Multidisciplinary Decision-Making-ITAlian Consensus After Two Years of Real Practice on the Management of Severe Uncontrolled CRSwNP by Biologics (ITACA Study).

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We aimed to reach an Italian multidisciplinary consensus on some crucial aspects of treatment decision making in CRSwNP, following 2 years of clinical experience in order to support specialists in the management of CRSwNP in clinical practice. We addressed issues relating to therapeutic decision-making and shared criteria for the treatment choice, as well as appropriate timing and criteria for evaluating treatment response, and highlighted the need for repeated multidisciplinary assessments. RECENT FINDINGS: A national survey has been conducted recently to understand how rhinology practice has changed in Italy with the advent of biologics and how this affects patients with uncontrolled, severe CRSwNP. Despite the many published consensus documents, practical recommendations, and protocols on the use of biologics in CRSwNP, heterogenous behaviors in practice are still observed mainly conditioned by the novelty of the topic. The consensus procedure followed a modified Delphi approach. The scientific board included 18 otorhinolaryngologists and 8 allergists, who selected the 4 main topics to be addressed and developed overall 20 statements. Consensus on these statements was sought by a larger group of 48 additional experts, through two rounds of voting, the first web-based, the second in presence with discussion and possible refinement of the statements. The statements reaching an average score ≥ 7 at the second voting round were approved. Five statements were proposed for each of the following topics: baseline evaluation of patients eligible for biologic therapy; choice between different therapeutic options; assessment of the response to biologic treatment; multidisciplinary management. At the first voting round, 19 out of the 20 statements reached a mean score ≥ 7. Following the discussion and a few consequent amendments, at the second round of voting all the 20 statements were approved.

The New Therapeutic Frontiers in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Biological Drugs.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a multifaceted disease characterized by a wide heterogeneity of clinical manifestations, endoscopic and histopathologic patterns, and responsiveness to therapy. From the perspective of an effective approach to the patient, the different inflammatory mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of EoE and biologics, in particular monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), targeting these pathways are needed. Currently, the most relevant is dupilumab, which interferes with both interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 pathways by binding IL-4 receptor α, and is the only mAb approved by the European Medicine Agency and US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of EoE. Other mAbs investigated include mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab (interfering with IL-5 axis), cendakimab and dectrekumab (anti-IL-13s), tezepelumab (anti-TSLP), lirentelimab (anti-SIGLEG-8), and many others. Despite the undeniable economic impact of biologic therapies, in the near future, there will be room for further reflection about the opportunity to prescribe biologic agents, not only as a last-line therapy in selected cases such as patients with comorbidities involving common pathways. Although recent findings are very encouraging, the road to permanent success in the treatment of EoE is still long, and further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of mAbs and to discover new potential targets.

Comparison of clinical remission criteria for severe asthma patients receiving biologic therapy.

BACKGROUND: The concept of remission on biological treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic target for patients with severe asthma, composed of 1. no chronic use of systemic steroids, 2. no exacerbations, 3. minimal symptoms, and 4. optimized lung function, for a significant time. However, the criteria for remission are not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare different criteria for remission in subjects receiving biologicals for severe asthma. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of adult subjects who receive a stable regimen of a biological for severe asthma for at least 6-months. We compared the proportion of subjects who fulfilled different specific criteria in the four domains, as well as those who achieved different composite outcome measures of clinical remission. RESULTS: Of 39 subjects, 28 were females (71.8%), mean age 60.4. Twelve were current or past smokers (30.8%). Twelve had prior different biological treatment (30.8%), and 3/39 had more than one previous treatment (7.7%). Current biological included mepolizumab 12/39 (30.8%), dupilumab 11/39 (28.2%), benralizumab 10/39 (25.6%), omalizumab 5/39 (12.8%), reslizumab 1/39 (2.6%). Different specific criteria were achieved in 39-80% of subjects, being highest for no chronic steroid use and lowest for symptoms control and lung function. Overall remission was obtained by 20-41%, depending on definition, with significant variability in agreement between different sets of remission criteria (Cohen's kappa 0.33-0.89). CONCLUSION: Clinical remission is achievable in real-world severe asthmatics on biological therapies. The core criteria for remission should be better defined.

Factors Affecting the Ability to Discontinue Oral Corticosteroid Use in Patients with EGPA Treated with Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and some with severe eosinophilic asthma require continuous long-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for disease control. The anti-interleukin-5 agent, mepolizumab, has recently become available for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma and EGPA, with promising results and safety profiles. The proportion of patients with EGPA who discontinued oral steroids was 18% in the MIRRA trial. To compare patients with EGPA who were able to discontinue steroids with mepolizumab with those who could not. METHODS: Twenty patients with EGPA treated with mepolizumab were evaluated at Osaka Habikino Medical Center. The OCS dose, asthma control test score, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, peripheral eosinophil count, and spirometric parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the mean OCS dose from a prednisolone equivalent of 8.88 ± 4.99 mg/day to 3.18 ± 3.47 mg/day (p < 0.001). In this study, 40% of patients discontinued oral steroids. The most common reason for the failure to discontinue steroids in patients was poor asthma control. The percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s significantly improved in patients with EGPA who could discontinue steroids after receiving mepolizumab. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, treatment with mepolizumab for EGPA was associated with a significant reduction in OCS use; however, poor asthma control was identified as an inhibiting factor for steroid reduction.

Healthcare costs and resources utilization in children with difficult-to-control asthma treated with biologic therapies: A population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is one of the most common diseases in children, with a variable range of severity. In recent years, treatment for severe asthma has been largely improved by the availability of targeted biologic therapies. Nevertheless, studies reporting real-world data and cost-effectiveness analyses are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate, on a population-based cohort of children with asthma, the impact of the treatment with biologics on healthcare service utilization and associated costs. METHODS: Data were retrieved from Healthcare Utilization database of Lombardy region (Italy). A cohort of 46 asthmatic children aged 6-11 in treatment with dupilumab, mepolizumab or omalizumab was identified during 2017-2021. We compared healthcare resources use between the year before ("baseline period") and the year after the treatment initiation ("follow-up period"). Average 1-year healthcare costs were also calculated. RESULTS: Comparing the baseline with the follow-up period, the number of patients with at least one exacerbation-related hospitalization and ER access decreased by 75.0% and 85.7%, respectively. The use of biologic agents, namely omalizumab, mepolizumab and dupilumab, significantly reduced oral corticosteroids (OCS), short-acting ß2-agonists and the association inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting ß2-agonists use. ER admissions for non-respiratory causes were also significantly reduced, while discontinuation rate was low (6.5%). The overall costs increased, due to the costs of the biologic agents, but the hospital admission-related costs due to respiratory causes reduced significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world investigation suggests that biologic agents reduced hospital admissions for respiratory causes and use of anti-asthmatic drugs, including OCS. However, long-term healthcare sustainability still needs more in-depth assessments.

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Tolerance After Biological Therapy in Patients With NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease: A Randomized Comparative Trial.

BACKGROUND: There are no prospective studies comparing how biological therapies affect nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) tolerance in NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease. OBJECTIVE: To study the induction of NSAID tolerance after biological therapy in patients with NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease. METHODS: A prospective pilot study in a real-world clinic setting was conducted among subjects with severe asthma and type 2 inflammation. A random allocation of therapy was carried out: benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, or omalizumab. NSAID intolerance was confirmed by an oral challenge test (OCT) using acetyl-salicylic acid (ASA-OCT). The principal outcome was NSAID tolerance according to OCT before and after 6 months of each biological therapy (intragroup comparisons). As exploratory outcomes, we compared NSAID tolerance between biological therapies (intergroup comparisons). RESULTS: A total of 38 subjects were included; 9 received benralizumab, 10 dupilumab, 9 mepolizumab, and 10 omalizumab. There was an increase in the concentration needed to produce a reaction during ASA-OCT with omalizumab (P < .001) and dupilumab (P = .004) but not with mepolizumab and benralizumab. Omalizumab and dupilumab achieved the highest frequency of NSAID tolerance (omalizumab 60%, dupilumab 40%, mepolizumab 22%, and benralizumab 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Biological therapies for asthma are useful for inducing NSAID tolerance; however, in patients with type 2 inflammation and high levels of total IgE, atopy, and eosinophils, anti-IgE or anti-IL4/13 seem to be more effective than antieosinophilic therapies. Omalizumab and dupilumab increased ASA tolerance, whereas mepolizumab and benralizumab did not. Future trials will be able to clarify this finding.

Successful and safe treatment of severe steroid depended eosinophilic asthma with mepolizumab in a woman during pregnancy.

A 26-year-old female with steroid dependent eosinophilic asthma and nasal polyps who had successfully been treated with mepolizumab for 17 consecutive months with complete steroid withdrawal and symptoms control, stopped biologic treatment due to pregnancy efforts. Mepolizumab discontinuation resulted in frequent exacerbations and daily symptoms despite high dose ICS/LABA and re-initiation of oral steroids. Mepolizumab was initiated again, followed by improvement of asthma control and gradual withdrawal of steroids within 2 months. The patient became pregnant during the fourth month of mepolizumab re-initiation. The patient presented two asthma exacerbations during pregnancy treated with short course (3 days) oral steroids and delivery was uneventful (female, Apgar 9, weight 2750 g, length 59 cm) in week 40 by caesarean section.

Impact of Biologic Therapy on the Small Airways Asthma Phenotype.

The small airways dysfunction (SAD) asthma phenotype is characterised by narrowing of airways < 2 mm in diameter between generations 8 and 23 of the bronchial tree. Recently, this has become particularly relevant as measurements of small airways using airway oscillometry for example, are strong determinants of asthma control and exacerbations in moderate-to-severe asthma. The small airways can be assessed using spirometry as forced expiratory flow rate between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75) and has been deemed more accurate in detecting small airways dysfunction than forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Oscillometry as the heterogeneity in resistance between 5 and 20 Hz (R5-R20), low frequency reactance at 5 Hz (X5) or area under the reactance curve between 5 Hz and the resonant frequency can also be used to assess the small airways. The small airways can also be assessed using the multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) test giving rise to values including functional residual capacity, lung clearance index and ventilation distribution heterogeneity in the conducting (Scond) and the acinar (Sacin) airways. The ATLANTIS group showed that the prevalence of small airways disease in asthma defined on FEF25-75, oscillometry and MBNW all increased with progressive GINA asthma disease stages. As opposed to topical inhaler therapy that might not adequately penetrate the small airways, it is perhaps more intuitive that systemic anti-inflammatory therapy with biologics targeting downstream cytokines and upstream epithelial anti-alarmins may offer a promising solution to SAD. Here we therefore aim to appraise the available evidence for the effect of anti-IgE, anti-IL5 (Rα), anti-IL4Rα, anti-TSLP and anti-IL33 biologics on small airways disease in patients with severe asthma.

A review of phase III clinical trials of US FDA-approved biologic therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a heterogenous disease with complex underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Biologics have been proven to be an effective add-on therapeutic option in severe and/or refractory cases. Currently, dupilumab, omalizumab and mepolizumab have phase III data to support their use in these patients and have received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration specifically for the treatment of nasal polyposis. Each of these biologics has shown its ability to reduce nasal polyp size and improve nasal congestion/obstruction and sense of smell, but additional research is needed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the different biologic agents for different nasal polyposis endotypes.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a complex disease that has many different causes. Biological therapies have been proven to be effective when added on to standard treatment in severe and/or cases that are not responsive to initial treatment. Currently, dupilumab, omalizumab and mepolizumab have data supporting their use in such patients and have received approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CRSwNP. Each of these biologics has shown its ability to reduce nasal polyp size and improve nasal congestion/obstruction and sense of smell, but additional research is needed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the different biologic agents for different CRSwNP subtypes.

Guía práctica de seguimiento y manejo del paciente con asma grave tratado con biológicos / Practical guide for the follow-up and management of patients with severe asthma treated with biologics

El manejo del asma grave descontrolada con biológicos es un área de extrema dificultad, dada la escasez de información respecto a los criterios de inicio de los mismos, las variables a evaluar para determinar la eficacia y seguridad de su manejo, los puntos de corte para determinar el momento oportuno para cambiar o agregar otro biológico y el proceso para disminuir o retirar los esteroides. Esta revisión incorpora la información más reciente y realiza una propuesta con base en ella.

The management of severe uncontrolled asthma with biologics is an area of extreme difficulty given the scarcity of information regarding their starting criteria, the variables to be evaluated to determine the efficacy and safety of their management, the cut-off points to determine the timing to change or add another biological and the process to decrease or withdraw steroids. This review incorporates the latest information and makes a proposal based on it

Appraisal of the Real-World Effectiveness of Biologic Therapies in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease.

BACKGROUND: There are no head-to-head studies for patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) comparing any of the 5 Food and Drug Administration-approved respiratory biologic therapies. OBJECTIVE: Explore outcomes in subjects with AERD using biologic therapies in a real-world clinic setting. METHODS: A retrospective pilot study was conducted for subjects with AERD who had been prescribed omalizumab (anti-IgE), mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), reslizumab (anti-IL-5), benralizumab (anti-IL-5 receptor alpha [anti-IL-5Rα]), or dupilumab (anti-IL-4 receptor alpha [anti-IL-4Rα]). Clinical outcomes pre- versus postinitiation of biologic therapy were explored including symptoms, 22-item sino-nasal outcome test scores, systemic corticosteroid and antibiotic prescriptions, and emergency room visits related to AERD. RESULTS: Of the 74 subjects, 58.1% (n = 43) had used 1 biologic, though many (41.9%, n = 31) trialed more than 1 biologic. Of the 50 subjects who had used anti-IL-4Rα therapy, 98% (49 of 50) still had this therapy prescribed at study completion compared with 48.6% (17 of 35) and 26.9% (7 of 26) of those who used anti-IgE and anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5 receptor alpha (anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα) therapy, respectively. Among those on anti-IL-4Rα therapy, there was a significant reduction in median total 22-item sino-nasal outcome test scores (51 to 19, P = .0002), corticosteroid bursts (2 to 0, P < .0001), and median number of antibiotic courses for respiratory disease (1 to 0, P = .0469) prebiologic versus postbiologic initiation. No statistically significant difference in those outcomes was observed for individuals on anti-IgE or anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IL-4Rα therapy led to significantly higher rates of clinical improvement in AERD when compared with anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα and anti-IgE biologic therapies. Prospective studies would help clarify best practices for the use of biologic therapies in AERD.

Biologic Therapies for Allergic Rhinitis and Nasal Polyposis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is an emerging body of research on targeted biologic therapies for the treatment of severe inflammatory nasal disorders, especially chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). This paper will evaluate the efficacy of biologic therapies for severe nasal inflammation by summarizing key preclinical trials of biologics for animal models of allergic rhinitis and the recent phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of biologic therapies for CRSwNP. RECENT FINDINGS: Biologics that target the IL-4 receptor (dupilumab), IgE (omalizumab), and IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab) in patients with CRSwNP have shown improvement of various metrics including Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores, Nasal Polyp Scores (NPS), Nasal Congestion Scores (NCS), and Lund-Mackay sinus opacification scores. The efficacy demonstrated through the dupilumab phase 3 trials (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and SINUS-52) led to approval of the first biologic for the treatment of CRSwNP. Phase 3 trials for omalizumab (POLYP 1 and 2) and mepolizumab (SYNAPSE study) and post hoc analyses of phase 3 asthma studies for reslizumab and benralizumab have also demonstrated positive results for the use of biologics for patients with CRSwNP. Future efficacy studies and risk/benefit and cost analyses of these biologics and other cytokine targets for allergic rhinitis with and without nasal polyposis need to be performed.

Benefits of biologic therapy administered for asthma on co-existent chronic rhinosinusitis: A real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Asthma and some chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) subtypes are mediated by similar pathophysiologic mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of biologic therapy for asthma on co-existent CRS in the "real-world" setting. METHODS: A review of electronic health records (2016-2019) at Mayo Clinic was conducted to identify asthma patients treated with biologics who had co-existent CRS. Matched-pair analyses compared pretherapy and posttherapy Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) scores and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores. Performance of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) after initiating biologics was studied. RESULTS: We identified 247 patients who received anti-asthma biologic therapy and had co-existent CRS. Of these, 181 patients (73.3%) had CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and 66 (26.7%) had CRS without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP). The biologics utilized were omalizumab (51.0%), mepolizumab (46.6%), benralizumab (10.5%), reslizumab (1.6%), and dupilumab (2.4%). Anti-interleukin-5 (anti-IL-5) intervention was associated with significant improvement in CT scores (CRS overall, CRSwNP subgroup, CRSsNP subgroup) and SNOT-22 scores (CRS overall, CRSwNP subgroup). Patients on omalizumab had a decrease in CT scores, but not SNOT-22 scores. ESS was performed in 206 patients (84.1%); 55 (22.3%) underwent surgery post-biologic intervention (anti-IL-5: 16.5%; omalizumab 27.8% of patients). CONCLUSION: Anti-IL-5 agents were associated with improved CT and SNOT-22 scores in the overall CRS group and in CRSwNP subgroup; CRSsNP patients showed improved CT scores only. Omalizumab improved CT but not SNOT-22 scores. ESS was performed in 22% of patients after initiating biologics. These real-world results may influence future trial designs and clinical applications of biologics for CRS. ©2021 ARSAAOA, LLC.

Subcutaneous Mepolizumab Injection: An Adjunctive Treatment for Recalcitrant Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis Patients With Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a non-invasive fungal disease that results from chronic allergic inflammation of the sinonasal mucosa. Failure to respond to mainstay medical therapies and sinus surgery leaves AFRS patients with limited alternatives and a decreased quality of life. Mepolizumab is a known IL-5 antagonist for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To identify the efficacy of mepolizumab on improving Modified Lund-Kennedy (MLK) endoscopic scores in recalcitrant AFRS patients with asthma. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 27 recalcitrant AFRS patients with asthma receiving a monthly mepolizumab injection between January 2017 and July 2019. Patients were evaluated endoscopically at baseline and at each follow-up visit every 6-8 weeks until their third visit. Secondary outcomes included SNOT-22 scores, serum eosinophil counts and the rate of prednisone rescues required in patients receiving mepolizumab compared to a retrospective control arm. RESULTS: Total median MLK scores improved significantly for all patients over three follow-up visits (6[4,7], 4[2,6], 5[2,6], 3.5[2.25,5]; p = 0.04). Amongst patients with a baseline polyposis score of 1 or more, combined MLK edema and polyposis sub-scores significantly improved (6[5.25,6], 3.5[2.25,5,75], 4[2.75,5.25], 4[3,4]; p = 0.02) versus patients with no polyposis (4[3,4], 3[1,4], 4[2,4], 3[0,4]; p = 0.90). Total SNOT-22 scores (56 vs 43; p = 0.04) and eosinophil counts (0.40 × 109/L vs 0.00 × 109/L; p < 0.01) decreased significantly when comparing baseline to last follow up. There was no significant difference in rate of prednisone rescues per 1000 person-days when comparing control to Mepolizumab population (1.19 vs 1.23; p = 1). CONCLUSION: Mepolizumab injections administered once monthly as an adjunctive treatment for recalcitrant AFRS patients with asthma appear to significantly reduce endoscopic signs of inflammation, patient-reported symptomatology and serum eosinophil levels. Patients with evidence of more severe endoscopic inflammation appear to benefit the most. Adjunctive treatment with mepolizumab does not reduce the need for prednisone rescues.

Mepolizumab: an alternative therapy for idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia with glucocorticoid intolerance.

A 55-year-old woman with cough-variant asthma presented for 1 month of worsening wheezing, cough, and dyspnea refractory to treatment. Initial laboratory findings revealed profound peripheral eosinophilia, and a chest computed tomography showed bi-apical consolidation. Bronchio-alveolar lavage demonstrated alveolar eosinophilia. She was diagnosed with idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP). Her peripheral eosinophilia and respiratory symptoms improved rapidly with high-dose systemic corticosteroid therapy. However, she was intolerant to corticosteroid monotherapy due to non-compliance and psychological adverse effects. Mepolizumab was initiated as a steroid-sparing agent, resulting in successful therapy for 2 years without relapse or adverse effects. Mepolizumab is an interleukin-5 (IL-5) antagonist monoclonal antibody, which is a targeted therapy for diseases mediated by eosinophil activity and eosinophil proliferation. Mepolizumab is typically used in ICEP refractory to steroids, but this case supports its use in cases of glucocorticoid intolerance. Further study of IL-5 antagonist therapies for ICEP may identify an alternative treatment modality for patients in whom the adverse effects of corticosteroids pose a challenge.

Biological Therapies of Severe Asthma and Their Possible Effects on Airway Remodeling.

Asthma is a chronic and heterogenic respiratory tract disorder with a high global prevalence. The underlying chronic inflammatory process and airway remodeling (AR) contribute to the symptomatology of the disease. The most severely ill asthma patients may now be treated using a variety of monoclonal antibodies aiming key inflammatory cytokines involved in asthma pathogenesis. Although clinical data shows much beneficial effects of biological therapies in terms of reduction of exacerbation rates, improvement of lung functions, asthma control and patients' quality of life, little is known on the effects of these monoclonal antibodies on AR-a key clinical trait of long-term asthma management. In this review, the authors summarize the data on the proven effects of monoclonal antibodies in asthma on AR. To date, in terms of reversing AR, the mostly studied was omalizumab. However, some studies also addressed this clinical issue in context of other severe asthma biological therapies (mepolizumab, benralizumab, tralokinumab). Still, data on effects of particular biological therapies on AR in severe asthma are incomplete and require further studies. According to the American Thoracic Society research recommendations, future research shall focus on AR in asthma and improve drugs targeting AR, including the available and future monoclonal antibodies.

ANCA-associated vasculitides: Recommendations of the French Vasculitis Study Group on the use of immunosuppressants and biotherapies for remission induction and maintenance.

Treatment of vasculitides associated with anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) (AAVs) has evolved dramatically in recent years, particularly since the demonstration of rituximab efficacy as remission induction and maintenance therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. In 2013, the French Vasculitis Study Group (FVSG) published recommendations for its use by clinicians. Since then, new data have made it possible to better specify and codify prescription of rituximab to treat AAVs. Herein, the FVSG Recommendations Committee, an expert panel comprised of physicians with extensive experience in the treatment and management of vasculitides, presents its consensus guidelines based on literature analysis, the results of prospective therapeutic trials and personal experience.

Pharmacogenetic investigation of efficacy response to mepolizumab in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Treatment of patients with the rare disease eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) with mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody to interleukin-5 (IL-5) that reduces blood eosinophil counts, as an add-on therapy to glucocorticoid treatment, results in more accrued weeks in remission, reductions in glucocorticoid use and reductions in relapse rate. However, treatment response varies across a continuum. Therefore, to investigate if large genetic effects could identify responders, the impact of genetic variants on efficacy in EGPA subjects taking mepolizumab and glucocorticoids was assessed in this post hoc study. Using linear regression and a negative binomial model, genetic variant association with three endpoints (accrued duration of remission, average oral glucocorticoid dose, and frequency of relapse) was tested in 61 EGPA subjects dosed with mepolizumab from MIRRA, a phase 3 trial. Candidate gene and genome-wide approaches were used. The candidate gene analysis was designed to investigate drug target effects with eight gene regions selected that were focused on the intersection of the glucocorticoid response (steroidal response) and IL-5 response mechanisms and recognizing potential overlap between EGPA and severe eosinophilic asthma diseases for which mepolizumab is used. The sample size was insufficient to enable testing of rare variants for effects. No genetic variant from either the candidate gene analysis or the GWAS associated with any endpoint. Thresholds to declare significance were p < 0.0008 (candidate variant) and p < 2.5 × 10-8 (genome-wide) analyses. Large genetic effects on mepolizumab-treatment response were not identified which could help differentiate responders from non-responders.

Real-Life Study of Mepolizumab in Idiopathic Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is an orphan lung disease characterized by concomitant systemic and local eosinophilia, along with bilateral lung infiltrates. Symptoms include dyspnea of subacute/chronic onset, cough, and general systemic signs. Although all patients do respond to oral corticosteroids, relapse rate is very high, which highlights the need for alternative therapies in case of relapsing ICEP. Mepolizumab is a fully humanized antibody directed against interleukin 5, a key growth factor of eosinophils. In the present study, we retrospectively studied the effect of off-label use of mepolizumab for relapsing ICEP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All data from patients treated with mepolizumab for relapsing ICEP were included in our database and diagnoses were reviewed. We analyzed the effect of treatment on relapse rate, oral corticosteroids (OCS) use, and lung lesions on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). RESULTS: We included ten patients in the final analysis, with a median follow-up of 9 months after initiation of mepolizumab. Beside its expected effect on circulating eosinophils, treatment with mepolizumab was associated with a significant reduction of annual rate of exacerbations and a reduced consumption of corticosteroids. We also observed a remission of lung lesions on follow-up HRCT. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label retrospective study, treatment of ICEP with mepolizumab was associated with a reduction of relapses, OCS use, and the disappearance of lung infiltrates.