Inconsistent Associations Between Risk Factor Profiles and Adjuvant Radiation Therapy (ART) Treatment in Patients with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Utility of the 40-Gene Expression Profile to Refine ART Guidance.

INTRODUCTION: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations for adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) use are similar for High Risk and Very High Risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) with negative post-surgical margins. Although studies report reductions in disease progression following ART treatment, ART use is likely inconsistent when guided by available risk factors. This study evaluated the association of ART with clinical risk factors in ART-treated and untreated patients and showed the clinical utility of the 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) for guiding ART. METHODS: A multicenter study of 954 patients was conducted with institutional review board (IRB) approval. The 40-GEP test was performed using primary tumor tissue from patients with either a minimum of 3 years of follow-up or a documented regional or distant metastasis. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis identified patterns of clinical risk factors for ART-treated patients, then identified untreated patients with matching risk factor profiles. Results were cross-referenced to 40-GEP test results to determine utility of the test to guide ART. RESULTS: Analysis demonstrated inconsistent implementation of ART for eligible patients. Cluster analysis identified four patient profiles based on clusters of risk factors and, notably, matching profiles in ART-treated and untreated patients. Further, the analysis identified patients who received but could have deferred ART on the basis of 40-GEP test result and biologically low risk of metastasis, and untreated patients who likely would have benefitted from ART on the basis of their 40-GEP test result. CONCLUSIONS: ART guidance is not determined by the presence of specific clinicopathologic factors, with treated and untreated patients sharing the same risk factor profiles. cSCC risk determination based on NCCN recommendations for clinical factor assessment results in inconsistent use of ART. Including tumor biology-based prognostic information from the 40-GEP refines risk and identifies patients who are most appropriate and likely to benefit from ART, and those that can consider deferring ART.

Adding MYC/BCL2 double expression to NCCN-IPI may not improve prognostic value to an acceptable level.

BACKGROUND: MYC/BCL2 double expression (DE) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP). This study aimed to determine whether the addition of DE to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Internal Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) could improve the prediction of disease progression in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. METHODS: This confirmatory prognostic factor study retrospectively recruited patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2018, at Ramathibodi Hospital (RA) and Thammasat University Hospital (TU). The follow-up period ended on July 1, 2022. Tumors expressing MYC ≥ 40% and BCL2 ≥ 50% were classified as DE. We calculated the hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) from the date of diagnosis to refractory disease, relapse, or death. Discrimination of the 5-year prediction was based on Cox models using Harrell's concordance index (c-index). RESULTS: A total of 111 patients had DE (39%), NCCN-IPI (8%), and disease progression (46%). The NCCN-IPI adjusted HR of DE was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9-2.8; P = 0.117). The baseline NCCN-IPI c-index was 0.63. Adding DE to the NCCN-IPI slightly increased Harrell's concordance index (c-index) to 0.66 (P = 0.119). CONCLUSIONS: Adding DE to the NCCN-IPI may not improve the prognostic value to an acceptable level in resource-limited settings. Multiple independent confirmatory studies from a large cohort of lymphoma registries have provided additional evidence for the clinical utility of DE.

Exploring the landscape of AI-assisted decision-making in head and neck cancer treatment: a comparative analysis of NCCN guidelines and ChatGPT responses.

PURPOSE: Recent breakthroughs in natural language processing and machine learning, exemplified by ChatGPT, have spurred a paradigm shift in healthcare. Released by OpenAI in November 2022, ChatGPT rapidly gained global attention. Trained on massive text datasets, this large language model holds immense potential to revolutionize healthcare. However, existing literature often overlooks the need for rigorous validation and real-world applicability. METHODS: This head-to-head comparative study assesses ChatGPT's capabilities in providing therapeutic recommendations for head and neck cancers. Simulating every NCCN Guidelines scenarios. ChatGPT is queried on primary treatments, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up, with responses compared to the NCCN Guidelines. Performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score, are employed for assessment. RESULTS: The study includes 68 hypothetical cases and 204 clinical scenarios. ChatGPT exhibits promising capabilities in addressing NCCN-related queries, achieving high sensitivity and overall accuracy across primary treatment, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up. The study's metrics showcase robustness in providing relevant suggestions. However, a few inaccuracies are noted, especially in primary treatment scenarios. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the proficiency of ChatGPT in providing treatment suggestions. The model's alignment with the NCCN Guidelines sets the stage for a nuanced exploration of AI's evolving role in oncological decision support. However, challenges related to the interpretability of AI in clinical decision-making and the importance of clinicians understanding the underlying principles of AI models remain unexplored. As AI continues to advance, collaborative efforts between models and medical experts are deemed essential for unlocking new frontiers in personalized cancer care.

NCCN Guideline Concordance Improves Survival in Pediatric and Young Adult Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although management guidelines in adult rectal cancer are widely studied, no consensus guidelines exist for the management of pediatric and young adult rectal cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2018) was queried for pediatric (age 0-21) and young adult (age 22-40) patients with rectal cancer. Patients were analyzed for receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-concordant therapy. Impact on survival was evaluated using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: 6655 patients (108 pediatric and 6547 young adult patients) with rectal cancer were included. Similar to previously published NCCN quality measures with overall guideline concordance approaching 90 % in adults, 89.6 % of pediatric and 84.6 % of young adult patients were classified as receiving pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy. However, pediatric patients were significantly less likely to receive post-operative guideline-concordant therapy than young adult patients (65.3 % verse 76.7 %, respectively, p = 0.008). Risk of death was significantly lower for pediatric patients who received post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.313; CI, 0.168-0.581; p < 0.001). In young adult patients, risk of death was significantly lower for those who received pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.376, CI 0.338-0.417, p < 0.001), and post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.456; CI 0.413-0.505; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: NCCN-based guidelines may reasonably guide peri-operative management decisions and improve survival in pediatric and young adult rectal cancer. Given the rarity of this cancer in young patients, employment of an experienced surgical and oncologic multidisciplinary team, along with discussion and involvement of the patient and family, are keys for balancing risks and benefits to offering the best therapeutic strategy. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Evaluating implementation of NCCN guideline-directed genetic screening recommendations for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: In 2019, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommended genetic testing for all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). To evaluate the status of implementation of these guidelines in a loco-regional setting, we performed a retrospective, observational study among patients with newly diagnosed PDAC who received oncologic care at Northeast Georgia Medical Center in Georgia. METHODS: Chart abstraction of patients with newly diagnosed PDAC from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 was performed to include information on genetic testing recommendation and completion, and time from diagnosis to testing. The deidentified dataset was then analyzed using appropriate descriptive and associative statistical testing. RESULTS: Of the cohort of 109 patients, 32 (29.4%) completed genetic screening; 16 (14.7%) were screened within 10 days of diagnosis. Among the 77 (70.6%) patients who did not receive genetic screening, 45 (41.3%) were not recommended genetic screening despite treatment intent with standard of care therapy. However, 32 (29.4%) were not recommended genetic screening in conjunction with a desire to pursue palliative care/hospice/or due to terminal illness. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the gap in implementation of NCCN guideline-directed genetic testing in PDAC patients as only a third underwent testing suggesting the need for systematic processes to facilitate testing. The test was more likely to be completed if done early in the course, especially soon after the diagnosis. Research is needed to explore discussing genetic testing for the large proportion of patients who are terminally ill at diagnosis where genetic screening would potentially benefit the family members.

Disparities in Receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline-Adherent Care and Outcomes among Women with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Insurance Type.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were designed to improve patient outcomes. Here, we examine factors that may contribute to outcomes and guideline adherence in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with triple-negative breast cancer using the California Cancer Registry. Adherent treatment was defined as the receipt of a combination of surgery, lymph node assessment, adjuvant radiation, and/or chemotherapy. A multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the effects of independent variables on adherence to the NCCN guidelines. Disease-specific survival was calculated using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 16,858 women were analyzed. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive guideline-adherent care (OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.73-0.92 and OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.79-0.95, respectively) compared to White patients. Hazard ratios adjusted for adherent care showed that Black patients had increased disease-specific mortality (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.16-1.42, p < 0.0001) compared to White patients. CONCLUSIONS: A significant majority of breast cancer patients in California continue to receive non-guideline-adherent care. Non-Hispanic Black patients and patients from lower SES quintile groups were less likely to receive guideline-adherent care. Patients with non-adherent care had worse disease-specific survival compared to recipients of NCCN guideline-adherent care.

The impact of NCCN-compliant multidisciplinary conference on the uptake of active surveillance among eligible patients with localized prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to investigate the impact of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-compliant multidisciplinary conference on the uptake of active surveillance (AS) among eligible patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: Retrospective review of our AS database was performed. Patients who are eligible for AS who sought a second opinion at a comprehensive cancer center (2010-2021) were presented to the multidisciplinary Localized Prostate Cancer Conference (LPCC) that includes urologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, and patient advocates. Cochrane Armitage test was used to examine trends over time. Multivariable regression models were fit to evaluate variables associated with the receipt of AS. RESULTS: Seven hundred twelve patients were identified (19% NCCN very low risk, 32% low risk, and 49% intermediate favorable risk). 43% were recommended AS as the preferred option by the community compared to 68% by LPCC, and 65% elected AS. Recommending AS significantly increased between 2010 and 2021 by the community (from 26% to 57%) and by LPCC (from 52% to 82%), while the proportion of men who received AS increased from 47% to 80% during the same period (P < 0.0001 for all). More recent LPCC era 2017 to 2021 (OR 12.31, 95% CI, 5.60-27.03, P < 0.0001), African American race (OR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.18-0.96, P = 0.04), positive cores at biopsy (OR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.94-0.97, P < 0.0001), age (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 1.10-1.18, P < 0.0001), NCCN low risk (OR 0.25, 95% CI, 0.08-0.81, P = 0.02) and NCCN intermediate favorable risk (OR 0.03, 95% CI, 0.01-0.09, P < 0.0001) were associated with receipt of AS. CONCLUSION: AS recommendation increased significantly over time by community urologists and to a higher extent by NCCN-compliant multidisciplinary conference. The Uptake of AS significantly increased within the same period. More recent LPCC era 2017 to 2021, African American race, the proportion of positive cores at biopsy, age, and NCCN risk were the main determinants of receipt of AS.

Persistent race- and sex-based disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate race- and sex-based disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility under the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network lung cancer screening guidelines. METHODS: Participants in the Southern Community Cohort Study with a smoking history diagnosed with lung cancer from 2002 to 2021 were identified for analysis. Differences in age at lung cancer diagnosis and smoking characteristics were evaluated among 4 groups: Black men, Black women, White men, and White women. RESULTS: A total of 2011 patients with lung cancer met study inclusion criteria, of whom 968 (48.1%) were women and 1248 (62.1%) were Black. Under the 2013 guideline, Black men with lung cancer were significantly less likely to be eligible for screening when compared with White men with lung cancer (37.7% vs 62.4%; P < .001), and Black women with lung cancer were significantly less likely to be eligible for screening when compared with White women with lung cancer (27.8% vs 56.7%; P < .001). Under the 2021 guideline, 62.6% of Black and 73.8% of White men (P < .001) with lung cancer would have been eligible for screening, resulting in an 11.2 percentage point difference in screening eligibility between Black and White men. Under the 2021 guideline, 50.3% of Black and 74.9% of White (P < .001) women with lung cancer would have been eligible for screening; notably, there remained a 24.6 percentage point difference in screening eligibility between Black and White women. In multivariable-adjusted analysis, under the 2021 USPSTF guideline, Black men with lung cancer had 46% lower odds of being eligible for screening compared with White men with lung cancer (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.76; P < .001) and Black women with lung cancer had 66% lower odds of being eligible for screening compared with White women with lung cancer (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.25-0.46; P < .001). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline increased the proportion of patients with lung cancer eligible for screening in each group. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of patients with lung cancer in the Southern Community Cohort Study, there remained a large gap in lung cancer screening eligibility between Black and White men and women under the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force guideline. Only 50% of Black women and 63% of Black men diagnosed with lung cancer would have qualified for screening.

Treatment and Survival Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multicentric Population-Based Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: The burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, little is known about CRC treatment and survival in the region. METHODS: A random sample of 653 patients with CRC diagnosed from 2011 to 2015 was obtained from 11 population-based cancer registries in SSA. Information on clinical characteristics, treatment, and/or vital status was obtained from medical records in treating hospitals for 356 (54%) of the patients ("traced cohort"). Concordance of CRC treatment with NCCN Harmonized Guidelines for SSA was assessed. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the association between survival and human development index (HDI). RESULTS: Of the 356 traced patients with CRC, 51.7% were male, 52.8% were from countries with a low HDI, 55.1% had colon cancer, and 73.6% were diagnosed with nonmetastatic (M0) disease. Among the patients with M0 disease, however, only 3.1% received guideline-concordant treatment, 20.6% received treatment with minor deviations, 31.7% received treatment with major deviations, and 35.1% received no treatment. The risk of death in patients who received no cancer-directed therapy was 3.49 (95% CI, 1.83-6.66) times higher than in patients who received standard treatment or treatment with minor deviations. Similarly, the risk of death in patients from countries with a low HDI was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.07-2.62) times higher than in those from countries with a medium HDI. Overall survival at 1 and 3 years was 70.9% (95% CI, 65.5%-76.3%) and 45.3% (95% CI, 38.9%-51.7%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 1 in 20 patients diagnosed with potentially curable CRC received standard of care in SSA, reinforcing the need to improve healthcare infrastructure, including the oncology and surgical workforce.

A mixed-methods study to inform development of a caregiver-specific problem list for cancer distress screening.

OBJECTIVE: Oncology guidelines for distress management recommend use of the single-item distress thermometer (DT) and accompanying Problem List (PL) to identify patients with high distress levels and their potential sources of distress. However, oncology practices have yet to establish standardized protocols to screen and triage caregivers with high distress levels. With an eye toward integrating caregiver-centered support services into cancer care, this mixed-methods study sought to assess caregiver distress and challenges that may contribute to their distress. METHODS: Nineteen caregivers of metastatic breast cancer patients (60% female, 47% ethnic/racial minority) completed an interview and a survey comprised of the DT, the original 39-item PL, and five additional caregiver-specific PL items. RESULTS: Caregivers reported moderate distress levels and more than half exceeded the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) cut-off, denoting significant distress. There was no association between caregiver distress and the number of items endorsed on the original PL. Qualitative analysis identified nine problem domains as areas of caregiver unmet need needs (i.e., practical challenges, caregiving responsibilities, social/relationship issues, caregiver and patient emotional well-being, caregiver and patient physical well-being, spiritual well-being, and communication). Two of the problem domains (caregiving responsibilities and communication) were not captured in any way by the original PL. CONCLUSION: With further research and development, the identified domains could serve as the basis for a caregiver-specific PL to facilitate triage and referral when incorporated as part of routine distress screening.

Surgical and Endoscopic Resection of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors Have Similar Disease-Specific Survival Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (dNETs) are rare, and their management is not well-defined. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend surgical resection of large dNETs (> 2 cm) and endoscopic resection of small tumors (< 2 cm). We compared the survival outcomes between surgical and endoscopic resection in various dNET sizes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using patient data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Variables analyzed included age, tumor size, grade, stage, and lymph node status. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was compared for endoscopic and surgical groups in dNET size strata: 0-0.5, 0.5-1, 1-2, 2-3, and > 3 cm. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: The study included 465 patients, with 124 (26.7%) undergoing surgical resection. The average age was 61.9 years, and tumor sizes ranged from 0.1 to 10.5 cm. Endoscopic resection had 40.5% of tumors between 0 and 0.5 cm, while surgery had only 21% (p < 0.001). In the surgical cohort, 79.8% had grade 1 tumors compared to 88.3% in the endoscopy group (P = 0.024). Among surgically resected cases, 48.4% (60 patients) had lymph node involvement. Age, tumor size, grade, and stage did not significantly predict survival after surgical resection. Stratified by tumor size, no difference in DSS was observed between surgery and endoscopy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection demonstrated similar survival outcomes to surgical resection across dNET sizes in this national analysis. Given the risks and the lack of survival benefits for surgery, endoscopic resection may be beneficial for both small and large tumors. Further studies are warranted to validate the current NCCN guidelines.

[Updated Interpretation of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines (Version 3. 2023) 
for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest morbidity and mortality in China. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the main pathological subtype of lung cancer. On April 13, 2023, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) released the third edition of the 2023 NCCN Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, which reflects the latest advances in international lung cancer research. This article will interpret the main updated contents of the new edition of the guidelines, and compare it with the third edition of the NCCN guidelines in 2022, so as to provide references about the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC for clinical medical personnel in China.
.

Overview of glottic laryngeal cancer treatment recommendation changes in the NCCN guidelines from 2011 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of glottic cancer remains challenging, especially with regard to morbidity reduction and larynx preservation rates. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has published guidelines to aid decision-making about this treatment according to the tumor site, clinical stage, and patient medical status. AIM: The present review was conducted to identify changes in the NCCN guidelines for glottic cancer treatment made between 2011 and 2022 and to describe the published evidence concerning glottic cancer treatment and oncological outcomes in the same time period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical practice guidelines for head and neck cancer published from 2011 up to 2022 were obtained from the NCCN website (www.NCCN.org). Data on glottic cancer treatment recommendations were extracted, and descriptive analysis was performed. In addition, a review of literature registered in the PubMed database was performed to obtain data on glottic cancer management protocols and treatment outcomes from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published from 2011 to 2022. In total, 24 NCCN guidelines and updates and 68 relevant studies included in the PubMed database were identified. The main guideline changes made pertained to surgical and systemic therapies, the consideration of adverse features, and new options for the treatment of metastatic disease at initial presentation. Early-stage glottic cancer received the most research attention, with transoral endoscopic laser surgery and radiotherapy assessed and compared as the main treatment modalities. Reported associations between treatment types and survival rates for this stage of glottic cancer appear to be similar, but functional outcomes can be highly compromised. CONCLUSION: NCCN panel members provide updated recommendations based on currently accepted treatment approaches for glottic cancer, constantly reviewing new surgical and non-surgical techniques. The guidelines support decision-making about glottic cancer treatment that should be individualized and prioritize patients' quality of life, functionality, and preferences.

Effect on Germline Mutation Rate in a High-Risk Chinese Breast Cancer Cohort after Compliance with The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2023 v.1 Testing Criteria.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) testing criteria for the high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes, specifically BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, and TP53, have been recently modified in 2023 to 2023 v.1. The following criteria have been changed: (1) from a person diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤45 to ≤50; (2) from aged 45-50 of personal breast diagnosis to any age of diagnosis with multiple breast cancers; and (3) from aged ≥51 of personal breast diagnosis to any age of diagnosis with family history listed in NCCN 2022 v.2. METHODS: High-risk breast cancer patients (n = 3797) were recruited from the Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry between 2007 and 2022. Patients were grouped according to NCCN testing criteria 2023 v.1 and 2022 v.2. A 30-gene panel for hereditary breast cancer was performed. The mutation rates on high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes were compared. RESULTS: About 91.2% of the patients met the 2022 v.2 criteria, while 97.5% of the patients met the 2023 v.1 criteria. An extra 6.4% of the patients were included after the revision of the criteria, and 2.5% of the patients did not meet both testing criteria. The germline BRCA1/2 mutation rates for patients meeting the 2022 v.2 and 2023 v.1 criteria were 10.1% and 9.6%, respectively. The germline mutation rates of all 6 high-penetrance genes in these two groups were 12.2% and 11.6%, respectively. Among the additional 242 patients who were included using the new selection criteria, the mutation rates were 2.1% and 2.5% for BRCA1/2 and all 6 high-penetrance genes, respectively. Patients who did not meet both testing criteria were those with multiple personal cancers, a strong family history of cancers not listed in the NCCN, unclear pathology information, or the patient's voluntary intention to be tested. The mutation rates of BRCA1/2 and the 6 high-penetrance genes in these patients were 5.3% and 6.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study provided a real-world application of the revision of NCCN guidelines and its effect on the germline mutation rate in the Chinese population. Applying the updated criteria for further genetic investigation would increase the positive detection rate, and potentially more patients would benefit. The balance between the resource and outcome requires careful consideration.

Capacity of ChatGPT to Identify Guideline-Based Treatments for Advanced Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND:  ChatGPT, created by OpenAI, is a large language model which has become the fastest growing consumer application in history, recognized for its expansive knowledge of varied subjects. The field of oncology is highly specialized and requires nuanced understanding of medications and conditions. Herein, we sought to better qualify the ability of ChatGPT to name applicable treatments for patients with advanced solid cancers. METHODS:  This observational study was conducted utilizing ChatGPT. The capacity of ChatGPT to tabulate appropriate systemic therapies for new diagnoses of advanced solid malignancies was ascertained through standardized prompts. A ratio of those medications listed by ChatGPT to those suggested in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines was produced and called the valid therapy quotient (VTQ). Additional descriptive analyses of the VTQ and its association with incidence and type of treatment were performed. RESULTS:  Some 51 distinct diagnoses were utilized within this experiment. ChatGPT was able to identify 91 distinct medications in response to prompts related to advanced solid tumors. The overall VTQ is 0.77. In all cases, ChatGPT was able to provide at least one example of systemic therapy suggested by the NCCN. There was a weak association between incidence of each malignancy and the VTQ. CONCLUSION:  The capacity of ChatGPT to identify medications used to treat advanced solid tumors indicates a level of concordance with the NCCN guidelines. As it stands, the role of ChatGPT to assist oncologists and patients in treatment decision making remains unknown. Nonetheless, in future iterations, it may be anticipated that accuracy and consistency in this domain will improve, and further studies will be needed to better quantify its capabilities.

Exploring knowledge gaps in the understanding of peripheral and deep en face margin assessment.

In 2022, National Comprehensive Cancer Network updated the phrase of "complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment (CCPDMA)" to "peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA)," which was meant to create more consistency across all treatment modalities and provide clarity to the meaning of total margin evaluation. The aim of this project was to investigate the interpretation of PDEMA across pertinent specialties and to identify any existing knowledge gaps in hopes of improving clinical performance of institutional practice. An electronic survey was administered to medical professionals within the divisions of dermatology and otolaryngology retrieving demographic data and assessing respondents' knowledge on tissue processing techniques and PDEMA. Of the four knowledge-based assessment questions administered, dermatology respondents answered three questions with > 80% accuracy and one question with < 65% accuracy. Otolaryngology respondents answered one question with > 80% accuracy and three with < 65% accuracy. Both groups answered the knowledge-based question evaluating the concept of "what must be true for Mohs or PDEMA to have value" with under 65% accuracy. When comparing dermatology and otolaryngology respondents, only one question which evaluated the proper methods to "achieve processing of the epidermal edge and the base of the tumor along a single plane in the lab" significantly differed between groups, with a percentage correct of 96% for dermatologists compared to 54% for otolaryngologists (p < 0.001). Results were found to be similar when resident physicians were removed from analysis. The overall percent correct for knowledge-based questions was shifted higher for dermatologists compared to otolaryngologists (p = 0.014). This trend was also redemonstrated when analyzing the data excluding residents (p = 0.053).

Impact of an NCCN-Compliant Multidisciplinary Conference on Treatment Decisions for Localized Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the impact of an NCCN-compliant multidisciplinary conference on treatment decisions of patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of our quality assurance localized prostate cancer database was performed. All patients with localized prostate cancer who sought a second opinion at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2009 and 2019 were presented to the multidisciplinary Localized Prostate Cancer Conference (LPCC) that includes urologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, and patient advocates. Multivariable regression models were fit to evaluate variables associated with concordance between community recommendations, LPCC recommendations, and treatment received by patients. RESULTS: A total of 1,164 patients were identified, of whom 26% had NCCN very low-/low-risk, 27% had favorable intermediate-risk, 25% had unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 22% had high-/very high-risk prostate cancer. Pathology changed in 11% of patients after genitourinary pathologist review, which caused disease reclassification in 9%. Concordance between community and LPCC recommendations occurred in 78%, with lowest concordance for androgen deprivation therapy (21%) and radiotherapy (53%). Concordance between community recommendations and treatment received occurred in 65%, with lowest concordance for androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy; among those who were recommended radiotherapy as the only option by their community urologist, only 26% received it. Concordance between LPCC recommendations and treatment received occurred in 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Community recommendations differed from the multidisciplinary NCCN-compliant recommendations in 22% of patients, primarily for radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary recommendations matched the treatment received in 92% of patients compared with 65% for community recommendations.

Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and lesion dissemination from baseline PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Further risk stratification of the group with low-risk and high-risk NCCN-IPI.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and lesion dissemination from baseline PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and the prognostic value of them in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) subgroups. METHODS: A total of 113 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT examination in our institution were retrospectively collected. The MTV was measured by iterative adaptive algorithm. The location of the lesion was obtained according to its three-dimensional coordinates, and Dmax was obtained. SDmax is derived from Dmax standardized by body surface area (BSA). The X-tile method was used to determine the optimal cut-off values for MTV, Dmax and SDmax. Cox regression analysis was used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses. Patient survival rates were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 24 months. The median of MTV was 196.86 cm3 (range 2.54-2925.37 cm3), and the optimal cut-off value was 489 cm3. The median of SDmax was 0.25 m-1 (range 0.12-0.51 m-1), and the best cut-off value was 0.31 m-1. MTV and SDmax were independent prognostic factors of PFS (all P < 0.001). Combined with MTV and SDmax, the patients were divided into three groups, and the difference of PFS among the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001), and was able to stratify the risk of NCCN-IPI patients in the low-risk (NCCN-IPI < 4) and high-risk (NCCN-IPI ≥ 4) groups (P = 0.001 and P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: MTV and SDmax are independent prognostic factors for PFS in DCBCL patients, which describe tumor burden and tumor dissemination characteristics, respectively. The combination of the two could facilitate risk stratification between the low-risk and high-risk NCCN-IPI groups.

Missed opportunities in the real-world genetic testing in BRCA gene variant carriers with cancers meeting NCCN criteria.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of patients meeting the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)'s BRCA genetic testing criteria prior to a diagnosis of a BRCA-related cancer. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with BRCA pathogenic variants and a diagnosis of a BRCA-related cancer. Patients were included if they had known dates of genetic testing and cancer diagnosis. NCCN criteria (version 2.2021) were applied to determine if patients met criteria for testing before a BRCA-related cancer diagnosis. The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients undergoing genetic testing following a diagnosis of a BRCA-related cancer who qualified for genetic testing based on NCCN criteria. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression were performed with significance at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 270 patients with a BRCA-related cancer, 229 (85%) underwent genetic testing after a cancer diagnosis. Most patients (97%) met at least one NCCN criteria for BRCA testing; 166 (73%) of patients who were tested following a BRCA-related cancer diagnosis also met the criteria for testing by family history. Publicly insured or uninsured patients were three times more likely to undergo BRCA testing after a diagnosis of cancer (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-8.40). Patients with a family history of pathogenic variants were more likely to undergo testing before a cancer diagnosis (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.05-0.23). CONCLUSION: Most patients with BRCA-associated cancers undergo genetic testing after their cancer diagnosis. Increased education on genetic testing criteria and novel methods to improve testing are desperately needed.