Effect of Sipjeondaebo-Tang on the Pharmacokinetics of S-1, an Anticancer Agent, in Rats Evaluated by Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

S-1 (TS-1®) is an oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer agent containing tegafur, oteracil, and gimeracil. Sipjeondaebo-tang (SDT) is a traditional oriental herbal medicine that has potential to alleviate chemotherapy-related adverse effects. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of SDT on the pharmacokinetics of S-1. Sprague-Dawley rats were pretreated with a single dose or repeated doses of SDT for seven consecutive days (1200 mg/kg/day). After the completion of pretreatment with SDT, S-1 was orally administered and plasma concentrations of tegafur, its active metabolite 5-FU, and gimeracil were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to evaluate the effect of SDT on pharmacokinetics of tegafur and 5-FU. Although a single dose of SDT did not have any significant effect, the absorption rate of tegafur decreased, and the plasma levels of 5-FU reduced significantly in rats pretreated with SDT for seven days in parallel to the decreased gimeracil concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic modeling also showed the enhanced elimination of 5-FU in the SDT-pretreated group. Repeated doses of SDT may inhibit the absorption of gimeracil, an inhibitor of 5-FU metabolism, resulting in enhanced elimination of 5-FU and decrease its plasma level.

Pharmacokinetics of initial full and subsequent reduced doses of S-1 in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer-effect of renal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: S-1 is a combination of tegafur [metabolized to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] with the modulators gimeracil (5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine) and oteracil potassium. 5-Chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine maintains plasma 5-FU concentrations by inhibiting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, a pyrimidine catabolism enzyme that degrades 5-FU. As 50% of 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine is excreted in urine, renal insufficiency may increase its blood level, increasing 5-FU concentrations. We investigated whether special dose modification is needed in the presence of renal insufficiency. OBJECTIVE: We compared steady state pharmacokinetics of 5-FU for the initial S-1 dose and reduced doses in patients with head and neck cancer requiring dose reduction due to renal and non-renal toxicities. METHODS: Chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin was administered every 5 weeks for two courses with a radiation dose totaling 70 Gy over 33-35 fractions. Two additional courses of adjuvant chemotherapy were administered in the case of an objective response. The S-1 and/or cisplatin dose was reduced in response to renal, hematologic or other toxicities. The primary endpoint was the change in area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve from time 0-10 hours (5-FU AUCss 0-10) between the initial and reduced S-1 doses. RESULTS: Although the mean 5-FU levels in patients with non-renal toxicities significantly decreased between the full and reduced dose, the full-dose and reduced-dose mean maximum 5-FU plasma concentrations at steady state (Css max) and AUCss 0-10 in patients with renal insufficiency were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Standard S-1 dose reduction for renal toxicity did not result in a significant decrease in 5-FU levels at steady state. A greater reduction to lower plasma 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine may be necessary in patients with renal insufficiency.

[Pharmacogenomics of the first-line treatment for gastric cancer: advances in the identification of genomic biomarkers for clinical response to chemotherapy]. / Farmacogenómica del tratamiento de primera linea en el cáncer gástrico: avances en la identificación de los biomarcadores genómicos de respuesta clínica.

Gastric cancer (GC) is often diagnosed at later stages due to the lack of specificity of symptoms associated with the neoplasm, causing high mortality rates worldwide. The first line of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment includes cytotoxic fluoropyrimidines and platin-containing compounds which cause the formation of DNA adducts. The clinical outcome with these antineoplastic agents depends mainly on tumor sensitivity, which is conditioned by the expression level of the drug targets and the DNA-repair system enzymes. In addition, some germ line polymorphisms, in genes linked to drug metabolism and response to chemotherapy, have been associated with poor responses and the development of adverse effects, even with fatal outcomes in GC patients. The identification of genomic biomarkers, such as individual gene polymorphisms or differential expression patterns of specific genes, in a patient-by-patient context with potential clinical application is the main focus of current pharmacogenomic research, which aims at developing a rational and personalized therapy (i.e., a therapy that ensures maximum efficacy with no predictable side effects). However, because of the future application of genomic technologies in the clinical setting, it is necessary to establish the prognostic value of these genomic biomarkers with genotype-phenotype association studies and to evaluate their prevalence in the population under treatment. These issues are important for their cost-effectiveness evaluation, which determines the feasibility of using these medical genomic research products for GC treatment in the clinical setting.

Farmacogenómica del tratamiento de primera línea en el cáncer gástrico: avances en la identificación de los biomarcadores genómicos de respuesta clínica / Pharmacogenomics of the first-line treatment for gastric cancer: advances in the identification of genomic biomarkers for clinical response to chemotherapy

Debido a la inespecificidad de los síntomas, el cáncer gástrico (CG) es diagnosticado frecuentemente en etapas avanzadas, lo que da cuenta de los altos índices de mortalidad debido a esta neoplasia a nivel mundial. El esquema de tratamiento adyuvante o neoadyuvante en los países occidentales incluye el uso de fluoropirimidinas citotóxicas y compuestos de platino formadores de aductos en el ADN. La respuesta clínica al tratamiento con estos fármacos depende principalmente de la sensibilidad del tumor, la cual a su vez está condicionada por el nivel de expresión de los blancos terapéuticos y de las enzimas de reparación del ADN. Sumado a esto, algunos polimorfismos de línea germinal en genes asociados al metabolismo y a la respuesta a estos fármacos, han mostrado asociación con respuestas pobres y con el desarrollo de eventos adversos, incluso con resultados fatales. La identificación de biomarcadores genómicos, en la forma de polimorfismos genéticos o la expresión diferencial de genes específicos asociados a la respuesta quimioterapeútica ha sido motivo de intensa investigación como base para la aplicación de la farmacogenómica en el establecimiento de una terapia farmacológica racional y personalizada del CG. Sin embargo, ante la eventual aplicación de la farmacogenómica en el ámbito clínico, es necesario establecer el valor pronóstico real de dichos biomarcadores mediante los estudios de asociación genotipo-fenotipo, así como su prevalencia en el contexto de cada población de pacientes. Estos aspectos son indispensables al evaluar la relación costo-efectividad de la introducción de los productos de la medicina genómica predictiva en el tratamiento del CG.

Gastric cancer (GC) is often diagnosed at later stages due to the lack of specificity of symptoms associated with the neoplasm, causing high mortality rates worldwide. The first line of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment includes cytotoxic fluoropyrimidines and platin-containing compounds which cause the formation of DNA adducts. The clinical outcome with these antineoplastic agents depends mainly on tumor sensitivity, which is conditioned by the expression level of the drug targets and the DNA-repair system enzymes. In addition, some germ line polymorphisms, in genes linked to drug metabolism and response to chemotherapy, have been associated with poor responses and the development of adverse effects, even with fatal outcomes in GC patients. The identification of genomic biomarkers, such as individual gene polymorphisms or differential expression patterns of specific genes, in a patient-by-patient context with potential clinical application is the main focus of current pharmacogenomic research, which aims at developing a rational and personalized therapy (i.e., a therapy that ensures maximum efficacy with no predictable side effects). However, because of the future application of genomic technologies in the clinical setting, it is necessary to establish the prognostic value of these genomic biomarkers with genotype-phenotype association studies and to evaluate their prevalence in the population under treatment. These issues are important for their cost-effectiveness evaluation, which determines the feasibility of using these medical genomic research products for GC treatment in the clinical setting.

A phase I study of sorafenib in combination with S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib inhibits several receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. S-1, an oral fluorouracil antitumor drug, plus cisplatin (CDDP) is the standard regimen for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (AGC) in Japan. The purpose of this phase I study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of sorafenib in combination with S-1 plus CDDP. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed previously untreated AGC were evaluated for eligibility and treated with sorafenib (400 mg bid, days 1-35), S-1 (40 mg/m(2) bid, days 1-21), and CDDP (60 mg/m(2), day 8). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pharmacokinetics for sorafenib, 5-FU, and CDDP were investigated in cycle 1. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of the study treatment. No specific or serious adverse event was newly reported in this study. Five patients had partial response and 8 had stable disease as the best response. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed no significant differences in the exposures of sorafenib when administered alone or in combination with S-1 and CDDP. CONCLUSIONS: The present phase I study demonstrates the acceptable toxicity and preliminary efficacy of combined treatment with S-1, CDDP, and sorafenib.

An immunoassay method for the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in patients with gastric cancer administered adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conventional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was compared with a new immunoassay method for measuring plasma (5-FU) concentrations in adjuvant chemotherapy with TS-1 for patients with gastric cancer. TS-1 was administered orally to patients after gastrectomy. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected on the seventh day of treatment. The mean area under the time concentration curve (AUC)(0-8), half-life (t(1/2)), and maximum drug concentration (C(max)) obtained by the two methods were as follows: GC-MS, 847.9 µg/ml/hr, 2.76 h, and 186.6 ng/ml; and immunoassay, 1311.2 µg/ml/hr, 3.5 h, and 259.8 ng/ml. Significant correlations were observed for AUC(0-8) (p=0.0001), C(max) (p=0.0007), and changes in the 5-FU concentration in blood over time (p=0.018) for the two methods. Compared with the conventional GC-MS method, the new immunoassay method provides similar results, but is simpler and results can be obtained earlier. This method will be useful for monitoring the 5-FU concentration in serum from patients with gastric cancer receiving TS-1.

Phase 1 trial of S-1 in combination with sorafenib for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor, which was approved as first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted a phase 1 study of sorafenib plus S-1 in patients with advanced HCC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We designed to escalate S-1 at 4 different dose levels with fixed dose of sorafenib. Four dose levels were as follows: level 1, D1-14 S-1 50 mg/m(2)/day + D1-21 sorafenib 400 mg bid; level 2, D1-14 S-1 60 mg/m(2)/day + D1-21 sorafenib 400 mg bid; level 3,, D1-14 S-1 70 mg/m(2)/day + D1-21 sorafenib 400 mg bid; level 4, D1-14 S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day + D1-21 sorafenib 400 mg bid. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: From August 2009 to July 2010, 20 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled. The median age was 48 years (range, 29-74). Eighteen (90%) patients had hepatitis B viral infection and 19 (95%) patients were rated as Child-Pugh class A. The dose-limiting toxicities were grade 4 infection and thrombocytopenia. After a median follow-up duration of 8.6 months (range, 3.7-14.2 months), median PFS was 3.9 months (95% CI, 0.8-7.0 months) and median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 0-22.4 months). In pharmacokinetic analysis, there was no statistically significant drug interaction between sorafenib and S-1. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sorafenib and S-1 showed tolerable toxicity profile and modest clinical efficacy in patients with advanced HCC. The recommended dose of sorafenib and S-1 was 400 mg twice daily and 40 mg/m(2) twice daily, respectively.

Effect of gastrectomy on the pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, in resectable gastric cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The effect of gastrectomy on pharmacokinetics after S-1 administration was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A dose of 40 mg/m(2) of S-1 was administered orally twice daily for 7 days (80 mg/m(2)/day) preoperatively in ten patients with resectable gastric cancer, and the same dose of S-1 was administered for 28 consecutive days after gastrectomy. Plasma concentrations of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium, all the components of S-1, and 5-FU were measured on pre- and postoperative days. Concentrations of 5-FU in tumor and normal tissues were also determined. RESULTS: At day 4 from the initial preoperative administration of S-1, the AUC of 5-FU was 1,055 +/- 304 ng h/ml. At day 18, day 28, and day 42 after gastrectomy, it was 1,012 +/- 331, 1,070 +/- 403, and 946 +/- 226 ng h/ml, respectively. No significant differences for plasma 5-FU were observed between pre- and postoperative days. In the resected tumor tissues, concentrations of 5-FU were 242 +/- 83 ng/g around 4.5 h and 91.7 +/- 37.0 ng/g around 20 h after the final administration, respectively. CONCLUSION: Gastrectomy does not affect on pharmacokinetics of 5-FU derived from S-1 regardless of partial or total gastrectomy, indicating that S-1 can be a useful drug in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

Alternative pharmacokinetics of S-1 components, 5-fluorouracil, dihydrofluorouracil and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine after oral administration of S-1 following total gastrectomy.

We studied whether total gastrectomy for gastric cancer would affect the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its degradation products, such as dihydrouracil (FUH(2)) and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL), after oral administration of the fluorouracil derivative S-1, composed of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP; a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor) and potassium oxonate. Blood and urine samples were obtained, both preoperatively and at least 2 weeks postoperatively, from six patients with advanced gastric cancers who were undergoing total gastrectomy. Plasma levels of tegafur, 5-FU, CDHP, potassium oxonate, FUH(2) and FBAL were measured prior to and at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 10 h after oral administration of 40 mg/m(2) S-1. The total amounts of 5-FU, FUH(2) and FBAL excreted into urine during the 24-h period after S-1 administration were also measured. Total gastrectomy significantly increased the maximum concentration and the area under the curve until 10 h after administration (AUC(1-10h)) of plasma 5-FU. The plasma AUC(1-10h) of CDHP was significantly higher than the preoperative value. In terms of clinical efficacy, the higher AUC(1-10h) of 5-FU after total gastrectomy may be beneficial to S-1 administered as adjuvant chemotherapy, and might be caused by the higher postoperative AUC(1-10h) of CDHP relative to preoperative values. However, the dose of S-1 for patients who have undergone total gastrectomy might be diminished to avoid severe adverse events and to continue the treatment for a long period.

S-1-induced, prolonged complete regression of lung metastasis from gastric cancer refractory to 5'-DFUR: a case report with pharmacokinetic study.

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine reported to be most active for gastric cancer. However, few studies have documented a complete response (CR) of lung metastasis to S-1 treatment. We describe a 66-year-old woman in whom S-1 induced complete regression of lung metastasis from gastric cancer, that had been refractory to another oral fluoropyrimidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR). After preoperative chemotherapy with a combination of etoposide, adriamycin and cisplatin and with methotrexate plus 5-fluorouracil, the patient underwent a total gastrectomy with lower esophagectomy for advanced diffuse-type gastric cancer with invasion of the esophagus in May 1993. She received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with 5'-DFUR (600 mg/day) for 3 years. However, a solitary metastasis to the left lung was detected in November 1996 and she underwent partial resection of the left lung. Chemotherapy with 5'-DFUR was reinitiated after operation, but re-metastasis to the left lung with elevation of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was diagnosed in June 1999. Treatment with S-1 was started in August. S-1 was given orally in a dose of 100 mg/day for 28 consecutive days, followed by a 14-day recovery; treatment was repeated every 6 weeks. The metastatic lesion in the left lung completely regressed after two courses of S-1 and the serum CEA level returned to the normal range. The patient received a total of 10 courses of S-1. The dose of S-1 was reduced to 80 mg/day from the sixth course because of grade 2 skin rash. Pharmacokinetic studies after administration of S-1 revealed high and prolonged plasma 5-FU levels. Nearly 4 years have passed since complete regression of the lung metastasis. This may be the first report to document a prolonged complete response of lung metastasis from gastric cancer induced by single-agent chemotherapy with S-1.

Tissue distribution and biotransformation of potassium oxonate after oral administration of a novel antitumor agent (drug combination of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate) to rats.

S-1, a new oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-derivative antitumor agent, is composed of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydropyridine, and potassium oxonate (Oxo). Oxo, which inhibits the phosphorylation of 5-FU, is added to reduce the gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity of the agent. In this study, we investigated the tissue distribution and the metabolic fate of Oxo in rats after oral administration of S-1. Oxo was mainly distributed to the intracellular sites of the small intestines in a much higher concentration than 5-FU, but little distributed to other tissues, including tumorous ones in which 5-FU was observed after oral administration of S-1. Plasma concentration-time profiles of Oxo and its metabolites after i.v. and oral administration of S-1 revealed that Oxo was mainly converted to cyanuric acid in the GI tract. Furthermore, the analysis of drug-related radioactivity in GI contents and in vitro studies suggested that Oxo was converted to cyanuric acid by two routes, the first being direct conversion by the gut flora in the cecum, and the second, conversion by xanthine oxidase or perhaps by aldehyde oxidase after degradation to 5-azauracil (5-AZU) by the gastric acid. These results indicate that, although a part of the administered Oxo was degraded in the GI tract, Oxo was mainly distributed to the intracellular sites of the small intestines in a much higher concentration than 5-FU and that little was distributed to other tissues, including tumors. We conclude that this is the reason why Oxo suppresses the GI toxicity of 5-FU without affecting its antitumor activity.