A national anti-doping education programme reduces doping susceptibility in British athletes.

The World Anti-Doping Agency's International Standard for Education instructs that national and international sport organisations evaluate their education programmes. We addressed this directive by examining the effectiveness of a national anti-doping programme. Athletes (N = 302, 41% female) completed measures of doping susceptibility, intention to use dietary supplements, Spirit of Sport and moral values, anti-doping knowledge and practice, and whistleblowing, prior-to and three-months after attending an anti-doping education programme. At three-month follow-up, athletes reported decreased doping susceptibility and intention to use dietary supplements coupled with increased importance of values, anti-doping knowledge, anti-doping practice and whistleblowing. Within-participant, moderated-mediation analyses revealed that programme-related changes in doping susceptibility were indirectly related to changes in intention to use dietary supplements, and, that this indirect relationship was moderated by moral values. These findings confirm the effectiveness of a national anti-doping education programme and highlight the contribution of dietary supplement use and personal values to changes in doping susceptibility.

Are dietary supplement users more likely to dope than non-users?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

In the past decade, a body of evidence has reported that dietary supplement use is related to prohibited performance enhancing substance use (i.e., doping). To help international and national sport organisations understand the degree to which dietary supplement use is related to doping, the objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to 1) compare the prevalence of doping between dietary supplement users and non-users and 2) identify whether supplement use is related to doping social cognitive factors. We searched for studies sampling athletes and that measured both dietary supplement use and doping in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus from database creation to May 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for cross-sectional studies and the STROBE checklist. Twenty-six cross-sectional studies, involving 13,296 athletes were included. Random-effect models revealed that doping was 2.74 (95% CI=2.10 to 3.57) times more prevalent in dietary supplement users (pooled prevalence = 14.7%) than non-users (6.7%), and that users reported stronger doping intentions (r=0.26, 0.18 to 0.34) and attitudes (r=0.21, 0.13 to 0.28) compared to non-users. Preliminary evidence also suggests that dietary supplement users were less likely to dope if they were more task oriented and had a stronger sense of morality. Results of the review are limited by the cross-sectional design used in all studies and lack of consistency in measurement of dietary supplement use and doping. Data indicate that athletes using dietary supplements are more likely to self-report doping Anti-doping policy should, therefore, target dietary supplement use in anti-doping education programmes by providing alternative strategies for performance enhancement or highlighting the safest ways they can be consumed. Similarly, as a large proportion of athletes use dietary supplements without doping, further research is needed to understand the factors that protect a dietary supplement user from doping. No funding was received for the review. A study protocol can be found here: https://osf.io/xvcaq.

Are Dietary Supplements a Gateway to Doping? A Retrospective Survey of Athletes' Substance Use.

Background: It is proposed that the use of dietary supplements might lead to the use of doping substances. This has been termed the gateway hypothesis. However, within an athletic sample, no research has examined the order in which these substances are consumed and what may explain the progression from dietary supplement use to doping. Objective: To identify whether dietary supplement use precedes doping and examine what moderates the dietary supplement-doping relationship. Methods: Competitive athletes (N=1,081, 42.0% female; Age=29.3±10.8 years) completed an online survey measuring dietary supplement use, doping use, doping subjective norms and age of using a supplement and/or doping substance. Results: Dietary supplement users were 11 times more likely to dope than non-users (OR=11.28, 95% CI = 2.72 to 46.77). Age for first use of a dietary supplement was younger than use of a doping substance (mean difference=-4.5±5.1 years old, p<0.001, d=0.90). Over three-quarters of doping users reported using a dietary supplement first (77.1%), whereas a small proportion of athletes started using dietary supplements and doping at the same time (12.5%) and some used doping substances before using dietary supplements (10.4%). Moderation analysis revealed that dietary supplement users may be more likely to dope because of a more favourable social acceptance of using prohibited substances than non-users. Conclusions: Data suggest that dietary supplement use is more likely to precede doping. However, not all doping users begin with using dietary supplements, which highlights the importance of measuring the temporal order of dietary supplement and doping use in future research.