Eggshell Membrane Ameliorates Hyperuricemia by Increasing Urate Excretion in Potassium Oxonate-Injected Rats.

Hyperuricemia is the primary cause of gouty arthritis and other metabolic disorders. Eggshell membrane (EM) is an effective and safe supplement for curing pain and stiffness connected with osteoarthritis. However, the effect of EM on hyperuricemia is unclear. This study determines the effects of EM on potassium oxonate-injected hyperuricemia. Uric acid, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen concentrations in the serum, and xanthine oxidase activity in the liver are measured. Protein levels of renal urate transporter 1 (URAT1), organic anion transporters 1 (OAT1), glucose transporter 9 (GLUT9), and ATP-binding cassette transporter G2 (ABCG2) in the kidney are determined with renal histopathology. The results demonstrate that EM reduces serum uric acid levels and increases urine uric acid levels in hyperuricemic rats. Moreover, EM downregulates renal URAT1 protein expression, upregulates OAT1 and ABCG2, but does not change GLUT9 expression. Additionally, EM does not change xanthine oxidase activity in the liver or the serum. EM also decreases uric acid uptake into oocytes expressing hURAT1. Finally, EM markedly reduces renal inflammation and serum interleukin-1ß levels. These findings suggest that EM exhibits antihyperuricemic effects by promoting renal urate excretion and regulating renal urate transporters. Therefore, EM may be useful in the prevention and treatment of gout and hyperuricemia.

Nutritional impact of active hexose-correlated compound for patients with resectable or borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Active hexose-correlated compound (AHCC) is a standardized extract from cultured Lentinula edodes mycelia, used as a potent biological response modifier in cancer treatment. We evaluated the nutritional effect of AHCC, given during neoadjuvant therapy, to patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Thirty patients with resectable or borderline-resectable PDAC received neoadjuvant therapy with gemcitabine plus S-1. We compared, retrospectively, the outcomes of 15 patients who received AHCC combined with neoadjuvant therapy with those of 15 patients who did not receive AHCC combined with neoadjuvant therapy. The median changes of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) were significantly better in the AHCC group. The relative dose intensity of neoadjuvant therapy was also significantly higher in the AHCC group. Thus, AHCC may improve the nutritional status during neoadjuvant therapy of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. To validate these results and examine the long-term impact of AHCC, a prospective phase II study for PDAC is ongoing.

Randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of SOX versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (KSCC1301).

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), is associated with many radiotherapy (RT)-related side effects. We aimed to evaluate whether S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) or folinic acid, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) can be as effective as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens for LARC without RT. METHODS: Patients with untreated resectable LARC were randomly assigned to receive SOX or mFOLFOX6. The NAC protocol period was 3 months. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints included pathological effects, surgical completion rate, 3-year survival, and safety. RESULTS: From September 2013 to October 2015, 56 and 54 patients were enrolled in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 69.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.9-83.6) and 73.4% (95% CI 58.7-83.6) in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively; no significant differences were found between the arms (log-rank test; P = 0.5315, hazard ratio: 0.808, 95% CI 0.414-1.578). The 3-year survival rates were 92.3 and 91.8% in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. The surgical completion rate was 98.1% overall, 100% in the SOX arm, and 96.0% in the mFOLFOX6 arm. The incidences of pathological response rates ≥grade 1b were 41.5 and 43.8% in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. Both treatments were manageable and tolerable. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of SOX and mFOLFOX6, both of which may be new neoadjuvant treatment candidates in previously untreated LARC cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 3rd Oct 2013; This study was registered in the UMIN clinical trials registry on 14th Aug, 2013. (Prospectively registered, UMIN-CTR number UMIN000011486). https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&recptno=R000013441&language=J.

Clinical Significance of Glioma-associated Oncogene 1 Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Administered Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 After Curative Surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Glioma-associated oncogene 1 (GLI1) is an important transcription factor in the hedgehog signalling pathway and tumour formation. We evaluated the clinical significance of GLI1 expression as a prognostic factor in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: GLI1 expression levels were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of cancerous and adjacent normal mucosa specimens obtained from 142 patients with Stage II/III GC administered adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative resection. The associations of GLI1 expression with clinicopathological features and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Clinicopathological features and GLI1 expression showed no association. Overall survival was significantly poorer in the high compared to the low GLI1 expression group (p=0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that GLI1 expression was a significant independent prognostic factor [p=0.019, hazard ratio (HR)=1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.70-3.38]. CONCLUSION: GLI1 expression may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with locally advanced GC.

Clinical study of XiangShaLiuJunZi decoction combined with S-1 as maintenance therapy for stage III or IV gastric carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: S-1, a new oral fluorouracil chemotherapeutical drug, has been increasingly used in clinical maintenance after first-line chemotherapy for stage III or IV gastric carcinoma (GC) and colorectal carcinoma (CRC) for its own advantages. XiangshaLiujunzi Decoction (XSLJZD), a classic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula with effects of alleviating the adverse reactions of chemotherapy and improving the quality of life of cancer patients has been gradually confirmed, with no more reports about the maintenance therapy mode of combination of chemotherapeutic drugs and TCM. We designed the study of XSLJZD combined with S-1 in the maintenance therapy of Stage III or IV GC and CRC, and hoped that this research program will go further and comprehensively evaluate its efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of XSLJZD combined with S-1 in the maintenance therapy of stage III or IV GC and CRC. METHODS: This study is an open, single-center, randomized study. Patients with stage III or stage IV GC and CRC will be randomized (1:1) into S-1group, S-1 combined with XSLJZD group for 5 years of maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and secondary end point was overall survival and Quality of Life Assessment (QOLA), which include an improvement in symptoms before and after treatment, Karnofsky Performance Status, and adverse events assessment. DISCUSSION: This study will provide meaningful clinical information about the combination of chemotherapeutic drugs S-1 with TCM in the maintenance therapy of stage III or IV GC and CRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-INR-16008575.

Role of Conversion Surgery for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer After Long-Term Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Unresectable pancreatic cancer (UR-PC) has a poor prognosis. Although conversion surgery has been considered a promising strategy for improving prognosis in UR-PC, the clinical benefit offered to patients with UR-PC remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of conversion surgery in patients with UR-PC. METHODS: We evaluated patients with UR-PC referred to our department for possible surgical resection between January 2008 and June 2017. Resectability was evaluated using multimodal imaging in patients who underwent chemotherapy for more than 6 months. Conversion surgery was performed only in patients who were judged eligible for R0 resection. RESULTS: In total, 90 patients were evaluated. Among them, only 22 (24.4%) could actually undergo conversion surgery, and the R0 resection rate was 72.7% (16/22). Although Evans grade ≥ IIB was noted in six patients (27.3%), none achieved complete response (CR). The median survival time was significantly longer among patients who underwent conversion surgery than in the unresected patients who underwent chemotherapy (21.3 months vs. 12.6 months; p < 0.001). Multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed microvascular invasion to have a significant adverse effect on recurrence-free survival (RFS: 7 months vs. not reached, p = 0.004) and overall survival (OS: 21 months vs. 85 months, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: After long-term chemotherapy, conversion surgery for UR-PC is associated with long-term survival. Microvascular invasion is predictive of poor prognosis in these patients; adjuvant protocols are therefore needed for patients with microvascular invasion.

S-1 and Oxaliplatin Versus Tegafur-uracil and Leucovorin as Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With High-risk Stage III Colon Cancer (ACTS-CC 02): A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase III Superiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer has not been established. This randomized phase III study was designed to verify the superiority of SOX over tegafur-uracil and leucovorin (UFT/LV) in patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer (any T, N2, or positive nodes around the origin of the feeding arteries). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for pathologically confirmed high-risk stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive either UFT/LV (300 mg/m2 of UFT and 75 mg/day of LV on days 1-28, every 35 days, 5 cycles) or SOX (100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 and 80 mg/m2 of S-1 on days 1-14, every 21 days, 8 cycles). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: A total of 478 patients in the UFT/LV group and 477 patients in the SOX group were included in the primary analysis. The 3-year DFS was 60.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.0%-64.9%) in the UFT/LV group and 62.7% (95% CI, 58.1%-66.9%) in the SOX group. The stratified hazard ratio for DFS was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.74-1.09; stratified log-rank test, P = .2780). In the N2b subgroup, the 3-year DFS was 46.0% (95% CI, 37.5%-54.0%) in the UFT/LV group and 54.7% (95% CI, 45.7%-62.7%) in the SOX group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.05). CONCLUSION: As postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, SOX was not superior to UFT/LV in terms of DFS in patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer.

Tegafur and 5-fluorouracil levels in tears and changes in tear volume in long-term users of the oral anticancer drug S-1.

Eye problems are an adverse reaction sometimes found in chemotherapy. Although not life-threatening, they can reduce patients' quality of life. The highest incidence of eye problems is reported for the combination anticancer drug S-1 (tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil), and methods to prevent or treat the eye problems caused by this drug are presently lacking. To determine early detection methods and treatment for adverse ocular reactions, we measured changes in tear volume and levels of tegafur (FT) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an active metabolite of FT, in the tears of patients with long-term use of S-1. A total of 11 patients receiving S-1 monotherapy as adjuvant chemotherapy after gastric cancer surgery were included. Tear volume and FT and 5-FU levels in tears were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry during a maximum of 8 treatment cycles (48 weeks). For analysis, patients were divided into two groups: "watering eyes" (n=6, complaints of watering eyes at least once during the treatment period) and "no watering eyes" (n=5, no complaints of watering eyes). Both groups exhibited increased FT and 5-FU levels in tears upon initiation of S-1 treatment, and levels rapidly decreased upon discontinuation. Our findings suggest a relationship between FT level in tears and tear volume in patients with long-term S-1 use. The symptom of watering eyes may thus be linked to FT level in tears.

Collagen gel droplet-embedded culture drug sensitivity test (CD-DST) predicts the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of collagen gel droplet-embedded culture drug sensitivity tests (CD-DSTs) in predicting the efficacy of adjuvant chemo-therapeutic treatments for pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: The clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of 22 PC patients who underwent CD-DST after pancreatectomy at Tohoku University between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Eligibility criteria were resectable or borderline resectable PC, successful evaluation for 5-fluorouracil sensitivity by CD-DST, treatment with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, and no preoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: The rate of successful evaluation by CD-DST was 52.3% in PC. The optimal T/C ratio, defined as the ratio of the number of cancer cells in the treatment group (T) to that in the control group (C), for 5-fluorouracil was 85% using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The sensitive group (T/C ratio < 85%; n = 11) had a better recurrence-free survival rate than the resistant group (T/C ratio ≥ 85%; n = 11; P = 0.029). A Cox proportional hazards regression model demonstrated that sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil was an independent predictor of recurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 3.28; 95.0% CI 1.20-9.84; P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: CD-DSTs helped to predict PC recurrence after S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

A feasibility study of gemcitabine, S-1 and leucovorin combination therapy (GSL) for advanced biliary tract cancer.

Objective: Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) combination chemotherapy is the current standard of care for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Recently, a randomized controlled trial showed the non-inferiority in overall survival of gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) compared to GC. Because leucovorin is known to enhance the activity of S-1, we conducted this study to evaluate the feasibility of combination therapy of gemcitabine, S-1 and leucovorin (GSL). Methods: Advanced BTC patients without prior treatment other than surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible to this study. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on day 1, and oral S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m2 and oral leucovorin at a dose of 25 mg twice daily on days 1-7, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was PFS and the secondary endpoints included OS, objective tumour response and the safety. Results: Between June 2013 and December 2015, 20 patients with advanced BTC (12 gallbladder, 4 extrahepatic, 2 intrahepatic, 2 ampulla) including 16 unresectable disease and 4 recurrent disease were enroled. The median PFS and OS were 5.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 - not reached) and 16.0 (95% CI, 6.4-20.8) months, respectively. A partial response was achieved in 3 (15%) and stable disease in 8 (40%), giving a disease control rate of 55%. Major grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (30%), anaemia (5%), stomatitis (15%), diarrhoea (15%) and anorexia (10%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: This study showed the feasibility and potential efficacy of GSL as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced BTC.

TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (GRAPE trial).

BACKGROUND: In our previous randomised phase 2 study for patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer, S-1 plus leucovorin improved progression-free survival compared with S-1 alone. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted at 58 centres in Japan and Korea. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that progressed during first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or recurred during or after post-operative gemcitabine-based adjuvant treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either S-1 (40-60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or TAS-118 (S-1 40-60 mg plus leucovorin 25 mg, twice daily for 1 week in a 2-week cycle). The primary end-point was OS. RESULTS: A total of 603 patients were randomised, and 300 and 301 patients received TAS-118 and S-1, respectively. There was no difference in OS between groups (median OS for TAS-118 versus S-1, 7.6 months versus 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-1.16]; P = 0.756). Progression-free survival was significantly longer with TAS-118 than S-1 (median, 3.9 months versus 2.8 months; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]; P = 0.009). There were interactions between Japan and Korea (P = 0.004) and between unresectable and recurrent disease (P = 0.025) in OS. Incidence, profile and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: TAS-118 did not improve OS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer compared to S-1. Further studies are needed to find patients who have benefit from adding leucovorin to S-1.

Kidney Injury from Recurrent Heat Stress and Rhabdomyolysis: Protective Role of Allopurinol and Sodium Bicarbonate.

BACKGROUND: Heat stress and rhabdomyolysis are major risk factors for the occurrence of repeated acute kidney injury in workers exposed to heat and strenuous work. These episodes, in turn, may progress to chronic kidney disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the effect of allopurinol (AP) and sodium bicarbonate on the kidney injury induced by recurrent heat stress dehydration with concomitant repeated episodes of rhabdomyolysis. METHODS: The model consisted of heat stress exposure (1 h, 37°C) plus rhabdomyolysis (R) induced by repetitive IM injections of glycerol (7.5 mL/kg BW days) in the rat. In addition, to replicate the human situation, uricase was inhibited (oxonic acid [OA] 750 mg/K/d) to increase uric acid (UA) levels. Additional groups were treated either with AP 150 mg/L, n = 10, bicarbonate (BC; 160 mM, n = 10), or both (AP + BC, n = 10) in drinking water. We also included 2 control groups consisting of normal controls (N-Ref, n = 5) and uricase-inhibited rats (OA, n = 5) that were not exposed to heat or muscle injury. Groups were studied for 35 days. RESULTS: Uricase-inhibited rats exposed to heat and rhabdomyolysis developed pathway and increased intrarenal oxidative stress and inflammasome activation. Kidney injury could be largely prevented by AP, and also BC, although the treatments were not synergistic. CONCLUSION: Increased levels of UA may play an important role in the renal alterations induced by heat stress and continuous episodes of rhabdomyolysis. Therefore, treatments aimed to reduce hyperuricemia may help to decrease the renal burden in these conditions. Clinical trials are suggested to test whether this is also true in humans.

[Pulmonary Metastasis of Gastric Cancer as Carcinomatous Lymphangiosis at Five and Half Years after Surgery;Report of a Case].

A 51-year-old woman underwent radical operation for a gastric cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium. Five and a half years later, screening chest computed tomography(CT)scan showed slight ground glass opacity(GGO)of the both lungs and they were regarded as inflammatory change. Several months later, she experienced a dry cough. CT scan showed aggravation of GGO, and she was refered to our hospital to investigate these lesions 6 years after operation. We performed a wedge resection of right middle lobe. A postoperative pathology revealed metastatic carcinomatous lymphangiosis of gastric cancer. Chemotherapy using capecitabine and oxaliplatin, and then docetaxel was performed and talc pleurodesis was done for the malignant pleural effusion. These treatments did not improve condition, and she died 7 months after lung operation. In conclusion, we need to consider GGO as the possibility of carcinomatous lymphangiosis in case of patient with gastric cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Reanalysis of the ACTS-HNC study.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved organ preservation or overall survival (OS) of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC), but in clinical trials of conventional CRT, increasing CRT intensity has not been shown to improve OS. In the Adjuvant ChemoTherapy with S-1 after curative treatment in patients with Head and Neck Cancer (ACTS-HNC) phase III study, OS of curative locoregional treatments improved more with adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium) than with tegafur/uracil (UFT). ACTS HNC study showed the significant efficacy of S-1 after curative radiotherapy in sub-analysis. We explored the efficacy of S-1 after curative CRT in a subset of patients from the ACTS-HNC study. METHODS: Patients with stage III, IVA, or IVB LAHNSCC were enrolled in this study to evaluate the efficacy of S-1 compared with UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative CRT in the ACTS-HNC study. Patients received S-1 at 80-120 mg/day in two divided doses for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest, or UFT 300 or 400 mg/day in two or three divided doses daily, for 1 year. The endpoints were OS, disease-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and post-locoregional relapse survival. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients (S-1, n = 87; UFT, n = 93) were included in this study. Clinical characteristics of the S-1 and UFT arms were similar. S-1 after CRT significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.93) and DMFS (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.97) compared with UFT. CONCLUSION: As adjuvant chemotherapy, S-1 demonstrated better efficacy for OS and DMFS than UFT in patients with LAHNSCC after curative CRT and may be considered a treatment option following curative CRT. For this study was not preplanned in the ACTS-HNC study, the results is hypothesis generating but not definitive.

The efficacy of combination of induction chemotherapy and irreversible electroporation ablation for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal focal therapy that utilizes high voltage electric pulses to permanently rupture the cellular membrane and induce cell death. In this multi-center study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of IRE in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: From 2012 to 2015, we performed laparotomic and laparoscopic IRE in a total of 70 patients with stage III LAPC. Either gemcitabine-based or TS-1 (Tegafur, Gimeracil, and Oteracil) chemotherapy was applied for at least 3 months before the IRE. RESULTS: No IRE-related deaths occurred. A median follow-up of 28.1 months showed that six patients (8.6%) experienced local recurrence and 24 (34%) experienced distant progression. The overall median survival from the time of treatment was 22.6 months, and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.4 months. The overall survival in the patients who used gemcitabine-based reagents was 19.1 months and that of those who used TS-1 was 28.7 months. The PFS for these two groups were 13.2 months and 26.4 months; the difference is significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that IRE is safe and effective for the control of LAPC. We surmise that the addition of IRE to a chemotherapy regimen may provide a survival advantage.

Efficacy after preoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S1 (DOS) in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of the XELOX and DOS regimens as preoperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: All cases of locally advanced gastric cancer treated with the XELOX or DOS regimen were reviewed retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out to reduce selection bias based on age, gender, location, Lauren type, carcinoembryonic antigen level, clinical tumor stage, and clinical node stage. RESULTS: From January 2010 to December 2016, 248 patients were matched; 159 of them received the XELOX regimen and 89 the DOS regimen. The response rates in the XELOX and DOS groups were 34.5 and 38.1%, respectively (P = 0.823). After four cycles of chemotherapy, 111 patients (69.8%) in the XELOX group and 65 patients (73.0%) in the DOS group underwent radical surgery (P = 0.485). The median progression-free survival (33.0 months vs. 18.7 months, P = 0.0356) and the median overall survival (43.8 months vs. 29.1 months, P = 0.0003) were longer for patients who received the DOS regimen than for those who received the XELOX regimen. The occurrence of grade 3 to 4 toxicity was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For locally advanced gastric cancer patients, the DOS regimen showed more benefit than the XELOX regimen as preoperative chemotherapy, without any added toxicity effects.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy Versus Surgery Alone for Early Gastric Cancer with One or Two Lymph Node Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Limited studies exist comparing clinical outcomes by adjuvant treatment for pT1N1 gastric cancer. This study compared the disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with pT1N1 gastric cancer according to the type of adjuvant treatment-surgery alone, chemotherapy (CTx), and chemoradiotherapy (CCRTx)-and evaluated risk factors for tumor recurrence. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2015, 738 patients underwent radical gastrectomy for pT1N1 gastric cancer and were divided into three groups: surgery alone (n = 355), CTx (n = 214), and CCRTx (n = 169). Chronological changes in adjuvant treatment type and chemotherapeutic regimens were evaluated and DFS was compared. Risk factors for tumor recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who underwent surgery alone was more than 50% until 2001, and the proportion of those who had either CTx or CCRTx was more than 50% from 2002 to 2011, after which the proportion who underwent surgery alone increased again. The main chemotherapeutic agent was 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin. The 5-year DFS was 96.5% in the surgery-alone group, 96.0% in the CTx group, and 95.8% in the CCRTx group (no significant difference). The various chemotherapeutic regimens did not show differences in DFS. In univariate and multivariate analyses, adjuvant CTx and CCRTx showed no beneficial effect with regard to tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Because adjuvant CTx and CCRTx did not show any benefit with regard to tumor recurrence, these treatment strategies might be unnecessary for pT1N1 gastric cancer after gastrectomy. Further studies are necessary to reveal pT1N1 gastric cancer patient subgroups who might benefit from adjuvant treatments.

The Antioxidant and Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitory Activity of Plumeria rubra Flowers.

Plumeria rubra Linn of the family Apocynaceae is locally known in Malaysia as "Kemboja". It has been used by local traditional medicine practitioners for the treatment of arthritis-related disease. The LCMS/MS analysis of the methanol extract of flowers (PR-ME) showed that it contains 3-O-caffeyolquinic acid, 5-caffeoquinic acid, 1,3-dicaffeoquinic acid, chlorogenic acid, citric acid, 3,3-di-O-methylellagic acid, kaempferol-3-O-glucoside, kaempferol-3-rutinoside, kaempferol, quercetin 3-O-α-l-arabinopyranoside, quercetin, quinic acid and rutin. The flower PR-ME contained high amounts of phenol and flavonoid at 184.632 mg GAE/g and 203.2.2 mg QE/g, respectively. It also exhibited the highest DPPH, FRAP, metal chelating, hydrogen peroxide, nitric oxide superoxide radical scavenging activity. Similarly, the XO inhibitory activity in vitro assay possesses the highest inhibition effects at an IC50 = 23.91 µg/mL. There was no mortality or signs of toxicity in rats at a dose of 4 g/kg body weight. The administration of the flower PR-ME at doses of 400 mg/kg to the rats significantly reduced serum uric acid 43.77%. Similarly, the XO activity in the liver was significantly inhibited by flower PR-ME at doses of 400 mg/kg. These results confirm that the flower PR-ME of P. rubra contains active phytochemical compounds as detected in LCMS/MS that contribute to the inhibition of XO activity in vitro and in vivo in reducing acid uric level in serum and simultaneously scavenging the free radical to reduce the oxidative stress.

Planned Safety Analysis of the ACTS-CC 02 Trial: A Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 With Oxaliplatin Versus Tegafur and Uracil With Leucovorin as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Stage III Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This trial was designed to verify the superiority of 6 months of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with SOX (S-1 with oxaliplatin) with UFT (tegafur and uracil) with LV (leucovorin) in terms of disease-free survival in patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer. We report the results of a planned safety analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for high-risk stage III colon cancer (any T, N2, or positive nodes around the origin of the feeding arteries) were randomly assigned to receive either UFT/LV (300-600 mg/d UFT with 75 mg/d LV on days 1-28, every 35 days, for 5 cycles) or SOX (100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 with 80-120 mg/d S-1 on days 1-14, every 21 days, for 8 cycles). Treatment status and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 966 patients were enrolled, and 932 patients were included in safety analyses. The planned 6-month protocol treatment was received by 76.9% of the patients in the UFT/LV group and 65.8% of those in the SOX group. The overall incidence of any Grade adverse events (AEs) were 91.3% in the UFT/LV group and 98.7% in the SOX group, and those of Grade ≥ 3 AEs were 16.1% and 36.1%, respectively. As for Grade ≥ 3 AEs, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and sensory neuropathy were more common in the SOX group. The incidence of Grade ≥ 3 sensory peripheral neuropathy was 4.6% in the SOX group. CONCLUSION: The completion rate of adjuvant SOX and its incidence of AEs were acceptable in patients with colon cancer.

[Efficacy and safety of Xiaoaiping combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xiaoaiping combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: This is a multi-center, randomized, open label and parallel controlled study. A total of 124 advanced esophageal cancer patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score ≥60 and expected survival time≥3 months were enrolled. We adopted design and divided the patients into study and control group. The patients in study group received Xiaoaiping combined with S-1 and cisplatin. The control group received S-1 and cisplatin. Each group included 62 patients and 21 days as a treatment cycle. The efficacy and adverse events in patients of the two groups were observed and compared. Results: 57 patients in the study group and 55 in the control group were included in efficacy assessment. The response rate was 54.4% and 34.5% in the study group and control group, respectively(P<0.05). Disease control rates were 86.0% and 69.1%, respectively(P<0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.97 in the study group and 6.43 months in the control group(P<0.05). The median overall survival(OS) was 12.93 in the study group and 10.93 months in the control group(P<0.05). The most common adverse events in the two groups were nausea and vomiting, thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, liver damage, pigmentation, oral mucositis, renal impairment and diarrhea. The incidences of nausea, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia and diarrhea in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion: Xiaoaiping combined with S-1 and cisplatin significantly increased response rate, and prolongedpatients' survival in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.