Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of Apixaban for postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following open gynecologic cancer surgery at a comprehensive cancer center.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety, efficacy, and feasibility of apixaban for postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following open gynecologic cancer surgery at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: This retrospective, cohort study included patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent open surgery between 3/2021 and 3/2023 and received 28-day postoperative VTE prophylaxis. Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation preoperatively were excluded. Predictors of 90- and 30-day VTE and 30-day bleeding events were determined using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for known confounders. RESULTS: 452 patients were included in the cohort: 348 received apixaban and 104 received enoxaparin. Those who received enoxaparin were more likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologists class III/IV (compared to I/II) (p = 0.033), current or former smokers (p = 0.012) and have a higher BMI (p < 0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.005), and age (p = 0.046). 30-day VTE rate was significantly lower in the apixaban group (0.6%) compared to the enoxaparin group (6.2%) (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.56; p = 0.006). 90-day VTE rate was 2.7% and 6.2% in the apixaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38-1.92; p = 0.704). Major bleeding complications (2.4% vs. 2.0%) and minor bleeding complications (0.9% vs. 3.0%) were similar in the apixaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively, on multivariate analyses. The median patient out of pocket cost was $10 (IQR 0.0-40.0) for apixaban and $20 (IQR 3.7-67.7) for enoxaparin (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings along with previously published data suggest that apixaban should be considered the standard of care for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing open surgery for gynecologic malignancies.

Association of type of oral anticoagulation with risk of bleeding in 45,114 patients with venous thromboembolism during initial and extended treatment-A nationwide register-based study.

BACKGROUND: Safety data for different anticoagulant medications in venous thromboembolism (VTE) are scarce, in particular for extended treatment. OBJECTIVES: To compare major bleeding rates depending on the choice of anticoagulation during initial (first 6 months) and extended treatment (6 months up to 5 years). METHODS: A nationwide register-based study including cancer-free patients with a first-time VTE between 2014 and 2020. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare bleeding rates. RESULTS: We included 6558 patients on warfarin, 18,196 on rivaroxaban, and 19,498 on apixaban. At 6 months, 4750 (72.4%) remained on warfarin, 11,366 (62.5%) on rivaroxaban, and 11,940 (61.2%) on apixaban. During initial treatment, major bleeding rates were 3.86 (95% CI 3.14-4.58), 2.93 (2.55-3.31), and 1.95 (1.65-2.25) per 100 patient-years for warfarin, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively, yielding adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.71-1.12) for rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 0.55 (0.43-0.71) for apixaban versus warfarin, and 0.62 (0.50-0.76) for apixaban versus rivaroxaban. During extended treatment, major bleeding rates were 1.55 (1.19-1.91), 1.05 (0.85-1.26), and 0.96 (0.78-1.15) per 100 patient-years for warfarin, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively, with aHRs of 0.72 (0.53-0.99) for rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 0.60 (0.44-0.82) for apixaban versus warfarin, and 0.85 (0.64-1.12) for apixaban versus rivaroxaban. Previous bleeding and increasing age were risk factors for bleeding both during initial and extended treatment. CONCLUSION: Apixaban had a lower bleeding risk than warfarin or rivaroxaban during initial treatment. During extended treatment, bleeding risk was similar for apixaban and rivaroxaban, and higher with warfarin.

Antithrombotic therapy and cardiovascular outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients without indications for chronic oral anticoagulation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: As the antithrombotic regimen that may best prevent ischaemic complications along with the lowest bleeding risk offset following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic regimens in patients without having an indication for chronic oral anticoagulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a PROSPERO-registered (CRD42021247924) systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating post-TAVI antithrombotic regimens up to April 2022. We estimated the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using a random-effects model in a frequentist pairwise and network metanalytic approach. We included seven studies comprising 4006 patients with a mean weighted follow-up of 12.9 months. Risk of all-cause death was significantly reduced with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared with low-dose rivaroxaban + 3-month single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.88), while no significant reduction was observed with SAPT vs. DAPT (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67-1.58) and SAPT and DAPT compared with apixaban or edoxaban (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.32-1.14 and RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.34-1.02, respectively). SAPT was associated with a significant reduction of life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding compared with DAPT (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.70), apixaban or edoxaban alone (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.79), and low-dose rivaroxaban + 3-month SAPT (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57). There were no differences between the various regimens with respect to myocardial infarction, stroke, or systemic embolism. CONCLUSION: Following TAVI in patients without an indication for chronic oral anticoagulant, SAPT more than halved the risk of bleeding compared with DAPT and direct oral anticoagulant-based regimens without significant ischaemic offset.

Reduced dose direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin with high time in therapeutic range in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are dose-reduced in elderly and patients with impaired renal function. Only reduced dose dabigatran is concluded as having similar stroke risk reduction and lower risk of major bleeding than warfarin in the pivotal studies. In clinical practice, reduced dose is prescribed more often than expected making this an important issue. The objective of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety between reduced dose DOACs and high TTR warfarin treatment (TTR ≥ 70%) in NVAF. A Swedish anticoagulation registry was used in identifying eligible patients from July 2011 to December 2017. The study cohort consisted of 40,564 patients with newly initiated DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban) (11,083 patients) or warfarin treatment (29,481 patients) after exclusion of 374,135 patients due to not being warfarin or DOAC naïve, not being prescribed reduced dose, having previous mechanical heart valve (MHV), or being under 18 years old. The median durations of follow up were 365, 419, 432 and 473 days for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. Warfarin TTR identified from Auricula was 70.0%. Endpoints (stroke and major bleeding) and baseline characteristics were collected from hospital administrative registers using ICD-10 codes. Cohorts were compared using weighted adjusted Cox regression after full optimal matching based on propensity scores. DOACs are associated with lower risk of major bleeding (HR with 95% CI) 0.85 (0.78-0.93), intracranial bleeding HR 0.64 (0.51-0.80), hemorrhagic stroke HR 0.68 (0.50-0.92), gastrointestinal bleeding HR 0.81 (0.69-0.96) and all-cause stroke HR 0.87 (0.76-0.99), than warfarin. Apixaban and dabigatran are associated with lower risk of major bleeding, HR 0.70 (0.63-0.78) and HR 0.80 (0.69-0.94), and rivaroxaban is associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke, HR 0.73 (0.59-0.96), with higher major bleeding risk, HR 1.31 (1.15-1.48), compared to warfarin. Apixaban is associated with higher all-cause mortality compared to warfarin, HR 1.12 (1.03-1.21). DOACs are associated with lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause stroke, than high quality warfarin treatment, with exception of rivaroxaban that carried higher risk of major bleeding and lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism. In this large observational registry-based NVAF cohort, DOACs are preferred treatment in patients with indication for DOAC dose reduction, even in a high TTR setting.

Comparison of the Treatment Persistence Among 4 Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used in Japan (edoxaban, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran); however, few studies have examined the long-term treatment persistence of these DOACs. Furthermore, the factors associated with persistence remain unclear. This single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolled participants who were newly prescribed the 4 DOACs between January 1, 2012, and April 30, 2020. We assessed the treatment persistence rate by calculating the cumulative incidence rate of prescription switch or discontinuation for 5 years from the initial prescription. The factors associated with persistence were examined using multivariate analysis. The edoxaban was used as a reference for comparison with the other DOACs. The persistence rate at 5 years was 52.9% for all DOACs, including 67.0%, 51.6%, 50.2%, and 37.0% for edoxaban, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age >65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95%CI, 0.41-0.93]), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.63 [95%CI, 1.11-2.39]), baseline hemoglobin (HR, 0.85 [95%CI, 0.78-0.93]), diabetes mellitus (HR, 0.51 [95%CI, 0.29-0.93]), and type of DOACs (rivaroxaban: HR, 1.81 [95%CI, 1.03-3.18]; apixaban: HR, 2.00 [95%CI, 1.15-3.48]; and dabigatran: HR, 2.84 [95%CI, 1.66-4.86]) were significantly associated with nonpersistence at 1 year. At 5 years, diabetes mellitus (HR, 0.60 [95%CI, 0.37-0.97]) and type of DOAC were significantly associated with nonpersistence (rivaroxaban: HR, 1.79 [95%CI, 1.09-2.94]; apixaban: HR, 2.04 [95%CI, 1.26-3.31]; and dabigatran: HR, 2.76 [1.73-4.42]). Long-term treatment persistence differed according to the type of DOAC, with edoxaban exhibiting the highest level of persistence. The factors associated with persistence may change over the treatment course, but larger studies are required to generalize our findings.

Use of Apixaban in Atrial Fibrillation With Ritonavir-Boosted Antiretroviral Therapy: A Case Report.

Purpose: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) pose a challenge when given with potent CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors, such as the commonly prescribed pharmacokinetic booster ritonavir. As per the manufacturer, apixaban offers a dose reduction when administered concurrently with ritonavir; thus, we explore the clinical indication and safety of apixaban when given with ritonavir-boosted highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in an HIV patient. Summary: We describe a 73-year-old male with extensive cardiac history, including a past medical history of resolved left ventricular thrombus, newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin, and HIV infection treated with ritonavir-boosted HAART. The patient presented to the emergency department with bleeding from multiple sites, necessitating the use of vitamin K. Consequently, his hospital course was complicated by episodes of minor bleeding and labile INR. Due to the complicated nature of his condition and the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs), he was transitioned from warfarin to apixaban. Since there is little readily available data to support the use of rivaroxaban and dabigatran with ritonavir, our patient was safely started on dose-reduced apixaban for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation due to the predictable nature of apixaban pharmacokinetics and proven superiority regarding adverse effects, as compared to other DOACs. Conclusion: Dose-reduced apixaban is a safe and viable choice in patients with atrial fibrillation warranting stroke prophylaxis while concurrently receiving ritonavir-boosted HAART.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention and Acute Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.

Cancer is a major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) constitutes approximately 15-25% of all VTE cases. For decades, the standard treatment for CAT used to be daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data on the safety and efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population emerged only in recent years and specific DOACs were included into recent guidelines recommendations. In this narrative review of the literature, we reported the results of the phase III randomized controlled trials that evaluated the DOACs for the prevention and the acute treatment of CAT. For the acute phase treatment, the anti-Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) showed better efficacy than LMWH in preventing VTE recurrence; however, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were also associated with an increased risk of bleeding events. For primary prevention of CAT in ambulatory cancer patients starting chemotherapy, apixaban and rivaroxaban showed better efficacy than placebo but a trend towards higher bleeding rates. Recent guidelines suggest the DOACs for the treatment of CAT in selected cancer patients (eg, low bleeding risk, no luminal gastrointestinal or genitourinary malignancies, no interfering medications). The DOACs are also suggested for primary thromboprophylaxis in selected ambulatory cancer patients at high risk of VTE (eg, Khorana score ≥2 prior to starting new chemotherapy, low bleeding risk, no interfering medications).

Evaluation of safety and efficacy outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in normal and extreme body weights for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.

Despite evolving evidence, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with extremes of body weight remains controversial. This study aimed to measure the impact of DOACs compared to warfarin on safety and efficacy outcomes in extreme body weight patients. This multi-center, health system, retrospective study examined the outcomes of patients with all body weights and extreme body weights prescribed a DOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) or warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism over a 9-year period. The primary outcome was a composite of thromboembolism, symptomatic recurrent VTE, or severe bleeding; analyzed by pre-determined BMI cutoffs. A total of 19,697 patients were included in the study: 11,604 in the DOAC group and in the 8093 in the warfarin group. 295 patients were underweight and 9108 patients were pre-obese to obese class 3. After adjusting for potential confounders, warfarin patients had higher odds of experiencing the composite outcome compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.337, 95% CI 1.212-1.475). Additionally, obese patients were 24.6% more likely to experience the outcome compared to normal BMI patients. Adjusted modeling showed that warfarin patients experienced higher bleed rates compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.432, 95% CI 1.266-1.620). Obese patients were less likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 0.749, 95% CI 0.658-0.854), and underweight patients were more likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 1.522, 95% CI 1.095-2.115) compared to normal BMI patients. In conclusion, DOACs for atrial fibrillation or VTE in patients with extreme body weights appear safe and effective when compared to warfarin.

Cost-effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants compared to low-molecular-weight-heparins for treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism in Spain.

AIM: Recent studies have compared the efficacy and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there is no available cost-effectiveness analysis comparing DOAC and LMWH. The study aimed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of DOAC (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) vs. LMWH for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE in Spain from the Spanish healthcare system perspective. METHODS: We developed a Markov model with a 12-month time horizon. The states included pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, major and non-major bleeding, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, post-thrombotic syndrome, and death. The use of medical resources and drug costs were obtained from the 2021 Spanish Ministry of Health database, and the main references for obtaining the outcomes were derived from Caravaggio, Hokusai VTE Cancer, ADAM VTE, and SELECT-D trials. We performed a deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis to validate the robustness. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) scores cost per life-year (€/LY) gained and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (€/QALY) gained. RESULTS: The 12-month cost of DOAC was 1,994€ (apixaban 1,944€, edoxaban 1,968€, rivaroxaban 2,122€) and 2,152€ for LMWH. The amount of QALY for DOAC was 0.54 (apixaban 0.55, rivaroxaban 0.53, and edoxaban 0.52) and 0.53 for LMWH. We observed similar results for LYs. ICER scores in terms both of €/LY and €/QALY show that DOAC is dominant over LMWH and apixaban showed the best profile. LIMITATIONS: Our research is based on an indirect comparison of a short-term clinical trial. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that DOAC is cost-effective and cost-saving compared to LMWH in treating VTE.

Comparison of Managing Factor Xa Inhibitor to Unfractionated Heparin Transitions by aPTT Versus a Treatment Guideline Utilizing Heparin Anti-Xa Levels.

BACKGROUND: There are inadequate data on the optimal strategy for transitioning factor Xa inhibitors (FXai; apixaban, rivaroxaban) to unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions. OBJECTIVE: In patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion, this study compared the safety and efficacy of monitoring UFH infusions using an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) titration scale versus utilizing an UFH-calibrated anti-Xa titration scale aided by a novel institutional guideline. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion at 2 medical centers from June 1, 2018, to November 1, 2020. One institution utilized aPTT while the other institution primarily used UFH-calibrated anti-Xa. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, major bleeding, or new thrombosis during the hospitalization with a planned noninferiority analysis. Secondary outcomes were also collected including the amount and duration of UFH administered between cohorts. RESULTS: The incidence rate of the primary composite endpoint was 6.3% in the anti-Xa group and 11% in the aPTT group (P < 0.001 for noninferiority, P = 0.138 for superiority) meeting noninferiority criteria. No statistical differences were seen in new thrombosis, major bleeding, or any bleeding. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This represents the first report of a comparison between aPTT versus anti-Xa monitoring in relation to clinical outcomes for patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion. A transition guideline primarily utilizing an UFH-calibrated anti-Xa assay appears to be a safe alternative to aPTT monitoring and can aid facilities in the management of patients during these complex transitions.

Case series of massive direct oral anticoagulant ingestion-Treatment and pharmacokinetics data.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are widely used due to favourable benefit/risk ratio. However, consequences of massive ingestion have been poorly investigated. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to report outcome and pharmacokinetic parameters in patients who massively ingested DOACs. METHODS: We conducted a 5-year cohort study including consecutive massive DOAC ingestion patients admitted to two critical care departments. Patients were managed in accordance with standards of care. We collected the main history, clinical, laboratory, management and outcome data. The time-course of plasma DOAC concentrations measured using specific assays was modelled. RESULTS: Twelve patients (3F/9M; age, 55 years [41-63], median [25th-75th percentiles]) were included. Ingestions involved rivaroxaban (n = 7), apixaban (n = 3) and dabigatran (n = 2), with presumed doses of 9.4-fold [5.0-22.0] the full daily dose. Six patients received activated charcoal but no antidote nor blood-derived product. No bleeding was observed. One patient died due to refractory cardiogenic shock related to bisoprolol co-intoxication. Highest observed peak plasma concentrations were 1720 ng/ml (rivaroxaban), 750 ng/ml (apixaban) and 644 ng/ml (dabigatran). Times to reach DOAC concentration below 50 ng/ml were ~20-45 h (rivaroxaban), ~125 h (apixaban) and ~30-50 h (dabigatran). Elimination half-lives were 2.5-25.5 h (rivaroxaban), 22.0 and 36.5 h (apixaban), and 5.8 and 15.5 h (dabigatran), with substantial interindividual variability and prolongation in case of cardiovascular failure related to co-intoxicants. Charcoal administration, even if delayed, may have contributed to limit toxicity, possibly by reducing absorption and/or enteroenteric recycling. CONCLUSION: No bleeding was observed in this series of massive DOAC ingestions despite elevated plasma concentrations. No patient required specific haemostatic agents. Charcoal administration should be considered to limit toxicity.

The Clinical Significance of Drug-Food Interactions of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of death in the world. For almost 60 years, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the mainstay of anticoagulation therapy, but in recent years direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the anticoagulant treatment of choice. DOACs were initially considered drugs with no significant food interactions; however, clinical observations from daily practice have proved otherwise as interactions with food ingredients have been reported. Food, dietary supplements or herbs may contain substances that, when administered concomitantly with DOACs, can potentially affect the plasma concentration of the drugs. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the clinical significance of drug-food interactions of DOACs, such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban and betrixaban. Patients treated with anticoagulants should avoid products containing St. John's wort and take special care with other food ingredients. As the interest in dietary supplements is on the rise, healthcare providers can contribute to the development of well-designed clinical trials on interactions between DOACs and food, and distribute sufficient knowledge about the proper use of these supplements among patients.

Differences in activated clotting time and total unfractionated heparin dose during pulmonary vein isolation in patients on different anticoagulation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Periprocedural pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) anticoagulation requires balancing between bleeding and thromboembolic risk. Intraprocedural anticoagulation is monitored by activated clotting time (ACT) with target value >300 s, and there are no guidelines specifying an initial unfractionated heparin (UFH) dose. METHODS: We aimed to assess differences in ACT values and UFH dosage during PVI in patients on different oral anticoagulants. We conducted an international, multi-center, registry-based study. Consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI, on uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy, were analyzed. Before transseptal puncture, UFH bolus of 100 IU/kg was administered regardless of the anticoagulation drug. RESULTS: Total of 873 patients were included (median age 61 years, IQR 53-66; female 30%). There were 248, 248, 189, 188 patients on warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively. Mean initial ACT was 257 ± 50 s, mean overall ACT 295 ± 45 s and total UFH dose 158 ± 60 IU/kg. Patients who were receiving warfarin and dabigatran compared to patients receiving rivaroxaban and apixaban had: (i) significantly higher initial ACT values (262 ± 57 and 270 ± 48 vs. 248 ± 42 and 241 ± 44 s, p < .001), (ii) significantly higher ACT throughout PVI (309 ± 46 and 306 ± 44 vs. 282 ± 37 and 272 ± 42 s, p < .001), and (iii) needed lower UFH dose during PVI (140 ± 39 and 157 ± 71 vs. 171 ± 52 and 172 ± 70 IU/kg). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in ACT values and UFH dose during PVI in patients receiving different anticoagulants. Patients on warfarin and dabigatran had higher initial and overall ACT values and needed lower UFH dose to achieve adequate anticoagulation during PVI than patients on rivaroxaban and apixaban.

Does atorvastatin therapy change the anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with atrial fibrillation?

Atorvastatin and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (xabans) are frequently co-administrated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, no studies investigating the possibility of the pharmacologic interaction between these agents have been conducted. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the impact of atorvastatin therapy on anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF. We enrolled 115 AF patients on long-term rivaroxaban (52 patients) and long-term apixaban (63 patients) therapy. Long-term atorvastatin (40 mg once daily) was administrated to 28 rivaroxaban-treated patients and to 28 apixaban-treated patients. Trough and peak samples were tested for anti-Xa activity with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis. For rivaroxaban, there were no significant differences in trough activity (45.5 ± 39.5 ng/ml vs. 46.2 ± 30.1 ng/ml; p = .34) and peak anti-Xa activity (179.2 ± 108.8 ng/ml vs. 208.1 ± 104.1 ng/ml; p = .94) between atorvastatin-treated patients and those without atorvastatin. Similarly, atorvastatin did not impact the trough activity (127.7 ± 71.1 ng/ml vs. 100.8 ± 61.1 ng/ml; p = .12) or peak anti-Xa activity (213.8 ± 103.6 ng/ml vs. 179.3 ± 72.9 ng/ml; p = .14) among apixaban-treated patients with AF. This observational study did not show a significant impact of atorvastatin on trough and peak anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF.

Intranasal In Situ Gel of Apixaban-Loaded Nanoethosomes: Preparation, Optimization, and In Vivo Evaluation.

The present study was conducted to formulate ethosomal thermoreversible in situ gel of apixaban, an anticoagulant drug, for nasal delivery. Ethosomes were formed, of lecithin, cholesterol, and ethanol, by using thin-film hydration method. The prepared ethosomes were characterized by Zetasizer, transmission electron microscope, entrapment efficiency, and in vitro study. The selected ethosomal formula (API-ETHO2) was incorporated in gel using P407 and P188 as thermoreversible agents and carbopol 934 as mucoadhesive agent. Box-Behnken design was used to study the effect of independent variables (concentration of P407, P188, and carbopol 934) on gelation temperature, mucoadhesive strength, and in vitro cumulative percent drug released at 12h (response variables). The optimized formulation was subjected to compatibility study, ex vivo permeation, histopathological examination for the nasal mucosa, and in vivo study. API-ETHO2 was spherical with an average size of 145.1±12.3 nm, zeta potential of -20±4 mV, entrapment efficiency of 67.11%±3.26, and in vitro % release of 79.54%±4.1. All gel formulations exhibited an acceptable pH and drug content. The optimum gel offered 32.3°C, 1226.3 dyne/cm2, and 53.50% for gelation temperature, mucoadhesive strength, and in vitro percent released, respectively. Apixaban ethosomal in situ gel evolved higher ex vivo permeation (1.499±0.11 µg/cm2h) through the nasal mucosa than pure apixaban gel. Histopathological study assured that there is no necrosis or tearing of the nasal mucosa happened by ethosomal gel. The pharmacokinetic parameters in rabbit plasma showed that intranasal administration of optimized API-ethosomal in situ gel achieved higher Cmax and AUC0-∞ than unprocessed API nasal gel, nasal suspension, and oral suspension. The ethosomal thermoreversible nasal gel established its potential to improve nasal permeation and prolong anticoagulant effect of apixaban.

Comparison of potential pharmacokinetic drug interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation and changing from warfarin to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant therapy.

There are now anticoagulant choices with proposed advantages of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin being less routine monitoring and less drug interactions. Interacting medication can impact the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy with management remaining clinically challenging. There have been limited studies comparing the potential for pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interactions between different anticoagulants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare potential PK interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) changing from warfarin to NOAC therapy. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with AF enrolled in a dedicated warfarin program but exiting this program to commence a NOAC. Patient data was collected, and concurrent medications were utilised to identify potential PK drug interactions with both warfarin and the chosen NOAC therapy. Patients were grouped according to the number of medications with potential PK interactions and comparisons made between groups. Of the 712 eligible patients who ceased warfarin to commence a NOAC, most commenced either apixaban (45.9%) or rivaroxaban (41.9%). When comparing warfarin to NOACs, there were significant differences in the proportion of patients taking no medication with potential PK drug interactions (46.9% vs 62.8%, p < 0.0001), and taking one (35.2% vs 28.5%, p = 0.0067) and two (14.5% vs 7.3%, p < 0.0001) potentially PK interacting medications. This study found when patients with AF were switched from warfarin to a NOAC, the potential for PK drug interactions significantly reduced but remained around 40%. Identifying and managing potential PK drug interactions with NOACs remains a priority to optimise clinical benefit of these anticoagulants.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several observational studies have compared the effect of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants to each other in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, confounding by indication is a major problem when comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatments in some of these studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant by only including the propensity score matching studies. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and Ovid databases until May 2020 to identify relevant observational studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the reported outcomes were collected and then pooled by a random-effects model complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model. RESULTS: A total of 17 retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with dabigatran use, the use of rivaroxaban was significantly associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.05-1.29]) and major bleeding (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.24-1.41]), whereas the use of apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.56-1.28]). Compared with rivaroxaban use, the use of apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54-0.73]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67-1.04]). Reanalyses with the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model produced similar results as the random-effects model. CONCLUSIONS: Current observational comparisons with propensity score matching methods suggest that apixaban might be a better choice compared with dabigatran or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients.

Evaluation of characteristics and dosing regimens in patients with new or recurrent thrombosis on apixaban and rivaroxaban.

Direct factor Xa inhibitors, such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, are widely used for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism; however, recent cases of therapeutic failure have been reported. Potential risk factors associated with therapeutic failure such as dose deviations outside of package labeling recommendations, and the use of direct factor Xa-specific inhibitor levels to guide clinical decision making continue to be areas of further investigation. Our study aimed to describe characteristics and dosing regimens in patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban who experienced a new or recurrent thrombosis. We performed a retrospective chart review on 190 patients on either apixaban or rivaroxaban presenting to our institution with new or breakthrough thromboembolism. Evaluation of prescribed anticoagulation regimens compared to package labeling recommendations, direct factor Xa inhibitor-specific anti-Xa levels, anticoagulation interruptions, use of parenteral bridge anticoagulation, final anticoagulation regimen disposition, and thrombosis-associated mortality were recorded. In patients presenting with breakthrough thromboembolism, 78% were on a regimen that matched package labeling recommendations. Anti-Xa levels were documented in 66 patients, the majority of which fell within institutional expected ranges at time of thrombosis. Therapy interruptions immediately prior to thrombosis were observed in 22% of patients and 21% of those patients received parenteral anticoagulation during interruption. Upon discharge, 46% of patients continued the same anticoagulation regimen with no changes. The mortality rate was 6%. In patients who present with new thromboembolism on apixaban or rivaroxaban, a thorough review of risks and benefits should be conducted to mitigate future risk of recurrent thrombosis.