Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 107(1): 126-135, 2020 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32006609

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Most patients with local prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy undergo palliative androgen deprivation therapy because whole-gland salvage treatments have a high risk of severe toxicity. Focal treatment reduces this risk while offering a second opportunity for cure. We report updated outcomes of ultrafocal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prospectively collected data from the first 50 treated patients were analyzed. Disease status was assessed by 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-Choline or 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and systematic or tumor-targeted biopsies. Ultrafocal salvage HDR-BT (1 × 19 Gy) was performed by implanting the clinical target volume (CTV: gross tumor volume + 5 mm margin) under fused transrectal ultrasound/MRI guidance. Follow-up included toxicity grading (using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0), quality of life assessment, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 31 months. Median CTV D95% was 18.8 Gy. We observed 2% grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, no grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity, and 22% newly developed grade 3 erectile dysfunction. Five of 13 patients (38%) with self-reported pretreatment potency (International Index of Erectile Function >17) remained potent. Clinically relevant quality of life deterioration was reported for only 6 of 31 items and was not statistically significant. Biochemical failure (nadir + 2) occurred in 26 patients. Among intraprostatic recurrences, 73% were in field. After 2.5 years, biochemical disease-free survival was 51% (95% confidence interval, 37%-69%), metastases-free survival was 75% (64%-89%), androgen deprivation therapy-free survival was 90% (82%-99%), and overall survival was 98% (94%-100%). Presalvage PSA, CTV size, and stage ≥T3 were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Higher-risk patients (stage ≥T3, PSA ≥10, or PSA double time ≤9 months) had 25% biochemical disease-free survival at 2.5 years versus 71% for lower-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: At this early stage, MRI-guided ultrafocal HDR-BT seems to be a safe salvage treatment option, with acceptable biochemical control in a well-selected group of patients and potential for effectively postponing androgen deprivation therapy.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Doses de Radiação , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Risco , Segurança , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Technol Cancer Res Treat ; 16(6): 1194-1201, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29333958

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Whole-gland salvage treatment of radiorecurrent prostate cancer has a high rate of severe toxicity. The standard of care in case of a biochemical recurrence is androgen deprivation treatment, which is associated with morbidity and negative effects on quality of life. A salvage treatment with acceptable toxicity might postpone the start of androgen deprivation treatment, might have a positive influence on the patients' quality of life, and might even be curative. Here, toxicity and biochemical outcome are described after magnetic resonance imaging-guided focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with radiorecurrent prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with pathologically proven locally recurrent prostate cancer were treated with focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in a single 19-Gy fraction using magnetic resonance imaging for treatment guidance. Primary radiotherapy consisted of external beam radiotherapy or low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Tumors were delineated with Ga-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen or F18-choline positron emission tomography in combination with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. All patients had a prostate-specific antigen level of less than 10 ng/mL at the time of recurrence and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≥12 months. Toxicity was measured by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. RESULTS: Eight of 17 patients had follow-up interval of at least 1 year. At a median follow-up interval of 10 months (range 3-40 months), 1 patient experienced a biochemical recurrence according to the Phoenix criteria, and prostate-specific membrane antigen testing revealed that this was due to a distant nodal metastasis. One patient had a grade 3 urethral stricture at 2 years after treatment. CONCLUSION: Focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with radiorecurrent prostate cancer showed grade 3 toxicity in 1 of 17 patients and a distant nodal metastasis in another patient. Whether this treatment option leads to cure in a subset of patients or whether it can successfully postpone androgen deprivation treatment needs further investigation.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Lesões por Radiação/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antígenos de Superfície/genética , Radioisótopos de Gálio/efeitos adversos , Glutamato Carboxipeptidase II/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/genética , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Terapia de Salvação/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA