A scoping review of evidence comparing models of maternity care in Australia.

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize available evidence comparing outcomes and experiences of care received in different maternity models in Australia and identify the information gaps hindering women's decisions between alternative models. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted to identify published research over the last twenty years that directly compared clinical and/or experiential outcomes of women in different maternity models of care in Australia. Outcome measures of included articles were identified and assessed to evaluate current comparative information available to women and health professionals. The quality of included studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools for randomised controlled studies (RCTs) and cohort studies. Quantitative data were extracted and synthesised for further analysis. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Published studies comparing at least two maternity care models providing antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care in Australia. RESULTS: Eight studies (five RCTs and three observational studies) met inclusion criteria. Seven studies compared the outcomes of public midwifery continuity care and standard public care and one compared the outcomes of public midwifery continuity care, standard care and private obstetric care. There was no evidence directly comparing all broadly categorised available models in Australia. Data for clinical outcomes were collected from hospital records and experiential data were self-reported. Seven out of eight studies used data collected from single public hospital settings and one study included data from two tertiary hospitals. Women in public midwifery continuity models were more likely to have unassisted vaginal births, continuity of care and satisfaction and lower use of interventions (i.e., episiotomy, induction of labour, use of analgesia) and neonatal admission in intensive care units (ICU), compared with those in standard public models (and private obstetric care in one study). CONCLUSION: This scoping review reveals lack of reliable direct comparison of clinical and experiential outcomes across the multiple available public and private maternity models of care in Australia. Quality alignment between women's needs and their maternity model of care can prevent under or over specialised care and avoidable health system costs. Comprehensive information comparing all available maternity care models can guide gatekeeper health professionals and women to choose the best model according to women's needs and preferences. There is a need for research providing more comprehensive and ecological comparisons between available models of maternity care to inform such decision making support. Moreover, women's experiential data across maternity model of care comparisons could be used more consistently to better represent the relative outcomes of alternative models from a consumer-centred perspective.

Group Yoga Effects on Cancer Patient and Caregiver Symptom Distress: Assessment of Self-reported Symptoms at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Complementary and integrative health approaches such as yoga provide support for psychosocial health. We explored the effects of group-based yoga classes offered through an integrative medicine center at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: Patients and caregivers had access to two yoga group classes: a lower intensity (YLow) or higher intensity (YHigh) class. Participants completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS; scale 0-10, 10 most severe) immediately before and after the class. ESAS subscales analyzed included global (GDS; score 0-90), physical (PHS; 0-60), and psychological distress (PSS; 0-20). Data were analyzed examining pre-yoga and post-yoga symptom scores using paired t-tests and between types of classes using ANOVAs. RESULTS: From July 18, 2016, to August 8, 2017, 282 unique participants (205 patients, 77 caregivers; 85% female; ages 20-79 years) attended one or more yoga groups (mean 2.3). For all participants, we observed clinically significant reduction/improvement in GDS, PHS, and PSS scores and in symptoms (ESAS decrease ≥1; means) of anxiety, fatigue, well-being, depression, appetite, drowsiness, and sleep. Clinically significant improvement for both patients and caregivers was observed for anxiety, depression, fatigue, well-being, and all ESAS subscales. Comparing yoga groups, YLow contributed to greater improvement in sleep versus YHigh (-1.33 vs -0.50, P = .054). Improvement in fatigue for YLow was the greatest mean change (YLow -2.12). CONCLUSION: A single yoga group class resulted in clinically meaningful improvement of multiple self-reported symptoms. Further research is needed to better understand how yoga class content, intensity, and duration can affect outcomes.

A Pragmatic Evaluation of Symptom Distress After Group Meditation for Cancer Patients and Caregivers: A Preliminary Report.

CONTEXT: Complementary health approaches such as meditation may help improve cancer patient and caregiver symptoms, yet little research has examined the clinical application of these programs. OBJECTIVES: We explored the effects of a meditation group class, offered as part of an integrative medicine clinic at a comprehensive cancer center, on patient and caregiver self-reported symptoms. METHODS: Participants (patients and caregivers) of any three meditation group classes offered-Power of Breath (PB), Sacred Sounds (SS), and Movement & Breath (MB)-were asked to complete the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS; scale 0-10, 10 most severe) before and after participation. ESAS individual items and subscales were analyzed; distress subscales included global (global distress score 0-90), physical (physical distress score 0-60), and psychological (psychological distress score, 0-20). Data were analyzed examining premeditation/postmeditation scores using paired t-tests and between types of meditation using analyses of variance. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two unique participants (76 patients and 66 caregivers) attended one or more meditation groups (mean 1.84) from May to December 2015 (265 total attendance: PB n = 92; SS n = 87; MB n = 86). For all participants, we observed clinically significant reduction/improvement in global distress scores (-5.17, SD 8; P < 0.0001) and in individual symptoms (ESAS decrease ≥ 1; means) of well-being (-1.36 SD 1.7; P < 0.0001), fatigue (-1.34 SD 1.9; P < 0.0001), anxiety (-1.26 SD 1.6; P < 0.001), and shortness of breath (-1.2 SD 2; P = 0.001). Comparing class length (60 vs. 90 minutes), class content (PB vs. SS vs. MB), and participants (caregivers vs. patients), there were no statistically significant differences in symptom score reduction. CONCLUSION: A single meditation group class offered as part of clinical care resulted in relief of multiple self-reported symptoms in both patients and caregivers.