Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SIB-VMAT technique) to dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) for localized prostate cancer: a dose-escalation trial (DESTROY-4).

PURPOSE: DESTROY-4 (DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY OF STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY) was a Phase I trial aimed to evaluate the safety and the feasibility of escalating doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on MRI-defined Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion (DIL) in low- and intermediate-risk pCa patients using a simultaneous integrated boost-volumetric arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) technique. METHODS: Eligible patients included those with low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma (NCCN risk classes) and an International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) ≤ 15. No restriction about DIL and prostate volumes was set. Pretreatment preparation required an enema and the placement of intraprostatic gold fiducials. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions. For the first three patients, the DIL radiation dose was set at 8 Gy per fraction up to a total dose of 40 Gy (PTV1) and was gradually increased in succeeding cohorts to total doses of 42.5 Gy, 45.0 Gy, 47.5 Gy, and finally, 50.0 Gy, while keeping the prescription of 35 Gy/7 Gy per fraction for the entire prostate gland. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurring within 90 days of follow-up (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events scale 4.0). Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires at defined intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 75 (range, 58-89) years were enrolled. The median follow-up was 26.3 months (8.9-84 months). 66.7% of patients were classified as intermediate-risk groups, while the others were low-risk groups, according to the NCCN guidelines. Enrolled patients were treated as follows: 8 patients (40 Gy), 5 patients (42.5 Gy), 4 patients (45 Gy), 4 patients (47.5 Gy), and 3 patients (50 Gy). No severe acute toxicities were observed. G1 and G2 acute GU toxicities occurred in 4 (16%) and 3 patients (12.5%), respectively. Two patients (8.3%) and 3 patients (12.5%) experienced G1 and G2 GI toxicities, respectively. Since no DLTs were observed, 50 Gy in five fractions was considered the MTD. The median nadir PSA was 0.20 ng/mL. A slight improvement in QoL values was registered after the treatment. CONCLUSION: This trial confirms the feasibility and safety of a total SIB-VMAT dose of 35 Gy on the whole gland and 50 Gy on DIL in 5 fractions daily administered in a well-selected low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma population. A phase II study is ongoing to confirm the tolerability of the schedule and assess the efficacy.

Highly hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer with a simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesions: a planning study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this planning study was to develop an acceptable technique for highly hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost technique (SIB-hHF-RT) for nonmetastatic National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created SIB-hHF-RT plans for 14 nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients with MRI-detectable intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) and without intestines locating close to the seminal vesicle and prostate. We prescribed 57 Gy for IPLs and 54 Gy for the remainder of planning target volume (PTV) in 15 fractions. The IPLs were contoured based on magnetic resonance imaging, and PTV was generated by adding 6-8-mm margins to the clinical target volume. For the dose-volume constraints of organs at risk (OARs), the same constraints as 54 Gy plans were used so as not to increase the toxicity. RESULTS: All created plans fulfilled the dose-volume constraints of all targets and OARs. The median estimated beam-on time was 108.5 s. For patient-specific quality assurance, the global gamma passing rates (3%/2 mm) with 10% dose threshold criteria were greater than 93% in all cases and greater than 95% in 11 cases. CONCLUSION: SIB-hHF-RT plans were developed that fulfill the acceptable dose-volume constraints and pass patient-specific quality assurance. We believe these plans can be applied to selected patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Associated Factors of Self-injury Among Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder in a Community and Residential Treatment Setting.

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) occurs in up to 50% of individuals with autism. As one of the most serious conditions in individuals with developmental disabilities, SIB affects the individual and his or her family in multiple contexts. A systematic analysis of factors most commonly associated with SIB could inform the development of individualized intervention strategies. The current study examined factors related to SIB in an analysis of client records of 145 children with autism in a comprehensive care center. Predictor variables included age, gender, the Adaptive Behavior Composite, sensory processing, aggression, stereotypies, irritability, adaptive skills, and medical conditions. Age, irritability, and the Adaptive Behavior Composite were found to significantly predict SIB.

The influence of simultaneous integrated boost, hypofractionation and oncoplastic surgery on cosmetic outcome and PROMs after breast conserving therapy.

INTRODUCTION: We retrospectively investigated the possible influence of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), hypofractionation and oncoplastic surgery on cosmetic outcome in 125 patients with stage I-II breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The boost was given sequentially (55%) or by SIB (45%); fractionation was conventional (83%) or hypofractionated (17%); the surgical technique was a conventional lumpectomy (74%) or an oncoplastic technique (26%). We compared cosmetic results subjectively using a questionnaire independently completed by the patient and by the physician and objectively with the BCCT.core software. Independent-samples T-tests were used to compare outcome in different groups. Patients also completed the EORTC QLQ C30 and BR23. RESULTS: Univariate analyses indicated no significant differences of the cosmetic results (P ≤ 0.05) for the type of boost or fractionation. However, the conventional lumpectomy group scored significantly better than the oncoplastic group in the BCCT.core evaluation, without a significant difference in the subjective cosmetic evaluation. Quality of life outcome was in favour of SIB, hypofractionation and conventional surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that the current RT techniques seem to be safe for cosmetic outcome and quality of life. Further investigation is needed to verify the possible negative influence of oncoplastic surgery on the cosmetic outcome and the quality of life as this technique is especially indicated for patients with an unfavourable tumour/breast volume ratio.

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy with vaginal cuff simultaneous integrated boost as an alternative to brachytherapy in adjuvant irradiation for endometrial cancer: a prospective study.

AIM: To report preliminary results of a prospective study using pelvic volumetric-modulated arc therapy and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT) on vaginal cuff postoperatively in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients, submitted surgery for EC, were recruited to SIB-VMAT prescribing a dose of 54 Gy to the pelvis and 66 Gy to the vaginal cuff in 30 fractions. A 2 mm transvaginal probe and magnetic resonance imaging were used to define the vaginal cuff. Toxicity data were collected according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0; clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 26 (range=12 to 39) months. According to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009, the stages were: IB1 in 20%, IB2 in 28%, IIA2 in 16%, IIB in 6%, IIIA in 2%, and IIIC in 28%. The 2-year Overall Survival and Local Control were 96% and 100%, respectively. Two pelvic node failures were registered. Acute gastrointestinal toxicity was: G0 in 12%, G1 in 52%, G2 in 36%; no case of toxicity G3 or more was observed. Acute genitourinary toxicity was: G0 in 10%, G1 in 42%, G2 in 48%; no case of toxicity G3 or more was observed. No late severe gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities were reported. A statistical correlation was found between acute G2 gastrointestinal toxicity with bowel V20 Gy ≥ 30%, V20 ≥ 40%, V30 ≥ 30%, Dmax ≥ 45 Gy. Acute G2 genitourinary toxicity was threefold higher with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In patients with EC, SIB-VMAT is feasible, and well tolerated. Preliminary data of clinical outcome are promising. Further prospective studies are advocated.

Surgery for Tourette syndrome.

Tourette syndrome is a chronic neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by motor and vocal tics. In the majority of cases, tics are associated by behavioral disorders such as obsessive-compulsive behavior. First symptoms typically appear in early childhood. Mostly symptoms disappear when adulthood is reached. Treatment options consist of behavioral therapy and medication. In refractory cases, surgery may be an option. In the past, several attempts have been made to treat therapy-refractory patients through neurosurgical ablative procedures. In 1999, deep brain stimulation was introduced as a novel treatment option for patients with intractable Tourette syndrome. Up until now, five brain areas have been used or suggested as potential target areas for deep brain stimulation in Tourette syndrome. In the majority of the published cases, there is a clear effect on tics but most studies consist of only a limited number of patients. A strict patient selection is absolutely mandatory. There is a need for double-blinded multicenter trials with inclusion of more patients.