Does medicinal cannabis affect depression, anxiety, and stress in people with cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies.

INTRODUCTION: Medicinal cannabis might have a role in supporting the mental health of people with cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy and safety of medicinal cannabis, compared with any control, as an intervention for depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms in people living with cancer. A secondary aim was to examine the effect of low versus high Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) dose on these outcomes. METHODS: Five databases were systematically searched, and complemented with a snowball search from inception to May 2023, for any type of interventional study that included humans of any age with any cancer type. Primary outcomes were incidence and severity of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Secondary outcomes were mood, cognition, quality of life, appetite, nutrition status, gastrointestinal symptoms, and adverse events. Data were pooled using Review Manager. Evidence was appraised using Cochrane risk of bias tools. Confidence in the estimated effect of pooled outcomes was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Fifteen studies (n = 11 randomized trials, n = 4 non-randomized trials) of 18 interventions (N = 1898 total participants; 100 % ≥18 years of age) were included. Ten studies examined THC (70 % synthetic), two synthetic cannabidiol with or without THC, and six whole-plant extracts. No clinically significant effects of medicinal cannabis were found on primary outcomes. The likelihood of anxiety events increased with higher-dose synthetic THC compared with a lower dose (OR: 2.0; 95 % CI: 1.4, 2.9; p < 0.001; Confidence: very low). Medicinal cannabis (THC, cannabidiol, and whole-plant extract) increased the likelihood of improved appetite (OR: 12.3; 95 % CI: 3.5, 45.5; p < 0.001; n = 3 interventions; Confidence: moderate) and reduced severity of appetite loss (SMD: -0.4; 95 % CI: -0.8, -0.1; p = 0.009; Confidence: very low). There was very low confidence that higher doses of synthetic THC increased the likelihood of any adverse event (OR: 0.5; 95 % CI: 0.3, 0.7; p < 0.001). Medicinal cannabis had no effect on emotional functioning, mood changes, confusion, disorientation, quality of life, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Confidence in findings was limited by some studies having high or unclear risk of bias and imprecise pooled estimates. CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of medicinal cannabis as a therapeutic intervention for depression, anxiety, or stress in people with active cancer. Further research should explore whether medicinal cannabis might improve and maintain appetite and if high-dose synthetic THC might increase the incidence of side-effects, including anxiety. To inform clinical practice, well-powered and rigorously designed trials are warranted that evaluate the effects of medicinal cannabis prescribed to target anxiety, depression, and stress.

Beneficio clínico del tratamiento con cannabinoides para el dolor crónico no oncológico / Clinical benefit of cannabinoids to treat chronic non-cancer pain / Benefício clínico do tratamento com canabinoide para dor crônica não oncológica

Introducción: los cannabinoides pueden ser una opción válida para el tratamiento del dolor crónico no oncológico de acuerdo a los estudios publicados hasta el momento y a nuestra experiencia clínica. Objetivo: valorar el beneficio clínico de preparados de cannabis medicinal (CM) para dolor crónico no oncológico en pacientes que consultaron en la Clínica de Endocannabinología del Uruguay (CEDU). Material y método: estudio descriptivo, observacional, longitudinal, de una población atendida en un centro privado de salud. Se trata de una cohorte de 438 pacientes que consultaron espontáneamente en CEDU desde septiembre de 2016 a marzo de 2020. El motivo de consulta fue dolor crónico no oncológico que no respondió al tratamiento estándar. Resultados: en la cohorte estudiada predominaron las mujeres (74%), promedio 69 años, que se asisten en el sistema privado de salud en el 95% de los casos, en su mayoría con instrucción secundaria. El tipo de dolor más frecuente fue el dolor osteoarticular. El quimiotipo de CM más usado fue cannabidiol (CBD) al 5%, con buena respuesta al tratamiento en el descenso del nivel del dolor y suspensión o disminución de uso de opioides (y derivados) y antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINES). Se observaron escasos y leves efectos adversos (EA) en la gran mayoría de los pacientes. Abandonaron el tratamiento 12 pacientes (menos del 3%). Conclusiones: esta investigación retrospectiva mostró una caída del nivel del dolor de 3,14 (valor p ≤ 0,0001), indicando que el CM puede ser una opción para el tratamiento del dolor crónico no oncológico. Se requieren más estudios para demostrar la efectividad y seguridad de los cannabinoides. Esto depende de muchos factores (leyes que faciliten la accesibilidad a variedad de productos de CM de grado médico, incentivos a la ciencia e investigación). De todas formas, podemos afirmar que los resultados presentados son prometedores en relación con su potencial terapéutico.

Introduction: Cannabinoids can be a valid option for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain, according to the studies published to date and our clinical experience. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical benefit of medicinal cannabis preparations (MCPs) for chronic non-cancer pain in patients seen at the Endocannabinology Clinic of Uruguay (CEDU). Method: Descriptive, observational, longitudinal study of a population treated at a private healthcare center. This involves a cohort of 438 patients who spontaneously consulted at CEDU from September 2016 to March 2020. The reason for consultation was chronic non-cancer pain that did not respond to standard treatment. Results: in the studied cohort, women prevailed and accounted for 74% of patients. Average age was 69 years old and 95% of them sought care within the private healthcare system. Most women had completed secondary school education. The most frequent type of pain was osteoarticular pain. The most used chemovar of Medicinal Cannabis (MC) was 5% cannabidiol (CBD), showing a favorable treatment response in reducing pain levels and the discontinuation or reduction of opioid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage. Few and mild adverse effects (AE) were observed in the vast majority of patients. Twelve patients (less than 3%) discontinued the treatment. Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated a reduction in pain level of 3.14 (p-value ≤ 0.0001) indicating that MC could be an option for the treatment of non-oncological chronic pain. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of cannabinoids. This depends on many factors (laws facilitating accessibility to a variety of medical-grade MC products, incentives for science and research). Nevertheless, we can assert that the presented results are promising in consideration of their therapeutic potential.

Introdução: os canabinoides podem ser uma opção válida para o tratamento da dor crônica não oncológica de acordo com estudos publicados até o momento e nossa experiência clínica. Objetivos: avaliar o benefício clínico das preparações de Cannabis Medicinal (CM) para dor crônica não oncológica em pacientes que consultaram a Clínica de Endocanabinologia do Uruguai (CEDU). Método: estudo descritivo, observacional, longitudinal de uma população atendida em um centro de saúde privado. Esta é uma coorte de 438 pacientes que consultaram espontaneamente no CEDU no período setembro de 2016 - março de 2020. O motivo da consulta foi dor crônica não oncológica que não respondeu ao tratamento padrão. Resultados: na coorte estudada, 74% eram mulheres, a idade média foi 69 anos, 95% frequentam a rede privada de saúde e a maioria com ensino médio. O tipo de dor mais frequente foi a osteoarticular. O quimiotipo de MC mais utilizado foi o Canabidiol 5% (CBD), com boa resposta ao tratamento em termos de redução do nível de dor e suspensão ou redução do uso de opioides (e derivados) e anti-inflamatórios não esteroides (AINEs). A grande maioria dos pacientes apresentou poucos e leves efeitos adversos (EAs). Menos de 3% dos 12 pacientes abandonou o tratamento. Conclusões: Esta investigação retrospectiva mostrou uma queda no nível de dor de 3,14 (valor de p ≤ 0,0001), indicando que o MC pode ser uma opção para o tratamento da dor crônica não oncológica. São necessários mais estudos para demonstrar a eficácia e segurança dos canabinoides. Isso depende de muitos fatores (leis que facilitem o acesso a uma variedade de produtos CM de grau médico, incentivos para ciência e pesquisa). De qualquer forma, podemos afirmar que os resultados apresentados são promissores em relação ao seu potencial terapêutico.

Cannabis use among adults undergoing cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the risks and benefits of cannabis use in the context of cancer care. This study characterized the prevalence, reasons for use, and perceived benefits of cannabis and compared symptoms and perceived risks between those who reported past 30-day cannabis use and those who did not. METHODS: Adults undergoing cancer treatment at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center completed measures of sociodemographic characteristics, cannabis use, use modalities, reasons for use, perceived harms/benefits of use, physical and psychological symptoms, and other substance/medication use. Analyses compared patients who used or did not use cannabis in the past 30 days. RESULTS: Participants (N = 267) were 58 years old on average, primarily female (70%), and predominantly White (88%). Over a quarter of respondents (26%) reported past 30-day cannabis use, and among those, 4.5% screened positive for cannabis use disorder. Participants who used cannabis most often used edibles (65%) or smoked cannabis (51%), and they were younger and more likely to be male, Black, and disabled, and to have lower income and Medicaid insurance than participants who did not use cannabis. Those who used cannabis reported more severe symptoms and perceived cannabis as less harmful than those who did not use cannabis. The most common medical reasons for cannabis use were pain, cancer, sleep problems, anxiety, nausea/vomiting, and poor appetite. Participants reported the greatest cannabis-related symptom relief from sleep problems, nausea/vomiting, headaches, pain, muscle spasms, and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer who used cannabis perceived benefits for many symptoms, although they showed worse overall symptomatology. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Among adults undergoing cancer treatment, 26% reported cannabis use in the past 30 days. Those who used cannabis were more likely to be male and disabled and to have lower income and Medicaid insurance than those who did not use cannabis. Participants most commonly reported using cannabis for pain, cancer, sleep, anxiety, and nausea/vomiting and reported the greatest perceived benefits for sleep, nausea/vomiting, headaches, pain, muscle spasms, and anxiety, yet participants who used cannabis also reported feeling worse physically and psychologically compared to those who did not use cannabis. Participants who used cannabis were more likely to report that cannabis was less risky to their health than alcohol, smoking, and opioids than those who did not use cannabis.

El cannabis como agente terapéutico en Ecuador, repercusión económica contable

El panorama salubrista ecuatoriano se enfrenta a la introducción, como producto legalizado, del cannabis como agente terapéutico en el país. Esta medida trae consigo una serie de transformaciones en varios aspectos a los que la vida productiva del país debe de adaptarse de forma acelerada. El objetivo de esta investigación fue analizar la posible repercusión económica contable que trae la legalización del cannabis como recurso terapéutico. Se desarrollo una revisión bibliográfica y análisis posterior para poder realizar un modelo futurista de como la introducción del cannabis influenciará el mercado productivo y contable en el país. Se considera que la introducción en el mercado farmacéutico de productos derivados de cannabis, para uso medicinal, será inicialmente importado; sin embargo, con el de cursar del tiempo se irán implementando otras acciones como la siembra, recolección, procesamiento, distribución y venta de producto final. Todos estos elementos generaran empleos, gastos, ingresos, inversiones y otros elementos que implican una repercusión económica y contable en el país. Se concluye que la perspectiva futura, desde el punto de vista económica y contable, con la legalización del cannabis como agente terapéutico en el país, es favorable; sin embargo, para lograrlo es necesario que se autoricen otros procesos previos a la comercialización de productos farmacéuticos basados en las propiedades del cannabis; solo de esa forma se podrá precisar su influencia en el mercado laboral y económico del Ecuador.

The Ecuadorian health scene is facing the introduction, as a legalized product, of cannabis as a therapeutic agent in the country. This measure brings with it a series of transformations in various aspects to which the productive life of the country must adapt rapidly. The objective of this research is to analyze the possible accounting economic repercussion that the legalization of cannabis brings as a therapeutic resource. A bibliographical review and subsequent analysis were carried out in order to carry out a futuristic model of how the introduction of cannabis will influence the productive and accounting market in the country. It is considered that the introduction into the pharmaceutical market of products derived from cannabis, for medicinal use, will initially be imported; however, with the passage of time, other actions will be implemented such as planting, harvesting, processing, distribution and sale of the final product. All these elements will generate jobs, expenses, income, investments and other elements that imply an economic and accounting repercussion in the country. It is concluded that the future perspective, from the economic and accounting point of view, with the legalization of cannabis as a therapeutic agent in the country, is favorable; However, to achieve this, it is necessary to authorize other processes prior to the commercialization of pharmaceutical products based on the properties of cannabis; Only in this way can its influence on the labor and economic market of Ecuador be specified.

Pharmacokinetics of Orally Applied Cannabinoids and Medical Marijuana Extracts in Mouse Nervous Tissue and Plasma: Relevance for Pain Treatment.

Cannabis sativa plants contain a multitude of bioactive substances, which show broad variability between different plant strains. Of the more than a hundred naturally occurring phytocannabinoids, Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have been the most extensively studied, but whether and how the lesser investigated compounds in plant extracts affect bioavailability or biological effects of Δ9-THC or CBD is not known. We therefore performed a first pilot study to assess THC concentrations in plasma, spinal cord and brain after oral administration of THC compared to medical marijuana extracts rich in THC or depleted of THC. Δ9-THC levels were higher in mice receiving the THC-rich extract. Surprisingly, only orally applied CBD but not THC alleviated mechanical hypersensitivity in the mouse spared nerve injury model, favoring CBD as an analgesic compound for which fewer unwanted psychoactive effects are to be expected.

Utilización medicinal de cannabis en pacientes oncológicos de San Carlos de Bariloche: Estudio basado en una encuesta / Medicinal use of cannabis in cancer patients in San Carlos de Bariloche: a survey-based study

RESUMEN INTRODUCCIÓN El uso medicinal del cannabis en pacientes oncológicos se ha popularizado en los últimos años. Para poder brindar asesoramiento que redunde en un uso más eficaz y seguro, es necesario conocer la experiencia y expectativas de los usuarios. El objetivo fue conocer los motivos y la experiencia del uso medicinal de cannabis en adultos con enfermedades oncológicas en San Carlos de Bariloche (Río Negro). MÉTODOS Se realizó un estudio basado en una encuesta en línea autoadministrada sobre uso de cannabis, tiempo y motivo de uso, grado de satisfacción, asesoramiento profesional, vía de administración y efectos adversos. RESULTADOS Participaron 201 pacientes. Un 19% utilizaba cannabis, y el 31% lo había utilizado antes. La principal forma de uso fue el aceite. Los principales motivos fueron tratar el dolor, dormir mejor y sentirse mejor. Las experiencias fueron satisfactorias o muy satisfactorias para más del 50%, y las más favorables fueron para tratar el dolor, mejorar el ánimo, tolerar la quimioterapia y dormir mejor. Entre las razones para dejar de usarlo se mencionó falta de utilidad, efectos adversos, dudas sobre dosis, tiempo de uso y calidad del producto adquirido. Menos del 50% de los pacientes habían recibido asesoramiento profesional sobre uso de cannabis. DISCUSIÓN El 50% de los participantes utilizó cannabis. Este relevamiento ofrece un diagnóstico útil para promover políticas que reflejen las necesidades frente al uso de cannabis.

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The medicinal use of cannabis in cancer patients has become popular in recent years. In order to provide advice that results in a more effective and safe use, it is necessary to know the experience and expectations of users. The objective was to know the reasons and experience of the medicinal use of cannabis in adults with oncological diseases in San Carlos de Bariloche (Río Negro province). METHODS The study was based on a self-administered online survey on cannabis use, time and reason for use, degree of satisfaction, professional advice, route of administration and adverse effects. RESULTS A total of 201 patients participated, of which 19% used cannabis and 31% had previously used it. The main form of use was oil. The main reasons for use were to treat pain, sleep better and feel better. The experiences were satisfactory or very satisfactory for more than 50%, and the most favorable ones were to treat pain, improve mood, tolerate chemotherapy, and sleep better. Lack of usefulness, adverse effects, doubts about the dose, time of use and quality of the product purchased were mentioned among the reasons for the decision to stop using it. Less than 50% of the patients had received professional advice on the use of cannabis. DISCUSSION Half of the participants used cannabis. This survey provides a useful diagnosis to foster policies that reflect the needs regarding the use of cannabis.

Phytocannabinoids and the individualization of treatment. Why is there no level of evidence? / Fitocanabinoides e a individualização do tratamento. Por que não há nível de evidências?

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The individualization of treatment has been recognized as essential in medical practice, especially due to the demand for different therapeutic approaches for similar situations. However, the complex and variable nature of the phytocannabinoids present in the cannabis plant presents challenges for the application of traditional models for testing the efficacy and safety of new drugs. The objective of the present study was to highlight the particularities of cannabis, including genetic variety, cultivation and production, which make it difficult to comply with traditional drug registration protocols, and the importance of individualizing treatment in the use of cannabis for the control of pain. CONTENTS: Traditional models for testing the efficacy and safety of new drugs are based on a rigid methodology, divided into development and post-market phases. However, the complexity of the cannabis plant, with hundreds of actives that can vary according to the genetic variety, cultivation and production process, makes the application of these models difficult. In addition, international rules do not allow the registration of patents on cannabis products, due to the consideration that they are natural products and the extraction methods are already used in the industry for other plant actives. The individualization of treatment is fundamental in the use of cannabis for pain control, given the complexity of the plant and the limitations of traditional models of testing and drug registration. CONCLUSION: The particularities of cannabis, such as genetic variability and the impossibility of registering patents, make compliance with current protocols difficult. However, the individualization of treatment allows adapting therapies to the needs of each patient, considering effectiveness and tolerance of side effects. Therefore, there is a need to rethink research and registry models to allow for a more flexible and personalized approach in the field of cannabis medicines.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A individualização do tratamento tem sido reconhecida como essencial na prática médica, especialmente devido à demanda por diferentes abordagens terapêuticas para situações semelhantes. No entanto, a natureza complexa e variável dos fitocanabinoides presentes na cannabis apresenta desafios para a aplicação dos modelos tradicionais de testes de eficácia e segurança de novos fármacos. O objetivo deste estudo foi destacar as particularidades da cannabis, incluindo a variedade genética, o cultivo e a produção, que dificultam a conformidade com os protocolos tradicionais de registro de medicamentos, e bem como a importância da individualização do tratamento na utilização da cannabis para o controle da dor. CONTEÚDO: Os modelos tradicionais de testes de eficácia e segurança de novos fármacos são baseados em uma metodologia rígida, dividida em fases de desenvolvimento e pós-mercado. No entanto, a complexidade da planta de cannabis, com centenas de ativos que podem variar de acordo com a variedade genética, o cultivo e o processo de produção, torna difícil a aplicação desses modelos. Além disso, as regras internacionais não permitem o registro de patentes de produtos canábicos, devido à consideração de que são produtos naturais e os métodos de extração já são utilizados na indústria para outros ativos vegetais. A individualização do tratamento é fundamental na utilização da cannabis para o controle da dor, dada a complexidade da planta e as limitações dos modelos tradicionais de testes e registro de fármacos. CONCLUSÃO: As particularidades da cannabis, como a variabilidade genética e a impossibilidade de registro de patentes, dificultam a conformidade com os protocolos atuais. No entanto, a individualização do tratamento permite adaptar as terapias às necessidades de cada paciente, considerando a efetividade e a tolerância aos efeitos colaterais. Portanto, é necessário repensar os modelos de pesquisa e registro para permitir uma abordagem mais flexível e personalizada no campo dos fármacos canábicos.

The Therapeutic Potential of Cannabidiol in Revolutionising Opioid Use Disorder Management.

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and is linked to a complex interplay of biopsychosocial factors as well as the increasing overprescription and availability of opioid medications. Current OUD management relies on the controlled provision of opioid medications, such as methadone or buprenorphine, known as opioid replacement therapy. There is variable evidence regarding the long-term efficacy of these medications in improving the management of OUD, thereby necessitating an exploration into innovative approaches to complement, or even take the place of, existing treatment paradigms. Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive compound derived from the cannabis plant, has garnered attention for its diverse pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and anxiolytic effects. Preliminary studies suggest that CBD may target opioid withdrawal pathways that make CBD a potential therapeutic option for OUD. This narrative review synthesises current literature surrounding OUD and offers a nuanced review of the current and future role of CBD in managing this condition. In doing so, we highlight the potential avenues to explore with respect to CBD research for the guidance and development of further research opportunities, framework and policy development, and clinical considerations before medicinal CBD can be integrated into evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Increased White Matter Coherence Following Three and Six Months of Medical Cannabis Treatment.

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated abnormal white matter (WM) microstructure in recreational cannabis consumers; however, the long-term impact of medical cannabis (MC) use on WM coherence is unknown. Accordingly, this study assessed the longitudinal impact of MC treatment on WM coherence. Given results from preclinical studies, we hypothesized that MC treatment would be associated with increased fractional anisotropy (FA) and reduced mean diffusivity (MD). Methods: As part of a larger, longitudinal investigation, patients interested in treating at least one medical condition with commercially available MC products of their choosing were assessed before initiating MC use (baseline n=37; female=25, male=12) and following three (n=31) and six (n=22) months of treatment. WM coherence was assessed via diffusion tensor imaging for bilateral regions of interest including the genu of the corpus callosum, anterior limb of the internal capsule, external capsule, and anterior corona radiata, as well as an occipital control region not expected to change over time. Results: In MC patients, FA values significantly increased bilaterally in several callosal regions relative to baseline following both 3 and 6 months of treatment; MD values significantly decreased in all callosal regions but only following 6 months of treatment. No significant changes in WM coherence were observed in the control region or in a pilot sample of treatment-as-usual patients (baseline n=14), suggesting that increased WM coherence observed in MC patients may be attributed to MC treatment as opposed to confounding factors. Interestingly, significant reductions in MD values correlated with higher cannabidiol (CBD) exposure but not Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol exposure. Conclusions: Overall, MC treatment was associated with increased WM coherence, which contrasts with prior research examining recreational cannabis consumers, likely related to inherent differences between recreational consumers and MC patients (e.g., product choice, age of onset). In addition, increased CBD exposure was associated with reduced MD following 6 months of treatment, extending evidence from preclinical research indicating that CBD may be neuroprotective against demyelination. However, additional research is needed to elucidate the clinical efficacy of MC treatment and the risks and benefits of long-term MC use.

Clinical Decision Making by Medical Marijuana Physicians in Florida: A Qualitative Assessment.

Medical marijuana (MMJ) was legalized in November 2016 with the passing of Amendment 2 in the state of Florida. Since the legalization, many studies have been conducted to understand the direct effect medical marijuana has on specific medical conditions. Unlike most allopathic drugs, medical marijuana does not target single ailments or specific conditions and does not follow precise recommending guidelines. There is scarce knowledge on how patient characteristics, including medical conditions, affect a physician's direct recommendations and registry limits. To obtain insight on the effect patient characteristics have on the clinical decision-making process, we conducted ten qualitative interviews of medical marijuana physicians who are certified to order medical marijuana for patients in Florida. Interview topics ranged from typical daily practice to specific recommendations for patient histories. Each interview was transcribed and thematically analyzed. Five major patient characteristics that influence a physician's recommendation emerged from the interviews: patient medical history, co-medications, lifestyle, marijuana experience level and counter-indications. Each category was analyzed further to understand how the characteristics influenced the practice of recommending and ordering product. Physicians emphasized the equivalent importance of reviewing a patient's medical history, lifestyle, and past marijuana experiences while also expressing the need to look holistically at the individual patient. Instead of the characteristics determining what the physician recommends for the patient and orders through the registry, the characteristics dictate the education given to the patient so that the patient may lead and determine their own individual care.

Clinical Characteristics and Quality of Life in Adults Initiating Medical Marijuana Treatment.

Introduction: Despite the rising availability and use of medical marijuana (MM) in the USA, little is known about the demographics, clinical characteristics, or quality of life of MM patients. This study describes the demographic characteristics and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of MM patients who are initiating treatment in Pennsylvania. Methods: Two-hundred adults naive to MM and referred for any of the 23 state-approved qualifying conditions were recruited at three MM dispensaries in Pennsylvania between September 2020 and March 2021. All participants consented to the study; completed semi-structured interviews that included demographic questionnaires, the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7); provided height and weight measurements; and allowed access their dispensary medical records. Results: Participants had a mean age of 48.5 ± 15.6 years, predominantly identified as female (67.5%), and were most commonly referred for chronic pain (63.5%) and/or anxiety (58.5%). Additionally, 46.0% were living with obesity as determined by BMI. Relative to a normative sample, participants reported diminished HRQoL in several domains, most notably in role limitations due to physical health (M = 46.0 ± 42.0), role limitations due to emotional problems (M = 52.5 ± 42.3), energy and fatigue (M = 39.8 ± 20.2), and pain (M = 49.4 ± 26.0). Discussion/Conclusion: Patients initiating MM treatment experienced low HRQoL in multiple domains. Future studies could evaluate the relationship between HRQoL and patients' decisions to pursue MM treatment, as well as changes in HRQoL with MM use over time.

Weight stability in adults with obesity initiating medical marijuana treatment for other medical conditions.

Few studies have evaluated weight change in patients who initiate medical marijuana treatment to address diagnosed health concerns. The objective of this study was to examine whether patients initiating medical marijuana use for a qualifying health condition experienced changes in health and biopsychosocial functioning over time, including weight gain or loss. Specifically, this observational, longitudinal study evaluated changes in the body mass index (BMI) of adults with co-morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) and severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) who were starting medical marijuana treatment for any of the 23 qualifying medical conditions at one of three dispensaries in Pennsylvania. Height and weight measurements were collected at baseline (prior to medical marijuana use) and then 90 days (± 14 days) later. Participants included in analyses (n = 52, M = 55.0 ± 13.6 years, 59.6% female) had a mean baseline BMI of 36.2 ± 5.4 kg/m2 and the majority sought medical marijuana for chronic pain (73.1%). No significant change in BMI was observed from baseline to month three (p > 0.05) in the sample. Additionally, no significant change in BMI was observed in the subset of patients with severe obesity (n = 12, p > 0.05). Our findings are limited by low follow-up rates and convenience sampling methodology but may help to mitigate weight gain concerns in the context of medical marijuana use.

Perceptions and prevalence of marijuana use among cancer patients managed at an outpatient department in Zimbabwe: A brief report.

BACKGROUND: Globally, marijuana is becoming an acceptable complementary medicine for symptom management in cancer. At the time that the study was conducted, Zimbabwean laws only allowed for the cultivation of marijuana for medical and scientific use. As of 18 July 2022, the national medicines regulator released a circular allowing the licensing, distribution, and use of cannabidiol-based products. Anecdotes indicate there is medical marijuana use among Zimbabwean patients with cancer. We sought to determine the prevalence, patterns of use and perceptions of medical marijuana among patients with cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was used to determine patterns and perceptions of marijuana use among outpatient patients with cancer. The study included adults attending the outpatient oncology clinic at Parirenyatwa Hospital Radiotherapy Treatment Center. RESULTS: Fifty participants with a median age of 50.5 years (IQR: 41-58) completed the questionnaire, and 28.0% of them were male. The prevalence of marijuana use in the sample was 24.0% (95% CI 13.9-38.2). Most marijuana users were male (83.3%, p < 0.001). The rate of medical marijuana use among users was 66.7%. Participants were generally neutral concerning the benefits of marijuana and how it should be regulated. Just under 50% indicated that they would be open to using it if it were legal. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The prevalence of marijuana use in the sample was comparable to other jurisdictions. Perceptions toward medical marijuana were generally neutral. Consequently, for medical marijuana and/or cannabidiol-based products to become acceptable in the Zimbabwean context, there is need for the dissemination of evidence-based information on their benefits.

Association of Tetrahydrocannabinol Content and Price in Herbal Cannabis Products Offered by Dispensaries in California: A Purview of Consumers/Patients.

Background and Aims: The U.S. legal cannabis market is saturated with products containing high levels of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), with no distinction between medical and recreational programs. This omnipresence of potent cannabis products seems to be driven by the recreational realm, where cannabis with the highest THC content is prized. This prevalence of highly potent cannabis is conveyed to medical programs, which places consumers (patients) at higher risk for over consumption and cannabis use disorder. Thus, understanding what factors influence the market that patients face in medical cannabis programs could shed light on the risks of legal cannabis. The supply and demand dynamic of the US for-profit cannabis market could explain the current market composition; therefore, we postulate that a financial gain could influence the perpetuation of the prevalence of high THC products in legal cannabis dispensaries. We investigate whether THC content in popular cannabis products correlates with higher prices and assess whether some attributes (type of product, chemovars, or presence of cannabidiol (CBD) affect the association of THC with price. Methods: We focus on the world's largest cannabis market, California. We randomly selected dispensaries across the state, screened for a web presence and product menu, determined the most prevalent product type, and collected THC and CBD concentration, price, and other product attributes. Results: We observed that herbal products were more common, they had THC concentrations greater than 10%, and THC concentrations positively correlated with price. This correlation existed in flower and preroll presentations, all chemovar, and independently of the level of CBD. CBD did not correlate with price; however, the presence of CBD diminished the THC and price correlation particularly in products with high THC (>15%). Conclusions: Overall, highly potent herbal cannabis products (>15% THC) are the majority of products offered and more expensive regardless of product type or chemovar in California dispensaries, suggesting that a financial gain contributes to the current market composition. Efforts to limit the availability of highly potent THC products and educate consumers about potential harms are needed.

Potency and Therapeutic THC and CBD Ratios: U.S. Cannabis Markets Overshoot.

Background and aims: The effects exuded by cannabis are a result of the cannabinoids trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), and is dependent upon their pharmacological interaction and linked to the two cannabinoids' concentrations and ratios. Based on current literature and trends of increasing cannabis potency, we postulate that most medical cannabis products with THC and CBD have ratios capable of producing significant acute intoxication and are similar to recreational products. We will test this by organizing products into clinically distinct categories according to TCH:CBD ratios, evaluating the data in terms of therapeutic potential, and comparing the data obtained from medical and recreational programs and from states with differing market policies. Methods: We utilized data encompassing online herbal dispensary product offerings from nine U.S. states. The products were analyzed after being divided into four clinically significant THC:CBD ratio categories identified based on the literature: CBD can enhance THC effects (THC:CBD ratios ≥1:1), CBD has no significant effect on THC effects (ratios ∼ 1:2), CBD can either have no effect or can mitigate THC effects (ratios 1:>2 < 6), or CBD is protective against THC effects (ratios ≤1:6). Results: A significant number of products (58.5%) did not contain any information on CBD content. Across all states sampled, the majority (72-100%) of both medical and recreational products with CBD (>0%) fall into the most intoxicating ratio category (≥1:1 THC:CBD), with CBD likely enhancing THC's acute effects. The least intoxicating categories (1:>2 < 6 and ≤1:6 THC:CBD) provided the smallest number of products. Similarly, the majority of products without CBD (0%) contained highly potent amounts of THC (>15%). These results were consistent, regardless of differing market policies in place. Conclusions: Despite the distinct goals of medical and recreational cannabis users, medical and recreational program product offerings are nearly identical. Patients seeking therapeutic benefits from herbal cannabis products are therefore at a substantial risk of unwanted side effects, regardless of whether they obtain products from medical or recreational programs. Efforts are needed to better inform patients of the risks associated with high potency cannabis and the interaction between THC and CBD, and to help shape policies that promote more therapeutic options.

Medical Cannabis for the Treatment of Migraine in Adults: A Review of the Evidence.

Background: Medical cannabis (MC) has been hypothesized as an alternative therapy for migraines, given the undesirable side effects of current migraine medications. The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of MC in the treatment of migraine in adults. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science for eligible studies in adults aged 18 years and older. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was conducted. Results: A total of 12 publications involving 1,980 participants in Italy and the United States of America were included.Medical cannabis significantly reduced nausea and vomiting associated with migraine attacks after 6 months of use. Also, MC reduced the number of days of migraine after 30 days, and the frequency of migraine headaches per month. MC was 51% more effective in reducing migraines than non-cannabis products. Compared to amitriptyline, MC aborted migraine headaches in some (11.6%) users and reduced migraine frequency. While the use of MC for migraines was associated with the occurrence of medication overuse headaches (MOH), and the adverse events were mostly mild and occurred in 43.75% of patients who used oral cannabinoid preparations. Conclusions: There is promising evidence that MC may have a beneficial effect on the onset and duration of migraine headaches in adults. However, well-designed experimental studies that assess MC's effectiveness and safety for treating migraine in adults are needed to support this hypothesis.

Clinical documentation of patient-reported medical cannabis use in primary care: Toward scalable extraction using natural language processing methods.

Background: Most states have legalized medical cannabis, yet little is known about how medical cannabis use is documented in patients' electronic health records (EHRs). We used natural language processing (NLP) to calculate the prevalence of clinician-documented medical cannabis use among adults in an integrated health system in Washington State where medical and recreational use are legal. Methods: We analyzed EHRs of patients ≥18 years old screened for past-year cannabis use (November 1, 2017-October 31, 2018), to identify clinician-documented medical cannabis use. We defined medical use as any documentation of cannabis that was recommended by a clinician or described by the clinician or patient as intended to manage health conditions or symptoms. We developed and applied an NLP system that included NLP-assisted manual review to identify such documentation in encounter notes. Results: Medical cannabis use was documented for 16,684 (5.6%) of 299,597 outpatient encounters with routine screening for cannabis use among 203,489 patients seeing 1,274 clinicians. The validated NLP system identified 54% of documentation and NLP-assisted manual review the remainder. Language documenting reasons for cannabis use included 125 terms indicating medical use, 28 terms indicating non-medical use and 41 ambiguous terms. Implicit documentation of medical use (e.g., "edible THC nightly for lumbar pain") was more common than explicit (e.g., "continues medical cannabis use"). Conclusions: Clinicians use diverse and often ambiguous language to document patients' reasons for cannabis use. Automating extraction of documentation about patients' cannabis use could facilitate clinical decision support and epidemiological investigation but will require large amounts of gold standard training data.

Therapeutic Potential of Cannabis, Cannabidiol, and Cannabinoid-Based Pharmaceuticals.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in the use of cannabis (and its extracts), as well as CBD oil (hemp extracts containing cannabidiol), for therapeutic purposes. While there is reason to believe that cannabinoids may be efficacious for a number of different diseases and syndromes, there exist limited objective data supporting the use of crude materials (CBD oil, cannabis extracts, and/or cannabis itself). SUMMARY: In the present review, we examined data for pure cannabinoid compounds (dronabinol, nabilone, and CBD), as well as partially purified medicinal cannabis extracts (nabiximols), to provide guidance on the potential therapeutic uses of high-THC cannabis and CBD oil. In general, data support a role for cannabis/cannabinoids in pain, seizure disorders, appetite stimulation, muscle spasticity, and treatment of nausea/vomiting. Given the biological activities of the cannabinoids, there may be utility in treatment of central nervous system disorders (such as neurodegenerative diseases, PTSD, and addiction) or for the treatment of cancer. However, those data are much less compelling. Key Message: On balance, there are reasons to support the potential use of medical cannabis and cannabis extract (Δ9-THC-dominant or CBD-dominant), but much more careful research is required.

Uso terapêutico da cannabis medicinal em pessoas com doença neurológica degenerativa / Therapeutic use of medicinal cannabis in people with degenerative neurological disease / Uso terapéutico de cannabis medicinal en personas con enfermedad neurológica degenerativa

Objetivo: apresentar o estado da arte das publicações expressas na literatura cientifica mundial sobre a temática, bem como identificar os benefícios terapêuticos da Cannabis medicinal no tratamento dos sintomas das doenças neurodegenerativas especificamente doenças de Parkinson, esclerose múltipla e Alzheimer. Método: trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura, cuja busca de dados foi realizada nas bibliotecas virtuais. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Lilacs, Cochrane Library e Scielo no período de agosto a outubro de 2021. Resultados: foram encontrados 158 artigos. Vinte e tres artigos foram selecionados para serem lidos na íntegra e 8 atenderam aos critérios desta revisão. Conclusão: as evidências mostram que embora cada vez mais prescritos ou autorizados, a cannabis medicinal ou os Canabinóides para a doenças neurodegenerativas continuam a ser controversos para muitos médicos.

Objective: to present the state of the art of publications expressed in the world Scientific literature on the subject, as well as to identify the therapeutic benefits of medicinal cannabis in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, specifically, Parkinson's diseases, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's. Method: this is an integrative literature review, whose data search was performed in virtual librares. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Lilacs, Cochrane Library and Scielo from August to October 2021. Results:158 articles were found. Twenty-three articles were selected to be read in full and 8 met the criteria of this review. Conclusion: evidence shows that although increasingly prescribed or authorized, medical cannabis or Cannabinoids for chronic pain remain controversial for many physicians.

Objetivo: presentar el estado del arte de las publicaciones expresadas en la literatura científica mundial sobre el tema, así como identificar los beneficios terapéuticos del cannabis medicinal en el tratamiento de enfermedades neurodegenerativas, en concreto, las enfermedades de Parkinson, la esclerosis múltiple y el Alzheimer. Método: se trata de una revisión integradora de la literatura, cuya búsqueda de datos se realizó en bibliotecas virtuales. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Lilacs, Cochrane Library y Scielo de agosto a octubre de 2021. Resultados: se encontraron 158 artículos. Se seleccionaron veintitrés artículos para ser leídos en su totalidad y ocho cumplieron los criterios de esta revisión. Conclusión: la evidencia muestra que, aunque cada vez más se prescribe o autoriza, el cannabis medicinal o los cannabinoides para el dolor crónico siguen siendo controvertidos para muchos médicos.

Benefícios terapêuticos dos canabinoides no tratamento da dor crônica em pacientes com câncer / Therapeutic benefits of cannabinoids in the treatment of chronic pain in cancer patients / Beneficios terapéuticos del cannabinoides en el tratamiento del dolor crónico en pacientes con cáncer

Objetivo: apresentar o estado da arte das publicações expressas na literatura cientifica mundial sobre a temática, bem como identificar os benefícios terapêuticos da Cannabis medicinal no tratamento da dor. Método: trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura, cuja busca de dados foi realizada nas bibliotecas virtuais. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, IBECS, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, Emerald Insight e Scielo no período de agosto a outubro de 2021. Resultados: foram encontrados 367 artigos. Quarenta e três artigos foram selecionados para serem lidos na íntegra e 15 atenderam aos critérios desta revisão. Conclusão: as evidências mostram que embora cada vez mais prescritos ou autorizados, a cannabis medicinal ou os Canabinóides para a dor crónica continuam a ser controversos para muitos médicos.

Objective: to present the state of the art of publications expressed in the world scientific literature on the subject, as well as to identify the therapeutic benefits of medicinal cannabis in the treatment of pain. Method: this is an integrative literature review, whose data search was performed in virtual libraries. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, IBECS, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, Emerald Insight and Scielo from August to October 2021. Results: 367 articles were found. Forty-three articles were selected to be read in full and 15 met the criteria of this review. Conclusion: evidence shows that although increasingly prescribed or authorized, medical cannabis or Cannabinoids for chronic pain remain controversial for many physicians.

Objetivo: presentar el estado del arte de las publicaciones expresadas en la literatura científica mundial sobre el tema, así como identificar los beneficios terapéuticos del cannabis medicinal en el tratamiento del dolor. Método: se trata de una revisión integradora de la literatura, cuya búsqueda de datos se realizó en bibliotecas virtuales. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, IBECS, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, Emerald Insight y Scielo de agosto a octubre de 2021. Resultados: se encontraron 367 artículos. Se seleccionaron 43 artículos para ser leídos en su totalidad y 15 cumplieron con los criterios de esta revisión. Conclusión: la evidencia muestra que, aunque cada vez más se prescribe o autoriza, el cannabis medicinal o los cannabinoides para el dolor crónico siguen siendo controvertidos para muchos médicos.