Targeted treatments of radio-iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.

Radio-iodine refractory metastatic thyroid cancers are rare and their management was until recently relatively complex. New therapeutic agents, kinase inhibitors, joined since the early 2000s the fight against these cancers with very promising results. These targeted agents showed for two of them (sorafenib; lenvatinib), in randomized phase III trials, a significant improvement in response rate and progressionfree survival when compared to placebo, leading to the first approval for radio-iodine refractory metastatic thyroid cancers. In parallel, patients also benefited from the development of interventional radiology techniques and organization of cares in oncology, with multidisciplinary management strengthened by the creation of a national network (TUTHYREF).

Impact of clinical practice guidelines on the management for carcinomas of unknown primary site: a controlled "before-after" study.

BACKGROUND: In 2002, the French Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centers published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of carcinomas of unknown primary (CUP). METHODS: A controlled "before-after" study at two centers (experimental in Lyon, France and control in Edmonton, Canada) to assess the impact of CPGs on CUP management. Fifty-CUP patients treated in 2000-2001, i.e. before CPG publication, and 50 patients treated in 2003-2004, were analyzed for both centers. RESULTS: In both groups, compliance for diagnostic workup was the same before or after CPGs publication. Non-adenocarcinoma histology and performance status (PS) < 2 were independent factors for CPGs compliance. In the experimental group, 75% of patients underwent inappropriate investigations. The proportion of patients from this group with unfavourable clinicopathologic entity and PS < or = 1, who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy did not significantly change (2000-2001: 27% vs. 2003-2004: 37.5%; P = 0.45). However, most patients treated in the pre period received organ-specific regimens, while most patients treated in the post period received taxane or gemcitabine-based regimens. Patients from the control group generally received taxane/carboplatin. CONCLUSIONS: Our study show that simply distributing CUP CPGs did not change practice and underline the necessity to disseminate and implement CPGs, both to oncologists and organ-specialist physicians.