Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 21(4): 413-420, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28346568

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 3-monthly supplementation of an oral vitamin D widely used in Spain (calcifediol) plus daily exercise could influence survival at one and four years after surgery for osteoporotic hip fracture. DESIGN: A pragmatic, randomized, partially single-blind placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Patients admitted to a tertiary university hospital for acute hip fracture. PARTICIPANTS: 675 healthy adult patients undergoing surgery for osteoporotic hip fracture were recruited from January 2004 to December 2007. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either 3-monthly oral doses of 3 mg calcifediol (Hidroferol Choque®) or placebo in the 12 months postsurgery. Patients who received calcifediol were also given an exercise programme. The placebo group received standard health recommendations only. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was survival at 1 year and at 4 year follow-up. We also recorded new fractures, medical complications and anti-osteoporotic treatment compliance. RESULTS: We included a total of 88 patients, aged 62 to 99 years. Mean age was 82 years and 88.6% were women. At 12 months, 10 (11.3%) patients had died, 9 of them, from the non-intervention group. At 4 years after surgery, 20 (22.7%) had died, 3 (3.4%) from the intervention group and 17 (19.3%) from the non-intervention group. At this time, survival curve analysis showed 93% survival in the intervention group and 62% in the non-intervention group (p=0.001). At 12-month follow up, there were 18 new fractures, 9 in each group. The non-intervention group had more medical complications, with significant differences at visit 2 (p = 0.04) and 3 (p = 0.02) but not at visit 4 (p = 0.18). No significant differences between groups were found regarding treatment compliance. CONCLUSION: 3-monthly, oral supplements of 3 mg calcifediol plus daily exercise improved survival at one-year and four-year follow up after surgery for an osteoporotic hip fracture.


Assuntos
Calcifediol/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Exercício Físico , Fraturas do Quadril/mortalidade , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Placebos/uso terapêutico , Método Simples-Cego , Espanha
2.
Injury ; 47(4): 877-80, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26892501

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis predisposes for a higher risk of hip fracture and its treatment is frequently underprescribed. Our purpose was to assess the relation between having a second hip fracture and receiving osteoporosis treatment. Also to assess the relation between this second fracture and using central nervous system drugs or being institutionalised. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all the patients that were admitted to our hospital with an osteoporotic proximal femoral fracture between September 2009 and February 2011. We identified 685 patients, 74 of which presented a contralateral fracture. We evaluated if they were receiving osteoporosis treatment or taking any medication that could affect the central nervous system and if they were institutionalised. RESULTS: A 10.8% of patients had a second fracture and the mean time between the two of them was 20 months (1-122). There was a clear female predominance (76.35%). The mean age at occurrence of the primary fracture was 83.02 years and 85 for the second. A 90.8% did not follow any type of osteoporosis medication before the first fracture. A 50.9% did not receive central nervous system drugs and 79.1% lived at home at the time of the first fracture. 12.8% of the patients that did not follow the osteoporosis treatment, had a contralateral fracture, 3% more than those that did follow some kind of treatment, but this difference was not significant (p=0.2). DISCUSSION: We identified a similar number of patients undergoing osteoporotic treatment as registered in literature. There was no significant difference between suffering a second hip fracture and following osteoporosis treatment, using psychotropic drugs or being institutionalised.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Fraturas do Quadril/prevenção & controle , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Suplementos Nutricionais , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Humanos , Institucionalização , Masculino , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Espanha/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA