Variations in treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based study in the East Netherlands.

AIMS: Differences in treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast were analysed for a geographically defined population in the East Netherlands. METHODS: Data from the Cancer Registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre East Netherlands were analysed for treatment of DCIS in the period between January 1989 and December 2003. The study population consisted of 800 female patients with a first diagnosis of DCIS of whom 798 underwent surgical treatment. The distribution of tumour characteristics and treatment were compared for several time periods. RESULTS: Surgical treatment was specified for 648 patients: 51% underwent breast-conserving surgery. The proportion of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery increased: 43% in the period 1994-1998 and 55 after 1999 (p<0.01). An axillary staging procedure was performed in 149 patients (19%), of whom 2 (1%) had tumour-involved lymph nodes. Of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery, 133 (40%) received radiation therapy: 7% in the period 1994-1998 compared to 62% after 1999 (p<0.01). Patients (60%) of 50 years or younger were treated with mastectomy compared to 44% in patients aged 50-69 years and 50% in patients of 70 years and older (p<0.01). The rate in use of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery was comparable to both age groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows variability in the treatment of DCIS in a geographically defined region. Approximately half of all patients were treated with mastectomy and 19% underwent an axillary staging procedure; this may represent aggressive, unwarranted treatment. In contrast, 38% of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery were not treated with radiation therapy after 1999, which may represent under-treatment.

Treatment and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer Stage IIIA diagnosed in 1989-1994: a study in the region of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre East, The Netherlands.

The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the treatment policy and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical stage IIIA in daily practice. We selected 212 patients, who had been diagnosed between 1989 and 1994 and registered by the Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre East (CCCE). Diagnostic tests comprised chest X-ray and bronchoscopy in all cases but one, computed tomography in 89%, mediastinoscopy in 55% and conventional tomography of the chest in 16%. NSCLC had been verified histologically in 88% and cytologically in 12%. The initial treatment for the primary tumor had been surgery alone in 13% of the patients, surgery plus radiotherapy in 8%, radiotherapy alone in 56%, chemotherapy in 1% (three patients, one in addition to surgery); 22% received none of these treatments. Median survival of the 212 patients was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval 8.3-11.0 months). Overall survival rates after 1, 2 and 3 years were 41, 17 and 8%, respectively. Three-year survival of the patients who had undergone surgery, surgery plus radiotherapy, radiotherapy alone and no treatment was 18, 19, 6 and 4%, respectively. Treatment was an independent prognostic factor (multivariate Cox's proportional hazards analysis adjusted for sub-stage, age, number of co-morbid diseases and hospital). In the same model, the Hazard rate ratio for one hospital relative to the five others was 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.8). Surgery (whether or not in combination with radiotherapy) independently gave the best results. In conclusion, policies varied between hospitals, although the variation in overall survival was small except at one hospital. New regional management guidelines are in preparation. Physicians will be encouraged to follow these guidelines, both with regard to diagnostic tests and to treatment policies, as our study showed that differences in policy might lead to differences in survival.

[Lung cancer in the Netherlands in the period 1989-1997: the epidemic is not over yet]. / Longkanker in Nederland in de periode 1989-1997: de epidemie is nog niet voorbij.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and interpret changes in incidence, mortality and survival of lung cancer in the Netherlands in the period 1989-1997. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis. METHODS: Data on the incidence of lung cancer were collected from the Dutch Cancer Registration (1989-1997), on mortality from Statistics Netherlands (CBS; 1989-1994), on the incidence of lung cancer in other European countries from EUROCIM (1990-1994), on survival of Dutch lung cancer patients from the Comprehensive Cancer Centre Amsterdam (1988-1997) and the Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (1988-1992) and on survival of other European lung cancer patients from EUROCARE (1985-1989). Incidence rates were calculated per 100,000 person years and standardized by age according to the European population structure. Survival was calculated as the ratio of observed survival among the lung cancer patients and the expected survival of the general population. RESULTS: The incidence of lung cancer among men decreased from 109 to 93, whereas that among women increased from 18 to 23. The incidence of lung cancer among Dutch men was high in comparison to other European countries, whereas that among women was average. The trends in lung cancer incidence were probably related to the trends in past smoking behaviour. Mortality decreased among men from 106 to 91 and increased among women from 15 to 20. Survival was better for younger patients, a localised tumour, and better for squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma than for large-cell undifferentiated or small-cell carcinoma. The relative 5-year survival was 12%, the relative 1-year survival 39%; these were good in comparison with other European countries. CONCLUSION: The incidence and mortality of lung cancer among Dutch men decreased, but still in 1997 almost 20 men in the Netherlands died each day of lung cancer. Among women the end of the increase is not in sight and in 1997 over 5 women died each day of lung cancer.