The psychological and physiological effects of integrated cognitive-behavioral and biofeedback therapy on panic disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and biofeedback therapy are commonly regarded as effective treatment modalities for panic disorder. The aim of this study was to establish a Taiwanese version of an integrated cognitive-behavioral and biofeedback therapy (ICB) and examine its effects on panic disorder using psychological and physiological indicators. METHODS: Thirty patients with panic disorder were enrolled in this study. They were randomly assigned to either the ICB group (n = 15) or the treatment as usual (TAU) group (n = 15). The intervention consisted of six sessions, conducted once a week. Psychological indicators were measured at baseline (prior to intervention), week 3, and week 6, while physiological indicators were measured at baseline and week 6. The psychological indicators included five scales, with the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) being the primary measure. The physiological indicators included respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and skin conductance, which respectively represent parasympathetic and sympathetic activity. RESULTS: Considering all participants, PDSS scores significantly decreased over time, but the difference between the ICB and TAU groups did not reach statistical significance. Among the physiological indicators, resting-state RSA and RSA under relaxation showed significant between-group differences over time, with the ICB group demonstrating a more pronounced improvement in RSA. CONCLUSION: In the context of existing pharmacological treatments, the benefits of ICB for panic disorder may not be observable through psychological indicators. However, it can lead to enhancement of parasympathetic activity as evidenced by the physiological indicators.

Optimizing the Utility of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosis and Therapy: A Roundtable Review and Recommendations.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a comprehensive diagnostic tool for evaluating patients with constipation, fecal incontinence, or anorectal pain; however, it is not widely utilized for reasons that remain unclear. The aim of this roundtable discussion was to critically examine the current clinical practices of ARM and biofeedback therapy by physicians and surgeons in both academic and community settings. METHODS: Leaders in medical and surgical gastroenterology and physical therapy with interest in anorectal disorders were surveyed regarding practice patterns and utilization of these technologies. Subsequently, a roundtable was held to discuss survey results, explore current diagnostic and therapeutic challenges with these technologies, review the literature, and generate consensus-based recommendations. RESULTS: ARM identifies key pathophysiological abnormalities such as dyssynergic defecation, anal sphincter weakness, or rectal sensory dysfunction, and is a critical component of biofeedback therapy, an evidence-based treatment for patients with dyssynergic defecation and fecal incontinence. Additionally, ARM has the potential to enhance health-related quality of life and reduce healthcare costs. However, it has significant barriers that include a lack of education and training of healthcare providers regarding the utility and availability of ARM and biofeedback procedures, as well as challenges with condition-specific testing protocols and interpretation. Additional barriers include understanding when to perform, where to refer, and how to use these technologies, and confusion over billing practices. CONCLUSIONS: Overcoming these challenges with appropriate education, training, collaborative research, and evidence-based guidelines for ARM testing and biofeedback therapy could significantly enhance patient care of anorectal disorders.

Biofeedback therapy for children: What is the maximum number of sessions we should offer?

BACKGROUND: Biofeedback therapy is an effective but resource intensive treatment for pediatric dysfunctional voiding. Based on our center's experience, we evaluated the rate of clinical improvement from biofeedback in order to identify the maximum number of sessions to offer patients. METHODS: We reviewed 490 pediatric patients who underwent at least 6 sessions of biofeedback from 2013 to 2021. At each session, patients and their parents documented their urinary symptoms (urgency, frequency, pain, and difficulties with stream), incontinence, medications, and stool pattern. This longitudinal data was abstracted, and the log odds of urinary symptoms or incontinence was modelled with number of sessions as a predictor using generalized estimating equations and robust standard errors in SAS v9.4. Gender and bowel dysfunction were included as interactions terms. A logistic regression using absence of urinary symptoms at last biofeedback session as a dependent variable was done to further explore differences between genders. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly female (324/490, 66%) with a mean age of 8.9 years (SD 3.3 years). Most common symptoms at presentation were urinary urgency (389/490, 79%) and urinary incontinence (413/490, 84%). Medication use was common at the time of the first session (191/490, 39%) with males more likely to be on alpha-blockers (54/166 vs 1/324, p < 0.001) and females more likely to be on antibiotic prophylaxis (68/324 vs 2/166, p < 0.001). The probability of having urinary symptoms or incontinence decreased up to session 11 (9 months from initial visit). There was slower rate of improvement after session 8 (3 months). Controlling for age, symptoms, and medication use at initial visit, male patients were less likely to report symptom resolution at the time of the last session (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33, 0.89). The nadir for reporting symptoms occurred by session 22 for male patients, compared to session 10 for female patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical improvement from biofeedback for pediatric patients with dysfunctional voiding may take up to 9 months of therapy, but most cases that improve do so by 3 months. The effect of gender on biofeedback efficacy requires further study, but males may have slower response to biofeedback. Our data provides guidance on when maximum benefit from biofeedback can be expected before considering re-evaluation or other therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms.

[Clinical efficacy of Manlyman Spray combined with biofeedback therapy on premature ejaculation].

Objective： To observe the clinical effect of Manlyman Spray combined with biofeedback therapy in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE)．Methods： A total of 60 primary premature ejaculation patients with stable sexual partners and regular sexual activity (≥１ times per week) from April 2021 to October 2022 were involved in the clinical observation, The patients' age is (34.3 ± 4.9) years old, and the course of the disease is (112.5 ± 65.5) months, and Manlyman Spray combined with biofeedback therapy was used to treat patients for 8 weeks. Manlyman Spray was sprayed 3 times on the surface of the penisqd for 4 weeks, and Biofeedback therapy is treated twice a week according to the AI setting module, for a total of 8 weeks. Before and 8 weeks after medication and at 4 weeks after drug withdrawal, the Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time (IELT), Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) scores and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) scores were Obtained and compared. Results： After 8 weeks of treatment, the IELT of the patients was significantly prolonged (ï¼»351.4 ± 76.7ï¼½ vs ï¼»87 ± 16.8ï¼½,P<0.05) and at 4 weeks after drug withdrawal, the therapeutic effect still existed (ï¼»345.9 ± 80.3ï¼½ vs ï¼»87 ± 16.8ï¼½,P<0.05), the PEDT scores were significantly improved after treatment (ï¼»18.2 ± 1.1ï¼½ vs ï¼»9.0 ± 1.4ï¼½,P<0.05)and at 4 weeks after drug withdrawal(ï¼»18.0 ± 1.2ï¼½ vs ï¼»9.0 ± 1.4ï¼½,P<0.05), and so were the CGIC scores (ï¼»13.4 ± 1.3ï¼½ vs ï¼»3.3 ± 1.4ï¼½,P<0.05, and ï¼»12.6 ± 1.6ï¼½ vs ï¼»3.3 ± 1.4ï¼½,P<0.05). Conclusion： The combination of Manlyman Spray and biofeedback therapy can effectively treat primary premature ejaculation, with a long duration of treatment and good safety, and the specific mechanism needs further study.

Dyssynergic Defecation and Other Evacuation Disorders.

Constipated patients are frequently referred to gastroenterologists for symptoms refractory to lifestyle modifications and laxatives. Dyssynergic defecation, the dyscoordination of rectoanal, abdominal, and pelvic floor muscles to facilitate defecation, is a major cause of refractory primary constipation. Understanding of the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of dyssynergic defecation and other evacuation disorders will allow providers to effectively manage these patients. This review focuses on the definition, pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment of dyssynergic defecation and other evacuation disorders. Emerging treatments for these disorders include home biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation and translumbosacral neuromodulation therapy for levator ani syndrome.

New Internet of Medical Things for Home-Based Treatment of Anorectal Disorders.

Home-based healthcare provides a viable and cost-effective method of delivery for resource- and labour-intensive therapies, such as rehabilitation therapies, including anorectal biofeedback. However, existing systems for home anorectal biofeedback are not able to monitor patient compliance or assess the quality of exercises performed, and as a result have yet to see wide spread clinical adoption. In this paper, we propose a new Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) system to provide home-based biofeedback therapy, facilitating remote monitoring by the physician. We discuss our user-centric design process and the proposed architecture, including a new sensing probe, mobile app, and cloud-based web application. A case study involving biofeedback training exercises was performed. Data from the IoMT was compared against the clinical standard, high-definition anorectal manometry. We demonstrated the feasibility of our proposed IoMT in providing anorectal pressure profiles equivalent to clinical manometry and its application for home-based anorectal biofeedback therapy.

The Efficacy of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients with Solitary Rectal Ulcer and Dyssynergic Defecation.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of solitary rectal ulcer (SRU) is challenging and controversial; generally, no response to conventional treatments can be obtained, particularly in patients with dyssynergic defecation (DD). We assessed the efficiency of biofeedback therapy (BFT) in patients who did not respond to conservative treatments and had coexistence of SRU and DD. METHODS: BFT responses, as well as anorectal manometry and rectoscopy results of 20 patients with the coexistence of SRU and DD, were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age was 32.5 years. Of the patients, 12 were female, and 8 of them were male. An average of 12 sessions of BFT was performed on the patients. Ulcer disappeared in 11 patients (55%) after BFT, and the ulcer size decreased in 3 patients (15%). However, ulcers healed in 9 (90%) of 10 patients whose DD pattern disappeared following BFT, and ulcers healed in only 20% of patients whose DD pattern continued (p = 0.005). The change in anal resting pressure after BFT was significant (p = 0.016). Ulcers were healed in 87.5% (7/8) of the patients whose anal resting pressure decreased after BFT and whose DD disappeared, while ulcers remained untreated in 85.7% of the patients whose anal resting pressure decreased, but the DD pattern continued (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SRU patients with DD are typically unresponsive to medical treatments. Ameliorating anorectal dyssynergia should be the priority of treatment in these patients. BFT is an effective treatment for DD. BFT enhances the healing of ulcers in patients with SRU by restoring coordination of the pelvic floor.

Barostat or syringe-assisted sensory biofeedback training for constipation with rectal hyposensitivity: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Rectal hyposensitivity (RH) is a well-known pathophysiological dysfunction in chronic constipation. Whether biofeedback training improves RH and restores bowel function is unknown. AIM: To investigate the efficacy of barostat-assisted sensory training (BAST) with syringe-assisted sensory training (SAST) in patients with RH in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Patients with RH and chronic constipation (Rome III) were randomized to receive 6 biweekly sessions of BAST or SAST. Verbal/visual feedback was provided during repeated rectal distensions to improve defecation desire/urge and first sensations with either 10-cm balloon connected to barostat (BAST) or 4-cm balloon connected to syringe and manometry probe (SAST). Sensory thresholds, bowel symptoms, and therapist and patient's rating of treatments were compared. The primary outcome (responders) was the improvement in ≥2 sensory thresholds. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were enrolled: 32 received BAST, 34 received SAST, and 56 completed study. There were significantly more responders in BAST group than SAST (78% vs. 53%, p = 0.0320). Rectal sensation normalized in 81% with BAST compared to 56% with SAST (p = 0.0270). When compared to baseline, desire and urge to defecate thresholds and bowel satisfaction improved with BAST (p = 0.0013; p = 0.0002; p = 0.0001) and SAST (p = 0.0012; p = 0.0001; p < 0.0001) and number of complete spontaneous bowel movements with BAST (p = 0.0029) but without inter-group differences. Therapists rated BAST as superior to SAST (p < 0.0001), but patients rated both equally. CONCLUSIONS: Sensory biofeedback training was effective and significantly improved rectal sensation and constipation symptoms. Although both techniques were useful, the novel BAST was more efficacious and easier to administer for treating RH.

Efficacy of a Modified Training Program of Adaptive Biofeedback Therapy for Dyssynergic Defecation in Patients with Chronic Constipation.

BACKGROUND: Biofeedback therapy is highly effective and safe in treating dyssynergic defecation, which affects more than half of patients with chronic constipation. However, conventional biofeedback training has limitations. AIMS: This study aims to modify the adaptive biofeedback (ABF) previously established by the investigators and evaluate its efficacy for dyssynergic defecation. METHODS: A total of 42 constipation patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either 4-week adaptive biofeedback (ABF) training (ABF group), or fixed biofeedback (FBF) training (FBF group). The ABF training program was modified, as follows: (1) the tailored training targets were set according to the ability of the individual subject, instead of the fixed values; (2) the outcome was scored on the basis of the rectal-anal pressure gradient; (3) the feedback information was delivered through multimedia. The outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The number of weekly bowel movements (BM) was significantly greater in the ABF group than in the FBF group. The improvement in dyssynergic defecation was also noted with the modified ABF training, which performed significantly better than the conventional training on incomplete defecation, bloating, defecation time, staining, and urgency. Notably, the use of medications was significantly reduced upon completion of the 4-week adaptive training, and this was significantly lesser than that in the fixed training. Furthermore, there was significantly better improvement on anorectal motility and rectal sensation in the ABF group vs. the FBF group. CONCLUSION: The modified ABF training program significantly improves constipation-related symptoms, and its performance is superior to conventional FBF training for dyssynergic defecation.

MORE EVIDENCE IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FULL OCCLUSION BIOFEEDBACK SPLINTS USED FOR SLEEP BRUXISM (SB) AND TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDER (TMD) PAIN.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Bergmann A, Edelhoff D, Schubert O, Erdelt KJ, Pho Duc JM. Effect of treatment with a full-occlusion biofeedback splint on sleep bruxism and TMD pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Nov;24(11):4005-4018. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03270-z. Epub 2020 May 19. PMID: 32430774; PMCID: PMC7544753. SOURCE OF FUNDING: None. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial (parallel design).

Efficacy of combination of biofeedback therapy and pelvic floor muscle training in dyssynergic defecation.

BACKGROUND: It is now known that with appropriate exercises, the functions of the muscles in the body ameliorate and increase in strength. We applied pelvic floor muscle relaxation training and exercises that strengthen the abdominal and pelvic muscles in combination with biofeedback therapy (BFT) to patients with dyssynergic defecation (DD). METHODS: Patients who met the criteria for DD and had no underlying organic cause were included in this study. The electromyography (EMG) technique was used for BFT therapy. Patients had received at least six sessions of BFT. BFT was considered successful in patients when the DD pattern in anorectal manometry (ARM) disappeared and/or adequate anal relaxation was obtained following BFT and in patients who had full clinical recovery. RESULTS: Data of 104 patients (58 females [55.8%] and 46 males [44.2%]) was evaluated. Abdominal and rectal symptoms disappeared in 71 (68.26%) patients. Of the patients who achieved symptomatic improvement, 58 (55.76%) saw a disappearance of the dyssynergic defecation pattern. When the differences between anal sphincter pressures before and after treatment were compared in patients who responded to BFT and those who did not, no significant differences were observed, but significant changes were found in anal squeezing pressures. It was found that those who had high squeezing pressures before BFT, those who increased their squeezing pressures after BFT, and those who decreased their resting pressure responded better to BFT. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, BFT was found to be more effective in those with a high squeezing pressure and those that increased squeezing pressure after BFT. These findings will influence the treatment of patients with dyssynergic defecation who do not respond to treatment. A combination of abdominal and pelvic floor muscle exercises and BFT increases patient response.

[Regenerative effect of comprehensive physiotherapeutic programs in the early postoperative period in patients with chronic paraproctitis]. / Regenerativnyi effekt primeneniya kompleksnykh fizioterapevticheskikh programm v rannem posleoperatsionnom periode u bol'nykh khronicheskim paraproktitom.

The modern lifestyle is often associated with low physical activity and blood stasis in the pelvic organs, which leads to increased incidence of proctological diseases, and increasingly in people of young working age. Chronic paraproctitis is the third most common proctological disorder that requires surgical treatment. The disease occurs commonly in the age group of 30-50 years, predominantly in men, which determines its socio-economic significance. It indicates the urgent need for advanced comprehensive physiotherapeutic programs for early rehabilitation of patients after surgery for chronic paraproctitis, and the application of new diagnostic technologies for assessment of surgery effectiveness and postoperative changes to provide adequate and effective medical rehabilitation. One of the main goals in the early postoperative period is the acceleration of adequate scar formation and reduction of the postoperative wound healing time; therefore, it seems reasonable to assess regeneration processes using transrectal ultrasound examination and sonoelastography of the scar tissue, which have great potential for use in coloproctology. OBJECTIVE: To study the role of the medical rehabilitation program in the early postoperative period on the adequate scar formation and postoperative wound healing processes (by transrectal ultrasound investigation and scar tissue sonoelastography) as well as postoperative complications rate and long-term (up to 12 months) treatment outcomes in patients with chronic paraproctitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 60 patients 20-69 years with chronic pararectal fistulas (ICD-10: K60.4). The patients were assigned into two groups. The control group consisted of 30 patients who received standard of care in the early postoperative period, including analgesics, local antibacterial ointments (Levomekol, etc.), and rectal suppositories (Relief Pro, etc.). The main group also consisted of 30 patients who received standard of care and a 5-day comprehensive physiotherapeutic program starting the second day after the surgery. Effectiveness was assessed by complex transrectal ultrasound investigation with color Doppler mapping, Doppler sonography, and sonoelastography at various post-surgery time points. RESULTS: The higher efficacy of the rehabilitation program, including intravenous ozone therapy, rectal laser therapy, recto-tibial myostimulation, and biofeedback therapy in the early postoperative period, versus the standard of care, was shown. CONCLUSION: The introduction of rehabilitation program including intravenous ozone therapy, rectal laser therapy, recto-tibial myostimulation, and biofeedback therapy in the early postoperative period significantly reduced the average postoperative wound healing time by accelerating the formation of an adequate scar (according to transrectal ultrasound investigation and scar tissue sonoelastography) and the incidence of postoperative complications and improved the long-term treatment outcomes (up to 12 months) in patients with chronic paraproctitis.

Randomized controlled trial of home biofeedback therapy versus office biofeedback therapy for fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Biofeedback therapy is useful for treatment of fecal incontinence (FI), but is not widely available and labor intensive. We investigated if home biofeedback therapy (HBT) is non-inferior to office biofeedback therapy (OBT). METHODS: Patients with FI (≥1 episode/week) were randomized to HBT or OBT for 6 weeks. HBT was performed daily using novel device that provided resistance training and electrical stimulation with voice-guided instructions. OBT consisted of six weekly sessions. Both methods involved anal strength, endurance, and coordination training. Primary outcome was change in weekly FI episodes. FI improvement was assessed with stool diaries, validated instruments (FISI, FISS, and ICIQ-B), and anorectal manometry using intention-to-treat analysis. KEY RESULTS: Thirty (F/M = 26/4) FI patients (20 in HBT, 10 in OBT) participated. Weekly FI episodes decreased significantly after HBT (Δ ± 95% confidence interval: 4.7 ± 1.8, compared with baseline, p = 0.003) and OBT (3.7 ± 1.6, p = 0.0003) and HBT was non-inferior to OBT (p = 0.2). The FISI and FISS scores improved significantly in HBT group (p < 0.02). Bowel pattern, bowel control, and quality of life (QOL) domains (ICIQ-B) improved significantly in HBT arm (p < 0.023). Resting and maximum squeeze sphincter pressures significantly improved in both HBT and OBT groups and sustained squeeze pressure in HBT, without group differences. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Home biofeedback therapy is non-inferior to OBT for FI treatment. Home biofeedback is safe, effective, improves QOL, and through increased access could facilitate improved management of FI.

Application of electroencephalographic (EEG) biofeedback therapy in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic diseases.

Schizophrenia is one of the chronic mental disorders characterized by disturbances in thought, emotion, language, perception, and behavior. There is no cure for this disease, and most of the current treatments are palliative. In this study, we aimed to analyze the application of electroencephalographic (EEG) biofeedback therapy, an adjunctive treatment used for many psychiatric disorders, in the rehabilitation of schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenic patients were selected as the experimental subjects, and the initial diagnosis criteria were set accordingly. A primary and a secondary efficacy index was then developed for the evaluation of EEG biofeedback therapy rather than traditional drug treatment. Lastly, the effects of the two methods were compared. The findings indicate that traditional drugs could be used in the treatment of mild schizophrenia, but showed poor results for severe and moderate schizophrenia. EEG biofeedback therapy was effective for the treatment of various degrees of schizophrenia and improved patients' sleep quality and anxiety. These findings have significant practical implications for the rehabilitation of schizophrenic patients and patients with chronic diseases in general.

Non-pharmacological Interventions for Intractable Epilepsy.

In 30% of epileptic individuals, intractable epilepsy represents a problem for the management of seizures and severely affects the patient's quality of life due to pharmacoresistance with commonly used antiseizure drugs (ASDs). Surgery is not the best option for all resistant patients due to its post-surgical consequences. Therefore, several alternative or complementary therapies have scientifically proven significant therapeutic potential for the management of seizures in intractable epilepsy patients with seizure-free occurrences. Various non-pharmacological interventions include metabolic therapy, brain stimulation therapy, and complementary therapy. Metabolic therapy works out by altering the energy metabolites and include the ketogenic diets (KD) (that is restricted in carbohydrates and mimics the metabolic state of the body as produced during fasting and exerts its antiepileptic effect) and anaplerotic diet (which revives the level of TCA cycle intermediates and this is responsible for its effect). Neuromodulation therapy includes vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation therapy (RNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy (TMS). Complementary therapies such as biofeedback and music therapy have demonstrated promising results in pharmacoresistant epilepsies. The current emphasis of the review article is to explore the different integrated mechanisms of various treatments for adequate seizure control, and their limitations, and supportive pieces of evidence that show the efficacy and tolerability of these non-pharmacological options.

Effect of treatment with a full-occlusion biofeedback splint on sleep bruxism and TMD pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to analyze treatment outcome with a full-occlusion biofeedback (BFB) splint on sleep bruxism (SB) and TMD pain compared with treatment with an adjusted occlusal splint (AOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were randomly allocated to a test (BFB) or a control (AOS) group and monitored over a 3-month period. Output variables were frequency and duration of bruxing events (bursts) and various pain symptoms. RESULTS: The BFB group showed a statistically significant reduction in the frequency and duration of bursts and a statistically significant improvement in the patients' global well-being and the facial muscle pain parameter. After the treatment was stopped, the BFB group showed a statistically significant reduction in the average and maximum duration but no statistically significant change in the frequency of bursts. CONCLUSIONS: The tested BFB splint is highly effective in reducing SB at the subconscious level, i.e., without waking the patient, and in achieving improvements in global pain perception. The results suggest that the BFB splint also provides a better treatment option for bruxism-related pain than an AOS. However, further research is needed, and specifically studies with a larger patient population displaying higher levels of pain at baseline. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: By reducing burst duration and therefore the pathological load on the masticatory apparatus, the BFB splint reduces TMD and bruxism-related symptoms and improves patients' physical well-being. In the long term, this could prevent damage to the TMJ. This study confirms the effectiveness and safety of this splint. THE UNIVERSAL TRIAL NUMBER: U1111-1239-2450 DRKS-ID REGISTRATION: DRKS00018092.

Does biofeedback therapy improve quality of life in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction: parents' perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) is a situation that often disrupts the quality of life (QoL) of both the child and the family with daytime and nighttime incontinence. Although the first-line treatment option for children with LUTD is standard urotherapy, biofeedback therapy can be performed in children in which standard urotherapy failed. OBJECTIVE: We studied the biofeedback success in children with LUTD according to parents' expressions. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our hospital records of children who were diagnosed with LUTD between 2005 and 2017. In total, 281 patients, refractory to standard urotherapy were included into the study and directed to biofeedback treatment. Their parents completed the dysfunctional voiding symptom scores (DVSS) before and after biofeedback therapy. RESULTS: At the end of the six-month follow-up period, all voiding disorders and voiding patterns were evaluated. According to DVSS, QoL tools before biofeedback treatment 48 (17%) parents appraised that LUTD caused no effect in their children's daily life, 104 (37.8%) expressed little effect, 89 (31%) moderate effect, and 40 (14.2%) serious effect. And, 120 (43%) parents expressed no effect, 95 (34%) little effect, 51 (18%) moderate effect, and 15 (5%) serious effect (P = 0.001) after biofeedback therapy. Biofeedback therapy affected positively the daily life of LUTD's family. The less serious the effect of LUTD on these children's family, the more success rate of biofeedback therapy. The effect of biofeedback therapy was less successful in moderated and serious affected families. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback treatment is a non-invasive and effective treatment modality for improving the QoL for LUTD families who were less suffered from LUTD.

Decreased electrodermal activity in patients with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Biofeedback therapy using electrodermal activity (EDA) is a new noninvasive therapy for intractable epilepsy. However, the characteristics of EDA in patients with epilepsy are little known; therefore, we assessed the EDA characteristics in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 22 patients with epilepsy and 24 healthy individuals. We collected information on demographic characteristics, EDA, and state anxiety from both groups, and epilepsy diagnosis, seizure number per month, disease duration, and number of antiepileptic drugs (AED) from the epilepsy group. A wristband device was used to measure resting EDA from both wrists for 10 min under controlled temperature and humidity. We compared the EDA levels between the epilepsy group and the control group and examined correlations between EDA and epilepsy-associated factors in the epilepsy group. RESULTS: A decreasing trend in EDA was observed during the first 1 min from the start of the measurement in 22 patients with epilepsy (with or without seizures) compared with healthy controls (P = 0.12). However, a significant decrease in EDA was found in 18 patients with epilepsy with seizures compared with healthy controls (-0.48 versus -0.26; P = 0.036). Furthermore, seizure frequency showed a significant inverse correlation with EDA in the epilepsy group (ρ = -0.50, P = 0.016). However, neither disease duration nor the number of drugs prescribed correlated with EDA in the epilepsy group . SIGNIFICANCE: Marginally decreased EDA was observed in patients with epilepsy, and significantly decreased EDA was found in patients with a higher seizure frequency. The present findings shed light on the appropriateness of EDA-biofeedback therapy in epilepsy.

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry can predict response to biofeedback therapy in defecation disorders.

PURPOSE: Biofeedback therapy (BT) is a simple and effective technique for managing outlet constipation and fecal incontinence. Several clinical factors are known to predict BT response, but a 50% failure rate persists. Better selection of BT responsive patients is required. We aimed to determine whether the defecation disorder type per high-resolution manometry (HRM) was predictive of BT response. METHODS: We analyzed clinical, manometric, and ultrasound endoscopic data from patients who underwent BT in our department between January 2015 and January 2016. Patients were classified into four groups per the following defecation disorder classification criteria: rectal pressure > 40 mmHg and anal paradoxical contraction (type I); rectal pressure < 40 mmHg and anal paradoxical contraction (type II); rectal pressure > 40 mmHg and incomplete anal relaxation (type III); and rectal pressure < 40 mmHg and incomplete anal relaxation (type IV). An experienced single operator conducted ten weekly 20-min sessions. Efficacy was evaluated with the visual analog scale. RESULTS: Of 92 patients, 47 (50.5%) responded to BT. Type IV and type II defecation disorders were predictive of success (p = 0.03) (OR = 5.03 [1.02; 24.92]) and failure (p = 0.05) (OR = 0.41 [0.17; 0.99]), respectively. The KESS score severity before BT (p = 0.03) (OR = 0.9 [0.81; 0.99]) was also predictive of failure. CONCLUSION: The manometry types identified according to the defecation disorder classification criteria were predictive of BT response. Our data confirm the role of three-dimensional HRM in the therapeutic management of anorectal functional disorders.

A Practical Guide to Biofeedback Therapy for Pelvic Floor Disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is effective for managing pelvic floor disorders (i.e., defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence). However, even in controlled clinical trials, only approximately 60% of patients with defecatory disorders experienced long-term improvement. The review serves to update practitioners on recent advances and to identify practical obstacles to providing biofeedback therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: The efficacy and safety of biofeedback therapy have been evaluated in defecatory disorders, fecal incontinence, and levator ani syndrome. Recent studies looked at outcomes in specific patient sub-populations and predictors of a response to biofeedback therapy. Biofeedback therapy is effective for managing defecatory disorders, fecal incontinence, and levator ani syndrome. Patients who have a lower bowel satisfaction score and use digital maneuvers fare better. Biofeedback therapy is recommended for patients with fecal incontinence who do not respond to conservative management. A subset of patients with levator ani syndrome who have dyssynergic defecation are more likely to respond to biofeedback therapy.