Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Oral Health Prev Dent ; 21(1): 93-102, 2023 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37014213

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Antibiotics play an important role in treating periodontal diseases. Due to the effectiveness of antibiotic therapies, their usage in dentistry has significantly increased. The aim of this study focused on the in-vitro susceptibility of different gram-negative oral bacteria species - which are associated with periodontal diseases (Fusobacterium spp., Capnocytophaga spp. and Leptotrichia buccalis) and have different geographical origins (Asia and Europe) - against antimicrobials that are clinically relevant in dental therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 strains were tested (29 Fusobacterium spp., 13 Capnocytophaga spp. and 3 L. buccalis) that were either isolated from Chinese patients or were obtained from different strain collections. Their antimicrobial susceptibility to the antimicrobial agents benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, doxycycline, tetracycline and metronidazole was tested using the E-Test. Strains with particular resistance to penicillin, clindamycin and metronidazole were further analysed for resistance genes. RESULTS: All tested bacterial isolates were sensitive to amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, doxycycline and tetracycline, but showed variable sensitivity towards other antibiotics such as benzylpenicillin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin and metronidazole. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that certain periodontal disease-related bacterial strains can be resistant towards antimicrobial agents commonly used in adjuvant periodontal therapy.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Leptothrix , Doenças Periodontais , Humanos , Clindamicina , Metronidazol , Capnocytophaga , Doxiciclina , Fusobacterium , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/farmacologia , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/uso terapêutico , Moxifloxacina , Leptotrichia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Amoxicilina/farmacologia , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina
2.
Anaerobe ; 69: 102358, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33741507

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Repeatedly, too low MIC results were obtained in Bacteroides fragilis quality assessment strains, using gradient strip tests with a ratio of amoxicillin:clavulanic acid of 2:1. We aimed to find the most accurate available gradient strip tests for susceptibility testing of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in B. fragilis in comparison with agar dilution with EUCAST methodology and breakpoints. METHODS: Twenty-seven clinical B. fragilis isolates were investigated using gold standard EUCAST amoxicillin/clavulanic acid agar dilution (fixed clavulanic acid concentration at 2 mg/L, with increasing amoxicillin concentrations) as well as three commercial gradient strip tests: XL (ratio), AUG (ratio) or AMC (fixed concentration). RESULTS: Using agar dilution (fixed concentration), 19 isolates were susceptible, 1 isolate was susceptible increased exposure (I) and 7 isolates were resistant. Categorical agreement of the gradient strip tests with agar dilution (fixed concentration) was 70% for XL (ratio), 71% for AUG (ratio) and 89% for AMC (fixed concentration). Very major error rates in comparison with agar dilution (fixed concentration) were 100%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUCAST breakpoint usage in amoxicillin/clavulanic acid susceptibility tests for B. fragilis should be accompanied by EUCAST methodology. When using alternative methods such as gradient strip tests, a higher degree of alignment with EUCAST methodology, such as using fixed clavulanic acid concentrations, improves precision.


Assuntos
Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bacteroides/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteroides fragilis/efeitos dos fármacos , Bacteroides fragilis/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Fitas Reagentes , Variação Genética , Genótipo , Humanos
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32958715

RESUMO

We applied combination antibiotic therapy to treat vertebral osteomyelitis and a psoas abscess caused by glycopeptide-intermediate (MIC, 2 µg/ml) and daptomycin-nonsusceptible (>2 µg/ml) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus The Etest synergy test showed the largest synergistic effects for imipenem/cilastatin and fosfomycin. Whole-gene sequencing showed amino acid changes in SA0802, SA1193 (mprF), and SA1531 (ald). Four weeks of combination treatment using imipenem/cilastatin (1.5 g per day) and fosfomycin (4.0 g per day) resulted in clinical improvement.


Assuntos
Fosfomicina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Osteomielite , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fosfomicina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imipenem/uso terapêutico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Osteomielite/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Salvação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
4.
J Mycol Med ; 30(2): 100970, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32334948

RESUMO

A survey of mycology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) was undertaken in France in 2018, to better understand the difference in practices between the participating centers and to identify the difficulties they may encounter as well as eventual gaps with published standards and guidelines. The survey captured information from 45 mycology laboratories in France on how they perform AFST (number of strains tested, preferred method, technical and quality aspects, interpretation of the MIC values, reading and interpretation difficulties). Results indicated that 86% of respondents used Etest as AFST method, with a combination of one to seven antifungal agents tested. Most of the participating laboratories used similar technical parameters to perform their AFST method and a large majority used, as recommended, internal and external quality assessments. Almost all the participating mycology laboratories (98%) reported difficulties to interpret the MIC values, especially when no clinical breakpoints are available. The survey highlighted that the current AFST practices in France need homogenization, particularly for MIC reading and interpretation.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Laboratórios , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Micologia , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/normas , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , França , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Laboratórios/normas , Laboratórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial/métodos , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/normas , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Micologia/história , Micologia/métodos , Micologia/normas , Micologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/normas , Controle de Qualidade , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31358578

RESUMO

MIC values for amphotericin B and three azoles determined by the EUCAST reference technique and by gradient concentration strips were compared for 30 Mucorales isolates belonging to clinically important species. Essential agreement (EA) within ±2 dilution steps at 24 hours between the techniques was 83.3% for isavuconazole. EAs for itraconazole, amphotericin B, and posaconazole were 86.7%, 73.3%, and 56.7%, respectively. A good agreement was obtained between visual and spectrophotometric readings for EUCAST.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Mucorales/efeitos dos fármacos , Nitrilas/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Anfotericina B/uso terapêutico , Azóis/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Itraconazol/uso terapêutico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
6.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29941644

RESUMO

A total of 301 Candida bloodstream isolates collected from 289 patients over 5 years at a tertiary hospital in Qatar were evaluated. Out of all Candida infections, 53% were diagnosed in patients admitted to the intensive care units. Steady increases in non-albicans Candida species were reported from 2009 to 2014 (30.2% for Candida albicans versus 69.8% for the other Candida species). Etest antifungal susceptibility testing was performed on all recovered clinical isolates to determine echinocandin (micafungin and anidulafungin) and amphotericin B susceptibilities and assess non-wild-type (non-WT) strains (strains for which MICs were above the epidemiological cutoff values). DNA sequence analysis was performed on all isolates to assess the presence of FKS mutations, which confer echinocandin resistance in Candida species. A total of 3.9% of isolates (12/301) among strains of C. albicans and C. orthopsilosis contained FKS hot spot mutations, including heterozygous mutations in FKS1 For C. tropicalis, the Etest appeared to overestimate strains non-WT for micafungin, anidulafungin, and amphotericin B, as 14%, 11%, and 35% of strains, respectively, had values above the epidemiological cutoff value. However, no FKS mutations were identified in this species. For all other species, micafungin best reported the echinocandin non-WT strains relative to the FKS genotype, as anidulafungin tended to overestimate non-wild-type strains. Besides C. tropicalis, few strains were classified as non-WT for amphotericin B.


Assuntos
Anfotericina B/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacorresistência Fúngica/efeitos dos fármacos , Equinocandinas/uso terapêutico , Candidemia/microbiologia , Candidíase/microbiologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Catar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29530845

RESUMO

Strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), particularly those belonging to the USA300 pulsotype, have been well described to cause severe osteoarticular infections (OAIs). A vancomycin MIC of ≥1.5 µg/ml has been demonstrated to contribute to disease severity in adults with MRSA and even methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. Little data exist describing the outcomes of MSSA OAIs in terms of molecular characteristics and vancomycin MIC. All patients/isolates were chosen from a surveillance study at Texas Children's Hospital (TCH). S. aureus OAI isolates were identified from 2011 to 2016 and subjected to vancomycin Etests, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and PCR to determine Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) production and agr group. Two hundred fifty-two cases of S. aureus OAI were identified; 183 cases were MSSA (72.6%). During the study period, a decrease in the proportion of cases secondary to MRSA was observed, declining from 37.8% to 15.9% (P = 0.02). Of the MSSA isolates, 26.2% and 23.5% were USA300 and PVL positive, respectively. An increase in the proportion of MSSA isolates with a vancomycin MIC of ≥1.5 µg/ml occurred in the study period (P = 0.004). In MSSA, an elevated vancomycin MIC was associated with multiple surgical procedures and venous thromboses, even when adjusting for empirical ß-lactam use. An increase in vancomycin MIC was noted among isolates belonging to agr group 4 during the study period. Methicillin resistance is declining among S. aureus OAI isolates at TCH. Simultaneously, vancomycin Etest MICs are increasing among MSSA isolates. Vancomycin MICs of ≥2 µg/ml are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in MSSA irrespective of antibiotic choice, suggesting that this may be a surrogate for organism virulence.


Assuntos
Doenças Ósseas Infecciosas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Vancomicina/farmacologia
8.
J Med Microbiol ; 67(1): 68-73, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29219803

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a sexually transmitted bacterial pathogen that continues to evolve to become resistant to known antibiotics. In preparing for potential emergence, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that clinical laboratories maintain or develop protocols to assess antibiotic susceptibly for this organism. This study examines the intra-laboratory variability of using the Etest method to provide consistent MIC values for N. gonorrhoeae and also compared the results of the Etest to known agar dilution MIC values. METHODOLOGY: Clinical N. gonorrhoeae isolates, 100 paired duplicates, were tested by eight laboratories for antibiotic susceptibility to ceftriaxone, cefixime and azithromycin using Etest strips.Results/Key findings. Overall, >80 % of the paired Etest MIC values were within one log2 dilution of the replicate. When compared to the agar dilution reference method, the cefixime Etest MIC values were consistently underreported by one dilution (seven laboratories) or two dilutions (one laboratory). The azithromycin Etest MIC values agreed 90.7 % with the agar dilution MIC values while the agreement with ceftriaxone was 90.9 %. CONCLUSION: Overall, the Etest method yielded reproducible MIC values within each laboratory with the azithromycin and ceftriaxone MIC results consistent to the reference agar dilution method while the cefixime result tended to provide a lower MIC value.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/efeitos dos fármacos , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolamento & purificação , Azitromicina/farmacologia , Cefixima/farmacologia , Ceftriaxona/farmacologia , Gonorreia/microbiologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
9.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 49(9): 647-654, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28440099

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increasing resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) to antibiotics calls for constant re-evaluation of multidrug regimens that have been used to eradicate the infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current antibiotic susceptibility of H. pylori in an Icelandic cohort. METHODS: Patients referred for gastroscopy were recruited prospectively. Those found to have a positive rapid urease test were included in the study. Susceptibility testing was conducted by the Epsilometer test (E-test) method for ampicillin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole and tetracycline. Results were obtained after three days of incubation in microaerophilic conditions at 37 °C, except for the metronidazole were the first 24 hours were anaerobic. RESULTS: Of the 613 patients who underwent gastroscopy, 138 (23%) had a positive rapid urease test. H. pylori was successfully cultured from 105 (76%) of the urease test positive patients and the isolates were tested for antibiotic susceptibility. Five patients had prior H. pylori eradication. Antibiotic resistance for ampicillin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole and tetracycline was 0%, 9%, 4%, 1% and 0%, respectively. If those who had previously undergone eradication treatment were excluded, the resistance was 0%, 6%, 3%, 1% and 0%, respectively. Clarithromycin resistance was higher amongst women than men, 13% vs. 5%, however, not significantly. Clarithromycin resistance was 60% amongst those who had previously received eradication treatment compared to 6% of those who had not (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin resistance amongst the H. pylori isolates can be considered relatively low. Therefore, in the current cohort, standard triple-drug clarithromycin-containing regimen should remain the first-line treatment against H. pylori.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Helicobacter pylori/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Claritromicina/administração & dosagem , Claritromicina/farmacologia , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Gastroscopia , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/epidemiologia , Humanos , Islândia/epidemiologia , Levofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Levofloxacino/farmacologia , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Metronidazol/farmacologia , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
10.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 20(12): O1098-105, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24890030

RESUMO

Despite recent controversies about toxicity and reduced efficacy, vancomycin remains the current treatment of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia. The parameter associated with treatment success is the vancomycin 24-h area under concentration-time curve to MIC ratio (AUC0-24/MIC). We aimed to determine the utility of calculated AUCs and explore the optimal AUC0-24/MIC targets associated with treatment success. In this single-centre retrospective observational cohort study of 127 patients with MRSA bacteraemia, forty-five (35.4%) did not respond to vancomycin treatment. Patient characteristics were essentially the same between those who did not respond to vancomycin treatment and those with treatment success, with independent predictors of treatment failure being source of bacteraemia (odds ratio (OR), 4.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.50-12.26; p 0.007) and not achieving an AUC0-24/MICBMD (using broth microdilution) target of ≥398 (OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 4.57-28.46; p< 0.001). Bacteraemic source-specific thresholds were observed with a higher AUC0-24/MICBMD target of 440 required for high-risk sources (e.g. infective endocarditis) compared with 330 for low-risk sources (line related bacteraemia). Overall treatment success in patients with MRSA bacteraemia was associated with a vancomycin AUC0-24/MICBMD target of ≥398, with source-specific targets observed. Future vancomycin practice guidelines will need to take into account MIC methodology, source of bacteraemia and patient populations prior to setting targets and monitoring recommendations.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/sangue , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Vancomicina/sangue , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Área Sob a Curva , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Falha de Tratamento , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA