both numbers and polarization of circulating Phl p 1- and Phl p 5-specific CD4(+) T cells, confirming that early clinical improvement during SLIT is not associated with dramatic alterations in T lymphocyte responses. CONCLUSION & CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Changes in patterns of peripheral CD4(+) T cells are not markers for the early onset of efficacy during SLIT.

Changes in basophil activation during grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy do not correlate with clinical efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers predicting the safety and efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) remain to be established. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to grass pollen received either a placebo or five-grass-pollen daily tablet sublingually for 4 months. Following exposure in an allergen challenge chamber, clinical responders and nonresponders were identified individually by evaluating their rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score (RTSS). Activation of peripheral blood basophils was measured by cytofluorometry before and after 2 or 4 months of immunotherapy, based on CD203c surface expression following allergen stimulation. RESULTS: Patients receiving the grass-pollen tablet had a relative mean improvement of 29.3% vs placebo in the average RTSS after 4 months of SLIT (P < 0.0003). No significant changes in basophil activation were noticed after 2 or 4 months of SLIT despite induction of specific IgGs. Among individual clinical responders, basophil activation was either decreased, increased, or unmodified during SLIT. Levels of basophil activation prior to immunotherapy were not predictive of local adverse reactions associated with immunotherapy. A moderate association was found between basophil activation and allergen-specific IgE levels, skin reactivity, or RTSS, suggesting that the former is, to some extent, indicative of disease severity. As such, patients with the highest level of basophil activation before treatment were more likely to benefit clinically from SLIT. CONCLUSIONS: Allergen reactivity of peripheral blood basophils is not a biomarker for adverse events or early onset of clinical responses to SLIT.

The average Adjusted Symptom Score, a new primary efficacy end-point for specific allergen immunotherapy trials.

BACKGROUND: In clinical trials, the efficacy of immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms is often evaluated with the average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS). Effective treatment is associated with a lower ARTSS vs. placebo but use of rescue medication to alleviate symptoms reduces the RTSS and decreases the mean difference between active treatment and placebo groups. OBJECTIVE: To develop and describe the average Adjusted Symptom Score (AdSS), a new end-point reflecting symptom severity and rescue medication use in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis trials. METHODS: To calculate the AdSS, the RTSS is adjusted as follows: if a patient takes rescue medication on day d, the day's AdSS (AdSS(d)) is defined as the value of RTSS(d) or AdSS(d-1), whichever is higher. The AdSS on the following day (AdSS(d+1)) is defined as the value of RTSS(d+1) or AdSS(d), whichever is higher. The average of the daily AdSSs (during the season) was calculated post hoc for two trials investigating the efficacy of five-grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in adult and paediatric patients and compared with the ARTSS and three other outcome measures (the average Rescue Medication Score (ARMS), the ARTSS and the average Combined Score). RESULTS: The average AdSS clearly discriminated between active and placebo treatments and confirmed the original ARTSS results. Adjustment for rescue medication use decreased the observed placebo effect. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The average AdSS can be a valuable alternative to the ARTSS as a primary efficacy end-point in grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis trials. By adjusting the RTSS for rescue medication use, the AdSS can estimate symptom severity and the treatment effect more accurately. The AdSS is now being tested prospectively in large clinical trials.