Virtual Music Therapy for Substance Use Disorders in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

BACKGROUND: Music therapy (MT) is an effective adjunctive treatment for substance use disorders (SUD), which is primarily available in inpatient treatment centers and rarely provided in outpatient primary care. METHODS: We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual group MT program for SUD in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), and secondarily assessed patient perceptions of its effect. Feasibility was measured by implementation-related process measures, attendance and use of technology. Qualitative interviews eliciting participant perceptions were conducted to evaluate acceptability and effect. Mood scores, substance use and craving were measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Onboarding of the music therapist took 3.5 months. All MT sessions were attended by 1 to 5 individuals out of 6. Participants reported that group MT was "soothing" and "calming," gave them tools to treat cravings and stress, and created a sense of community. They reported that during sessions their cravings decreased. Anxiety and depression scores trended down, as did the number of days of substance use. They all stated they would seek out MT again. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that remote group MT is feasible and acceptable to our FQHC patients with SUD. Patients reported an improvement in mood and their ability to manage stress, and a decrease in substance use. CONCLUSION: We wish to build on the results of this study to enhance our understanding of the effects of MT in the outpatient setting, and broaden our patients' access to MT in primary care.

Bag Lady: A Soulful and Scientific Reflection on Black Women's Health.

At the intersection of sexism and racism, Black women experience undue burden of poor health. Established literature in both scientific and artistic arenas archive health disparities facing Black women such as mental health and suicidality. Using poetry, this piece serves as a channel to express the joys and pains of the human experience as well as inspire healing and synergy through honest examination of societal structures. This mixed media artistry (intended to be sung and spoken) weaves together lyrical and literary works, featuring by quotes from Erykah Badu's Bag Lady; Dr. Maya Angelou's many works; Ntozake Shange's for colored girls who have considered suicide / when the rainbow is enuf; and Dr. Melissa Harris-Perry's Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes, and Black Women in America. It ultimately articulates how to journey across the arc of triumph for well-being synergizing mind, body, and spirit.

The Role of Spirituality on Physical Activity and Sleep Among African American Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: African Americans with chronic conditions have reported the importance of spirituality in their lives. Aspects of spirituality have been shown to be related to physical activity (PA) and sleep, and PA and sleep affect quality of life (QOL). This study examined the association between spirituality, PA, and sleep in long-term African American breast cancer survivors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 323 breast cancer survivors who previously participated in a case-only study. During 2015-2016, participants completed a questionnaire focused on survivorship that used validated measures for spirituality, PA, and sleep. Adjusted binary and multinomial logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of spirituality with total PA, meeting PA guidelines, sleep duration, and sleep medication. RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 54.8 (SD = 9.89) years. The range of spirituality scores was 7-48 (median = 44). Among participants who had a score ≥ 44, 59% had high total PA, 61% met PA guidelines, 59% had high sleep duration, and 55% did not use sleep medication. Higher spirituality score was associated with higher total PA (aOR for ≥ 681 min/week: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.03-3.50), meeting PA guidelines (aOR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.06-2.98), sleep duration > 7 h/night (aOR: 1.72, 95% CI 1.05-2.83), and lack of sleep medication use (aOR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24-0.84). CONCLUSION: In African American long-term breast cancer survivors, a higher spirituality score increased the likelihood of greater PA and high sleep duration. These results indicate that interventions surrounding spirituality may benefit the QOL of African American breast cancer survivors.

US South Asian Youths' Perspectives on the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM).

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) includes varied medical and healthcare systems, healing practices, and products that are outside of allopathy/biomedicine. The aim of this study was to examine US South Asian youths' beliefs, practices, decision-making, and experiences of using CAM. Ten focus group discussions with 36 participants were conducted. Data were coded deductively and inductively by four coders, working in pairs. Thematic analysis was performed. Disagreements were resolved through consensus. The results showed that CAM was appealing because of its often low cost, ease of access, family traditions to use CAM, and the perception that it was safe to use. Participants exercised pluralistic health choices. Some responses suggested a hierarchy wherein allopathy was used for serious, acute issues, and CAM for much of the remaining issues. The high use of and trust in CAM among young US South Asians raises important issues (e.g., provider support and integration to prevent potential interactions and avoid delaying allopathic treatment). More exploration is needed about the decision-making processes of US South Asian youth, including the perceived benefits/limitations of allopathy and CAM. US healthcare practitioners should familiarize themselves with South Asian social and cultural beliefs about healing to provide culturally-appropriate services and enhance patient care.

Growing and Glowing: A Digital Media Campaign to Increase Access to Pregnancy-Related Health Information for Black Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Low birthweight is a health issue disproportionately experienced by Black women. In Hillsborough County, Florida, Black women experience higher rates of low birthweight compared to the rest of Florida. This study examines the feasibility of a second attempt to use a digital low birthweight campaign to increase knowledge about low birthweight and pregnancy among Black women in Hillsborough. METHODS: Content for the Growing and Glowing campaign was delivered on social media through a web series with local prenatal care providers and educational images. Two cross-sectional surveys examined changes in pregnancy-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among Black women in Hillsborough. Digital metrics showed campaign reach and engagement. RESULTS: Growing and Glowing attained 1,234 followers, 805,437 impressions, and a reach of 19,875. Web series videos were viewed almost 27,000 times, with 89% average viewer retention. The website attracted 2,634 unique page views. Evaluation surveys showed significant improvements in positive pregnancy-related intentions. Women aware of the campaign showed significantly higher awareness of the importance of prenatal care, and higher awareness of local resources. CONCLUSION: Results from the second study of this campaign approach suggest that using a highly targeted digital intervention can be a well-received and potentially effective way to deliver pregnancy-related health information to Black women, even during a global pandemic. This approach has numerous benefits in reaching women who may fall outside traditional health marketing approaches.

Impact of a Culturally Grounded Running Program on Four Components of Wellness Among Indigenous Participants: A Pilot Study of the Running Medicine Program.

Movement as medicine is the premise behind Running Medicine (RM), a community-based wellness program that began in 2016 in New Mexico. RM is centered in the Indigenous traditions of running and is oriented to improving the four dimensions of wellness-mind, body, spirit, and social. Using retroactive surveys of RM's Spring 2019 participants, we investigated the program's effectiveness in the realms of physical, mental, spiritual, and social wellness. Based on data from participant surveys, RM appears to be effective at improving the four realms of wellness. Indigenous participants improved to a greater degree in mental and social wellness than non-Indigenous participants, while the opposite was true for physical and spiritual wellness. For both groups, the largest effect size among the four domains was seen in social wellness. Among our participants, this culturally grounded approach to wellness appears to be effective at improving the four realms of physical, mental, spiritual, and social wellness.

Comparison of the Warfarin Dosing and Outcomes in Hmong Versus East Asians Patients: Real-World Data From an Integrated Healthcare System.

Background Previous research predicted that Hmong, an understudied East Asian subpopulation, might require significantly lower warfarin doses than East Asian patients partially due to their unique genetic and clinical factors. However, such findings have not been corroborated using real-world data. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of Hmong and East Asian patients receiving warfarin. Warfarin stable doses (WSD) and time to the composite outcome, including international normalized ratio (INR) greater than four incidences or major bleeding within six months of warfarin initiation, were compared. Results This cohort study included 55 Hmong and 100 East Asian patients. Compared to East Asian patients, Hmong had a lower mean WSD (14.5 vs. 20.4 mg/week, p<0.05). In addition, Hmong had a 3.1-fold (95% CI: 1.1-9.3, p<0.05) higher hazard of the composite outcome. Conclusion Using real-world data, significant differences in warfarin dosing and hazard for the composite outcome of INR>4 and major bleeding were observed between Hmong and East Asian patients. These observations further underscore the importance of recognizing subpopulation-based differences in warfarin dosing and outcomes.

Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health: Maternity Patient and Health Care Team Perspectives.

Objective: To identify patient and health care team perspectives on screening and referral for Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) in maternity care. Methods: This human-centered design study was conducted in a prenatal clinic and in the surrounding community of a university teaching hospital in the Southeastern United States. Qualitative data were collected through semistructured interviews and focus groups between March 2019 and February 2020, with findings shared in-person with participants for feedback. Results: A total of 19 English- and Spanish-speaking patients and 11 health care team members participated. Participants suggested that all patients should be screened as part of integrated health assessments, early in care and periodically, but only when protocols are in place for addressing needs-immediate or ongoing. They expressed concerns that disclosure of SDoH screening data might exacerbate already existing biases, negatively impact care, or be used to harm them. Patients wanted proactive transparency about the purpose of SDoH screening, and to know who would have access to their data, when and how it would be used, and how long it would be stored. Patients expressed concern about confidentiality and stigma, and wanted their health care team to normalize seeking help, and acknowledge that birthing people's circumstances change over time. Patients and health care team responded that patient-provider communication should be respectful, be antiracist, and demonstrate respect for patient autonomy. Conclusion: Patients and health care team members recommended that SDoH resource information be accessible to all patients regardless of endorsed needs.

Using the health belief model to assess racial/ethnic disparities in cancer-related behaviors in an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center catchment area.

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minorities experience well-documented disparities across the cancer trajectory. However, factors underlying these disparities may vary regionally. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was developed to explain and predict health-related prevention and early detection behaviors, particularly uptake of health services. Our goal was to use the HBM to guide an exploration of factors that contribute to racial/ethnic health disparities in the catchment area of a large National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in the Southeastern United States. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected by the cancer center for its triennial Community Health Needs Assessment, which sampled adults from the center's 15-county catchment area. White non-Hispanics (WNHs; n = 887), Black non-Hispanics (BNHs; n = 78), Hispanics/Latinxs (H/Ls; n = 185), and those identifying as another race/ethnicity ("Others"; n = 39) were compared across key HBM variables, including demographic/psychosocial information, perceived benefits and barriers to preventive health behaviors, risk perception, and health behavior outcomes. RESULTS: Controlling for annual household income, relationship status, and age (for certain screening behaviors), significant differences were seen in information-seeking behaviors, risk perception, community attributes, discrimination, and distress. Non-WNH groups reported worse community attributes, higher everyday discrimination, lower health literacy, less confidence in their ability to get health information, and lower perceived risk of cancer. CONCLUSION: This analysis presents a better understanding of how HBM factors may influence health disparities in the cancer center's catchment area. Results describe the needs of community members from racial and ethnic minority groups, which will inform future research, education, outreach, and service activities.

A Call to Action: Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Parkinson's Research and Care.

The current base of knowledge around Parkinson's disease has been assembled in partnership with a cohort of participants that does not resemble the diversity of people with the disease. This poor representation in research results in an incomplete picture of the disease and disparities in care. The Michael J. Fox Foundation has defined four major areas of action: 1) identifying barriers and solutions to research participation; 2) funding inclusive research with greater participant diversity; 3) building a clinician/researcher workforce committed to health equity; and 4) supporting a more holistic understanding of PD. While factors driving disparities, including broader societal challenges, are complex, it is imperative that the PD research, care, and patient communities move in a decisive and coordinated fashion to identify and implement strategies that advance treatments for everyone with PD and eliminate care inequities.

Evaluation of an Integrated Health Promotion Program for a low-income urban population: Findings and lessons learned.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a multicomponent pilot program for low-income individuals with, or at risk for, hypertension, diabetes, and/or overweight. DESIGN: Pre-post evaluation including baseline and follow-up assessments, satisfaction surveys, program utilization data, and focus groups. SAMPLE: The evaluation included 138 participants. The majority were Latinx (88%), female (82%), born outside the United States (80%), and had not graduated from high school (52%). The most common health conditions were hypertension (59%), overweight or obesity (55%), high cholesterol (53%), and diabetes (34%). MEASUREMENTS: Engagement in program activities, health indicators (e.g., blood pressure), and behavior change. Qualitative data focused on perceptions of the program and its impacts. INTERVENTION: The program offered a number of health promotion services, including consultation with a nurse and a community health worker (CHW), health and nutrition talks, subsidized farm shares, cooking classes, exercise classes, and home visits. RESULTS: There were improvements in general health, blood pressure, and knowledge and behavior related to disease management and healthy eating. CONCLUSIONS: Program success was attributed to the wide range of complementary program components. The staffing model was also a strength: the CHW/nurse collaboration combined clinical expertise with cultural, language, and community knowledge to create a program that was accessible and empowering.

A Basic Review of the Preliminary Evidence That COVID-19 Risk and Severity Is Increased in Vitamin D Deficiency.

As the world's attention has been riveted upon the growing COVID-19 pandemic, many researchers have written brief reports supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is related to the incidence and severity of COVID-19. The clear common thread among the top risk groups-vitamin D deficiency-may be being overlooked because of previous overstated claims of vitamin D benefits. However, the need to decrease COVID-19 fatalities among high-risk populations is urgent. Early researchers reported three striking patterns. Firstly, the innate immune system is impaired by vitamin D deficiency, which would predispose sufferers to viral infections such as COVID-19. Vitamin D deficiency also increases the activity of the X-chromosome-linked "Renin-Angiotensin" System, making vitamin D deficient individuals (especially men) more susceptible to COVID-19's deadly "cytokine storm" (dramatic immune system overreaction). Secondly, the groups who are at highest risk for severe COVID-19 match those who are at highest risk for severe vitamin D deficiency. This includes the elderly, men, ethnic groups whose skin is naturally rich in melanin (if living outside the tropics), those who avoid sun exposure for cultural and health reasons, those who live in institutions, the obese, and/or those who suffer with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. And thirdly, the pattern of geographical spread of COVID-19 reflects higher population vitamin D deficiency. Both within the USA and throughout the world, COVID-19 fatality rates parallel vitamin D deficiency rates. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, and RSMLDS, with targeted Google searches providing additional sources. Although randomized controlled trial results may be available eventually, the correlational and causal study evidence supporting a link between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 risks is already so strong that it supports action. The 141 author groups writing primarily about biological plausibility detailed how vitamin D deficiency can explain every risk factor and every complication of COVID-19, but agreed that other factors are undoubtedly at work. COVID-19 was compared with dengue fever, for which oral vitamin D supplements of 4,000 IU for 10 days were significantly more effective than 1,000 IU in reducing virus replication and controlling the "cytokine storm" (dramatic immune system over-reaction) responsible for fatalities. Among the 47 original research studies summarized here, chart reviews found that serum vitamin D levels predicted COVID-19 mortality rates (16 studies) and linearly predicted COVID-19 illness severity (8 studies). Two causal modeling studies and several analyses of variance strongly supported the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is a causal, rather than a bystander, factor in COVID-19 outcomes. Three of the four studies whose findings opposed the hypothesis relied upon disproven assumptions. The literature review also found that prophylactically correcting possible vitamin D deficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic is extremely safe. Widely recommending 2,000 IU of vitamin D daily for all populations with limited ability to manufacture vitamin D from the sun has virtually no potential for harm and is reasonably likely to save many lives.

Role of norms in variation in cancer centers' end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol.

BACKGROUND: A critical barrier to improving the quality of end-of-life (EOL) cancer care is our lack of understanding of the mechanisms underlying variation in EOL treatment intensity. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying 1) organizational and provider practice norms at major US cancer centers, and 2) how these norms influence provider decision making heuristics and patient expectations for EOL care, particularly for minority patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: This is a multi-center, qualitative case study at six National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comprehensive Cancer Centers. We will theoretically sample centers based upon National Quality Forum (NQF) endorsed EOL quality metrics and demographics to ensure heterogeneity in EOL intensity and region. A multidisciplinary team of clinician and non-clinician researchers will conduct direct observations, semi-structured interviews, and artifact collection. Participants will include: 1) cancer center and clinical service line administrators; 2) providers from medical, surgical, and radiation oncology; palliative or supportive care; intensive care; hospital medicine; and emergency medicine who see patients with cancer and have high clinical practice volume or high local influence (provider interviews and observations); and 3) adult patients with metastatic solid tumors and whom the provider would not be surprised if they died in the next 12 months and their caregivers (patient and caregiver interviews). Leadership interviews will probe about EOL institutional norms and organization. We will observe inpatient and outpatient care for two weeks. Provider interviews will use vignettes to probe explicit and implicit motivations for treatment choices. Semi-structured interviews with patients near EOL, or their family members and caregivers will explore past, current, and future decisions related to their cancer care. We will import transcribed field notes and interviews into Dedoose software for qualitative data management and analysis, and we will develop and apply a deductive and inductive codebook to the data. DISCUSSION: This study aims to improve our understanding of organizational and provider practice norms pertinent to EOL care in U.S. cancer centers. This research will ultimately be used to inform a provider-oriented intervention to improve EOL care for racial and ethnic minority patients with advanced cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ; NCT03780816 ; December 19, 2018.

The Role of Sexual Orientation in the Associations Between Religiousness and Hypertension.

This study assessed the cross-sectional associations between organizational religious activity (ORA), intrinsic religiosity (IR), and hypertension in a US nationally representative sample. Data were from Wave IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, collected in 2008. The sample (N = 5115, Mage = 28.96 years, 54% female) was divided into three sexual orientation categories: heterosexual, mostly heterosexual, and sexual minority. Dependent variables were systolic and diastolic blood pressure and binary cut-scores of clinical hypertension. ORA and IR were independent variables, with sexual orientation as the moderator. Multivariable analyses revealed greater ORA was associated with increased blood pressure (BP)/hypertension for the sexual minority group. There was a trend in the heterosexual group where ORA was associated with decreased BP. Generally, ORA was not associated with BP/hypertension in the mostly heterosexual group. There were no significant effects for IR. Future research should continue to examine the complex ways ORA and IR are associated with health based on sexual orientation and use longitudinal methodology to examine how ORA may impact BP/hypertension across the lifespan.

Community-Dwelling Adults at Nutrition Risk: Characteristics in Relation to the Consumption of Oral Nutritional Supplements.

Purpose: Nutrition risk and utilization rate of simple but effective interventions such as oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) in community settings in the United States, particularly among older adults, has received little emphasis. We conducted a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling adults ≥55 years of age and living independently to assess their risk of poor nutrition and characteristics in relation to ONS consumption. Methods: Demographic characteristics, activities of daily living (ADL), and health care resource utilization in the past 6 months were also collected via telephone survey. Nutrition risk was assessed with the abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (abPG-SGA) and the DETERMINE Checklist. A logistic regression model tested possible predictors of ONS use. Results: Of 1001 participants surveyed, 996 provided data on ONS use and 11% (n = 114) reported consuming ONS during the past 6 months. ONS users were more likely to be at high nutrition risk than nonusers based on both abPG-SGA (43% vs 24%, P < .001) and DETERMINE Checklist (68% vs 48%, P < .001) scores. ONS users reported less functional independence based on ADL scores (86% vs 92%, P = .03), taking ≥3 medications/day (77% vs 53%, P < .001), and utilizing more health care services. Higher nutrition risk (per abPG-SGA), lower body mass index, hospitalization in the past 6 months, and ≥3 medications/day were each independently associated with ONS use (P < .05). Conclusions: Although one in four, urban community-dwelling adults (≥55 years of age) were classified as at high nutrition risk in our study, only 11% reported consuming ONS-a simple and effective nutrition intervention. Efforts to improve identification of nutrition risk and implement ONS interventions could benefit nutritionally vulnerable, community-dwelling adults.

An Innovative Electronic Health Toolkit (Our Whole Lives for Chronic Pain) to Reduce Chronic Pain in Patients With Health Disparities: Open Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain affects millions of Americans. Our Whole Lives, an electronic health (eHealth) toolkit for Chronic Pain (Our Whole Lives for Chronic Pain [OWLCP]), is a mind-body chronic pain management platform that teaches self-management strategies to reduce pain impact and pain medication use. OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of OWLCP in reducing pain impact and pain-related outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post clinical study (2 cohorts) to assess the feasibility of OWLCP usage among low-income patients with chronic pain. Outcome data, collected at baseline and 9 weeks, included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29), pain self-efficacy, and pain medication use. In the statistical analysis, we used descriptive statistics, logistic regression, linear regression, and qualitative methods. RESULTS: Among the enrolled 43 participants, the average age was 50 years, (39/43) 91% were female, (16/43) 37% were black, and (7/43) 16% were Hispanic. From baseline to follow-up, the PROMIS measures showed a reduction in depression (P=.02), pain interference (P=.003), and average pain impact score (P=.007). Pain self-efficacy increased ((P<.001), whereas opioid use had a 13% reduction (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: The eHealth chronic pain management platform, OWLCP, is a potential tool to reduce the impact of chronic pain for low-income racially diverse populations.

Escaping the Prison of Mind: Meditation as Violence Prevention for the Incarcerated.

People in prison are disproportionately affected by health problems, some of which lead to imprisonment and some of which are caused by imprisonment. Mental illness and substance use disorders fall into both of these categories, but they are not the only ailments affiliated with incarceration. Prior to their incarceration, many people in prison did not have safe housing or stable employment and job security, and institutional policies and/or budgetary concerns prevent many inmates from receiving adequate health care while in prison. Prison inmates in the United States are both victims and perpetrators of violence while incarcerated. In all cases, acts of violence have negative psychological consequences for the victim, including depression and shame. Mindfulness meditation training for prison inmates might be among the most effective of interventions, helping to prevent violence, improve quality of life, and reduce recidivism. Research and evaluation of data suggest that mindfulness-based nonviolence programs are transferable to other inmate populations, and the author recommends that both the private and public prison systems implement such programs nationwide, with the support of state and federal governments.

A Successful Walk-In Psychiatric Model for Integrated Care.

PURPOSE: Accommodating walk-in psychiatry visits in primary care can improve access to psychiatric care for patients from historically underserved groups. We sought to determine whether a walk-in psychiatry model embedded within an integrated care practice could be sustained over time, and to characterize the patients who accessed care through it. METHODS: We reviewed electronic health records linked to 811 psychiatry encounters in an integrated care practice between October 1, 2015 and September 30, 2017. Primary outcomes were the initial and return psychiatry encounters per month. Secondary outcomes were the demographics and diagnoses of patients who accessed their initial visits through walk-in sessions and scheduled appointments. RESULTS: 490 initial psychiatry evaluations and 321 return encounters took place over the 2-year study period. The volume of initial psychiatry evaluations per month did not significantly change, but the volume of psychiatry follow-up encounters significantly increased after the walk-in session expanded. Medicaid recipients (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.0); individuals without a college degree (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5); individuals who were single, divorced, or separated (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5); and individuals who identified as Black or Hispanic (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.6) were more likely to access an initial psychiatry evaluation through a walk-in session as opposed to a scheduled appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Providing psychiatric care on a walk-in basis in integrated care is sustainable. Patients from historically underserved groups may access psychiatric care disproportionately through a walk-in option when it is available.

Factors influencing prostate cancer treatment decisions for African American and white men.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer racial disparities in mortality outcomes are the largest in all of oncology, and less aggressive treatment received by African American (AA) patients versus white patients is likely a contributing factor. However, the reasons underlying the differences in treatment are unclear. METHODS: This study examined a prospective, population-based cohort of 1170 men with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic prostate cancer enrolled from 2011 to 2013 before treatment throughout North Carolina. By phone survey, each participant was asked to rate the aggressiveness of his cancer, and his response was compared to the actual diagnosis based on a medical record review. Participants were also asked to rate the importance of 10 factors for their treatment decision-making process. RESULTS: Among AA and white patients with low-risk cancer (according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines), 78% to 80% perceived their cancers to be "not very aggressive." However, among high-risk patients, 54% of AA patients considered their cancers to be "not very aggressive," whereas 24% of white patients did (P < .001). Although both AA and white patients indicated that a cure was a very important decision-making factor, AAs were significantly more likely to consider cost, treatment time, and recovery time as very important. In a multivariable analysis, perceived cancer aggressiveness and cure as the most important factor were significantly associated with receiving any aggressive treatment and were associated with surgery (vs radiation). After adjustments for these factors and sociodemographic factors, race was not significantly associated with the treatment received. CONCLUSIONS: Racial differences in perceived cancer aggressiveness and factors important in treatment decision making provide novel insights into reasons for the known racial disparities in prostate cancer as well as potential targets for interventions to reduce these disparities.

Acessibilidade da População Negra ao Cuidado Oncológico no Brasil: Revisão Integrativa / [Accessibility of the Black Population to Cancer Care in Brazil: Integrative Review]

Tem-se apontado a persistência de desigualdades raciais na acessibilidade a bens e serviços e de saúde, estando o câncer inserido nesse contexto. O objetivo dessa revisão de literatura integrativa foi analisar, os fatores que impactam a acessibilidade da população negra ao cuidado oncológico no Brasil. A busca foi realizada nas bases PubMed, BVS/Lilacs e EMBASE e foram incluídos artigos originais publicados em português, inglês e espanhol sem limite temporal. Os resultados foram discutidos a partir do tipo de câncer abordado: câncer de mama, câncer ginecológico, câncer de próstata e câncer de cavidade oral. Destacou-se que as desigualdades raciais e socioeconômicas refletem nas ações de acessibilidade ao cuidado oncológico, maioritariamente nos casos de detecção precoce. Independentemente do tipo de câncer, formas de diagnóstico e tratamento, é inegável que a raça está associada à dificuldade de acesso, sendo as condições de vida do paciente negro determinantes para o cuidado oncológico. Há uma necessidade indiscutível que o profissional de saúde estenda seu olhar prioritário para a população negra assim como já faz, rotineiramente, com crianças e idosos, transpondo barreiras de acessibilidade a bens e serviços de saúde.

It has been pointed out the persistence of racial inequalities in the accessibility to goods and services and of health, being the cancer inserted in this context. The objective of this review of the integrative literature was to analyze the factors that impact the accessibility of the black population to cancer care in Brazil. The search was carried out in PubMed, BVS / Lilacs and EMBASE databases and included original articles published in Portuguese, English and Spanish with no time limit. The results were discussed from the type of cancer addressed: breast cancer, gynecological cancer, prostate cancer and oral cancer. It was pointed out that racial and socioeconomic inequalities reflect on the actions of accessibility to cancer care, mainly in cases of early detection. Regardless of the type of cancer, forms of diagnosis and treatment, it is undeniable that race is associated with the difficulty of access, and the living conditions of the black patient are determinants for cancer care. There is an undeniable need for health professionals to extend their priority to the black population, as it does routinely with children and the elderly, transposing barriers to accessibility to health goods and services.