Effective Treatment of Rosacea and Other Vascular Lesions Using Intense Pulsed Light System Emitting Vascular Chromophore-Specific Wavelengths: A Clinical and Dermoscopical Analysis.

Background: Facial telangiectasias is a prevalent cosmetic disorder that can be associated with several conditions such as rosacea. IPL (intensity pulsed light) therapy is commonly used for the treatment of vascular lesions. This study tested the efficacy of an IPL system emitting selected vascular chromophore-specific wavelengths in the range of 500-1200 nm for the treatment of vascular lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 39 patients affected by different vascular lesions on their face were enrolled. The procedure consisted of three treatment sessions, spaced 1 month apart, using the IPL system with a 500-677 and 854-1200 nm filter. Follow-up was performed at 21-90 days (3 weeks-3 months) after the last IPL session. Three-dimensional and dermoscopic clinical photographs were captured and evaluated using a five-point scale. Adverse events were checked. Results: In total, 21 patients achieved excellent improvement, 13 patients achieved good improvement, 3 patients achieved moderate improvement, 2 patients achieved mild improvement, and 0 patients achieved no improvement, with an overall good response to treatment. The photographic evaluation showed good results as soon as 3 days after the last IPL session. Relevant side effects were absent. Conclusions: The study device may represent a successful treatment to improve vascular lesions that are resistant to laser therapy.

Tear Film Lipid Layer Changes Following Combined Effect of Heated Eye Mask with Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Evaporative Dry Eye: A Randomized Control Study.

Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a complex ocular surface inflammatory disorder with a multifactorial etiology. Therapies such as intense pulsed light (IPL) and heated eye mask (HEM) have been reported to improve the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) and signs and symptoms of DED. Methods: This randomized study aimed to compare the effects of IPL combined with HEM (IPL+HEM) group, IPL group, and control group in participants with evaporative DED. All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 21 (D21), day 42 (D42), and day 84 (D84) for noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), TFLL, corneal conjunctival staining (CS), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expressibility (MGEx), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Results: The mean age of participants was IPL+HEM: 28.06 ± 3.88 years, IPL: 29.88 ± 4.68 years, and control: 28.52 ± 3.77 years. At D84, significant improvements in TFLL (p < 0.05), noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) (p < 0.05), corneoconjunctival staining (CS) (p < 0.05), MGQ (p < 0.05), MGEx (p < 0.05), and OSDI (p < 0.05) were found in the IPL+HEM and IPL groups, whereas the control group had no significant improvements. Furthermore, ΔTFLL significantly correlated with ΔNITBUT (r = -0.678, p < 0.001), ΔCS (r = 0.321, p < 0.001), ΔMGQ (r = 0.669, p < 0.001), ΔMGEx (r = 0.598, p < 0.001), and ΔOSDI score (r = 0.649, p < 0.001). Conclusions: IPL therapy in combination with HEM and IPL therapy only can significantly improve the quality of TFLL and clinically reduce the sign and symptoms of evaporative DED. However, IPL therapy in combination with HEM was found to be more effective than IPL therapy alone.

Hyperspectral assessment of acne skin exposed to intense pulsed light (IPL) intense pulsed light in acne treatment.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of intense pulsed light action on the skin is based on selective photothermolysis. The light delivered to the tissue is scattered and absorbed by chromophores that absorb a beam of radiation of a specific length. The skin reflectance changes depending on the physiological state of the tissue, as shown by the hyperspectral camera. The aim of the study was to assess the hyperspectral reflectance of acne skin before and after intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and to compare it with the reflectance of healthy skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 27 volunteers with diagnosed moderate acne. The control group consisted of 20 people without acne lesions. All acne volunteers underwent a series of four treatments using IPL at weekly intervals. The volunteers with acne lesions were photographed before the series of treatments and a week after the 4th treatment. RESULTS: Acne skin shows lower reflectance than healthy skin. Acne skin after IPL therapy is characterized by a higher reflectance compared to acne skin before the therapy and resembles the reflectance of the skin of the control group. A statistically significant difference was found between the acne skin before the treatments and the skin of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of IPL therapy on acne skin is the increase of its reflectance by reducing the number of chromophores, which brings it closer to the reflectance value of healthy skin. Hyperspectral imaging allows for: the evaluation of the treated skin at each stage, a precise selection of the light wavelength depending on the problem, and therefore, for optimizing the number of irradiations and increasing the safety of the therapy.

Assessment of adverse events for a home-use intense pulsed light hair removal device using postmarketing surveillance.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) hair removal devices are convenient for consumers. Consumer safety associated with home-use IPL devices, however, remains a subject of interest. In this descriptive analysis, we assessed the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) for a home-use IPL device from postmarketing surveillance and qualitatively compared these with AEs from clinical studies and medical device reports of home-use IPL treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this analysis of voluntary reports, we queried a distributor's postmarketing database for IPL devices for the period beginning January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. All sources of comments, for example, phone, e-mail, company-sponsored web sites, were included in the analysis. AE data were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology. Also, we conducted a PubMed search to identify AE profiles from existing literature on home-use IPL devices and we searched the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for reports on home-use IPL devices. These results were qualitatively compared to the data in the postmarketing surveillance database. RESULTS: A total of 1692 cases involving IPL were identified from voluntary reports of AEs between 2016 and 2021. The shipment-adjusted reporting rate for AE cases (number of AE cases/100,000 shipped IPL devices) was 67/100,000 during this 6-year period. The most commonly reported AEs were pain of skin 27.8% (470/1692), "thermal burn" 18.7% (316/1692), and erythema 16.0% (271/1692). Among the top 25 AEs reported, no unexpected health events were observed. The reported AEs were qualitatively similar to the pattern seen in clinical studies and the MAUDE database associated with such home-use IPL treatments. CONCLUSION: This is the first such report documenting AEs for home-use IPL hair removal from a postmarketing surveillance program. These data are supportive of the safety of such home-use low-fluence IPL technology.

Expert opinion about laser and intense pulsed light (IPL)-induced leukoderma or vitiligo: a cross-sectional survey study.

Vitiligo patients may desire laser hair removal, skin rejuvenation, vascular treatments, and other laser or intense pulsed light (IPL) assisted treatments. However, there is a risk of inducing new depigmented patches (Koebner phenomenon). In absence of guidelines on the safe use of laser or IPL in vitiligo patients, dermatologists tend to be reluctant to administer these treatments. The aim of this survey study was to provide an estimation of the occurrence and related risk factors of laser/IPL-induced leukoderma or vitiligo. A cross-sectional survey study was performed among 15 vitiligo experts from 11 countries, with 14 questions about affected patients, involved laser/IPL treatments and the physicians' approach. In a total of 11,300 vitiligo patients, laser/IPL-induced leukoderma or vitiligo was reported in 30 patients (0.27%). Of these, 12 (40%) patients had a medical history of vitiligo and seven (58%) of these patients had stable (> 12 months) vitiligo before the treatment. Most frequently reported were hair removal procedures and localization of the face and legs. Side effects like blistering, crusting, and erosions occurred in 56.7% of the cases. These vitiligo experts based their advice on the risk of the laser treatment on stability of the vitiligo (43%) and activity signs (50%), and 50% discuss the risks before starting a laser treatment. Relevant activity signs are the Koebner phenomenon (57.1%), confetti-like lesions (57.1%) and hypochromic borders (50%). Laser-induced leukoderma or vitiligo is an uncommon phenomenon. Remarkably, a minority had a medical history of vitiligo of which 58% were stable. Consequently, most cases could not have been prevented by not treating vitiligo patients. However, a majority had laser/IPL-induced skin damage. Therefore, caution is advised with aggressive settings and test-spots prior to the treatment are recommended. This study showed significant variation in the current recommendations and approach of vitiligo experts regarding laser/IPL-induced leukoderma or vitiligo.

Combined therapy of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy and intense pulsed light for rosacea.

Rosacea is difficult to treat. Therefore, new alternative modalities are necessary to demonstrate. The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) and intense pulsed light (IPL) for rosacea to provide a new treatment option for rosacea. The study was conducted from November 2017 to April 2019 at the Department of Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University. Patients aged 18-65 years and diagnosed clinically as erythematotelangiectatic (ET) or papulopustular (PP) rosacea were enrolled. Three times of ALA-PDT at 10 days interval followed by 3 times of IPL at 3-4 weeks interval were defined as 1 session and applied to the whole face of each patient. ALA-PDT: 5% ALA, red light (fluency dose 60-100 mW/cm2, 20 min); IPL: 560/590/640 nm, double/triple-pulse mode, pulse width 3.0 to 4.5 ms, delay time 30-40 ms, energy fluency 14-17 J/cm2. Ten patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 4 patients received only 1 session, while 6 patients received 2 sessions. After all treatments, 50% of patients achieved 75-100% improvement, and 30% achieved 50-75% improvement. Forty percent of patients were graded very satisfaction and 30% graded moderate satisfaction. All noninvasive measurements showed no significant differences among all time points (p > 0.05). The side effects were pain, burning sensation, itching, erythema, desquamation, slight edema, slight exudation, and hyperpigmentation. All of which were tolerable and recovered in a few days. The combined therapy of ALA-PDT and IPL showed an effective option for rosacea with a safety profile.

Optimized combined low level light therapy and intense pulsed light therapy for the treatment of dry eye syndrome caused by Meibomian glands dysfunction.

Dry eye syndrome (DES) is a common disease that can lead to ocular discomfort, reduced visual acuity and reduced quality of life. Meibomian Gland dysfunction plays an important role in most cases. To evaluate the effects of "EyeLight", a novel device delivering combined intense pulsed light (IPL) and low-level light therapy (LLLT), we conducted a retrospective chart review of patients refractory to conventional medical treatment who were treated with "EyeLight" therapy at Laser Vision, Lebanon. Each patient received between 2 to 5 treatment sessions. Clinical measurements were obtained before and after each session, including tear film breakup time (TBUT), ME-CHECK-meiboscale and the ME-CHECK questionnaire to determine the need for an additional session and to monitor progress. The same clinical evaluation was performed 3 to 5 weeks after the final treatment. A total of 52 eyes were included. A significant improvement in objective clinical signs was found, with an increase in TBUT from 6.98±1.41s. to 9.27±1.25s. (P<0.001) and a decrease in ME-CHECK-meiboscale (P<0.001). A reduction of severity level on the ME-CHECK-meiboscale classification was observed in 90%, along with a significant improvement in subjective clinical signs on the ME-CHECK questionnaire (P<0.001). No ocular or facial adverse events were noted. "EyeLight" treatment of 2 to 5 sessions depending on the severity of MGD in each eye showed an improvement in objective clinical signs and subjective symptoms and therefore appears to be an effective treatment for DES related to MGD refractory to conventional treatment.

Combined intense pulsed light and low-level light therapy for the treatment of refractory Meibomian gland dysfunction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of combined Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) in treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this prospective study, 70 patients with refractory MGD were enrolled; group 1 received 3 consecutive sessions of IPL + LLLT treatment using Eye-light® on day 1, day 15 and day 45; group 2 received hyaluronate sodium 2 mg/ml drops 3 times a day for 6 months. Patients underwent at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE), tear-film breakup time (TBUT), fluorescein ocular surface staining, meibum expressibility and quality evaluations. Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Germany) was used to assess NIBUT, tear meniscus height (TMH), meibography, and bulbar redness score. RESULTS: At 6 months a significant improvement of OSDI (p = 0.03), SANDE (p = 0.02), NIBUT (p = p < 0.0001), TMH (p = 0.04), TBUT (p = 0.02), corneal-conjunctival staining score (p = 0.02), lid margin score (p < 0.0001), and bulbar redness score (p = 0.001) were recorded in group 1. Comparing the two groups, statistically significant differences were observed at 6 months in TBUT (p = 0.03), lid margin score (p < 0.001), Meibum expressibility (p = 0.03) and NIBUT (p < 0.001). No adverse events were recorded throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the efficacy and safety of combined IPL and LLLT demonstrating its superiority compared to topical treatment.

The use of light in the treatment of acne vulgaris-a review.

Topical and oral antibiotic therapy is also a popular method of treatment. The effectiveness of this method is limited by the increasing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics. Over the decades since the introduction of antibiotics to treat acne, the resistance levels of bacteria have changed. This defense mechanism is developed evolutionarily. Modifications of antibiotic receptor sites, alteration of drug influx/efflux, or enzymatic degradation are common mechanisms used by bacteria to initiate and strengthen internal antibiotic resistance. The basic chromophores used in light therapy are hemoglobin, melanin, water bound to proteins, and porphyrins. Hemoglobin absorbs light mainly at 580 nm, while melanin absorbs the entire visible spectral range (400-750 nm). Porphyrins are aromatic compounds, classified as photosensitizing substances, intensively absorbing blue light, and to a lesser extent in long visible bands, such as orange and red light. Using IPL makes it possible to cover the maximum light absorption of porphyrins and hemoglobin, therefore it can be an effective tool in the treatment of inflammatory lesions in acne vulgaris. In view of the effectiveness of light therapy and its effect even on antibiotic-resistant bacteria, it is worth considering the possibility of using light therapy instead of antibiotic therapy. Due to the increasing resistance of bacteria to antimicrobials, they should be used with caution and as a last resort. The high-energy light treatment act only locally (unlike with antibiotics taken orally) and on a chromophore, such as melanin, hemoglobin, or porphyrins.

Efficacy and safety of Intense pulsed light therapy for dry eye caused by meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: This research explored the efficacy and safety of IPL in the treatment of dry eye caused by Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: A total of 132 patients with dry eye caused by MGD were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into either the experimental group or the control group by random number table. The experimental group (n=66) was treated with intense pulsed light (IPL), and the control group (n=66) was treated with palpebral gland massage combined with a hot compress. The efficacy, the incidence of adverse events, and patients' levels of satisfaction with treatment were compared between the 2 groups. The quality score of the palpebral gland, the height of the lacrimal river, and the change of tear secretion function were analyzed using a generalized linear equation at different time points. RESULTS: The total effective rates of experimental group and control group were 90.2% and 80.0%, respectively, and the therapeutic effects of experimental group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). In the generalized estimation equation, with the passing of time, the eyelid gland quality score for moderate and severe abnormality, the lacrimal river height measurements ≤0.35 mm, and the tear secretion measurements ≤5 mm all decreased (P<0.05). In addition, the moderate and severe abnormal eyelid gland quality score, the lacrimal river height measurements ≤0.35 mm and the tear secretion measurements≤5 mm of patients in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between two groups during treatment (P>0.05). In the satisfaction survey, patients who received IPL treatment had higher levels of satisfaction at 7 days and 30 days than those control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IPL is more effective in the treatment of eyelid gland dysfunction dry eye than a traditional eyelid gland massage combined with a hot compress. IPL effectively improves eye function and alleviates clinical symptoms and has good safety; thus, it can be considered for clinical application and promotion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100045886).

Study of autologous platelet-rich-plasma versus its combination with intense pulsed light in treatment of melasma.

Melasma is a common acquired hypermelanosis of variably successful therapies with frequent relapse. Platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) is a promising treatment in melasma, alone or combined with other treatments. We evaluated efficacy of autologous PRP in melasma treatment and the effect of combined intense pulsed light (IPL). Study included 20 Egyptian female melasma patients. PRP was injected in all melasma area and IPL was used on the right hemi-face. Melasma Area and Scoring Index (MASI) of melasma area, modified-MASI (mMASI) of PRP-IPL side and of PRP side significantly decreased after treatments (p-value < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between both sides regarding mMASI score or patient and physician satisfaction (p-value > 0.05). Our study provides the first comparison between PRP versus its combination with IPL in melasma treatment. We think the improvement of melasma with regression of melasma scores after PRP treatment is an important finding.

Safety and Efficacy of an Augmented Intense Pulse Light Protocol for Dry Eye Syndrome and Blepharitis.

Objective: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an augmented BroadBand Light (BBL™) protocol on the upper and lower eyelids in improving meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and/or dry eye disease (DED). Background: DED, often associated with MGD, can cause significant morbidity and accounts for 3.54 billion U.S. dollars of health care spending yearly. Intense pulsed light (IPL) has been used to treat MGD DED with some success. BBL therapy, a high-quality IPL machine, shows much promise for decreasing inflammation and redness in rosacea, as well as hyperpigmentation from sun damage. Methods: A retrospective medical chart review was performed for MGD DED and/or hyperpigmentation patients who received BBL therapy between January 1, 2015, and February 28, 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients who underwent at least one BBL treatment. Each treatment involved the upper and lower eyelids, as well as cheeks, nose, and face. Each MGD DED subject completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and underwent pre- and post-treatment standard clinical examinations. Results: Forty-seven patients had treatment without significant adverse effects; all patients with MGD DED reported improvement in their dry eye or blepharitis. BBL was determined to be a safe and effective treatment. There were no changes in visual acuity (p = 0.555) and OSDI scores were improved (p = 0.016). There was one case each of mild corneal/conjunctival abrasion, temporary hyperpigmentation, and two of temporary eyelash thinning. Patients with MGD also showed significant improvement in blepharitis and reduced hordeolum frequency after BBL treatment. Conclusions: This novel IPL/BBL protocol appears safe and effective for treating dry eye and blepharitis.

[Intense pulsed light treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa: a within-person randomized controlled trial]. / Intense pulsed light treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa: a within-person randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease of the intertriginous areas. HS affects hair follicles causing perifollicular inflammation, resulting in the formation of nodules and painful abscesses. Intense pulsed light (IPL) uses selective photothermolysis to destroy the hair follicles. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of IPL hair removal as treatment for mild-to-moderate HS. MATERIALS & METHODS: We conducted a single-blinded, clinical randomized trial with patients with Hurley Stage I-II. Patients with symmetrical disease were randomized to monthly unilateral treatment of the axilla or groin. The contralateral side served as internal control. Concomitant treatment modalities for HS were not permitted throughout the study. Efficacy was assessed using Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), modified Sartorius score (MSS) and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients completed the trial and were included in the analysis. HiSCR was not evaluated in patients without abscesses or inflammatory nodules pre-treatment. HiSCR was insignificantly different between the intervention side (8/12) and control side (4/10), P=0.467. There was, however, a significant reduction in regional MSS on the intervention side with a median score decreasing from 8.5 (IQR: 6.3-13.5) to 4.5 (IQR 1.8-8.0) post-treatment, P=0.006, and an insignificant score reduction in the control side from 6.0 (IQR: 4.5-8.3) to 5.0 (IQR: 2.5-9.0), post-treatment P=0.492. CONCLUSION: IPL hair removal resulted in a significant reduction on MSS on the treated area with no significant reduction on the control side. Our study suggests that IPL may be an effective treatment for mild-to-moderate HS.

Subjective Quality of Vision in Evaporative Dry Eye Patients After Intense Pulsed Light.

Background and objective: Intense pulsed light (IPL) improves visual and clinical symptoms of dry eye disease and helps improve meibomian gland (MG) function thereby positively contributing to the tear lipid layer, a major component for a normal tear film physiology. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of IPL in moderate to severe evaporative dry eye (DE) owing to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) on the subjective quality of vision (QOV). Methods: This is a prospective, open-label study; patients with moderate to severe evaporative DE owing to MGD were consecutively enrolled and underwent two IPL treatment sessions at 3-week intervals. Clinical assessments included: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and QOV questionnaires, noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), interferometric fringe pattern as determined by tear film lipid layer (TFLL) quality, lid margin abnormalities, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), conjunctival hyperemia (CH) redness score, MG (evaluated with a slit-lamp microscope), best-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count, and intraocular pressure were conducted at pretreatment, days 21 and 42 after IPL treatment. Results: A total of 128 eyes of 64 patients (39 women, 25 men; mean age 36.09 ± 11.13 years) with moderate to severe DE owing to MGD consecutively received IPL treatment at days 1 and 21. OSDI (p < 0.05), QOV (p < 0.05), NITBUT (p < 0.05), TFLL score (p < 0.05), and MG quality and expressibility (p < 0.05) improved significantly at day 42, whereas CFS and CH showed minor not significant improvements (p > 0.05) at day 42 of assessment. Conclusions: IPL treatment reduced the severity of DE symptoms and improved the overall tear film stability in patients with moderate to severe evaporative DE owing to MGD. In addition, visual complaints experienced by DE patients secondary to MGD significantly decreased.

Auto-flocculation microalgae species Tribonema sp. and Synechocystis sp. with T-IPL pretreatment to improve swine wastewater nutrient removal.

It is recognized coupling microalgae, which is rich in lipids or protein with wastewater treatment offers extra economic benefits that can potentially make microalgal production feasible by reducing production costs and providing environmental benefits. However, the pretreatment of high concentration nutrients such as ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), total phosphorus (TP) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) in swine wastewater is the premise of application for microalgae in wastewater treatment. This study two auto-flocculation microalgae Tribonema sp. and Synechocystis sp. were selected for evaluation; they were cultivated in diluted swine wastewater together after it was pretreated with titanium dioxide (TiO2) plus intense pulsed light (T-IPL). The results showed that the growth of the two strains in the wastewater pretreated with T-IPL grew better than when grown without the pretreatment. The content of lipid in the two algae, cultured in the pretreated wastewater, was also higher than the lipid content from the un-pretreated wastewater; but protein content was lower. Overall, the removal efficiencies of pollutants NH3-N, TP, and COD by the two microalgae in anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater (ADSW) with T-IPL pretreatment, were higher than the removal efficiencies without pretreatment. This research also indicates that these two auto-flocculation microalgae have the potential to reduce harvesting costs. And, using T-IPL to pretreat wastewater could provide a promising method for the pretreatment of wastewater.

The results of the diode laser hair reduction treatments after the IPL hair reduction treatments.

Introduction: Lasers and IPL action are similarly based on the selective photo thermolysis principle, where the melanin acts as chromatophore. There are, however, fundamental differences in the way they are built and in the light they emit.The goal of this paper is to compare the results of epilation treatments by a laser and by an IPL and to rate the effectiveness of a diode laser epilation following a non-coherent light therapy.Methods: 45 healthy females, 21-23 years old, skin type II-III took part in the study.805 nm diode laser and the IPL device with a wavelength of 640-1200 nm, was used. The informed consent for participation and treatment was obtained during a consultation. The participants were randomly divided into three groups of 15: I - one IPL treatment was followed by three diode laser treatments, II - two IPL treatments followed by three diode laser treatments, III- three IPL treatments followed by three diode laser treatments.Results: A percentage average of hair loss among patients treated with a diode laser as a control group is higher which indicates the laser's higher effectiveness.Conclusion: The IPL has been shown to negatively impact the effectiveness of a diode laser. This is linked with the way non-coherent light weakens and thins the hair that impedes the absorption of laser light by the melanin and adversely affects the treatment results.

Combined low level light therapy and intense pulsed light therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of combined intense pulsed light therapy (IPL) and low-level light therapy (LLLT) on clinical measures of dry eye related to severe meibomian gland disease (MGD) in subjects unresponsive to previous medical management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients treated by 4 physicians at 3 centers. All patients were documented treatment failures with traditional pharmaceutical therapy. They all had their MGD evaluated before treatment using a grading scale (0-4), tear breakup time in seconds and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. To be included, all patients had to have had a short course of adjunct pharmaceutical or device-related therapy, along with a combined IPL/LLLT treatment. As well, a second MGD evaluation with the same three measures had to have been conducted 1-3 months post treatment. RESULTS: A total of 460 eyes of 230 patients were identified for inclusion in the data set. Mean OSDI scores were significantly lower after treatment; 70.4% of patients had pretreatment OSDI scores indicative of dry eye; this dropped to 29.1% of patients after treatment. A 1-step or greater reduction in MGD grading was observed in 70% of eyes, with 28% of eyes having a 2-step or greater reduction. Tear breakup time was ≤6 seconds in 86.7% of eyes pretreatment, dropping to 33.9% of eyes after treatment. There were no ocular or facial adverse events or side effects related to the combined light treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of combined IPL/LLLT for the treatment of severe MGD appears to be beneficial in patients who have failed topical and/or systemic therapy.

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light Treatment with Meibomian Gland Expression of the Upper Eyelids for Dry Eye Disease.

Objective: To investigate the safety of and change from baseline of tear breakup time and visual analog pain scales in dry eye disease subjects with upper lid Meibomian gland dysfunction after intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment assessing global ocular pain severity, ocular pain frequency, and ocular pain in the previous 24 h. This is a prospective single-site study. Methods: All patients received active treatment consisting of four treatments spaced no fewer than 2 weeks apart and no longer than 4 weeks apart. The IPL therapy was performed with a Lumenis M22 (Lumenis Ltd., Yokneam, Israel) xenon-based micropulsed IPL utilizing a 590 nm filter with a 6 mm clear SapphireCool cylindrical lightguide for the upper lids with a fluence of 10 J/cm2 across the upper eyelids, including the tragus for two passes. Patients then received expression of their meibomian glands using two cotton-tipped applicators. Tear breakup data were collected as well as global ocular pain, ocular pain episodes in the past 24 h and frequency of ocular pain episodes. Results: All of the assessments for the treated eyes improved over the course of treatment. Statistically significant physician increases in measured tear breakup times were measured for each eye independently. Statistically significant decreases in global eye dryness scale, eye dryness in the preceding 24 h, and frequency of ocular pain episodes between treatments were observed. There were no serious or nonserious adverse events in the trial. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that a new specialized 6 mm cylindrical handpiece for the M22 Lumenis IPL machine is safe and effective in increasing physician-measured tear breakup time as well as several scales of the symptoms of ocular dryness, including global symptoms, frequency of symptoms, and ocular dryness occurring within the previous 24 h before the study visit.

Intense Pulsed Light Treatment for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Skin Types III/IV.

Background and objective: Several cases of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), particularly the moderate to severe ones, are considered intractable by traditional therapy. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy has emerged as a new choice for management of MGD in recent years, given that use of lasers and optical treatments is typically challenging in patients with darker skin types. Methods: IPL treatment for MGD is administered in the periorbital area with the thinnest skin in our body, which has an inherent risk of skin side effects. We evaluated the effects and safety of this therapy in Chinese patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III-IV. Forty MGD patients were randomly administered IPL treatment with two types of parameters in the left and the right eye. Results: Results revealed that both parameter settings of IPL treatment could gradually and effectively raise the tear breakup time (BUT) and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score. However, younger patients showed better improvement in BUT (F = 19.54, p < 0.01) and OSDI (F = 9.93, p < 0.01) compared with older patients. Conclusions: Overall, results showed that IPL treatment is safe and effective in MGD patients with skin types III-IV.