Mono-allergic and poly-allergic rhinitis patients have comparable numbers of mucosal Foxp3+CD4+ T lymphocytes.

BACKGROUND: We previously found that allergic rhinitis patients with an isolated pollen sensitization responded more strongly to a nasal provocation with grass pollen (GP) than patients who had an additional house dust mite (HDM) sensitization. To elucidate this phenomenon, we investigated the dynamics of Foxp3+CD4+ T lymphocytes in allergic rhinitis patients with distinct allergen sensitizations. METHODS: Three groups of allergic rhinitis patients with skin prick test confirmed allergic sensitizations were investigated and compared to 14 healthy controls: 14 subjects with an isolated grass pollen sensitization (Mono-GP); 9 subjects with isolated housedust mite sensitization (Mono-HDM); 29 subjects with grass pollen and house dust mite sensitization (poly-sensitized). Subjects in the Mono-GP group were challenged with grass pollen extract, subjects in the Mono-HDM group were challenged with house dust mite extract, subjects in the poly-sensitized group and the healthy controls were randomly challenged with either grass pollen or house dust mite. Nasal biopsies were taken before and after nasal provocation. We compared the distribution of FoxP3+CD4+ cells in nasal biopsies before and after nasal provocation using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: There was no difference in the number of FoxP3+CD4+ cells between healthy and the three allergic groups at baseline.Nasal provocation did result in an increase in eosinophils in the three allergic groups, but did not result in a change in the number of FoxP3+CD4+ cells in any of the groups or induced differences between any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Clinical differences in the response between mono-GP and multiple-sensitized allergic individuals are not related to differences in the number of regulatory T cells in the nasal mucosa.

Comparison of Timothy grass pollen extract- and single major allergen-induced gene expression and mediator release in airway epithelial cells: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem and its prevalence has increased considerably in the last decades. As the allergic response with its clinical manifestations is triggered by only a few proteins within natural extracts, there is an increasing tendency for single-component-resolved diagnosis and immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: As natural exposure is not to single proteins, but to complex mixtures of molecules, we were interested in comparing the activation of respiratory epithelial cells induced by the purified major allergen Phl p 1 with the induction caused by a complete extract of Timothy grass pollen (GPE). METHODS: NCI-H292 cells were exposed to GPE or Ph1 p 1 for 24 h, isolated RNA and cell culture supernatants were used for microarray analysis, multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) and subsequent analysis. RESULTS: We found 262 genes that showed a GPE-induced change of at least 3-fold, whereas Ph1 p 1-stimulation resulted in 71 genes with a fold induction of more than 3-fold. Besides genes that were regulated by both stimuli, we also detected genes displaying an opposite response after stimulation, suggesting that GPE might be more than purified major allergens with regard to induced immune responses. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Additional components within GPE and the resulting modulation of general processes affecting gene transcription and signalling pathways might be crucial to maintain/overcome the diseased phenotype and to induce the influx of cells contributing to late-phase allergic responses. When the initial process of sensitization is the matter of interest or late-phase allergic responses, one might miss important immune modulatory molecules and their interaction with allergens by applying single components only.

Timothy grass pollen extract-induced gene expression and signalling pathways in airway epithelial cells.

BACKGROUND: Grass pollen allergy is one of the most common allergies worldwide and airborne allergens are the major cause of allergic rhinitis. Airway epithelial cells (AECs) are the first to encounter and respond to aeroallergens and are therefore interesting targets for the development of new therapeutics. Our understanding of the epithelial contribution to immune responses is limited as most studies focus on only a few individual genes or proteins. OBJECTIVE: To describe in detail the Timothy grass pollen extract (GPE)-induced gene expression in AECs. METHODS: NCI-H292 cells were exposed to GPE for 24 h, and isolated RNA and cell culture supernatants were used for microarray analysis and multiplex ELISA, respectively. RESULTS: Eleven thousand and seven hundred fifty-eight transcripts were affected after exposure to GPE, with 141 genes up-regulated and 121 genes down-regulated by more than threefold. The gene ontology group cell communication was among the most prominent categories. Network analysis revealed that a substantial part of regulated genes are related to the cytokines IL-6, IL-8, IL-1A, and the transcription factor FOS. After analysing significantly regulated signalling pathways, we found, among others, epidermal growth factor receptor 1, IL-1, Notch-, and Wnt-related signalling members. Unexpectedly, we found Jagged to be down-regulated and an increased release of IL-12, in line with a more Th1-biased response induced by GPE. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our data show that the stimulation of AECs with GPE results in the induction of a broad response on RNA and protein level by which they are able to affect the initiation and regulation of local immune responses. Detailed understanding of GPE-induced genes and signalling pathways will allow us to better define the pathogenesis of the allergic response and to identify new targets for treatment.

Desloratadine reduces systemic allergic inflammation following nasal provocation in allergic rhinitis and asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have demonstrated that some second-generation antihistamines have anti-inflammatory effects. It is not known whether these effects are also demonstrable in vivo. In this study we investigated the effect of treatment with desloratadine (DL) on systemic inflammation and on nasal and bronchial mucosal inflammation after nasal allergen provocation (NP) in subjects with grass-pollen-allergic rhinitis and asthma. METHODS: Twenty-six subjects with grass-pollen-allergic rhinitis and asthma were randomly allocated to 8 days of treatment with DL (n = 13) or placebo (n = 13) outside the grass pollen season. On day 7 they underwent nasal provocation with grass pollen allergen. Nasal and bronchial biopsies were taken for immunohistochemical evaluation, and blood samples were analysed. Rhinitis and asthma symptoms, peak nasal inspiratory flow and peak expiratory flow, were also measured at specified times. RESULTS: The number of circulating eosinophils decreased during DL treatment, and there was a reduced increase in circulating eosinophils after NP in these subjects. There was also a significant reduction in early bronchial clinical response. There was no significant lessening in the severity of the nasal symptoms. Nasal and bronchial mucosal inflammation parameters did not alter under DL treatment. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that treatment with DL reduces systemic eosinophilia and prevents the increase in circulating eosinophils after NP. DL also significantly reduces the early bronchial clinical response to NP. However, airway mucosal inflammation is not altered by 1 week of treatment.

dSIR2 and dHDAC6: two novel, inhibitor-resistant deacetylases in Drosophila melanogaster.

We have identified new members of the histone deacetylase enzyme family in Drosophila melanogaster. dHDAC6 is a class II deacetylase with two active sites, and dSIR2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. These proteins, together with two class I histone deacetylases, dHDAC1 and dHDAC3, have been expressed and characterized as epitope-tagged recombinant proteins in Schneider SL2 cells. All these proteins have in vitro deacetylase activity and are able to deacetylate core histone H4 at all four acetylatable lysine residues (5, 8, 12, and 16). Recombinant dHDAC6 and dSIR2 are both insensitive to TSA and HC toxin and resistant, relative to dHDAC1 and dHDAC3, to inhibition by sodium butyrate. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy of stably transfected SL2 lines reveals that dHDAC1 and dSIR2 are nuclear, dHDAC6 is cytosolic, and dHDAC3 is detectable in both cytosol and nucleus. dHDAC6 and dSIR2 elute from Superose 6 columns with apparent molecular weights of 90 and 200 kDa, respectively. In contrast, dHDAC1 and dHDAC3elute at 800 and 700 kDa, respectively, suggesting that they are components of multiprotein complexes. Consistent with this, recombinant dHDAC1 coimmunoprecipitates with components of the Drosophila NuRD complex and dHDAC3 with an as yet unknown 45-kDa protein.