Combined effects of valproate and naringin on kidney antioxidative markers and serum parameters of kidney function in C57BL6 mice.

Valproate is known to disturb the kidney function, and high doses or prolonged intake may cause serum ion imbalance, kidney tubular acidosis, proteinuria, hyperuricosuria, polyuria, polydipsia, and dehydration. The aim of this in vivo study was to see whether naringin would counter the adverse effects of high-dose valproate in C57Bl/6 mice and to which extent. As expected, valproate (150 mg/kg bw a day for 10 days) caused serum hyperkalaemia, more in male than female mice. Naringin reversed (25 mg/kg bw a day for 10 days) the hyperkalaemia and activated antioxidative defence mechanisms (mainly catalase and glutathione), again more efficiently in females. In males naringin combined with valproate was not as effective and even showed some prooxidative effects.

Evaluation of the effect of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate on arrhythmia-related cardiovascular outcomes in patients receiving chronic haemodialysis with hyperkalaemia: protocol for the multicentre, randomised, controlled DIALIZE-Outcomes study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with kidney failure receiving chronic haemodialysis have elevated risk of arrhythmias potentially increasing the likelihood of sudden cardiac death, stroke and hospitalisation. The DIALIZE study (NCT03303521) demonstrated that sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) was an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for predialysis hyperkalaemia in patients undergoing haemodialysis. The DIALIZE-Outcomes study evaluates the effect of SZC on sudden cardiac death and arrhythmia-related cardiovascular outcomes in patients receiving chronic haemodialysis with recurrent hyperkalaemia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: International, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 357 study sites across 25 countries. Adults (≥18 years) receiving chronic haemodialysis three times per week with recurrent predialysis serum potassium (K+) ≥5.5 mmol/L post long interdialytic interval (LIDI) are eligible. Patients (~2800) will be randomised 1:1 to SZC or placebo, starting at 5 g orally once daily on non-dialysis days and titrated weekly in 5 g increments (maximum 15 g) to target predialysis serum K+ 4.0-5.0 mmol/L post LIDI. The primary objective is to evaluate efficacy of SZC versus placebo in reducing occurrence of the primary composite endpoint of sudden cardiac death, stroke or arrhythmia-related hospitalisation, intervention or emergency department visit. Secondary endpoints include efficacy of SZC versus placebo in maintaining normokalaemia (serum K+ 4.0-5.5 mmol/L post LIDI) at the 12-month visit, preventing severe hyperkalaemia (serum K+ ≥6.5 mmol/L post LIDI) at the 12-month visit and reducing the incidence of individual cardiovascular outcomes. Safety of SZC will be evaluated. The study is event driven, with participants remaining in the study until 770 primary endpoint events have occurred. Average time in the study is expected to be ~25 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval was obtained from the relevant institutional review board/independent ethics committee from each participating site (approving bodies in supplementary information). The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT 2020-005561-14 and clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04847232.

Implications of differences between point-of-care blood gas analyser and laboratory analyser potassium results on hyperkalaemia diagnosis & treatment.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalaemia is managed in the emergency department (ED) following measurement of potassium results by blood gas analysers (BGA) or laboratory analysers (LAB). AIMS: To determine the prevalence of clinically significant differences between BGA and LAB potassium results and the impact on ED hyperkalaemia management. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of time-matched ED BGA and LAB potassium samples from 2019 to 2020 (taken within 15 min, one or both results ≥6.0 mmol/L). Mean differences and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were determined for pairs with one or both results ≥6.0 mmol/L and a separate 500 consecutive sample pairs. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-eight matched BGA and LAB samples met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 201 (41.2%) differed by ≤0.5 mmol/L, 169 (34.6%) included a haemolysed LAB sample, and 12 (2.5%) had an unreportable BGA sample. One hundred six (21.7%) pairs differed by >0.5 mmol/L, and 60/106 (57%) had normal LAB potassium results, but BGA indicated moderate/severe hyperkalaemia (two of these pairs received hyperkalaemia treatment). Of patients with a haemolysed LAB sample, or where pairs differed by >0.5 mmol, 48 were treated with insulin and five (10.4%) experienced hypoglycaemia. Mean differences and LoA for pairs with LAB results <6.0 mmol/L but BGA ≥6.0 mmol/L demonstrated unacceptable agreement, with 18 (25.7%) BGA results exceeding 8.0 mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially significant discordance may occur between BGA and LAB potassium results. Clinicians need to be aware of factors impacting both analytical methods' accuracy (such as poor venepuncture or sample handling, (K) EDTA interference) and undetectable haemolysis with BGA measurements. We recommend BGA hyperkalaemia be confirmed with LAB results using a non-haemolysed sample where time permits.

Re-Thinking Hyperkalaemia Management in Chronic Kidney Disease-Beyond Food Tables and Nutrition Myths: An Evidence-Based Practice Review.

Potassium dysregulation can be life-threatening. Dietary potassium modification is a management strategy for hyperkalaemia. However, a 2017 review for clinical guidelines found no trials evaluating dietary restriction for managing hyperkalaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Evidence regarding dietary hyperkalaemia management was reviewed and practice recommendations disseminated. A literature search using terms for potassium, hyperkalaemia, and CKD was undertaken from 2018 to October 2022. Researchers extracted data, discussed findings, and formulated practice recommendations. A consumer resource, a clinician education webinar, and workplace education sessions were developed. Eighteen studies were included. Observational studies found no association between dietary and serum potassium in CKD populations. In two studies, 40-60 mmol increases in dietary/supplemental potassium increased serum potassium by 0.2-0.4 mmol/L. No studies examined lowering dietary potassium as a therapeutic treatment for hyperkalaemia. Healthy dietary patterns were associated with improved outcomes and may predict lower serum potassium, as dietary co-factors may support potassium shifts intracellularly, and increase excretion through the bowel. The resource recommended limiting potassium additives, large servings of meat and milk, and including high-fibre foods: wholegrains, fruits, and vegetables. In seven months, the resource received > 3300 views and the webinar > 290 views. This review highlights the need for prompt review of consumer resources, hospital diets, and health professionals' knowledge.

Population kinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of serum potassium in patients receiving sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim.

Since trimethoprim (TMP) dose-dependently inhibits the excretion of potassium, a population kinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed to establish an adequate dosing schedule and characterize factors of hyperkalaemia. Dataset was constructed using a retrospective observational cohort of hospitalized patients (>18 years) with oral sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim formulation. The model integrated a kinetic model for TMP, a urinary TMP concentration-response curve and a kinetic model for serum potassium using an indirect response model. The model was a function of body weight, renal function, serum potassium levels and TMP dosing schedule. We evaluated covariates by the stepwise forward and backward selection methods. The Monte Carlo simulation determined the probability of hyperkalaemia (>5.5 or >6.0 meq/L) according to the dosing schedule, renal function and covariates. This study included 317 patients [age 62 (42-72) years] with 4359 serum potassium levels. The significant covariate was non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with a 72.3% reduction in 50% inhibitory concentration. Monte Carlo simulation revealed that high-dose TMP (400 mg thrice daily) co-administered with NSAIDs led to mild hyperkalaemia (>10%) and severe hyperkalaemia (approximately 5%), regardless of renal function. In conclusion, clinicians should pay attention to hyperkalaemia with TMP high-dose and co-administered NSAIDs.

Experience of a Bespoke Hyperkalaemia Clinic to Facilitate Prescribing of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) improve prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but suboptimal dosing or discontinuation of these medications often occurs due to RAASi-associated hyperkalaemia. We established a nephrology-led hyperkalaemia clinic to oversee prescribing of patiromer, an oral potassium binder, to facilitate RAASi optimization. METHODS: The clinic was established in July 2019 at a nephrology tertiary centre in the UK. Patients with HFrEF who were unable to increase RAASi dosage due to hyperkalaemia were referred to the clinic, where all patients commenced patiromer 8.4 g daily. RAASi adjustments were deferred to the referring teams. Study outcomes included the percentage of patients who achieved a RAASi dose increase and the proportion of patients with normokalaemia at follow-up. Outcomes were evaluated until 1 May 2021. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were reviewed in the clinic between July 2019 and December 2020. Mean age was 71.6 years (±10.6 years), 56% had diabetes, and 71% had chronic kidney disease stages 3a-5; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 56 mL/min/1.73 m2 (±21 mL/min/1.73 m2). During follow-up, 13 patients discontinued patiromer (6 of whom did so due to gastrointestinal side effects) and were discharged; 2 patients died from non-hyperkalaemia-related illness; one switched to an alternative potassium binder. Over a mean follow-up of 13.4 months (±5.8 months), 17 of the 20 patients (85%) who continued with a potassium binder achieved a RAASi dose increase, with 4 patients (20%) receiving maximal dosages. This was attained by achieving normokalaemia during follow-up. No patients required magnesium supplementation. Of the 19 patients on patiromer, 12 continued this therapy for more than 12 months and 4 received it safely for 20 months. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Patiromer prescribing in a nephrology-led hyperkalaemia clinic facilitated RAASi up-titration in patients with HFrEF by controlling potassium levels.

The "FIFTY SHADOWS" of the RALES Trial: Lessons about the Potential Risk of Dietary Potassium Supplementation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Hyperkalaemia (HK) is one of the most common electrolyte disorders and a frequent reason for nephrological consultations. High serum potassium (K+) levels are associated with elevated morbidity and mortality, mainly due to life-threatening arrhythmias. In the majority of cases, HK is associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), or with the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) and/or mineral corticoid antagonists (MRAs). These drugs represent the mainstays of treatment in CKD, HF, diabetes, hypertension, and even glomerular diseases, in consideration of their beneficial effect on hard outcomes related to cardiovascular events and CKD progression. However, experiences in relation to the Randomised Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) cast a long shadow that extends to the present day, since the increased risk for HK remains a major concern. In this article, we summarise the physiology of K+ homeostasis, and we review the effects of dietary K+ on blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in the general population and in patients with early CKD, who are often not aware of this disease. We conclude with a note of caution regarding the recent publication of the SSaSS trial and the use of salt substitutes, particularly in patients with a limited capacity to increase K+ secretion in response to an exogenous load, particularly in the context of "occult" CKD, HF, and in patients taking RAASis and/or MRAs.

Real-world clinical burden and economic assessment associated with hyperkalaemia in a large integrated healthcare system: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalaemia (HK) is a serious and potentially life-threatening condition. Both acute and chronic conditions may alter potassium homeostasis. Our aim is to describe HK incidence, clinical outcomes, and associated resource use within a large, integrated healthcare system. METHODS: Adult patients seen at Intermountain Healthcare facilities with a serum potassium (sK) result between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2018 were retrospectively studied. Descriptive assessment of a population with detected HK, defined by any sK > 5.0 mmol/L and HK frequency and severity to associated resource use and characteristics of HK predictors were made. Multivariable Cox hazard regression was used to evaluate HK to outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1,208,815 patients included, 13% had HK. Compared to no-HK, HK patients were older (60 ± 18 vs 43 ± 18 years, P < 0.001), male (51% vs 41%, P < 0.001), and had greater disease burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index 3.5 ± 2.8 vs 1.7 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). At 3 years, more HK patients experienced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (19 vs 3%, P < 0.001), persisting post-adjustment (multivariable hazard ratio = 1.60, P < 0.001). They incurred higher costs for emergency department services ($552 ± 7,574 vs $207 ± 1,930, P < 0.001) and inpatient stays ($10,956 ± 93,026 vs $1,477 ± 21,423, P < 0.001). HyperK Risk Scores for the derivation and validation cohorts were: 44% low-risk, 45% moderate-risk, 11% high-risk. Strongest HK predictors were renal failure, dialysis, aldosterone blockers, diabetes, and smoking. CONCLUSION: Within this large system, HK was associated with a large clinical burden, affecting over 1 in 10 patients; HK was also associated with increased 3-year MACE risk and higher medical costs. Although risk worsened with more severe or persistently recurring HK, even mild or intermittent HK episodes were associated with significantly greater adverse clinical outcomes and medical costs. The HyperK Score predicted patients who may benefit from closer management to reduce HK risk and associated costs. It should be remembered that our assumptions are valid only for detected HK and not HK per se.

Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis.

AIMS: The complementary studies FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) examined cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in different, overlapping stages of CKD. The purpose of the FIDELITY analysis was to perform an individual patient-level prespecified pooled efficacy and safety analysis across a broad spectrum of CKD to provide more robust estimates of safety and efficacy of finerenone compared with placebo. METHODS AND RESULTS: For this prespecified analysis, two phase III, multicentre, double-blind trials involving patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes, randomized 1:1 to finerenone or placebo, were combined. Main time-to-event efficacy outcomes were a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure, and a composite of kidney failure, a sustained ≥57% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline over ≥4 weeks, or renal death. Among 13 026 patients with a median follow-up of 3.0 years (interquartile range 2.3-3.8 years), the composite cardiovascular outcome occurred in 825 (12.7%) patients receiving finerenone and 939 (14.4%) receiving placebo [hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-0.95; P = 0.0018]. The composite kidney outcome occurred in 360 (5.5%) patients receiving finerenone and 465 (7.1%) receiving placebo (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88; P = 0.0002). Overall safety outcomes were generally similar between treatment arms. Hyperkalaemia leading to permanent treatment discontinuation occurred more frequently in patients receiving finerenone (1.7%) than placebo (0.6%). CONCLUSION: Finerenone reduced the risk of clinically important cardiovascular and kidney outcomes vs. placebo across the spectrum of CKD in patients with type 2 diabetes. KEY QUESTION: Does finerenone, a novel selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, added to maximum tolerated renin-angiotensin system inhibition reduce cardiovascular disease and kidney disease progression over a broad range of chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes? KEY FINDING: In a prespecified, pooled individual-level analysis from two randomized trials, we found reductions both in cardiovascular events and kidney failure outcomes with finerenone. Because 40% of the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of >60 mL/min/1.73m2 they were identified solely on the basis of albuminuria. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Finerenone reduces the risk of clinical cardiovascular outcomes and kidney disease progression in a broad range of patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. Screening for albuminuria to identify at-risk patients among patients with type 2 diabetes facilitates reduction of both cardiovascular and kidney disease burden.

Preoperative mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist reduces postoperative hyperkalaemia in patients with Conn syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The preoperative use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in patients with unilateral forms of primary aldosteronism (PA) is not standardized. The current Endocrine Society Guidelines do not specifically recommend MRA treatment before surgery. It is unclear whether preoperative MRA can optimize perioperative blood pressure and potassium control, and reduce the incidence of postoperative hyperkalaemia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of MRA on the incidence of postoperative hyperkalaemia in addition to perioperative blood pressure and potassium concentration in patients undergoing unilateral adrenalectomy for the treatment of PA. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centres, Victoria, Australia. PATIENTS: A total of 96 patients who were diagnosed with unilateral forms of PA: 73 patients ('MRA' group) received preoperative MRA while 23 patients ('No-MRA' group) did not. RESULTS: The prevalence of postoperative hyperkalaemia was significantly higher in the 'No-MRA' group at 2-4 weeks after surgery, compared to the 'MRA' group (35% vs. 11%, p = .014). In a logistic regression, the use of MRA significantly predicted a lower incidence of postoperative hyperkalaemia after adjusting for age, sex, baseline aldosterone-to-renin ratio, potassium and preoperative eGFR. Before surgery, patients in the 'MRA' group had normalized blood pressure and potassium concentration requiring fewer antihypertensive medications and no potassium supplements. CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRA use was associated with optimal perioperative blood pressure and normalized serum potassium in addition to a lower incidence of postoperative hyperkalaemia. MRA should be considered standard treatment for patients awaiting surgery for PA.

Hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia outpatient management: a survey of 500 French general practitioners.

AIMS: How general practitioners (GPs) manage dyskalaemia is currently unknown. This study aimed at describing GP practices regarding hypokalaemia or hyperkalaemia diagnosis and management in their outpatients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A telephone survey was conducted among French GPs with a 20-item questionnaire (16 closed-ended questions and 12 open-ended questions) regarding their usual management of hypokalaemia or hyperkalaemia patients, both broadly and more specifically in patients with heart failure and/or chronic kidney disease and/or in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin receptor blockers or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. We aimed to interview 500 GPs spread geographically throughout France. This descriptive survey results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (if normally distributed or as median and inter-quartile range if the distribution was skewed). Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and proportions (%). A total of 500 GPs participated in the study. Dyskalaemia thresholds (for diagnosis and intervention) and management patterns were highly heterogeneous. The mean ± SD (range) potassium level leading to 'intervene' was 5.32 ± 0.34 mmol/L (4.5-6.5) for hyperkalaemia and 3.23 ± 0.34 mmol/L (2.0-6.5) for hypokalaemia. Potassium levels leading to refer the patient to the emergency department (ED) were 6.14 ± 0.55 (4.5-10) and 2.69 ± 0.42 mmol/L (1-4), respectively. Potassium binders (51-65%) or potassium supplements (67-74%) were frequently used to manage hyperkalaemia or hypokalaemia. GPs uncommonly referred their dyskalaemic patients to cardiologists or nephrologists (or to the emergency department, if the latter was deemed necessary owing to the severity of the dyskalaemia). We identified an association between the close vicinity of GP office from an ED and 'referring a heart failure patient' (19.2% with ED vs. 8.6% without ED) and referring a heart failure and chronic kidney disease patient on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (16.7% with ED vs. 9.3% without ED). Although the majority (67%) of GPs had an electrocardiogram on hand, it was rarely used (14%) in dyskalaemic patients. Subgroup analyses considering gender, age of the participating GPs, and high-income/low-income regions did not identify specific patterns regarding the multidimensional aspect of dyskalaemia management. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the considerable heterogeneity of French GP practices toward dyskalaemia diagnosis and management approaches, there is a likely need to standardize (potentially enabled by therapeutic algorithms) practices.

Effect of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone on liver fat and metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (MIRAD trial).

AIM: To investigate whether the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone has beneficial effects on liver fat and metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in type 2 diabetes (MIRAD) trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this 26-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled 140 patients with T2D and high risk of cardiovascular disease. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either eplerenone with a target dose of 200 mg/day for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or more and 100 mg/day for patients with eGFR between 41 and 59 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or placebo. The primary outcome measure was change in liver fat by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at week 26 from baseline; secondary outcomes were changes in metabolism, and safety by incident hyperkalaemia. RESULTS: No changes in liver fat in the eplerenone group 0.91% (95% CI -0.57 to 2.39) or the placebo group -1.01% (-2.23 to 0.21) were found. The estimated absolute treatment difference was 1.92% (-3.81 to 0.01; P = 0.049). There was no beneficial impact on supporting secondary outcome variables of metabolism as fat mass distribution, lipid metabolism or insulin resistance. Despite a high dosage of eplerenone 164 versus 175 mg in patients treated with placebo (P = 0.228), the number of patients with incident hyperkalaemia (≥5.5 mmol/L) was low, with six in the eplerenone versus two in the placebo group (P = 0.276). CONCLUSION: The addition of high doses of eplerenone to background antidiabetic and antihypertensive therapy does not show beneficial effects on liver fat and metabolism in patients with T2D.

Spironolactone to increase natriuresis in congestive heart failure with cardiorenal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Signs and symptoms of volume overload are the most frequent reason for hospital admission in acute heart failure (AHF). Diuretics are mainstay treatment, but their optimal type and dose regimen remain unclear, especially in patients with cardiorenal syndrome. METHODS: This prospective study aimed to include 80 AHF patients with volume overload and cardiorenal syndrome. Through a 2 × 2 factorial design, patients were randomised towards (1) combinational treatment with acetazolamide and low-dose loop diuretics versus high-dose loop diuretics; and (2) open-label oral spironolactone 25 mg OD given upfront versus at discharge. Here reported are the results of the spironolactone treatment arm after complete follow-up of 34/80 patients (since the study was stopped because of slow recruitment). The primary study end-point was incident hypokalaemia (<3.5 mmol/L) or hyperkalaemia (>5.5 mmol/L). RESULTS: Serum potassium derangements were numerically less frequent in the upfront versus discharge spironolactone group, yet this result was underpowered due to incomplete study recruitment (hyperkalaemia: 6% vs. 11%; hypokalaemia: 13% vs. 28%, respectively; p-value = .270). Natriuresis after 24 h was higher in the upfront vs. discharge spironolactone group (314 ± 142 vs. 200 ± 91 mmol/L, respectively; p-value = .010). Relative change in plasma NT-proBNP level after 72 h was similar among both groups (-16 ± 29% vs. -5 ± 45%, respectively; p value = .393), with no difference in all-cause mortality (p-value = .682) or the combination of all-cause mortality and heart failure readmission (p-value = .799). DISCUSSION: Spironolactone use upfront in AHF patients at high risk for cardiorenal syndrome is safe and increases natriuresis.

Onset time of hyperkalaemia after angiotensin receptor blocker initiation: when should we start serum potassium monitoring?

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) frequently induce hyperkalaemia in high-risk patients. Early detection of hyperkalaemia can reduce the subsequent harmful effects. This study was performed to examine the onset time of hyperkalaemia after ARB therapy. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis to determine the onset time of hyperkalaemia (serum potassium >5·5 mm) among hospitalized patients newly starting ARB therapy between 2004 and 2012, in a tertiary teaching hospital. Predefined possible risk factors and concomitant medications were evaluated. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: During the 97-month study period, a total of 4267 hospitalized patients started ARBs as new drugs and 225 patients showed hyperkalaemia. A significantly increased risk of hyperkalaemia was detected among patients with a high baseline potassium [odds ratio (OR) 6·0] and those who took non-potassium-sparing diuretics (OR 2·2) or potassium supplements (OR 1·6). A high glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was associated with a lower risk of hyperkalaemia (OR 0·992). Fifty-two percentage of hyperkalaemic events occurred within the first week after initiation of ARB therapy. The highest frequency of hyperkalaemia occurred on the first day after initiation of ARBs. Hyperkalaemia occurred earlier in patients with a high baseline serum potassium level, reduced GFR, diabetes and in those without heart failure. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Hyperkalaemia occurs most frequently at the beginning of ARB therapy in hospitalized patients. Monitoring of serum potassium and estimated GFR after initiation of ARBs should be started within a few days or not later than 1 week, especially in patients with risk factors.